:
> Can you share the output of the following command?
>
> conda list -n sagetest
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 6:24 PM Robert Parini wrote:
>
>> Using conda on macOS 12.4 (with Apple silicon) I get the attached error
>> after installing sage with:
>>
>&
Using conda on macOS 12.4 (with Apple silicon) I get the attached error after
installing sage with:
conda create -n sagetest sage
conda activate sagetest
sage
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
r 5, 2019 at 1:43:23 AM UTC-8, Robert Samal wrote:
>
> I noticed the following strange behavior of
> graph6_string()/sparse6_string() functions of graphs:
>
> sage: K2=graphs.CompleteGraph(2)
> sage: P=K2.cartesian_product(K2)
>
> sage: print(P.sparse6_string())
> sage
I noticed the following strange behavior of
graph6_string()/sparse6_string() functions of graphs:
sage: K2=graphs.CompleteGraph(2)
sage: P=K2.cartesian_product(K2)
sage: print(P.sparse6_string())
sage: print(Graph(P.graph6_string()).sparse6_string())
:CoKN
:Cci
To explain: I understand,
I observed the following weird behavior of the symbolic engine.
sage: x/x
1
sage: x^2/x
x
sage: (x^2+x)/x
(x^2 + x)/x
sage: assume(x>0)
sage: assume(x,'real')
sage: assumptions()
[x > 0, x is real]
sage: (x^2+x)/x
(x^2 + x)/x
To clarify: first, I consider the first two simplifications slightly
Indeed it works in Sage 8.4.
Thanks!
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 8:34:41 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> This got broken in Sage 8.5.
> (still works in 8.4)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:09 AM David Joyner > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed,
Sorry, F=GF(3), I made my original example shorter and didn't read it
properly.
So the full problematic code is
B=matrix(GF(3), 2,2,[1,0,1,0], sparse=True)
v=vector(GF(3), [1,1])
B.solve_right(v)
Thanks,
Robert
On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 5:17:59 PM UTC-7, Robert Samal wrote:
>
>
I am trying to solve a rather large linear systems of equations of GF(3).
As the matrices are sparse, I thought that adding "sparse=True" to the
constructor of the matrix could be of help. However, I ran to a strange
error message.
B=matrix(GF(3), 2,2,[1,0,1,0], sparse=True)
v=vector(F,
Hi, Dima; thanks for taking the time to help out a noob -- again.
This is what I did:
sage: a,b,y,z=var('a,b,y,z')
sage: p=z*x^2+x^2-(x^2+y^2)*(a*x-2*b*y)+z*y^2+y^2
sage: type(p)
The book says that I should be able to do this:
sage: p.collect(x).collect(y)
And get this in return:
sage:
me other strange default.--Rob
On 5/10/18, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote:
> On 2018-05-10 19:38, Robert Gross wrote:
>> I have aliased cp to "cp -i" and "mv" to "mv -i".
>
> What do you mean this *exactly*?
>
> --
> You receiv
On 5/9/18, I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mac OS 10.13.4. Upgrade from 8.1 to 8.2. Hangs at
>
> [ncurses-6.0.p0] config.status: creating include/ncurses_cfg.h
>
> This happened when I used "sage --upgrade" and it occurs again with "sage
> -i ncurses".
Same happened building from scratch. The relevant
iliar with, has its own plotting code, dunno about
Sage, in any event just reusing the splitting algorithm isn't any big
deal.
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and s
k we (Maxima project) should dump it.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To pos
n(3*x)+3*sin(x))/24
Obviously the presence of 'false' is a bug.
If you can make a bug report in the Maxima bug tracker, that would very
helpful. https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs
By the way I am working with Maxima 5.40+ (almost 5.41).
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because yo
e, to prevent
that conversion. That causes trouble, given the widespread implicit
assumption about exact numbers.
It's a bug of course -- perhaps you can submit a bug report to:
http://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs
but you can work around it by setting keepfloat to false, or writing 1/5
instead
real part of an expression. Consider:
sage: y = var('y')
sage: assume(x, 'real')
sage: assume(y, 'real')
sage: log(x+I*y).real_part()
log(abs(x + I*y))
Best,
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from th
))?
