[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta6 released

2022-03-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
With Ubuntu 18.04, and running doctests with few optional/external packages, I get: -- sage -t --long --random-seed=4345853567077574058850080858948729205 src/sage/combinat/designs/incidence_structures.py # 1 doctest failed sage

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta7 released

2022-04-04 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thanks for the release. I am quite happy that #20343 is now in! Testing on Ubuntu 18.04 with few optional and external packages, I get: -- sage -t --long --random-seed=290149003222784740688944140527868655673 src/sage/combinat/de

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc0 released

2022-04-11 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, running doctests with few optional and external tags, I get: Using --optional=4ti2,build,ccache,cryptominisat,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pip,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_c

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc1 released

2022-04-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Testing with few optional and external packages on Ubuntu 18.04, I get failures with 8 files: -- sage -t --long --random-seed=244716197900726204861772829584257473787 src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/l

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

2022-05-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thanks for the release. On Ubuntu 18.04, with some optional and external packages installed, I get: -- sage -t --long --random-seed=10041023278531363329797553849793068311 src/sage/combinat/designs/incidence_structures.py # 1 do

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

2022-05-17 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thanks for the release! Sébastien On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 12:27:40 AM UTC+2 Volker Braun wrote: > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta1 released

2022-06-01 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 20.04 + few optional packages, I get: Using --optional=4ti2,build,ccache,cryptominisat,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pip,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sage_spkg ... ---

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta3 released

2022-06-23 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, I get Git branch: develop Git ref: 9.7.beta3 Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local' and SAGE_VENV='/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10.3' Using --optional=build,debian,external,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bli

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta0 released

2022-09-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
After upgrading my gcc, g++ and gfortran to 9, I managed to build and test with a bunch of optional and external packages. I get the following list of failures. Using --optional=build,debian,external,glucose,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomi

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta1 released

2022-10-06 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On a machine running Ubuntu 20.04 + some optional and external packages, I obtain: Using --optional=4ti2,build,ccache,cryptominisat,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pip,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backe

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta2 released

2022-10-21 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, here is what I get with few optional/external packages: Using --optional=build,debian,external,glucose,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,cplex,csdp,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_he

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta3 released

2022-11-07 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, with few optional/external packages, here is what I get: Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local' and SAGE_VENV='/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10.8' Using --optional=build,debian,external,glucose,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detecte

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta5 released

2022-12-12 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04 + optional packages, I get: Using --optional=build,debian,dot2tex,external,glucose,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,cplex,csdp,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_nu

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta6 released

2023-01-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, I managed to make build and doc ok with cython capabilities: $ sage ┌┐ │ SageMath version 9.8.beta6, Release Date: 2022-12-21 │ │ Using Python 3.10.8. Type "help()" for help. │

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thanks for the release. On my side, I am stuck with the following. I was having the same issue with the previous version. I saw I was not alone, but I still don't know what is the solution? Anybody know? Make distclean? Sébastien [sagelib-9.8.rc0] installing. Log file: /home/slabbe/GitBox/sa

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On another machine running Ubuntu 22.04, installing sage from source from scratch, I get "m4: Permission denied" error during the "make configure". Should I "sudo make configure" ? Never done that before... See below: $ make configure ./bootstrap -d make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire « /home

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 6:31:21 PM UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote: Some people have had an issue with Singular: the system version is too new. Using "./configure --with-system-singular=no" (probably after "make distclean"?) would help, if that's the problem. There is an upgrade ticket for

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 7:37:27 PM UTC+1 matthia...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 9:30:30 AM UTC-8 Sébastien Labbé wrote: ./bootstrap: 9: m4: Permission denied make: *** [Makefile:365 : configure] Erreur 1 Do you have "." in PATH? No What does &quo

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta7 released

2023-04-03 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, running tests with few optional and external packages, I get: Using --optional=4ti2,antic,build,ccache,cryptominisat,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,lidia,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pip,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_c

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta7 released

2023-04-04 Thread Sébastien Labbé
this is probably due to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35093/commits/99901632beaa604331bca3d82eb5347bc43fc14e Could you edit the corresponging installed file in local/ and see if this starts passing. If so, please open an issue. I changed the false to true. The error is still there

