Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

2022-03-27 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 02:37:20 UTC, Marc Culler on sage-release: > That worked like a charm! > > * frame #0: 0x83c0f9024900 > frame #1: 0x000153ff8b7c > _dop.cpython-39-darwin.so`PyFortranObject_New > + 40 > frame #2: 0x000153ff66fc

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc4 released

2022-01-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2022-01-24 21:20 UTC, Volker Braun on sage-release: > > 97d550d15c (tag: 9.5.rc4, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc4 On Debian 10 buster, occasional `sagemath_doc_html` failure, tracked at - Sage Trac ticket 33139 Fix sagemath_doc_html-none build failure

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

2022-01-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Fixing links in my previous post, thanks Frédéric's tip at https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/t3ZRCJ5coPU/m/6AJxsCxfBQAJ 2022-01-23 à 17:57:38 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit : > 2022-01-22 13:05:04 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre on sage-release: > >> >> On Cygwin: failed to build sagemath_doc_html.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

2022-01-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2022-01-19 00:05:13 UTC, Volker Braun on sage-release: > > 8ea92d580a (tag: 9.5.rc3, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc3 On Ubuntu 21.10, the build succeeded but 5 doctests failed in `src/sage/modules/free_module_integer.py`. I don't know whether that failure is already tracked.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

2022-01-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2022-01-22 13:05:04 UTC, Samuel Lelievre on sage-release: > > On Cygwin: failed to build sagemath_doc_html. > > On Debian: failed to build sagemath_doc_html. > See the ticket 0 patchbot report for pascaline at > https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/ On Debian (but not o

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta9 released

2021-12-24 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thanks Dima and Matthias for your feedback. I opened three tickets related to my report: - #33078: Use system Python 3 on Cygwin - #33079: Fix python3 build failure on Cygwin - #33080: Fix scipy-3.7.2 build failure on Cygwin Tried applying #33055, which did not seem to help with the Python 3

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-10-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2021-10-30 18:34:21 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier: > > After rebuilding and reinstalling the same (really) > optional packages, `ptestlong` gets exactly one > (reproducible) failure, i. e. the one reported by > Samuel Lelièvre. > > I am at loss as to why I needed to rebuild 9.5 > from sratch instead

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released

2021-09-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2021-09-14 22:50:30 UTC, Volker Braun: > > c349c87d0d (tag: 9.5.beta1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > 9.5.beta1 > Thanks for this new release. In Cygwin 3.2.0 in Windows 10: ```bash $ export MAKE='make -j4' && ./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q && make -s V=0 && make -s V=0

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta6 released

2021-07-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thanks for this new release! On macOS 10.14.6 with many Homebrew packages installed, starting from a working previous beta release, Sage 9.4.beta6 builds and passes all but one doctests. ``` $ git pull origin develop --tags -q && git branch -v * develop 8bae3ff7ad Updated SageMath version

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc1 released

2021-04-01 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thanks for this new release. Would a ticket upgrading to the latest OpenSSL still be considered for Sage 9.3? Or should we just strongly encourage users to install OpenSSL via some package manager and build Sage from source using that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta7 released

2021-02-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre: > > On macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages, > [failed to build linbox]. Logs: > > https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-02-08-s93b7-brew.zip > > I'll try #31355. Same failure to build linbox after applying

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta1 released

2020-12-08 Thread Samuel Lelievre
hon3 > from system or homebrew. config.log contains the > relevant information why the system python3 is > rejected by Sage. > > Fri 2020-11-20 00:42:07 UTC Samuel Lelievre: >> >> >> > From: Volker >> > Subject: Sage 9.3.beta1 released >> > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta1 released

2020-11-19 Thread Samuel Lelievre
> From: Volker > Subject: Sage 9.3.beta1 released > > 222059565b (tag: 9.3.beta1, trac/develop) > Updated SageMath version to 9.3.beta1 Thanks for this new release! All tests passed here when running `make testlong` (more detail below), but I could not install JupyterLab. Setup - macOS

