http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.2/sage-3.0.2.rc3.tar
Unless something goes horribly wrong this will be identical to
the final 3.0.2 release. If you added some feature that should
be in the Sage release tour please add them to
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.0.2
Right now that list con
On May 24, 2:17 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On an amd phenom hardy heron, built fine but sage -testall failed with this:
Hi,
> --
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/server/no
On May 24, 2:36 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> build & test report on rc3 with
> SAGE_BUILD_THREADS=3
> SAGE_PBUILD=yes
>
> No problems in build.
Ok, good so far.
> sage --testall: many many lisp.run processes started up and did not
> go away, during testing of tut.
On May 24, 4:57 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/24 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The clisp zombie problem has been known for a while and I susptect
> > that the issue is us not properly terminating them. I.e. any Singular
> &g
Hello folks,
the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble. We
are building binaries and once those are in place we will announce
formally on sage-support.
Release notes are at
http://www.sagemath.org/anno
On May 22, 9:12 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Jason Grout
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had someone send me a Mac OSX on x86 port, but I need access to
> > such a machine to try it out and make it part of the saclib distro. I
>
On May 25, 7:45 pm, "Franco Saliola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:43 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> > has been pushed. Please try "sage -u
On May 25, 10:20 pm, bertd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bert,
> I have a Core2-quad processor.
> Ubuntu 8.04, 64-bit.
>
> Fails to build GMP. All before this seems to work ok.
this is a POSIX non-compliance problem in spkg-install. We are
tracking it at #3301 and a fix should be up there in a
On May 26, 1:11 am, bertd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 25, 1:32 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bert,
> > What is /bin/sh link to on your box? Usually on Ubuntu it is a link to
> > bash, so unless something has changed or you did something to th
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0.2 has been released on May 24th, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org)
Sage is developed by volunteers and combines 71 open source packages.
It is available for download from sagemath.org and its mirro
On May 28, 6:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Groenewald) wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 06:27:32AM -0700, mhampton wrote:
> > I think it would be very nice to have a "citation" command in Sage,
> > something like the citation command in R. This could also provide
> > citation material fo
On May 28, 6:47 am, rjf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> See the response to a small part of this in a separate thread on open-
> source and proofs (unless the moderator removes that message.).
>
> I joined sage-devel some time ago, but as [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I
> haven't figured out how to
On May 28, 4:08 pm, Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, folks,
Hi Daniel,
> I was reading the Sage Programming Guide this morning (excellent read,
> by the way), and the the end of section 2.4.1 mentions that "Using
> sage_search from the Sage prompt . . . one can easily find . . .
>
On May 28, 9:12 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> I tried to install fricas (prompted by an earlier thread -- I wonder
> which?) but this happened (with 3.0.2 on linux):
>
> axiom_build_bindir =
> /home/jec/sage-3.0.1/spkg/build/fricas-1.0.2/build-dir/build/x86_64-suse-li
On May 28, 10:41 pm, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bill,
> William is right, GCL was not required to install fricas. The original
> version I uploaded 10 months ago built fricas from pre-generated lisp
> source using clisp. The install took about 10 minutes to complete.
>
> After dow
rk on OSX 64 bit build support
which I will plug in a separate email and much more. Apologies
to anybody not mentioned by name here, but below you can see
all the gory details.
As usual there are the sources and a sage.math only binary:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-
Hello folks,
I have updated my current OSX 64 bit binary and it can be downloaded
from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.2/sage-sage-3.0.2.a1-64bit-osx-2008-05-27-i386-Darwin.dmg
The reason I did another release is that I got the the notebook to
work by fixing
On May 28, 11:01 pm, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bill,
> > It seems to expect gcl to be installed, so it is likely that once you
> > install a system wide gcl it would get beyond that point. In the past
> > there was trouble building FriCAS/Axiom/OpenAxiom with the clisp
> > Sage
On May 29, 4:14 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> At first, sage -testall repoted a failure, in twist.py, but on
> retesting it passed:
Thanks for testing. The twist.py pops up occasionally and it seems to
be cause by ports being closed/used - but I am certainly not 100%
On May 29, 6:33 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:18 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > 3.0.3.alpha0 built ok and all test passed!
>
> My 3.03.alpha0 build testing:`
>
> Fedora 8, x86_64: pass
> suse, x86_64: pass
> osx10.5 intel: pass
On May 29, 6:33 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:18 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 3.0.3.alpha0 built ok and all test passed!