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta6 released

2023-10-16 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04 with the following optional packages, Using --optional=4ti2,antic,build,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,kissat,latte_int,lidia,normaliz,pip,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sage_spkg I get

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.4.beta9 released

2024-06-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On old Ubuntu 18.04, running tests with a bunch of optional/external packages installed + internet, here is what I get: Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local' and SAGE_VENV='/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.11.8' Using --optional=4ti2,build,cbc,ccache,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta6 released

2014-04-05 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Bonjour sage-release, On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 2:09:20 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > Get it from the "develop" git branch or the source tarball at > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-6.2.beta6/sage-6.2.beta6.tar.gz > I get an error while building matplotlib1-3.1. It seems

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2 released

2014-05-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Hi sage-release, I get an error with the compilation of sage/graphs/distances_all_pairs.c. Here is what I did: $ git checkout master $ git pull --ff-only github master $ make distclean $ make [...] Host system: Darwin pol 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel V

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2 released

2014-05-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:54:58 PM UTC+2, Peter Bruin wrote: > > Hello, > > It looks like (the automatically generated) distances_all_pairs.c is the > result of an interrupted/failed Cython compilaton. My copy of that file is > 14706 lines long and the last line is > > #endif /* Py_PYTHON_H *

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2 released

2014-05-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
$ make [...] Updating Cython code Compiling sage/graphs/distances_all_pairs.pyx because it changed. Found compiled sage/graphs/distances_all_pairs.pyx in cache Finished Cythonizing, time: 10.05 seconds. [...] and then the same error again. I need to delete the "compiled sage/graphs/distances_a

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2 released

2014-05-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 11:17:53 PM UTC+2, Peter Bruin wrote: > > The Cython cache seems to be ~/.cycache/, at least on my system. > thanks! now it works : [...] Updating Cython code Compiling sage/graphs/distances_all_pairs.pyx because it changed. Cythonizing sage/graphs/distances_all_pai

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.rc2 released

2015-04-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
I get an error with libgd while compiling sage-6.6.rc2 on this machine: $ uname -a Darwin MacBookebastien.home 14.1.0 Darwin Kernel Version 14.1.0: Mon Dec 22 23:10:38 PST 2014; root:xnu-2782.10.72~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 Full libgd-2.1.0.p0.log is attached to this email. It finishes with: mv -

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.rc2 released

2015-04-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 12:20:04 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > post the bzip2 install log > >> >> The bzip2 install log is attached. It was successful finishing with: real0m16.313s user0m12.348s sys 0m7.020s Successfully installed bzip2-1.0.6.20140317 Deleting tempora

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.rc2 released

2015-04-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 12:01:29 PM UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > I get an error with libgd while compiling sage-6.6.rc2 on this machine: > Maybe I have an hypothesis for this error... I am currently reinstalling everything from scratch on my machine after I changed the hard

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.rc2 released

2015-04-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:35:04 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > bzip2 installed /Users/seb/Applications/sage/local/lib/libbz2.la, but it > seems to be gone now. Who deleted it? > Nobody, it is still there. Thanks for the follow up. I now understand what is happening. Not only I changed

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.rc2 released

2015-04-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> Let me recompile from scratch... I will give an update afterwards. > > Testing that Sage starts... [2015-04-09 19:47:34] Sage version 6.6.rc2, released 2015-04-02 Yes, Sage starts. Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. T

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7.beta0 released

2015-04-16 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On ubuntu 14.04 64 bit make ptestlong gives 266 files with 1 failing doctest, always the same warning: sage -t --long src/doc/de/thematische_anleitungen/sage_gymnasium.rst ** File "src/doc/de/thematische_anleitungen/sage_gymnasiu

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7.beta0 released

2015-04-16 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 11:05:11 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > chmod 700 ~/.sage/.python-eggs > > should fix this > > Indeed: All tests passed! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7.beta1 released

2015-04-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
All tests passed with make ptestlong on ubuntu 14.04 x86_64. Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7.beta3 released

