On Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 10:13 Henri Girard wrote:
> My sudo -H pip3 install sage got for answer : Requirement already
> satisfied: sage in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages (9.2b12)
>
For what it's worth, you should almost never `sudo pip install` anything on
Ubuntu, because it can break system
On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 1:44:38 PM UTC+2 david@gmail.com wrote:
> Same here on a fresh clone with macOS 10.15.16
>
>
> [dochtml] Building en/constructions.
> [dochtml]
> [dochtml] [construct] building [html]: targets for 16 source files that
> are out of date
> [dochtml] [construct]
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 8:41 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> Le sam. 28 déc. 2019 à 02:12, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > Computer, OS, build choices:
> >
> > - iMac, Mid 2015
> > - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave
> > - build for Python 2
> > - build Sage's `gcc` and `openssl` packages
> > - build Sage's Python
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:41 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 87c3057957 (tag: 9.0.beta9, trac/develop) Updated
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:27 AM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Surprisingly it did work after a distclean. Strange... Sorry for the noise.
Make sure that if `./configure` was re-run that it kept
`--with-python=2`. There is a bug that if configure gets re-run
needlessly sometimes it doesn't keep the
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:11 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Can I please get a review on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28258 ?
>
> This issue has been holding me up for weeks, making testing difficult.
Thanks Volker (who reviewed). With that ticket, plus
https://trac.sagemath.org/
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:50 AM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Broken with a Python 2 build. Do we care?
>
> In particular, SageNB is not built with Python 2, but the doctester thinks it
> should be:
We do care: Support for Python 2 is not being dropped yet. Please
open a blocker ticket.
> ./sage
Can I please get a review on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28258 ?
This issue has been holding me up for weeks, making testing difficult.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:15 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 2:55 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The first try at running make gives me this:
> >
> >
> > [sagelib-9.0.beta6] make[4] : on entre
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The first try at running make gives me this:
>
>
> [sagelib-9.0.beta6] make[4] : on entre dans le répertoire «
> /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/src »
> [sagelib-9.0.beta6] cd . && export\
>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:31 PM darwin doppelganger wrote:
>
> I did a "make distclean" followed by "make" on my Mac OSX 10.14.6, Xcode
> 11.2.1 and the build completed successfully:
It's not even necessary to do a full `make distclean`. Instead you
have to manually reconfigure your build to
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:23 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:15 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > Testing this on Windows + Python 3 for the first time in a while.
> > During the docbuild it crashes while generating one of the plots, with
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:15 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Testing this on Windows + Python 3 for the first time in a while.
> During the docbuild it crashes while generating one of the plots, with
> some call to maxima resulting in:
>
> RuntimeError: ECL says: #
>
&g
Testing this on Windows + Python 3 for the first time in a while.
During the docbuild it crashes while generating one of the plots, with
some call to maxima resulting in:
RuntimeError: ECL says: #
I'll see if I can get this in any other context. Has anyone else seen
problems like this on Python
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:00 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:57 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related
> > to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module th
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:57 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related
> to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that
> uses fflas-ffpack; specifically sage.libs.linbox_flint_interface:
>
> [sageli
When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related
to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that
uses fflas-ffpack; specifically sage.libs.linbox_flint_interface:
[sagelib-8.9] g++ -shared -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base
-L/opt/sagemath-8.9/local/lib
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
> **
> Fi
Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
**
File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 535, in
sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable
Failed
Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make
sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the
following in 8.9 final:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356
As discussed when the first version of this code was added, it's
actually reasonably robust and
IMO we should go forward with 8.9 for now and make the next version 9.0. By
then Python 3 support will be even more solid.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 16:54 Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> The second file should have been fixed by
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28312
>
> but it was probably not
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:58 PM Markus Wageringel
wrote:
>
> This also happened to me a few weeks ago. The underlying problem seems to be
> that the uninstall script fails because it tries to call sage-dist-helpers,
> but cannot find it. This file has recently been moved from src/bin to
>
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 18:07:16 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 3:31:07 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 01:00:29 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :
This ticket has also been languishing for no particular reason:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27724
It was previously looked upon favorably: It is a patch to GAP that has
already been accepted upstream by the GAP developers. For a time it
was only held up for me to update the patch to the
:30 Volker Braun wrote:
> I reviewed the ticket but rather not merge it at the last minute. Imho its
> quite possible that it breaks something on lesser-used platforms so we
> should merge it at the beginning of a release cycle, not the end.