> Suse, Itanium: fails; can't build clisp
I forgot this one: I tested on that machine and upgrading to cli
On May 30, 10:06 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I managed to get quite a way building 3.0.2 on my Solaris laptop
> before there were any issues at all, but with 3.0.3.alpha0 things have
> not gone so smoothly. However, I have very recently updated the
> software on the lapto
Hello folks,
I am sure the subject line will make sure that next to no one reads
this message, but it is important for some of us.
Anyway, I finally got a pretty good lead what goes wrong when we
compute 1/y in a MV polynomial ring on Solaris using libSingular (1/x
also crashes, but that is not
On Jun 1, 12:27 am, "Gary Furnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Gary,
> A bunch of the stuff in misc.functional is junk... I've deleted a
> bunch of it in my symbolics rewrite without any issues.
You because you didn't have any problem there does not mean we can
just delete things willy-nilly.
On Jun 1, 1:02 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Gary Furnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The things in misc.functional are covered up by other imports in
> > general. They only are usable if you change the import order in
> > all.py in major
lag" is not available.
) at Python/ceval.c:3669
#75 0x0008585c in PyEval_EvalCodeEx (co=0x491728, globals=Variable
"globals" is not available.
) at Python/ceval.c:2836
#76 0x00083c94 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0x1ed5c0, throwflag=Variable
"throwflag" is not available.
) at Python/ce
On Jun 1, 5:30 pm, Robert Dodier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.
>
> Jaap Spies wrote:
> > See at the end of:
>
> >http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2008/011842.html
>
Hi Robert,
> I don't know what is at stake here from the perspective of Sage,
> but so f
On Jun 1, 4:57 pm, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello Sage team,
Hi Georg,
> great work so far, keep pushing forward!
> I've got the following question:
>
> Does a new SPKG, whose contents are licensed under GPLv3+ ("three
> plus"),
> fulfil your license requirement in order to
On Jun 1, 6:01 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:51 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I really hope Maxima is not GPL V2 only, since:
> (1) that would mean we couldn't distribute it with Sage,
Obvious
On Jun 1, 8:11 pm, Robert Dodier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > In fact looking through the actual source code, it mostly says
> > "Copyright William F. Schelter" or "See the GNU General Public
> > License for more details. You should have received a copy of
> > the GNU Gen
On Jun 2, 1:20 am, rjf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It might be worth observing that the Department of Energy was happy to
> supply DOE Macsyma to Bill Schelter or to anyone else (except Fidel
> Castro)
:)
> on almost any terms, non-exclusively They gave Bill
> permission to redistribute
Hello folks,
I just tested clisp 2.45 on Solaris 10 on x86-64 [*not* a Sparc] and
with "-O0 -g" and gcc 4.3. make as well as make check passes. So it
looks like we will finally be close to having a working clisp out of
the box at least on x86[-64] based Solaris and can get the port
working a litt
On Jun 2, 11:11 pm, Francesco Biscani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi William,
Hi Francesco,
> William Stein wrote:
>
> | That said I really *really* want a full native version of Sage on
> Windows...
>
> I've been wondering about this for a
On Jun 2, 11:51 pm, Francesco Biscani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Michael,
Hi Francesco,
> mabshoff wrote:
>
> | For 32 bits we are fixing the Cygwin issues and one goal for Dev1
> | [starting in a little
Malb rocks:
[18:30] mabshoff|afk : actually in structs.h of Singular there
is this logic:
[18:31] #elif defined(SunOS_5)
[18:31]// #define HAVE_GENERIC_ADD
[18:31]#define HAVE_MULT_MOD
[18:31]#ifdef HAVE_MULT_MOD
[18:31]#define HAVE_DIV_MOD
[18:31]#endif
[18:34] wstein
On Jun 4, 12:39 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
> > If coercion was implemented with 100% pure Cython code (with an eye
> > for speed where it is needed),
>
> The critical path for doing arithmetic between elements is 100% pure
> Cython code. The path for discovering coe
emonstrate the quality of some of the
issues we need to fix. Compared to the segfault hell we had up until
yesterday I would call this an improvement: :
###
sage -t devel/sage/sage/libs/ntl/ntl_mat_ZZ.pyx
File "/home/ma
On Jun 4, 2:06 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my attempt to build sage 3.0.2 on Solaris (SPARC).