2015-04-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit, after make distclean, make ptestlong finishes with: -- All tests passed! -- Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subsc

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7 released

2015-05-19 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64, after updating to github master and running make distclean, sage-6.7 builds fine and starts, documentation builds fine but make ptestlong finishes with 220 files having failing doctests all of them related to missing optional package (I think make distclean removes them

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7 released

2015-05-19 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 10:12:23 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Did you run "make ptestlong" or "make ptestall"? > You are right. I did "make ptestall". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7 released

2015-05-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Is there a way to "sage -i" all optional packages that are used the doctests of the whole sage library? Should "make ptestall" do that before running tests? On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 10:17:17 AM UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
1 - On the first compilation, I get: [algebras ] writing output... [ 96%] sage/algebras/steenrod/steenrod_algebra_mult [algebras ] writing output... [100%] sage/algebras/weyl_algebra [algebras ] dumping object inventory... done [algebras ] build succeeded. [graphs ] reading sources... [ 73%] sa

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Exactly, make doc-clean && make finishes with: ... Elapsed time: 515.1 seconds. Done building the documentation! I understand that "sage -docbuild reference html" is not the way to go anymore? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta7 released

2015-07-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Running make ptestlong on Ubuntu 14.04 and using --optional=arb,benzene,bliss,buckygen,cbc,cryptominisat,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_gap,database_odlyzko_zeta,database_pari,database_stein_watkins,database_symbolic_data,dot2tex,gambit,gap_packages,gcc,gdb,mcqd,modular_decomposition,mpir,naut

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta7 released

2015-07-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> > But the one in doctest/test.py keeps being there. > > -- > sage -t --long --warn-long 29.8 src/sage/doctest/test.py # 1 doctest > failed > > Needs review at: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18873 -- You received this m

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta8 released

2015-07-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit and using --optional=arb,benzene,bliss,buckygen,cbc,cryptominisat,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_gap,database_odlyzko_zeta,database_pari,database_stein_watkins,database_symbolic_data,dot2tex,gambit,gap_packages,gcc,gdb,mcqd,modular_decomposition,mpir,nauty,plantri,python

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.rc1 released

2015-07-25 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On OSX 10.10.2, Xcode 6.3, make ptestlong finishes with: -- sage -t --long src/sage/doctest/test.py # Timed out after testing finished -- which is not persisten

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc0 released

2015-09-28 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit, Using --optional=arb,benzene,bliss,buckygen,cbc,coxeter3,cryptominisat,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_gap,database_odlyzko_zeta,database_pari,database_stein_watkins,database_symbolic_data,dot2tex,gambit,gap_packages,gcc,gdb,mcqd,modular_decomposition,mpir,nauty,plantri

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc3 released

2015-10-08 Thread Sébastien Labbé
-- which is not reproducible. Also, I confirm that I also get the display latex problem cited above: > ./sage -n jupyter > In[1]: %display latex > In[2]: sin(x^2) > results in > Out[2]: \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}\sin\left(x^{2}\right) Sébastien Labbé On Wednesday, October 7, 201

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10.beta5 released

2015-11-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
With optional sage packages coxeter3 and cryptominisat, I get some optional doctests that are broken: -- sage -t --warn-long 27.7 src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t --warn-long 27.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10.beta5 released

2015-11-30 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 3:49:49 PM UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > With optional sage packages coxeter3 and cryptominisat, I get some > optional doctests that are broken: > > -- > sage -t --warn-lon

Re: [sage-release] Sage-6.10.rc1 released

2015-12-16 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Similarly, sage: len(str('a')) 1 sage: len(repr('a')) 3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to th

[sage-release] patchbot says ValueError: {} inserted on {} non-empty lines

2015-12-22 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Hello patchbot developers, At http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/13580/, before the doctest continuation problem was fixed, the patchbot was returning an incomplete error message (see below). Maybe it would be better to raise ValueError(full_msg.format(something here)) ? == plugins

[sage-release] Re: patchbot says ValueError: {} inserted on {} non-empty lines

2015-12-22 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Oups, I wanted to post this on sage-devel. Sorry. Sébastien On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 10:30:10 PM UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > Hello patchbot developers, > > At http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/13580/, before the doctest > continuation problem was fixed, t

