2021-05-27 12:44 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
>
> On Ubuntu 18.04, testing with various optional
> and external packages, I obtain:
>
> The other failures are copied below (I am not able
> to see the problem with the first one):
Probably the "period" / "full stop" at the very end.
> ... 292, ...]
>
2021-05-27 14:43 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021, 15:34 Clemens Heuberger,
> wrote:
>>
>> Also on Ubuntu 18.04 (without any optional packages apart ccache installed),
>> I
>> have the failing doctest with graph.py (two out of three runs) and
>> consistently
>>
>> $ ./sage -t
Fixed at
- Sage Trac ticket 31825
Failure when testing sage_conf version
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31825
Also reported at
- https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/MMG9Q-cswyA/m/lH9DCmTiAgAJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Paul Masson:
>
> Installed xz using Homebrew. Appears to have done the trick. Thanks Volker.
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31915
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
2021-06-22 19:52 UTC, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release:
>
> Built from a fresh clone of the develop tree on macOS 10.13.6
> (2017 iMac Pro, 18-core Xeon W).
> Testing (‘ptestlong’) had one failure:
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 70.4 --random-seed=0
> src/sage/graphs/bipartite_graph.py # 1
2021-05-01 à 01:13, Volker Braun:
>
> c27d4d6803 (tag: 9.3.rc5, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.3.rc5
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6, using many Homebrew packages,
the build from a working 9.3.rc4 succeeds. Running
make testlong
gives two failing doctests:
```
$
2021-02-07 22:04 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 8453ffb849 (tag: 9.3.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.3.beta7
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages,
I failed to report on beta6 for which cypari2 failed to build;
with beta7, cypari2 now builds
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6 with Homebrew and many packages,
running `make` led to an error while building dochtml.
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.2_2/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/runpy.py",
line 188,
Le mer. 24 mars 2021 à 03:14, Matthias Köppe:
>
> We updated Singular. You may have to use "make sagelib-clean"
> to rebuild the Sage library from scratch.
>
> (See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29711 for the issue that
> sagelib does not have proper dependencies on the libraries
> that it
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build cysignals-1.10.2.
Logs:
https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-03-12-s93b8.zip
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this
2021-03-13 17:27 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:00:17 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build cysignals-1.10.2.
>>
>> Logs:
>>
>> https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-03-12-s93b8.zip
>
> From your log:
>
> gcc
2021-03-14 17:53 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 10:48:30 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> 2021-03-13 17:27 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>> > On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:00:17 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>> >> On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build
2021-03-16 01:26 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:42:44 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre:
>>
>> On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
>> ```
>> $ source .homebrew-build-env
>> $ ./bootstrap -q
>> $ ./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url -q
>> ./configure: line
2021-03-16 09:24 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> 2021-03-16 01:26 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
> >
> > On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:42:44 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre:
> >>
> >> On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
> >> ```
> >> $ source .homeb
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
```
$ source .homebrew-build-env
$ ./bootstrap -q
$ ./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url -q
./configure: line 40596: SAGE_SPKG_CONFIGURE_SAGELIB: command not found
configure: WARNING:
Thanks Volker for the new release and Matthias for the overview
of remaining work.
On macOS 10.14.6 with many Homebrew packages, from an
existing SageMath 9.3.rc0, after the following commands:
```
$ source .homebrew-build-env && ./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q
```
the extraneous configure
2021-02-17 12:05 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> 2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel Lelievre:
> > >
> > > 2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre:
> > > >
> > > > On macOS 10.14.6 with lots
2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel Lelievre:
> >
> > 2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre:
> > >
> > > On macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages,
> > > [failed to build linbox]. Logs:
> > >
> > >
2021-02-17 23:06 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:51 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2021-02-17 12:05 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
> > >
> > > 2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel L
2021-08-22 12:04 UTC, Frédéric Chapoton:
>
> Le dimanche 22 août 2021 à 11:01:33 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>>
>> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.5.
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
>> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source
2021-08-12 21:41 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 7282b2b6c6 (trac/develop, tag: 9.4.rc2) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc2
> 79dc8f55f8 Trac #32359: fedora 34: ./configure aborts while checking for
> pari.cfg
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
Thanks for this new release
2021-08-09 12:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.4.rc0 to 9.4.rc1 and running ptestlong
> gives three permanent failures :
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/doctest/test.py # 7
> doctests failed
> sage -t
Volker Braun:
>
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
> because of numpy
> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the
Le sam. 31 juil. 2021 à 01:14, Kenji Iohara:
>
> On my Mac OS 11.5, it compiled perfectly from the first build
> whereas I had some problem ptestlong
> claiming that I don't have Pytest even if
> pytest --version gives me pytest 6.2.4...