Best,
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sa
ceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3280 for a related bug.
HTH
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
T
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
run into a similar error with the next call to a Maxima function.
Sorry I can't be more helpful,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an ema
msy but not incorrect.
HTH in some way.
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
I guess I'm also assuming that Sage punts to Maxima for real() here. But
integral_numerical is probably not calling Maxima, right?
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
I tried as an experiment) introduces its own problems though.
That exposes some bugs in gruntz, and also some results which are
different, so it would be necessary to trawl through them and verify
that they're correct.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
e same for domain:real and
domain:complex).
Reported as: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3126/
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
f627fec5000)
On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 6:38:53 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Can you tell us more about what eog links to?
>
> $ sage -sh command -v eog
> /usr/bin/eog
> $ sage -sh ldd /usr/bin/eog # adjust path as necessary
>
> Also, are you overridin
this directly in Maxima, the equation is
solved in both cases. (I assume that Sage calls Maxima to solve
equations; is that right?) Heaven knows Maxima has 1 bug in which
results depend on the names of variables, but I guess this isn't
one of them.
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because
I assume you meant
sage: v = P(5)
sage: v(oo)
A positive finite number
This is because the elements of QQ coerce to the parent of oo, which
is the signed infinity ring. This is so we have
sage: P.x = PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: w = x + 5
sage: v = w - x
w(1.0)
6.00
sage: v(1.0)
Fixes to the source files?
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 3:23:10 AM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote:
I built a new binary. Harald, can you replace the F21 binary with the new
one on the mirrors?
buildbot@build:~$ md5sum
binaries/sage-6.4.1-x86_64-Linux-Fedora_21_x86_64.tar.gz
sage -upgrade from 6.2 error on Fedora 19. Running in a root window
upgrade terminates with a permission error
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
I think the Mathematica interface is still broken. I'm looking into what it
would take to fix it.
What kind of sage object are we talking about?
On Sunday, 21 December 2014 17:01:47 UTC-5, Shane Scott wrote:
Am I correct in thinking the sage-mathematica interface is still broken?
If
on it, for the record.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
decidable to Maxima, you can get a
partially-evaluated conditional, but not a partially-evaluated
loop (triggers an error), and various programming functions (e.g.
length, first, integerp) might act in an unexpected way. This, too,
hasn't caused trouble, from what I remember.
FWIW
Robert Dodier
--
You
(-1,-log(2))
(%i7) %, numer;
(%o7) 1.273097216447114
(%i8) quad_qags (foo, x, 2, 3);
(%o8) [1.273097216447114,1.413421842285782E-14,21,0]
Looks like Maxima handles the definite and indefinite integrals as
expected. Or perhaps I have misunderstood the problem?
Hope this helps,
Robert
this clear above. Is this a bug, or am I
missing something?
This is a bug. If you have time, can you please report it to the
Maxima bug tracker: http://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support
I do find this behavior quite surprising--diameter should be an alias
for either relative or absolute diameter, not depending on the
interval.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:44 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to use the Real Interval Field (RIF), which in principle
does
);
mat_function (log, mymatrix);
For large, numerical matrices, I'm sure linalg.logm is much faster.
But for small or nonnumerical matrices, maybe Maxima is useful.
Hope this helps,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe
range of problems). But I find that Maxima's
'to_poly_solve' can solve it. Maybe someone here can say how to
call it from Sage.
In fact, the solution is: w=t+t^2
Are you sure? Assuming some value for t, plotting the expression
doesn't seem to show a solution at w = t + t^2.
best
Robert Dodier
://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
Am 08.10.2014 um 11:54 schrieb fbotana:
Nevertheless, it seems that QEPCAD is not anymore installed/working. Try
http://sagecell.sagemath.org/?q=xlgebu
That's a pity. I was using it [1], but I didn't find the time to learn
how to fix (and update) the broken [2] qepcad spkg.