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0.beta0 released

2015-12-23 Thread Sébastien Labbé
I don't know if patchbots run make distclean but all of them report "Build Failed" on 7.0.beta0 with the following error: checking if g++ accepts -dumpversion option... yes checking g++ version... 4.7.3 checking for sqrt in -lm... yes checking package versions... The content of "/home/worker/sag

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.0.beta0 released

2015-12-23 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 11:16:18 AM UTC+1, François wrote: > > It looks like one ticket for the packages of type `script` wasn’t included > then. > But I can see that http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19427 merged in sage-7.0.beta0 contains the diff: - echo >&2 "The content of \"$PK

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.1.beta3 released

2016-02-16 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit Using --optional=gcc,mpir,python2,sage make ptestlong finishes with labbe@priminfo sage-git $ tail logs/ptestlong.log sage -t --long --warn-long 27.1 src/sage_setup/docbuild/sphinxbuild.py [0 tests, 0.00 s] sage -t --long --warn-long 27.1 src/sage/schemes/toric/sheaf/

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
All tests passed on Ubuntu 14.04 with make ptestlong using --optional=mpir,python2,sage Other than the Tutte polynomial one, I get two other slow doctests that are not marked with #long time. I can not confirm whether it is a regression as I don't keep my old version of sage. sage -t --long -

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-30 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> -installed.update(pip_installed_packages()) > +# installed.update(pip_installed_packages()) > I confirm that this change fixes the problem I mentionned earlier. Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsu

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta5 released

2016-09-22 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Using --optional=4ti2,atlas,mpir,python2,sage on Ubuntu 16.04 make ptestlong finishes with "All tests passed". Thank you! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta6 released

2016-10-06 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, Using --optional=4ti2,atlas,ccache,meataxe,mpir,pandocfilters,python2,sage make ptestlong finishes with: sage -t --long --warn-long 42.7 src/sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense.pyx Timed out (and interrupt failed) *

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.rc0 released

2016-10-12 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, running make ptestlong finishes with "Error installing package openblas-0.2.19" with the following line in the openblas-0.2.19.log ./openblas_utest: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory The end of the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.rc0 released

2016-10-12 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 10:02:40 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > Thanks for your report. I saw this error on two of the patchbots too. > > Are you using the Sage-installed GCC package? What is the output of > > $ ./sage --sh -c 'which gfortran; gfortran --version' > $ ./sage -

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.4.rc0 released

2016-10-12 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 12:22:32 PM UTC+2, François wrote: > > I pushed a branch on that ticket to fix what I suspect is > the problem. > If it fixes it, I’ll push upstream since it is a problem > in their default makefile. > > Branch posted on #21689 fixes it! Thanks! Sébastien -

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.rc1 released

2016-10-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
>From branch 7.4.rc0 + #21689, I checked out branch 7.4.rc1 and "make start" works because "openblas" was not recompiled (why?). But on branch 7.4.rc1, if I force compilation of openblas with "sage -f openblas", then I get the same problem I reported yesterday in the 7.4.rc0 thread. Therefore,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.rc1 released

2016-10-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> Therefore, I will mark #21689 as a blocker so that it gets included in 7.4. > ... I just realized Jeroen already set #21689 as blocker when he created the ticket. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this gr

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta0 released

2016-10-26 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, Using --optional=4ti2,atlas,ccache,meataxe,mpir,pandoc_attributes,pandocfilters,python2,sage make ptestlong finishes with sage -t --long --warn-long 42.6 src/sage/modular/hecke/module.py Timed out ** Tests r

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta4 released

2016-11-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, I get an error building the documentation (even after make doc-clean && make): [manifolds] /home/labbe/Applications/sage-git/src/doc/en/reference/manifolds/index.rst:4: WARNING: undefined label: tensors-on-free-modules (if the link has no caption the label must precede a secti