Regarding pytest, you probably have it installed
2021-09-21 00:10 UTC, William Stein:
>
> The official non-beta OpenSSL 3.0.0 release just happened. Finally!
Upgrading to it is already positively reviewed:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32499
so Sage 9.5 will have it. Yay! --Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Thanks Volker for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with many packages from
Homebrew: "All tests passed!"
On Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, with many packages:
- Sage 9.5.beta9 fails to build python3-3.9.7 unless
we configure `--with-python3=/usr/bin/python3`
and fails to build
>From a fresh git clone, one of the following two options
is needed to build Sage:
./bootstrap && ./configure && make
make configure && ./configure && make
>From a fresh tarball, the "make configure" is supposed
not to be necessary, as tarballs ship an appropriate
version of configure. You may
Hi,
Regarding the release process, my understanding is Volker works
on a release branch in a different repo; once we see Sage 9.5.beta7 at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/tags
it can be considered as released. It sometimes takes the announcement
a few hours or a day to get posted by Volker
On Cygwin, build failure on sagemath_doc_html-none,
apparently having something to do with Singular.
Details:
https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-11-27-s95b7-cygwin-fail.zip
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To
2021-11-20 10:25 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> cc60cfebc4 (tag: 9.5.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta7
Thanks for this new release!
On Debian 10 buster, using many system packages,
Sage 9.5.beta7 pulled on an existing older develop
built but failed its tests. After `make distclean` though:
2021-10-29 21:42 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> f716a0b366 (tag: 9.5.beta5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta5
Thanks for this new release!
On Debian 10 buster, `make -s V=0 ptestlong` resulted in
doctest failures in two files, after a successful build.
The files which had doctest failures are:
-
2021-10-19 23:07 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 056b8d4e7b (tag: 9.5.beta4) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta4
Thanks for this new development release!
On Cygwin, failed to build SciPy.
I might try #32746 which fixes a similar problem on Fedora.
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32746
--
You
2021-10-27 13:36 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> 2021-10-19 23:07 UTC, Volker Braun:
> >
> > 056b8d4e7b (tag: 9.5.beta4) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta4
>
> Thanks for this new development release!
>
> On Cygwin, SageMath 9.5.beta4 failed to build SciPy.
> I might
2021-07-19 21:24 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> First results from https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3099545203
>
> ubuntu trusty xenial bionic focal groovy hirsute impish
> - clean, with timeouts for some variants, and except for doctest failure in
>
2021-07-23 01:09 UTC, Travis:
>
> If we merge basically all of the tickets with a positive review,
> we probably have enough for a release.
Currently 150 tickets have milestone 9.4 and positive review:
2021-12-25 04:59 UTC, Samuel Lelievre on sage-release:
>
> Thanks Dima and Matthias for your feedback.
> I opened three tickets related to my report:
>
> - #33078: Use system Python 3 on Cygwin
> - #33079: Fix python3 build failure on Cygwin
> - #33080: Fix scipy-3.7.2 build failure on Cygwin
>
>
2022-01-10 04:02 UTC, Matthias Köppe on sage-release:
>
> On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc0
>
> Thanks, Volker, for preparing the first release candidate.
+1
Here is a failure
> On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> 2022-01-10 04:02 UTC, Matthias Köppe on sage-release:
>> >
>> > On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
>> >>
2022-01-13 20:26 UTC, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release:
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 2022, at 03:15 , Volker Braun:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> > branch.
> > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> >
2022-01-14 10:00 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Eric Gourgoulhon:
> >
> > On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
> > - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta8, with system python (3.8.10): OK
> > - make ptestlong --> 2 doctests failed in
2022-01-11 11:31 UTC, Vincent Delecroix on sage-release:
>
> Got a matplotlib related doctest failure in graph plotting
> (via elliptic curves on this example)
Maybe related to this recently opened ticket:
- Sage Trac ticket 33143
Matplotlib update breaks build on debian buster
2022-01-13 23:22 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 3da1b22c25 (tag: 9.5.rc1) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc1
Thanks for this new development release.