>
> The build process reports gmp_aux.h is not found, I checked and there
> is no such file. However, this in itself does not cause the build
> process to stop, but it lat
On Jun 4, 12:51 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 5:13 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
Hi David,
> > with malb's libSingular fix we are down from 120+ segfaults to about
> > 100 doctes
On Jun 4, 2:56 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Francois,
> It looks like gmp_aux.h is generated during "make setup3" which is
> completely skipped on sun, from the skpg-install script:
> do_tune()
> {
> if [ $UNAME = "SunOS" ]; then
> return
> fi
> do_make
On Jun 4, 3:08 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Well, I have seens the same problem on other Solaris boxen and we do
> > not explicitly just /dev/random, but we do so via GNUTLS. We might
> > patch GNUTLS slightly on Solaris, but up to know it isn't 100% clear
> > to my why t
On Jun 4, 9:19 am, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tim,
> The first bunch of SAGE dependencies entered the Debian NEW queue (the
> queue of packages waiting for review from the Debian ftpmasters before
> they are uploaded to Debian unstable) tonight; by tomorrow I expect that
> th
On Jun 4, 5:29 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 June 2008, mabshoff wrote:
> > Yes, what could go wrong? ;)
>
> > Seriously: What I meant above is that we ought to see on Solaris only
> > if switching to /dev/urandom as
On Jun 4, 6:13 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Hi Kai-Philipp
> I just read the installation readme and built my own application to
> start the sageserver:
>
> Just start the Apple-ScriptEditor and enter the following code:
>
> tell application "Terminal"
> do s
On Jun 4, 9:30 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 1:10 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gmp_aux.h exists without the tuning, but I am not sure why we skip the
> > tuning on Solaris. I will certainly see if I cannot reactivate that.
>
On Jun 4, 9:39 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 9:02 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Aside from that it would be good with somebody with deeper Solaris-
> > internals fu than me could enlighten me if /dev/random is the
> > preferred sou
On Jun 5, 12:56 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 8:35 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> I don't believe the problem I was experiencing is anything to do with
> the shell, or how it is called. As Is said, I&
On Jun 5, 11:07 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it happens because the makefile is full of direct calls
> to make rather than something like $MAKE. So even if you
> started with gmake you will call make eventually which will
> protest to GNU-ism. Add this to my TODO list:
> Fin
On Jun 5, 4:13 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Jun, 15:03, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > Well, we require gmake anyway for freetype since that specifically
> > requires gmake. gld should not be required, at l
[This goes also directly to Bryan since I do not know if he reads sage-
devel, replies should stay on sage-devel]
Hi,
I just noticed that Bryan updated my FreeBSD porting wiki page. It has
not been updated in a while, but that is my fault since I have not
been updating the wiki page about the on
On Jun 6, 5:48 am, Bryan L Newbold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bryan,
> Wow you're fast!
I work full time on Sage thanks to William and I have no life, so no
surprises on my end ;)
> I'm running ./sage -t * with 3.0.3 under emulation right
> now and trying a new compile, I intended to post r
On Jun 6, 7:45 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 1:04 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Never mind! Silly me had removed "-shared" from the linking line.
> > I got past ntl.
>
> Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
> my Sun
On Jun 6, 8:31 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 7:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Great, I copied your revised ntl package from your home directory (on
> > > my Sun Ultra 60 called 'main-webserver
On Jun 6, 9:07 am, "Glenn H Tarbox, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Glenn,
> OK, so I just couldn't help myself... forgive me this transgression. (I
> know I'm gonna regret this in the morning :-)
Yes, flame thrower on ;) [just kidding]
> I think Sage would benefit from git. Its simply bet
On Jun 6, 9:32 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 7:44 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > > The Solaris port does seem to be coming on, which is good. The ntl fix
> > > from Francois seems to work on both
On Jun 6, 10:30 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 6, 9:05 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > > * Then Solaris became free and open source.
>
> > Well, you still have to register for the privilege to download
On Jun 6, 10:13 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On May 30, 10:03 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> > > I've tried both Sun's make and GNU make. They both give the same
> > > issue.
>
> > >
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I've downloaded sage-3.0.3.alpha1, overwrote sage-3.0.3.alpha1/spkg/
> standard/ntl-5.4.2.p3.spkg with one created by Francois on my Sun
> Ultra 60 (main-webserver) and tried to compile Sage on my Blade 2000
> (kestrel). The Blade is quite a bit quicker than the Ultra 60,
On Jun 6, 6:46 pm, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Biill
> Thanks for looking into this for us. My access to sun machines is
> currently limited, but hopefully I should get access again in the next
> few days. Then I'll definitely be keen to ensure FLINT compiles on
> those machines.