Robert
[1] https
Installed pre-compiled Sage-6.3.app on Mac OS X 10.9.5
At startup of Terminal Session, there is this
~$ /Applications/Sage-6.3.app/Contents/Resources/sage/sage; exit
sys:1: RuntimeWarning: not adding directory '' to sys.path since everybody
can write to it.
Untrusted users could put files in
On 2014-09-20, Kristoffer Ryhl-Johansen kristofferr...@gmail.com wrote:
f(x)=log(1-x)*log(1+x)/(1+x)
f.integrate(x,0,1)
Produces a segfault when I run it on my ubuntu 14.04 computer
Fixed by Maxima commit f7921c5265 (bug in Risch code).
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message
packages loaded by
abs_integrate, but that doesn't seem to be the case; so I guess the
problem is triggered by abs_integrate itself.
I will try to investigate some more. If someone files a bug report,
that will help us track it. http://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs
best
Robert Dodier
--
You
(f2, x, 1, 10^11) fails (with error=5, integral
is probably divergent or slowly convergent) but
quad_qag(f2, x, 1, 10^11, 4) succeeds, likewise quad_qagi(f2, x, 1, inf)
succeeds. If Sage is indeed calling QUADPACK, perhaps at least the
error number can be reported?
For what it's worth,
Robert
quadrature in
Sage!
Yes, but most of them are QUADPACK, right?
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr
http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2009/12/mathematical-software-and-me-very.html
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:14 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
When William Stein first started the project it was an acronym SAGE
for (I think) System for Algebra and Geometry Experimentation. But
soon
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 10:25:03 AM UTC+2, I wrote:
I see the following wrong results:
sage: x2 and x1
x 2
sage: x2 or x1
x 1
I found a way to compute these with Sage:
sage: qepcad(qepcad_formula.and_(x 2, x 1), vars='(x)')
x - 1 0
sage: qepcad(qepcad_formula.or_(x 2, x
Am 16.07.2014 20:41, schrieb Nils Bruin:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:25:03 AM UTC-7, robert.pollak wrote:
sage: x2 and x1
x 2
sage: x2 or x1
x 1
That's because and and or are program flow constructs in python, as
they are in C (they have shortcut evaluation behaviour).
Am 16.07.2014 21:06, schrieb slelievre:
Robert Pollak wrote:
I see the following wrong results:
sage: x2 and x1
x 2
sage: x2 or x1
x 1
The best way to manipulate logical combination of inequalities might be
to use polyhedra.
Looking at the documentation [1] I do
Am 17.07.2014 11:32, schrieb Robert Pollak:
In fact, I do not even know how to create the and situation.
The following should be x=2 and x=0:
sage: Polyhedron(ieqs=[(2,-1), (0,0)]).Hrepresentation()
(An inequality (-1) x + 2 = 0,)
Oops, mistake!
This should be
sage: Polyhedron(ieqs=[(2,-1
Also, why do I need two steps here?:
sage: solve([x==0, x!=1], x)
[[x == 0, -1 != 0]]
solve([x == 0, -1 != 0], x)
[x == 0]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/21 aka
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16672
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Mahrud Sayrafi sayraf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In this page:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/constructions/linear_algebra.html#eigenvectors-and-eigenvalues
in the eigenvectors and
Hello!
I see the following wrong results:
sage: x2 and x1
x 2
sage: x2 or x1
x 1
Is this just a syntax problem? How would I enter this correctly?
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
The very short answer is to type make and wait an hour or three.
On Jul 14, 2014 4:54 AM, Oscar Alberto Castillo Felisola
o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking it out! Thank you John.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
After reading qepcad.py I tried to translate this to a qepcad call:
qepcad(qepcad_formula.or_(qepcad_formula.and_(x-5 0, 3(x-1) =
x-5), qepcad_formula.and_(x-5 0, 3(x-1) = x-5)), vars='(x)')
3(x-1) tries to call 3 with the argument x-1. That explains the error
you're
: 'sage.rings.integer.Integer' object is not callable
Can you please help me to compose the correct call?