>
>
> On Friday, June 14, 2019 at 1
by someone. I marked the issue as "critical" and not
"blocker" only because I can technically work around it, but shouldn't have
to.
Unless there's a serious reason to rush this release please resolve this
issue first.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 10:59 E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
Could somebody please review the following ticket:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27721
It has been stalled for weeks now for no good reason other than, I presume,
lack of availability for someone to review it.
I would really like this ticket to be resolved and merged before making an
8.8
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:14 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:03 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:05 PM E. Madison Bray
> > > wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:05 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM E. Madison Bray
> > > wro
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > I don't know why the rush to call this a release candidate when there are
> > clearly still several outstanding problems to be resolved befo
I don't know why the rush to call this a release candidate when there are
clearly still several outstanding problems to be resolved before the next
release.
As usual absolutely zero communication of a plan or coordination with the
community.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 02:28 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
>
The tests should make sure nothing in ~/.gap is ever loaded if at all
possible (e.g. update the GAP interfaces to add an option to disable use of
~/.gap` when running the tests, for example)
On Sat, May 25, 2019, 03:22 François Bissey wrote:
> We’ll want some kind of follow up. The test will
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:40 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> baff1c42dd (tag: 8.8.beta5) Updated SageMath version
Could someone have a look at, and maybe give positive-review to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27385. It would be lovely if we
could get this fix in 8.7, and the patch I added only affects Cygwin.
Bernard Parisse has said he will fix the issue upstream but I haven't
followed through yet on
Thank Volker,
On my Ubuntu machine,
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS"
I got one seemingly random failure I haven't seen before:
sage -t --long
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:01 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:08 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, ptestlong gets one
> transient failure :
>
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 146.8
d now.
Of course, that could indicate a bug in the build system, but I'm not
sure now how I would reproduce the situation. This arose in part
because I was playing around with
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27267
> Le 25/02/2019 à 15:39, E. Madison Bray a écrit :
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 201
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:36 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Ubuntu 14.04 I am getting a strange error when trying to build the
> docs. Tried `make doc-clean` to no avail:
Also, when I try running the tests for
sage.categories.finite_coxeter_groups I get the same failure at:
sage -t
On Ubuntu 14.04 I am getting a strange error when trying to build the
docs. Tried `make doc-clean` to no avail:
[dochtml] [categorie]
/home/embray/src/sagemath/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/categories/finite_coxeter_groups.py:docstring
of
I am getting some mysterious new segfaults with this on Cygwin.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:27 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:18 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
I am getting a hang / possible error during doc building
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:40 AM wrote:
>
> I have the same issue with libffi !
I will look into that ASAP. It's a similar / related problem to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26996 but affecting libffi. The
install target for libffi might even depend on your compiler's
settings, which might
nly disagree, though I believe my suggestion
is one that requires the least work for everyone involved (since it's
merely a question of what arguments to pass to perform the tests).
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 11:45:20 AM UTC+1, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>>
>> In fact I'd ar
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> The final 8.6 should follow real soon, so please give
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:18 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Frederic, if can you make #26740 work then I'll merge it (no matter what Eric
> says ;-)
As I last pointed out on that ticket it doesn't even require any code
changes. In fact I'd argue it doesn't even require a Makefile target,
as the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:37 AM Steven Trogdon wrote:
>
> On my Gentoo changing the ownership was not sufficient. After changing the
> ownership I had to
>
> git reset --hard HEAD
>
> which revealed that
>
> Updating f894105d0d..b36eca1990
> error: The following untracked working tree files
47 matches
Mail list logo