Th
Merged in alpha1:
#1440: Bjarke Hammersholt Roune:Inconsistency in subs and substitute
for univariate polynomials
#2353: Burcin Erocal: MPolynomialRing should be deprecated
#3111: John Cremona: Two bug fixes for elliptic curve abelian_group()
#3254: Mike Hansen: improvements and doctests
ce at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.3/sage-3.0.3.alpha1.tar
Cheers,
Michael
On Jun 7, 4:05 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Merged in alpha1:
>
> #1440: Bjarke Hammersholt Roune:Inconsistency in subs and substitute
> for univari
On Jun 8, 3:10 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dave,
> If one tries to build Sage on Solaris, there is a warning the Solaris
> operating system is not well supported and it's tricky to build on
> Solaris.
>
> **
> Machine:
On Jun 7, 11:08 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2:20 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dave,
> > I've now submitted this as a trac event - number 3381.
Good.
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3381#preview
>
> > Dave
>
> I noticed in
On Jun 7, 10:21 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2008, at 1:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Hi Dave,
> > A lot of Sage compilation is about compiling different .spkg files.
> > Since these are independent of each other, I suspect these could be
> > compiled in parallel
On Jun 8, 1:55 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dave,
> I've posted quite a few things here recently on my attempts to build
> Sage on Solaris. Here's my summary of the current issues in building
> SAGE 3.0.3.alpha1 under Solaris 10, listed in order of the failures.
>
> My
On Jun 8, 1:15 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 6:04 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > including iconv was
> > discussed in the past, but IIRC it is large and builds slow, so we
> > might just disable icon
t; print sys.path # <-- FYI, sys.path is different in sage than in python
> interpreter
Yes, sys.path is different, but that is to be expected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.0.3.alpha2$ ./
sage
--
| S
On Jun 8, 10:59 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Dave,
> Is there a general policy on whether compiler flags should give the
> best performance on a particular machine, or should the binaries work
> on any similar system? I can see advantages in each.
Right now we pick up SS
On Jun 9, 9:42 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
> I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
> 10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
>
Hi,
I think this is a definite issue since
> >> I tried to do "sudo easy_install feedparser", which worked. I can
> >> "import feedparser" from the python shell, but not from sage unless I
> >> explicitly add it to my path.
>
As sys.path shows by sudoing you are installing into the system wide
python. As William has pointed out that is n
On Jun 9, 2:43 am, IzI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I would prefer to submit the bug as a Trac issue, but was not able to
> subscribe.
>
> Steps to reproduce the problem:
> 1.) download and install SAGE to a 32bit (P4) Ubuntu 8.04
> 2.) wgethttp://www.sagemath.org/packages/experimental/PIL-1
On Jun 9, 1:45 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 9:09 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 8, 10:59 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
>
>
On Jun 9, 10:05 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi David,
> This is on an 8-core 2GHz xeon running debian. (Tom Boothby's machine.)
>
> In a clean build of sage-3.0.2:
>
> sage: time x = bernoulli(4)
> CPU times: user 4.19 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 4.20 s
> Wall time: 4.20 s
Hi Bill,
On Jun 9, 3:07 pm, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't gmp 4.2.1 build on cygwin? Do you happen to recall what the
> issues were, as it'll be a problem for mpir too (though I did manage
> one build on cygwin already).
>
> Bill.
At some point after a recent Cygwin update gmp 4
On Jun 9, 3:20 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
>
> >> [...]
> >> No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary
Hello folks,
I *just* replaced the current SSL certificate of www.sagenb.com that
was only valid for another couple weeks with one that expires five
years from now. So your browser will likely complain about the new
certificate, but that is expected If you are using a FireFox 3 based
browser you
On Jun 9, 7:01 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > The last version, so that we could build on cygwin, and also it was
> > needed
> > for OS X 10.5 64-bit. We will switch to mpir soon, as soon as
> > there is a
> > release :
Riccardo Gori wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Riccardo,
I have also forwarded your email to sage-devel.
> In SAGE-3.0.2 with a Intel Mac OSX 10.5 I found the following bug:
>
> If I create a sympy matrix and if I try to access it it gives me an error.
> Step to reproduce:
>
> sage: import sympy
> sage: M =
Riccardo Gori wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi Riccardo,
thanks for the bug report. I have forwarded it to sage-devel.
Cheers,
Michael
> In SAGE-3.0.2 with a Intel Mac OSX 10.5 I found the following bug:
>
> Trying to evaluate a sympy function gives a wrong result. With sympy in a
> python shell everythi
The following popped up at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/t/3d048be6e156a877
sage: R1,x = PolynomialRing(ZZ,3,'x').objgens();R1
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x0, x1, x2 over Integer Ring
sage: p = 3*x[0]*x[1]*x[1]*x[2];p
3*x0*x1^2*x2
sage: p.degrees()
(1, 2, 1)
sage: R2,y =
On Jun 10, 5:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Riccardo Gori wrote:
> >> Hello,
>
> > Hi Riccardo,
>
> > I have also forwarded your email to
about failing builds on
Solaris or 64 bit OSX, we will get to that hopefully this and next
week.