(Because of http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16642 I am currently using
http://sagecell.sagemath.org/, which has 'Version B 1.50, 22 May 2008' of
qepcad.)
Best regards,
Robert Pollak
--
You received
it is certainly a drawback.
I don't know if e.g. SymPy could solve it; I didn't try.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support
as n increases without
bound. So I'm guessing the limit is zero.
If you need a proof, maybe you can show the integral is bounded,
therefore the limit is zero.
Sorry I can't be more helpful,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support
host: Windows 8.1
VirtualBox 4.3.12
guest: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Sage 6.2 Release Date 2014-05-06
Statements that gave rise to the error:
A5 = AlternatingGroup(5)
A5_sgs = A5.subgroups()
len(A5_sgs)
=
...
RuntimeError: Gap produced error output
Error, sorry, the GAP Tables of Marks Library is not
What exactly do you mean by simplify a real number?
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:32 AM, SiL588 . ch4r...@hotmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately I don't know the rules of Phyton language, i just started
using Sage notebook to do linear algebra computation.
I think I did what you said, I assinged m a
and presentation MathML. I tinkered with maximaMathML
a couple of months ago and it seemed to work OK (after fixing some
bugs). Write me off-list if you're interested.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:58:14 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
Yes there is! The hook is the hash function.
CPython implementation
it.
... in some cases only a trivial hash function (such as: hash of the
parent) should be used.
or, better, just 1: set([ZZ(1), QQ(1)])
This is probably a bad idea--it'll lead to very poor and
hard-to-diagnose performance issues.
- Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
)*bessel_i(-1/2,x^(3/2))*x^(3/4)/sqrt(2)
Hope this helps,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
, inf);
(%o20) -log(2)
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Georgios Tzanakis gtzana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Note that
intL[i][introws[i]] + j %w == 0:
would probably be just (or nearly) as fast as
((int(tupleL[i])[int(rows[i])])+j
Note that
intL[i][introws[i]] + j %w == 0:
would probably be just (or nearly) as fast as
((int(tupleL[i])[int(rows[i])])+j %w)==0
If you're going to be dealing with arrays of ints you might want to
look into NumPy and/or memory views for even more speed.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM,
, 0), 1+x], [(0, 1), 1-x], [(1, 10),
0*x^0]], x)
This seems to evaluate correctly within its domain, but I can't plot it,
say, with this (or variations thereof):
plot(t(x), x, -4, 4)
What am I doing wrong?
--Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
that the patch is 7 months old. I'm
curious, is it in active development? I sure would like to see a solid
piecewise implementation in an upcoming Sage release.
Thanks again.
--Robert
On Tuesday, 28 January 2014 22:14:39 UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:29:16 PM UTC-5
How hard would it be to let make -jN actually work from the top-level make?
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joseph P. Skudlarek jsku...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a request to update the README.txt file used when building from
sources -- the README.txt buries the fact that -jN in make -jN is
not be enabled in the top-level make, in my opinion. Typically,
make -jN makes parallel compiles within the same package (if the package
supports it). The parallel build in sage compiles different packages in
parallel, but each package still compiles as -j1.
On 01/03/2014 02:48 AM, Robert
;
(%o12) -asin(x)+u+%pi/2
(%i13) asin(sqrt(3)*sqrt(2)/3) + asin(sqrt(3)/3) + asin(sqrt(1 - u^2)) +
asin (u);
(%o13) %pi
This is just what I got from some half-hearted hacking; I'm sure there
are serious limitations.
Good luck, have fun, hope this helps.
Robert Dodier
--
You received
sage: Integers(45)['t']
Univariate Polynomial Ring in t over Ring of integers modulo 45
I don't think we have linear algebra over general non-integral-domains, but
sage: R = GF(5)['x']
sage: M = random_matrix(R, 4, 4); b = random_vector(R, 4); x = M \ b
sage: M*x
(4*x^2 + x + 4, x^2 + 2*x + 4,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-08-19, Vincent Knight knigh...@cf.ac.uk wrote:
--001a1133aa8653f2ed04e4510b09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks for the answer kcrisman but I'm afraid I'm still not sure I
understand.
