I'd advise to use the "show" command instead of the plot command and
try a show(figsize=[20,20]) ( keep all your other options inside ) !
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googleg
dear Ram
Follow the link http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact .I hope it answer
your queries.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:41 PM, ram.rac...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there something in Sage like Mathematica's `Interact`? For example,
> I want to have a graph, and a slider, and when I move the s
Is there something in Sage like Mathematica's `Interact`? For example,
I want to have a graph, and a slider, and when I move the slider, it
makes some change to the graph in real-time.
Possible?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Well, I didn't get around to trying the patch. But I just downloaded
and tried 4.2.1. Now I get exactly what Ivan Andrus is seeing here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d11b3c29f052c830
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
Unfortunately the default graphs turn out to be too small for the size
of the labels
Is there a canonical way to draw a Graph at (say) twice the default
size while
retaining the size of the edge labels?
I noticed that there is a 'dpi' option for the associate plot object
but that changes
the
Thank you!
With these options I get decent looking graphs.
On Nov 21, 2:19 am, William Stein wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Kazuo Thow
> Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [sage-support] Problems with Graphs
> To: William Stein
> Cc: Kevin Clark
>
> Mi
In the context of compiling sage from source ( 4.1.2 and 4.2.1 on 32bit
Debian Stable gcc-4.3.2 and 4.2.6) I find the wiki() function at the sage:
prompt raises error and no wiki -page appears.
sage: wiki()
/home/angeli/sage-4.1.2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin/user.py:9:
DeprecationW
Done it, too.
On Nov 21, 3:32 am, Ajay Rawat wrote:
> Done!
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello Sage Community!
>
> > Last fall I made a survey about Sage. It gave us some insight about
> > who is using Sage, Sage's weak points and strength and al
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kazuo Thow
Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [sage-support] Problems with Graphs
To: William Stein
Cc: Kevin Clark
Michel,
There's an option in the plot() function, edge_labels, which is set to
False by default. If you use
> G=DiGr
Michel wrote:
> I am trying to use the Graph functionality in sage but it does not
> quite work.
>
> I do
>
> G=DiGraph({0: {2: '3*x^2'}, 1: {0: '3/x'}, 2: {1: '6*x^2'}})
> G.show()
>
> A pgn viewer pops up showing the graph indeed. However:
>
> (a) The vertex labels are cropped.
> (b) No edge
I ended up following your suggestions, downloading the readline and
libreadline-dev libraries, and compiling Sage from source. So far all
seems good!
Thanks,
Alasdair
On Nov 19, 3:20 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Nov 18, 7:31 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Alasdair,
>
> > On Wed, Nov 18
I'm wondering if anyone is using SAGE on a cluster. I recall something
about dSAGE a while back, is that still being supported?
I see on the tutorial there's something about using mpiPy with SAGE.
If I install SAGE on each of my compute nodes, is mpiPy already
included? Do I have to setup mp
Dear Simon,
On Nov 20, 2:19 pm, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Luis!
>
> First, I would produce a clone of Sage, in order to not destroy your
> installation by mistake. So, in the shell, do
> sage -clone work
> where you can replace "work" by another word that you like (except
> "main").
>
> (...)
Th
I am trying to use the Graph functionality in sage but it does not
quite work.
I do
G=DiGraph({0: {2: '3*x^2'}, 1: {0: '3/x'}, 2: {1: '6*x^2'}})
G.show()
A pgn viewer pops up showing the graph indeed. However:
(a) The vertex labels are cropped.
(b) No edge labels are shown.
Am I doing somethin
I am trying to use the Graph functionality in sage but it does not
quite work.
I do
G=DiGraph({0: {2: '3*x^2'}, 1: {0: '3/x'}, 2: {1: '6*x^2'}})
G.show()
A pgn viewer pops up showing the graph indeed. However:
(a) The vertex labels are cropped.
(b) No edge labels are shown.
Am I doing somethin
I am trying to use the Graph functionality in sage but it does not
quite work.
I do
G=DiGraph({0: {2: '3*x^2'}, 1: {0: '3/x'}, 2: {1: '6*x^2'}})
G.show()
A pgn viewer pops up showing the graph indeed. However:
(a) The vertex labels are cropped.
(b) No edge labels are shown.
Am I doing somethin
Thanks, William. I'll check that out.
Also, for those interested in the bug i reported, i'd like to rephrase
the description of my situation, because i stated it a little
confusingly above. Take two. I have a big symbolic expression E
involving lots of derivatives. I want to replace the deriva
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On Nov 19, 5:31 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
>
>> sage: assume(n, 'odd')
>> sage: assumptions()
>> [n is odd]
>> sage: foo=sin((-1)*n*pi)
>> sage: foo.simplify()
>> 0
>> sage: forget(n, 'odd')
>> sage: assumptions()
>> []
>> sage: foo=sin((-1)*n*pi)
Hi Luis!
On 20 Nov., 19:10, finotti wrote:
...
> I know that Sage developers have different priorities, but this is
> sort of important to me...
Definitely polynomials *are* a priority for some developers...
> So, is there a way I can redefine how Sage
> computes powers of polynomials in charac
Hi,
On Oct 20, 1:16 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> Interesting point, I've madehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7253
I know that Sage developers have different priorities, but this is
sort of important to me... So, is there a way I can redefine how Sage
computes powers of polynomials in
On Nov 20, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Jorge E. ´Sanchez Sanchez wrote:
> Thank you very much Robert,
>
>I recently upgrade my Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 and because I have no
> problems with my binary Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09
> installation I thought I could stay with it, (last time I up
Thank you very much Robert,
I recently upgrade my Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 and because I have no problems
with my binary Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 installation I
thought I could stay with it, (last time I upgrade sage I had too many problems
with other spkg's I had working, whic
Done!
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> Hello Sage Community!
>
> Last fall I made a survey about Sage. It gave us some insight about
> who is using Sage, Sage's weak points and strength and also new
> project ideas. This year I want to repeat it. Everyone - just
>
On Nov 19, 5:31 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
> sage: assume(n, 'odd')
> sage: assumptions()
> [n is odd]
> sage: foo=sin((-1)*n*pi)
> sage: foo.simplify()
> 0
> sage: forget(n, 'odd')
> sage: assumptions()
> []
> sage: foo=sin((-1)*n*pi)
> sage: foo.simplify()
> 0
I'm guessing that Sage punts to Maxima
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Did the upgrade still work for you?
> Mine ended normally, but if I start the notebook and want to do
> something, I get the message that maxima could not be started. I'll have
> to compile from source (again).
Try forcing rebuilding of th
Did the upgrade still work for you?
Mine ended normally, but if I start the notebook and want to do
something, I get the message that maxima could not be started. I'll have
to compile from source (again). I just don't get it why the upgrade
hardly ever works form me, while I hear from others tha
At some point overnight the process which I thought had hung must have
revived itself and finished, since I left it running and when I came
in this morning I had a running sage server! It's hard to tell how
long it took, but at least an hour as far as I can tell.
John
On 19 Nov, 17:35, John Crem
27 matches
Mail list logo