Sources are in the usual place:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.3/sage-3.0.3.alpha2.tar
We have build tested this already and there are a bunch of tickets
with fixes
On Jun 13, 6:01 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 13, 1:24 pm, eduardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > SAGE in "/home/SAGE/sage-3.0.2" (as root)
> > IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/home/SAGE/sage-3.0.2/local/...
>
> If you install (extract) something as root, t
On Jun 13, 4:31 pm, "M. Yurko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Michael,
> In the reference manual (13.7 Tables of zeros of the Riemann-Zeta
> function) it states that zeta_zeros() gives a list of the "first 1
> imaginary parts." However, it should say "first 10 imaginary
> parts" (add a ze
=== The Problem with Patch Review ===
Mandatory patch review was introduced at SD5 and it should be
considered a success since it certainly seems to have helped to keep
the code quality up and prevent many potential bugs from slipping into
Sage. Unfortunately we did not have any formal mechanism
On Jun 16, 10:27 am, "Craig Citro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Editor and reviewer can be the same person, but the reviewer should
> > not be the patch author.
>
> Editor and patch author can also be the same person, unless someone
> has a strong objection. (This seems to differ from the p
://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.3/sage-3.0.3.rc0.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.3/sage-3.0.3.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
Please test and report any issues and also if it works :)
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 3.0.3.rc0:
#2575
On Jun 16, 9:31 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am almost ok with releasing rc0. I saw only one problem with any
> doctests (I
> did not finish doctesting yet on itanium linux).
>
> There is *one* problem on our debian64 virtual machine on bsd. I guess you
> saw thi
of
> telling from the 240k line install.log what was taking the time?
Run
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.0.3.rc0$ grep
"real" install.log | grep "[0-9]s" | grep "[0-9]m"
real0m0.099s
real0m0.014s
real1m9.018s
real0m0.
On Jun 17, 5:21 pm, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Roberto Canteri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Hi Dan,
Greg Lansweber actually has working code code for an OSX app he demoed
at Dev1 that will hopefully make it into Sage soon.
Cheers,
Michael
> > Date: Tue,
On Jun 18, 2:02 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 10:05AM +0200, Philippe Saade wrote:
> > So, can some of you visithttp://www.sagemath.frand tell me if you
> > see something wrong ?
>
> I visited it, poked around, did some downloading, and it all seems to
> work
On Jun 18, 2:46 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can confirm that this is broken for me too in 3.0.2.
> > I don't know why -- we haven't changed trace in *years*.
> > Argh.
>
> > Any ideas?
>
> It may be (and probably is) related to IPython 0.8.2 which went in in 3.0.2.
I am v
On Jun 18, 1:02 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> OK, you were right: atlas took 115m37s, i.e. about 2hrs .
That is pretty much what I suspected.
> When you say cache size, do you mean on the machine? The laptop has
> 2GB ram -- was supposed to have 4 but they forgot to
On Jun 19, 12:57 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/18 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 1:02 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
>
> >> OK, you were
Hello folks,
during my talk about the Sage development process I raised a couple of
issues on how we can improve the quality of Sage that have been
discussed in the past here in the groups, in IRC and also face to
face. I did end up making a wiki page at http://wiki.sagemath.org/QualityControl
B
Hello folks,
I have thought about the coercion merge and how to handle the next
couple releases. I would suggest the following game plan:
Releases [time frame in brackets]:
3.0.4: This is 3.0.3 + "doctest timeit" + "pickle jar" and very, very,
very critical fixes only [this weekend]
3.1.0: 3.0.
On Jun 20, 1:42 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2008, at 5:42 PM, root wrote:
>
> > I believe you sidestepped the question. My point is that Sage
> > makes the claim that it will be a viable alternative to the 4Ms.
> > In computational mathematics that is a testable clai
On Jun 20, 3:38 pm, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sage has a huge test suite that gets run with every release,
I actually run the test suite (which takes about an hour and a half of
CPU time and is about 45,000 input statements) after every patch I
merge.
> Is there an obvious way to col
On Jun 20, 2:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If anybody is doing anything to the notebook, please do one of:
>
> 1) Stop immediately
> 2) Notify me of all patches, and have them *DONE* by Monday.
>
> I'm completely refactoring the inner workings of the notebook, and your
> patches a
+1
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://w
801 - 900 of 2912 matches
Mail list logo