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta4 released

2016-11-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 11:25:40 AM UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > On Ubuntu 16.04, I get an error building the documentation (even after > make doc-clean && make): > I had uncommited changes in my repo (reverting cython version to 0.24 for testing purposes

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta4 released

2016-11-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On OSX 10.10.2, I get two errors with make ptestlong (only the one with singular.py reappears on a rerun) : sage -t --long --warn-long 263.5 src/sage/misc/trace.py ** File "src/sage/misc/trace.py", line 66, in sage.misc.trace.tra

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-01 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On OS X 10.10.2, make ptestlong creates two sage.png file due to #21947 (I will create a ticket to fix this shortly) and finishes with: -- sage -t --long --warn-long 264.4 src/sage/modular/modform/element.py # Timed out sage -t

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-01 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> > make ptestlong creates two sage.png file due to #21947 (I will create a > ticket to fix this shortly) > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22009 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta6 released

2016-12-11 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On OS X 10.10.2, make ptestlong has only one already reported failing test ( `sage126` is not defined line 514 in singular.py). Also, I get a strange log file for sqlite which contains a little bit more than the SPKG.txt file : $ cat logs/pkgs/sqlite.log Found local metadata for sqlite-autocon

[sage-release] Re: Sage Debian Live 7.4 released

2016-12-12 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thank you very much Thierry. It was of great help during Sage Days 79. I also used it recently on a old windows computer not connected to the internet. It gives a second life to this machine:) Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-releas

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta6 released

2016-12-15 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> Also, I get a strange log file for sqlite which contains a little bit more > than the SPKG.txt file : > > $ cat logs/pkgs/sqlite.log > I found out that this junk file is created by sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py, I created: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22062 -- You received thi

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.5.rc0 released

2016-12-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> ImportError: No module named interpreters.wrapper_rdf > > Again, Eek! > Justin > It was also reported in Cannot build Sage 7.5.beta6 inside Docker, Dec 16, 2016 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/JkUfCPxoi80/discussion The part " 'sage_setup.docbuild' is a package and cannot

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.rc0 released

2016-12-22 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, git pull develop from 7.5.beta6 and make ptestlong has only one failing (timed out) test: sage: from sage.doctest.external import has_mathematica ## line 111 ## sage: has_mathematica() # random ## line 112 ## **

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.6.beta3 released

2017-02-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.06, make ptestlong with MAKE="make j6" had one failing test which I can not reproduce: sage -t --long --warn-long 36.7 src/sage/homology/simplicial_complex.py ** File "src/sage/homology/simplicial_complex.py", line 2

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.6.beta4 released

2017-02-17 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, MAKE="make -j6" make ptestlong finishes with: -- sage -t --long --warn-long 47.7 src/sage/homology/simplicial_complex.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t --long --warn-long 47.7 src/sage/modular/abvar/homology.py # T

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.6.beta3 released

2017-03-23 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 9:07:54 AM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > On 13/02/2017 14:32, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > > Also git status now tells me I have this file in SAGE_ROOT: > > > > octave-workspace > > > > ? > > How did you

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta3 released

2017-04-25 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On OSX 10.10 Yosemite, without #22860, make ptestlong yields only one failed already reported doctest: NotImplementedError: Unable to parse Giac output: integrate(t^n*exp(-s*t),t,0,+infinity) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" grou

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.0.beta3 released

2017-04-25 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> Stupid question because I noticed stuff on the patchbot and so on. > What happens if you do > export LC_ALL=C > before running the test? > $ export LC_ALL=C $ sage -t --long src/sage/calculus/calculus.py gives the same failed doctest. Do yo mean export LC_ALL=C make ptestlong ? -- Y

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta7 released

2017-05-24 Thread Sébastien Labbé
make ptestlong finishes with All tests passed! on Ubuntu 16.04. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To pos

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta9 released

2017-06-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On osx 10.10, make ptestlong gives 2 doctest errors (which are not reproducible): sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py ** File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 208, in sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable Failed example:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta11 released

2017-06-16 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On osx 10.10, make ptestlong gives: All test passed! On Ubuntu 16.04, make ptestlong gives -- sage -t --long --warn-long 61.1 src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py # 1 doctest failed ---