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2 released

2020-11-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-11-03 09:57:12 UTC, Jonathan: > > There no windows binaries for 9.2 yet. Maybe there > is a reason for it, but I should wanted to post that. > It's being worked on. It's not unusual that preparing Windows binaries for a new Sage version takes a few days to a few weeks. New releases of

[sage-release] Re: info

2020-10-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le samedi 24 octobre 2020 10:13:29 UTC+2, HG a écrit: > > Yesterday no one pip version worked ? I am on ubuntu 20.10 > which should get out in few days, I did a do-release-upgrade -d > > This morning I was trying pip : > > $ sudo -H pip3 install sage > Requirement already satisfied: sage

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc0 released

2020-10-07 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Volker Braun wrote: > > f6250c2682 (tag: 9.2.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.2.rc0 Thanks for this new release! I tried this: - Sage 9.2.rc0 + #30589 (Use Python 3.9.0) on two systems: - Debian 10 buster - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with Homebrew Things look good. Only two

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-10-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-09-21 09:23:54 UTC, Samuel Lelievre: > > > This is now: > > - Sage Trac ticket 30624 > Improve configure's recommendation message > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30624 > > I don't have time to work on it now. > Update: I pushed a branch. Ne

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-21 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le lundi 21 septembre 2020 04:40:57 UTC+2, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 10:05:59 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre > wrote: > >> [...] what we should do about it is probably adapt the wording >> to better convey that. For instance

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-09-16 09:51:38 UTC, Eric Gourgoulhon: > > On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM: > > - build (-j8) from a fresh git clone with a maximum of system > packages (details below), including the system Python (3.8.2): OK > - all tests from ptestlong passed > > Details of

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-11 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-09-11 22:31:21 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:16 PM Samuel Lelievre: >> >> I'll reinstall gcc@9 and python@3.7 and try again. > > but why, install gcc (i.g. gcc@10), Sage now accepts it. > Probably you want to configure with CC=clang CXX=c

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-11 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le vendredi 11 septembre 2020 05:55:47 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : > > > > Le jeudi 10 septembre 2020 19:15:43 UTC+2, Matthias Köppe a écrit : >> >> On Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 10:08:32 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre >> wrote: >>> >>> On a

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le jeudi 10 septembre 2020 19:15:43 UTC+2, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > On Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 10:08:32 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre > wrote: >> >> On a MacBook Air (early 2014) with >> macOS 10.14.6 Mojave, with Homebrew >> (but having removed Homebr

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-19 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-08-19 12:43:58 UTC, Sébastien Labbé: > > Testing with various optional and external packages, I get: > [...] > Speaking of optional packages, could someone review - Sage Trac ticket 30390: Fix PyPI url https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30390 -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta8 released

2020-08-13 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-08-13 21:59:31 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > OK, I tried to reproduce this on a Mac, and indeed the build hangs > waiting for some parallel process to finish: > On hitting ctrl-C, it always (the stage of the docbuild may differ though) > shows the following backtrace: > ... > [dochtml]

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta8 released

2020-08-13 Thread Samuel Lelievre
I opened a ticket for the issue reported by John: - Fix building html documentation on macOS https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30351 I tried applying #30345 but the problem persisted. Then I realised Dima mentioned #30345 in relation to timeouts when running make testalllong on Debian, not in

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-07-29 08:39:13 UTC, François Bissey: > > The important bits from that last log > [198/517] creating build/[...]/build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb > [...] > In file included from build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb/arith.c:656: > In file included from build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb/arb_wrap.h:14: > In

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-07-26 20:46:10 UTC, Matthias Köppe: > > From your log: > > [ 4/517] clang -Wno-unused-result [...] > -I/opt/s/sage92b6/local/include/singular > -I/opt/s/sage92b6/local/include/ -std=c++11 > In file included from [...]/letterplace_ideal.cpp:675: >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta3 released

2020-07-08 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-07-08 07:14:54 UTC, Eric Gourgoulhon: > > 2020-07-07 22:56:55 UTC, Justin C. Walker: >> >> >> So today, I dutifully did the same thing (for beta3). However, >> once getting the repository in place, there was no “./configure”. > > You should run > > make configure > > first. In other words,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta1 released (fplll on ARM problem?)