On an Acer laptop, on Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, two attempts:
- from a freshly downloaded tarball
- from a fresh git clone
Both attempts failed
2022-01-10 19:05, François Bissey on sage-release:
>
> That one is because a recent gain is used
> see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31563
Probably you typed "a recent giac" and some software on
your computer decided to change that into "a recent gain".
--
You received this message because
2022-03-08 15:25 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.6.beta3 to 9.6.beta4 gives me
> one transient failure (already known) :
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 209.2
> --random-seed=31897748386618397374885466269378290605
>
2022-03-12 16:28 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 55a711e3d6 (tag: 9.6.beta5) Updated SageMath version to 9.6.beta5
Thanks Volker for this new release!
Congratulations on clearing the backlog of positively reviewed tickets:
https://trac.sagemath.org/query?milestone=sage-9.6=positive_review
2022-02-28 00:37 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 1e8ba0aac4 (tag: 9.6.beta3) Updated SageMath version to 9.6.beta3
Thanks for releasing this new beta version.
On Cygwin, tried `make -j4`, and fpylll failed to build.
Perhaps one dependency is not properly indicated?
Running `make` again gave the
2022-02-20 14:30 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 15c8011dd0 (tag: 9.6.beta2) Updated SageMath version to 9.6.beta2
Thanks for this new release.
On Debian 10 buster, one `make ptestlong` gave "all tests passed"
with seed 180869625321339283697396330889120925058.
However other seeds fail due to:
- Sage
2022-03-01 10:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.6.beta1 to 9.6.beta3 and running ptestlong
>gets me one temporary failure :
>
> ... src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py # 1 doctest
> failed
>
> and one
2022-03-03 10:29 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> FWIW, I get exactly the same result on another,
> slightly smaller, machine (Debian testing running
> on core i5 + 8 GB RAM) : temporary failure on
> cycliccover_finite_field.py, permanent failure
> on graph.py, (more moderate) overconsumption
> of
2022-01-30 15:48 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 439907fd9a (tag: 9.5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5
Andrey Novoseltsev reports issues updating SageCell
to use Sage 9.5:
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-cell/c/ttEhExVQQbk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2022-01-30 15:48 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 439907fd9a (tag: 9.5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5
In Cygwin in Windows 10, the build fails for me
on `sagemath_doc_html`, as has been the case
on that machine since Sage 9.5.beta7.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
2022-01-30 15:48 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 439907fd9a (tag: 9.5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5
Thanks Volker for this new release!
On Debian 10 buster, `make -s V=0 ptestlong` fails on two files:
```
... src/sage/features/interfaces.py # Timed out
... src/sage/game_theory/parser.py # 2 doctests
2022-01-14 21:49 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
>
> The failures with the following files are new and are copied below:
>
> SEED=115792415560373440200802359516411195501
> alias sagetest="./sage -t --long --random-seed=$SEED"
> sagetest src/sage/databases/findstat.py # 12 doctests failed
> sagetest
2022-01-16 17:17 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> f9b2db94f6 (tag: 9.5.rc2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc2
Thanks Volker for this new release candidate.
On Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, build fails for me while trying
to build `sagemath_doc_html-none`, with or without ticket #33078,
as
2022-01-21 16:20 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
>
> Thanks Volker for the release. My first try at building with configuration.
>
> The relevant part of logs/pkgs/cryptominisat-5.6.8.log is copied below.
Might be solved by:
- Sage Trac ticket #33183:
Better fix installation of cryptominisat and
2022-01-19 00:05 UTC, Volker Braun on sage-release:
>
> 8ea92d580a (tag: 9.5.rc3, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc3
Thanks Volker!
On Cygwin: failed to build sagemath_doc_html.
On Debian: failed to build sagemath_doc_html.
See the ticket 0 patchbot report for pascaline at
2022-04-28 00:55, David Joyner:
>
> This issue was that I just upgraded ubuntu to 21.10
While you are at it, Ubuntu 22.04 is out! --Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Congratulations to Volker and to all Sage contributors
on the new release.
2023-05-21 01:00 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> I have created a changelog at
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases/tag/10.0
> (automatically generated from the merged PRs by GitHub;
> then lightly edited).
Thanks.
>
The original pull request was merged, so open a new one.
Trac tickets were occasionally reopened but not after
they were merged in a development release.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
101 - 159 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
