[sage-devel] Re: Rules for closing tickets in trac

2007-10-22 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Monday 22 October 2007, mabshoff wrote: Hello, since this has come up repeatedly I would like to clarify: Do not close any tickets in trac unless you have been explicitly told to do so by either malb, was, cwitty or mabshoff. This is to avoid having issues slip through the cracks. Once a

[sage-devel] Re: Rules for closing tickets in trac

2007-10-22 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 22, 10:40 am, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 22 October 2007, mabshoff wrote: Hello, Hello, since this has come up repeatedly I would like to clarify: Do not close any tickets in trac unless you have been explicitly told to do so by either malb, was,

[sage-devel] Re: Rules for closing tickets in trac

2007-10-22 Thread Martin Albrecht
Take ticket 729 as an example (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/729): It was closed by Robert (rml) because the bugfix/feature request was invalid. Michael (mabshoff) reopened it due to the rule state above. But there is nothing for the release manager to do and I feel

[sage-devel] Re: Rules for closing tickets in trac

2007-10-22 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 22, 11:13 am, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take ticket 729 as an example (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/729):It was closed by Robert (rml) because the bugfix/feature request was invalid. Michael (mabshoff) reopened it due to the rule state above. But

[sage-devel] Re: Rules for closing tickets in trac

2007-10-22 Thread Robert Miller
What caused me to actually raise the issue is #656: That one is clearly not a duplicate. #968 is an enhancement relative to #656. During Bug Day 4 William also told rlm not to close tickets until the issue had been officially resolved. I'm assuming you're talking about 956. The reason I

[sage-devel] Re: Rules for closing tickets in trac

2007-10-22 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 22, 5:17 pm, Robert Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What caused me to actually raise the issue is #656: That one is clearly not a duplicate. #968 is an enhancement relative to #656. During Bug Day 4 William also told rlm not to close tickets until the issue had been officially