Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta1 released

pip should be able to uninstall itself so sage -pip uninstall pip sage -i pip should give you the standard sage version of pip back. I did not test this, so use at your own risk. On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 17:33:50 UTC+2, John Cremona wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 May 2018, 16:26 Erik Bray,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Release process

On Saturday, 12 May 2018 14:10:27 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-05-12 10:31, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > > it could perhaps > > be useful to have additional integration branches where the *reviewer* > > would be supposed to merge a branch when setting the corresponding > > ticket to

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

I created https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24190 for the issue. On Friday, 10 November 2017 13:34:53 UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > Can somebody open a ticket for that issue? > > On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 11:44:43 PM UTC+1, François Bissey wrote: >> >> Smells like

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

Scipy fails to build on the sage4 patchbot (4.4.26-gentoo). Relevant part of the log: [scipy-0.19.1] getarrdims:warning: assumed shape array, using 0 instead of '*' [scipy-0.19.1] getarrdims:warning: assumed shape array, using 0 instead of '*' [scipy-0.19.1]x,y =

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta9 released

Sorry forgot to include the footnote [1] [1] https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/Ubuntu/16.04/x86_64/4.4.0-96-generic/petitbonum/2017-10-22%2018:09:18?short On Sunday, 22 October 2017 21:46:07 UTC+2, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > Some patchbot [1] that build 8.1.beta8 correctly fails to

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta9 released

Some patchbot [1] that build 8.1.beta8 correctly fails to build ipykernel since this release. I created https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24088 for this. Note that ipykernel was upgraded in 24064 so this might be related. Most relevant part of the log: [ipykernel-4.6.1] Traceback (most

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.beta8 released

Please ignore the previous post, I found it in the mean time. For anyone interested, the qepcad issue can be found at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22851 On Friday, 20 October 2017 17:16:07 UTC+2, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > I added #24075 to the known patchbot failures meta

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.beta8 released

I added #24075 to the known patchbot failures meta ticket at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23832 . Do you have a ticket nr for the qepcad ticket for me? On Friday, 20 October 2017 10:41:20 UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote: > > I opened a blocker ticket for the first issue > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.beta8 released

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 at 15:32 Ralf Stephan wrote: > Error downloading giacpy_sage-0.6.6.tar.gz > The servers only have the previous 0.6 version. > Note that the patchbots arando sage4 and quasar are failing to build for the same reason (although rst2ipynb is the package whose

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta6 released

On Ubuntu 14.04 i686 with a lot of optional packages installed sage -t --long src/sage/tests/books/judson-abstract-algebra/actions-sage.py ** File "src/sage/tests/books/judson-abstract-algebra/actions-sage.py", line 115, in

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta5 relesed

Note that all tests pass on the same machine without optional packages. On Friday, 15 September 2017 21:33:43 UTC+2, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > The following tests fail on Ubuntu 16.04 with all optional packages except > > gmp igraph libtheora mpfrcx python_igraph > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.beta5 relesed

The following tests fail on Ubuntu 16.04 with all optional packages except gmp igraph libtheora mpfrcx python_igraph installed. If any of these look familliar to you then links to existing tickets and or mailinglist discussions are highly appreciated. See also

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.beta4 released

Was there already a ticket created for the failing elliptic curves test? One of the patchbots is also having this problem: https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/23739/Gentoo%20Base%20System/2.2/x86_64/4.4.26-gentoo/sage4/2017-09-11%2001:04:17?short On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 01:56:57 UTC+2,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3 released

building Sage... On Monday, August 11, 2014 9:24:34 AM UTC+1, Maarten Derickx wrote: I just compiled the new sage on my new macbook pro (with OS X 10.9). It seems that everything works except for some problems with Pillow / PIL: sage2 maarten$ ./sage -t --long src/sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta6 released

” pynac has to be updated (the source of your problem) and sage -b won’t do that. Francois On 2/04/2014, at 22:00, Maarten Derickx m.derick...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I really like the new git based workflow. It makes it much faster to update my dev version of sage, however

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta4 released

When I tried to build it also failed at singular. ld complains about: symbol dyld_stub_binding_helper not found . Googling for this led me to some not very helpful threads that where mostly about that when you try to compile something for IOS you should set target at least a recent enough

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta4 released

mercredi 19 mars 2014 14:04:16 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : Which version of OSX and Sage, and did you try the branch at the aforementioned ticket? On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 5:41:41 AM UTC-4, Maarten Derickx wrote: When I tried to build it also failed at singular. ld complains about