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta11 released

2017-06-17 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> Thanks Volker! This is indeed the case: I've recently added the line > %colors Linux > to the file ~/.sage/init.sage > Removing it fixes the problem. > It is better to set colors Linux in the file profile_default/ipython_config.py see https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10060/sage-terminal-col

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.rc0 released

2017-07-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, make ptestlong finishes with two doctest failures that were already reported on this mailing list. Both doctests pass when run separately. -- sage -t --long --warn-long 61.4 src/sage/homology/simplicial_complex.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta4 released

2017-09-10 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, make ptestlong failed on building the documentation with the following error: Building reference manual, first pass. Error building the documentation. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 174, in _run_module_as_

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta7 released

2017-10-13 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On a recent dell machine running Ubuntu 16.06, I get one failing test during make ptestlong. The test pass when run alone : sage -t --long src/sage/libs/gap/assigned_names.py ** File "src/sage/libs/gap/assigned_names.py", line 5

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta9 released

2017-10-23 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04 make ptestlong gives All tests passed! Thank you, Sébastien On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 7:22:18 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http:/

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc3 released

2017-11-30 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, I get problem building python2-2.7.14.p2 during make ptestlong. The error is reproducable when I perform sage -i python2 End of log is below ... gcc -pthread -shared -L. -L/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/lib -L. -L/home/slabbe/Gi

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc3 released

2017-12-01 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> ImportError: No module named _ctypes > ctypes module failed to import > math module imported OK > hashlib module imported OK > crypt module imported OK > readline module imported OK > socket module imported OK > Error: One or more modules failed to import. > > real2m25.869s > user2m5.51

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc3 released

2017-12-01 Thread Sébastien Labbé
... and I get "All tests passed!" after make ptestlong. Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.beta0 released

2017-12-21 Thread Sébastien Labbé
I get 5 failing # optional - rst2ipynb doctests. log below. -- sage -t --long --warn-long 59.5 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 5 doctests failed -- sage -t --l

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.beta8 released

2018-03-14 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, my first attempt at running make finishes with a problem with giac (undefined reference to `png_set_longjmp_fn') The log finishes with: ... [giac-1.4.9.45.p2] libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DGIAC_GENERIC_CONSTANTS -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/l

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.beta8 released

2018-03-14 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> ... still running. > > make ptestlong eventually finished with: -- All tests passed! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.beta8 released

2018-03-15 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> this is a typical symptom of trying to link a wrong version of libpng. > Yes, but why does the `sage -f libpng` was not forced since it was necessary? I am not an expert at all on this, but from my point of view, it is like if there was problem with dependencies of giac. > > But what does

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta1 released

2018-05-15 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, the command `./sage -t -p --all --long --optional=sage,optional,external` finishes with: -- sage -t --long src/sage/coding/code_constructions.py # 1 doctest failed ---

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta1 released

2018-05-17 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 9:24:26 PM UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > On Ubuntu 16.04, the command `./sage -t -p --all --long > --optional=sage,optional,external` finishes with: > > -- > sage -t --lo

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta2 released

2018-05-18 Thread Sébastien Labbé
The first run of make gave the following error with gfan: Found local metadata for gfan-0.6.2.p0 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/build/bin/sage-download-file", line 25, in import sage_bootstrap File "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/build/bin/../sage_bootstrap/

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.4.beta1 released

2018-08-22 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Running Ubuntu 16.06, I get Using --optional=bliss,cbc,ccache,cmake,dot2tex,external,gmpy2,lrslib,mpir,notedown,pandoc_attributes,python2,rst2ipynb,sage the command ./sage -t -p --all --long --optional=sage,optional,external --show-skipped --logfile=logs/ptestallshowskipped.log gives: --

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.4.beta6 released

2018-09-25 Thread Sébastien Labbé
The command: ./sage -t -p --all --long --optional=sage,optional,external Using --optional=bliss,cbc,ccache,cmake,dot2tex,external,gmpy2,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,notedown,pandoc_attributes,python2,rst2ipynb,sage External software detected for doctesting: ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,l

<    1   2   3   >