2020-06-24 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-01-26 18:37:59 UTC, Martin Albrecht: > > Sorry, I have no idea about this. But indeed, we never test on ARM. > Feel free to open an issue on FPLLL’s issue tracker but I’m not sure > there’s much we can do without a machine to test things on. I opened this issue:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.rc3 released

2020-05-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Wed 2020-05-06 19:35:12 UTC, Jonathan Kliem: > > Thank you Samuel Lelievre and Emmanuel Charpentier > for testing. Your doctests failures are known: > > If pari 2.11.4 is installed on the system > If you use glpk from your system, > If you have libsqlite3 but not sqli

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.rc1 released

2020-04-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le samedi 25 avril 2020 18:15:55 UTC+2, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 9:02:42 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> >> 1. The 'configure' step suggested to `brew install ppl` >> even though I already had Homebrew's ppl. [...] >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.rc1 released

2020-04-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
> Date: Wed 2020-04-22 22:41:50 UTC > From: Volker Braun > Subject: Sage 9.1.rc1 released Thanks for this new development release. On macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with lots of Homebrew packages installed, failed to build Pillow. Logs: https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/sage3logs.zip -- You

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.rc0 released

2020-04-14 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le lundi 13 avril 2020 17:35:58 UTC+2, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > On Sunday, April 12, 2020 at 3:37:55 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.rc0 released

2019-12-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
8, 2019 at 8:12:31 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> Thu 2019-12-26 à 23:24 UTC, Volker Braun: >> > >> > 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to >> 9.0.rc0 >> >> >> Computer, OS, build choices: >> >>

[sage-release] Re: [sage-support] Changelog for Sage?

2019-11-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
So far Jeroen was taking care of this after each release. It's a matter of running a script and checking that there are no typos in author names and reviewer names. Would anyone want to relieve him of that responsibility? Thu 2019-10-17 13:32:49 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > any idea why no release

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta2 released

2019-10-24 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sun 2019-10-19 22:33:17 UTC, Volker Braun: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" > git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > > 76b7fdd115 (tag: 9.0.beta2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta7 released

2019-08-27 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le mardi 27 août 2019 22:04:42 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > > > I reinstalled my openssl which looks recent: > > (sage-sh) $ openssl version > OpenSSL 1.1.1b 26 Feb 2019 > > But this does not fix the issue. > After installing openssl, you need to force-reinstall python. sage -f python2

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc3 released

2019-06-28 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Also, pdf chapters of the SageMath documentation tend to rank quite high among results for web search engine queries about Sage. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.beta7 released

2019-06-01 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sat 2019-06-01 06:29:44 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:25 AM Frédéric Chapoton: > > > > Do we plan to distribute also a python3-version of > > sage 8.8 (binaries) ? Of course, some tests are still > > not passing, but sage works nevertheless. > > IMHO it is too early. > Some

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

2018-11-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2018-11-26 03:21:58 UTC+1, Steven Trogdon: > > Something rather weird here. I'm unable to complete a pull of the latest > 8.5.beta5 because of > > Updating f894105d0d..b36eca1990 > error: unable to unlink old 'docker/entrypoint.sh': Permission denied > > Now entrypoint.sh is owned by root

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta4 released

2018-11-21 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Tue 2018-11-20 11:45:15 UTC+1, Martin R: > The findstat doctest is a trivial fix (remove the first useless ellipsis), > if you open a ticket, I'll fix it immediately. Ticket at: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26728 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.4.beta7 released

