As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
e6cae6d88d (tag: 8.2.beta5, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
8.2.beta5
9dd4282d36 Trac #24660: Memory leak i
Note that from this release a fresh build on OS X will use clang.
Building gcc and using it can be triggered with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes
as usual.
Incremental upgrade will continue to use the previously configured compiler.
Feedback on optional packages that are broken by the move appreciated.
Franç
So how to use clang on Linux?
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:36 AM François Bissey wrote:
> Note that from this release a fresh build on OS X will use clang.
> Building gcc and using it can be triggered with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes
> as usual.
> Incremental upgrade will continue to use the previously con
> On 9/02/2018, at 23:03, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> So how to use clang on Linux?
CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
Adjust to the peculiarity of your install in terms of PATH and compiler
names.
François
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" gro
An incremental build from previous beta fails on gfortran :
[gfortran-7.2.0] Found local metadata for gfortran-7.2.0
[gfortran-7.2.0] Using cached file
/home/chapoton/sage/upstream/gcc-7.2.0.tar.xz
[gfortran-7.2.0] gfortran-7.2.0
[gfortran-7.2.0] ==
Which version of ubuntu? We have seen an instance of that problem during review
but we thought it was fixed. OK, there was something nagging me but it looked
fixed on the patchbot.
> On 9/02/2018, at 23:56, fchapot...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> An incremental build from previous beta fails on gfortran
ubuntu 17.10. There is also at least one patchbot having the same issue, see
https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/
Le vendredi 9 février 2018 12:02:28 UTC+1, François Bissey a écrit :
>
> Which version of ubuntu? We have seen an instance of that problem during
> review
> but we thought it was
Actually if you have the autotools packages installed (from the system or sage)
can you try
autoreconf -i
then re-run configure and see if that fix it.
> On 10/02/2018, at 00:02, François Bissey wrote:
>
> Which version of ubuntu? We have seen an instance of that problem during
> review
> but
I did a make distclean and make. Everything built smoothly.
Le vendredi 9 février 2018 12:10:40 UTC+1, François Bissey a écrit :
>
> Actually if you have the autotools packages installed (from the system or
> sage)
> can you try
> autoreconf -i
> then re-run configure and see if that fix it.
On 2018-02-09 11:56, fchapot...@gmail.com wrote:
An incremental build from previous beta fails on gfortran :
Please do
touch configure.ac && make build
and send me the full output.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscr
I sent something at your lri adress.
Le vendredi 9 février 2018 13:52:24 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> On 2018-02-09 11:56, fchap...@gmail.com wrote:
> > An incremental build from previous beta fails on gfortran :
>
> Please do
>
> touch configure.ac && make build
>
> and send me the fu
I think I understand why this might happen:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24694
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googl
On 2018-02-09 12:02, François Bissey wrote:
We have seen an instance of that problem during review
but we thought it was fixed.
That was a different issue. While the error message was the same, the
underlying reason was different.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Trying clang on Linux, after make distclean fails in giac but I'm not sure
if my installation is the reason. TLDR:
./index.h:571:11: error: no template named 'hash_map' in namespace 'std';
did you mean '__gnu_cxx::hash_map'?
giac compile log is attached
--
You received this message because you a
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24696
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:35 PM Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Trying clang on Linux, after make distclean fails in giac but I'm not sure
> if my installation is the reason. TLDR:
> ./index.h:571:11: error: no template named 'hash_map' in namespace 'std';
I have a build failure in subprocess32 on a python3 build (using export
SAGE_PYTHON3=yes)
[subprocess32-3.2.7] Found local metadata for subprocess32-3.2.7
[subprocess32-3.2.7] Attempting to download package
subprocess32-3.2.7.tar.gz from mirrors
[subprocess32-3.2.7]
http://www.mirrorservice.or
OK, that’s a slightly different issue. I didn’t think that would be a problem
but this
package shouldn’t be needed with python3.2+ since it is a backport of
functionality for
older python. So it would be best not to install it with python3.
> On 10/02/2018, at 05:55, fchapot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2018-02-09 17:55, fchapot...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a build failure in subprocess32 on a python3 build (using export
SAGE_PYTHON3=yes)
Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24650
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsu
Volker, it would be great (and I would appreciate) if you could set up a
buildbot that checks that sage builds with python3. One can not yet say
that vanilla-sage builds and starts with "export SAGE_PYTHON3=yes", but at
least it builds (since some time already). Starting is another matter, but
Can you first set up a makefile target that is supposed to be tested? E.g.
"make test-python3" builds with py3 and eventually gets extended to test
things that already work?
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 9:15:04 PM UTC+1, fchap...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Volker, it would be great (and I would ap
This is way above my understanding of "make" matters. So help from Erik or
Jeroen or whoever is knowledgeable in this kind of things, is required.
Le vendredi 9 février 2018 21:24:34 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> Can you first set up a makefile target that is supposed to be tested? E.g.
>
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 00:25 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Yay for using clang!
Built from a fresh clone/checkout of
We didn’t test clang 3.7 which is what your machine is using at OS X 10.11.
But I recognised the error as one I got in the same place when I tried a build
with icc on linux. Yes that’s a fun bit I haven’t mentioned yet.
You can technically try any compiler that pretends to be gcc - but only clang
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 10:32:49 PM UTC-5, François Bissey wrote:
>
> We didn’t test clang 3.7 which is what your machine is using at OS X
> 10.11.
Would that be the same as this one? I also have 10.11.
$ clang --version
Apple LLVM version 7.3.0 (clang-703.0.31)
Target: x86_64-appl
> On 10/02/2018, at 18:06, kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 10:32:49 PM UTC-5, François Bissey wrote:
> We didn’t test clang 3.7 which is what your machine is using at OS X 10.11.
>
> Would that be the same as this one? I also have 10.11.
>
> $ clang --version
>
> Apple LL
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 19:32 , François Bissey wrote:
>
> We didn’t test clang 3.7 which is what your machine is using at OS X 10.11.
> But I recognised the error as one I got in the same place when I tried a build
> with icc on linux. Yes that’s a fun bit I haven’t mentioned yet.
> You can techni
> On 10/02/2018, at 19:40, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> Thanks for this. I have
>
> Apple LLVM version 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81)
> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
> Thread model: posix
>
> Is there a fairly straight-forward way to get Apple’s clang at what you're
> calling 3.8?
Can you ins
After building with clang on OpenSuSE two dozen doctests fail, all due to
segfault in linbox:
File "sage/matrix/matrix_modn_sparse.pyx", line 730, in
sage.matrix.matrix_modn_sparse.Matrix_modn_sparse._rank_linbox
(build/cythonized/sage/matrix/matrix_modn_sparse.c:9008)
sig_on()
S
28 matches
Mail list logo