2018-10-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thu 2018-10-04, 11:12:29 UTC+2, Erik Bray: > > Sometimes when I run the tests I get failures like: > > sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/cluster_algebra_quiver/quiver.py > ** > File

[sage-release] Re: sage-8.4

2018-08-07 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le mardi 7 août 2018 07:56:41 UTC+2, HG a écrit : > > > I have an old computer intel dual core with 4 Go RAM, I have cosmic > (ubuntu +1 =18.10) installed and I tried compiling the sage 8.4 version, > no problem after a night compilation... ok. > Hi Henri, thanks for the information. To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta1 released

2018-05-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Under macOS 10.10.5, after downloading the cysignals patch https://github.com/sagemath/cysignals /commit/daef81e2fc111378ccc58b3f572eb18c70753a30.patch into build/pkgs/cysignals/patches both the build+docbuild of Python2-based Sage and the build+nodocbuild of Python3-based Sage were

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta1 released

2017-12-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2017-12-17 20:06:46 UTC, Justin C. Walker: > > Built w/o problems from fresh clone/pull of “develop” branch, > on macOS 10.11.6 (Quad-core Core i7). > > Testing (‘ptestlong’) yielded two failures that persisted when run by itself. > Later, I tried this “by hand” (copying the sage commands

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.6.beta2 released

2017-02-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le samedi 4 février 2017 14:41:49 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:55:00 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> Should 'make ptestlong' ignore the content of 'init.sage'? >> > > Yes. > Note that there is a ticket fo

[sage-release] Re: Conda package for Sage

2017-02-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sun 2017-02-05 13:27:02 UTC+1, Isuru Fernando: > I've packaged sage 7.5.1 for conda for linux and have uploaded it to anaconda.org. > > To try it out you can do on linux with miniconda3, (Downloads about 1 GB) > > conda create -n sage sage sage-spkg-sources -c isuruf -c conda-forge > > This

[sage-release] Re: Reverting blacklisting of GCC 4.8 (#20231)

2016-05-19 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-05-13 11:15:02 UTC+2, Christian Stump: > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 9:35:35 PM UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: >> >> +1 for still supporting GCC 4.8 for a while (unless it's very >> troublesome): this is the GCC version of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, which is >> officially supported until April

[sage-release] Re: Sage Fedora RPM

2016-02-04 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-02-04 23:30:12 Z, Volker Braun: > > I'm working automating distribution packaging with our binary builds. > There is now an experimental sage rpm package for Fedora 23 at > > http://files.sagemath.org/linux/64bit/sagemath-7.1.beta1-1.x86_64.rpm > > The rpm installs to /opt/SageMath and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.0 released

2016-02-04 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-01-31 23:39:30 Z, Justin C. Walker: > > > On Jan 31, 2016, at 15:23 , Volker Braun wrote: > > > Is that a parallel build? the mashed-together log isn't very meaningful. > > Yes it is (-j24; Dual 6-core Xeons). > > With any luck, you will find a tarball of the logs directory attached. >

[sage-release] Re: Sage developers days on packaging, portability, documentation tools

2016-02-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
The upcoming Sage developer days at Cernay on packaging, portability, documentation tools are now numbered "Sage Days 77". https://wiki.sagemath.org/days77 The dates should be decided by next week-end, it's still time to indicate your preferred dates at

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0 virtual appliance

2016-01-27 Thread Samuel Lelievre
I think updating the instructions to use the SageAppliance on Windows is an emergency. I remember reading that the Windows version is by far the top download. It's annoying for users when things break. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release"

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:43:54 -0800 (PST), Volker Braun: > Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new > binary packaging. That is, now binaries are patched > automatically on first run, no more relocation after that. Thank you for that. On a MacBook Air running OS X 10.10.5, I downloaded

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.beta1 released

2015-02-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2015-02-23 10:40:06 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik: On 2015-02-23, John Cremona john.c...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: On 22 February 2015 at 22:27, Volker Braun vbrau...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Looks like your system git is incompatible with the Sage libcrypto and the dev scripts