If by
Using a Python list is probably the fastest way to iterate over an
array of Python objects--it's a PyObject** under the hood and Cython
uses the C API calls to get at it. Your check might be the
bottleneck, especially if it's a Python call.
Also, no need to write this as a while loop; just use
), 'integrate(...)).
'integrate is a formal integral -- it doesn't invoke the code to solve
definite integrals -- so it won't bump into that error.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group
On 2013-07-18, Ed Scheinerman edward.scheiner...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: sum(1/binomial(n,k),k,0,n)
(n + 1)*2^(-n)
and that answer is wrong.
That's a bug in Maxima's simplify_sum -- reported as bug # 2614.
https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/2614/
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received
type.
HTH
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage
I've recently had issues trying to log in to Sage via sagenb.org
I had set up a Sage account using my Google account. Now when I attempt to log
in it takes me to a page where I choose which Google account I want to use. So
far so good. But when I click on an account, it takes me to the new
what might be available in Sage
proper.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(2), 1, 1)
sage: A.det()
1
sage: b = random_vector(GF(2), 1)
sage: %time x = A \ b
CPU times: user 1.61 s, sys: 0.06 s, total: 1.67 s
Wall time: 1.67 s
sage: A * x == b
True
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Juan Grados juan...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the
The syntax R.A,d = QQ[] creates a polynomial ring in two
variables, with generators A and d (bound to the current session). A^d
is not a polynomial in A and d over QQ.
sage: R.A,d=QQ[]
sage: R
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in A, d over Rational Field
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Rolandb
might not have
much choice but if you're doing research than you can use whatever
tools allow you to work/collaborate best.
- Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
(to_poly_solve);
Loading maxima-grobner $Revision: 1.6 $ $Date: 2009-06-02 07:49:49 $
(%o1)
/home/robert/maxima/maxima-git/maxima-code/share/to_poly_solve/to_poly_s\
olve.mac
(%i2) to_poly_solve ([(a*x+b*y)*x*y/c=1,3*log(a + b + c) -
log(27*a*b*x*y)],[x,y]);
Maxima encountered a Lisp error:
BINDING-STACK
Hi,
I upgraded to 5.7, and I get an error from zn_poly-0.9.p9 when running the
quick self-test: nuss_mul()... FAIL!.
This is on a Mac OX 10.6. I did manage to install the rest of sage-5.7,
and I can start sage successfully, so I can try to test anything that
anyone can suggest to pinpoint the
It's cPickle with a capital P.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:30 AM, akhil lalwani.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I want to use cpickle to store a matrix object in a text file. Sample code
is as follows:
A = matrix(GF(2),2,3) #creating a 2 * 3 matrix having all entries
zero
import
anything unless the exponent is a literal integer, so the question
seems pointless. I'd have to look at it again before figuring out if the
question could be skipped.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group
, not just
53 bits (as it would be if 1.2 was parsed to 53 bits then passed in to
RealField(1000)).
For all of the above, see RR?, RDF?, etc. for (lots!) more documentation.
- Robert
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, LFS lfahlb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - I would appreciate if someone could point me
Setting xmin/xmax for parametric_plot doesn't seem to do anything, but
ymin/ymax work as expected. What am I doing wrong?
t = var('t')
parametric_plot( (cos(t), sin(t)), (t, 0, 2*pi), xmin=-2, xmax=2, ymin=-2,
ymax=2)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
as the basis for an implementation? Pointers to any other
resources would be interesting.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
. Are there implementations of these approaches in
Sage or any upstream project? (e.g. PARI/GP, Singular, I don't know.)
best,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
()),
%if(?%and(-%pi/2 parg(sqrt(4*c+b^2)+b),
parg(sqrt(4*c+b^2)+b) = %pi/2),
[d = (b*sqrt(4*c+b^2)+2*c+b^2)/2],%union()))
I didn't check the result; sorry about that.
best
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
When you say plot these values, do you mean as real or complex
values? To do so you need to choose an embedding, e.g.
sage: K.a = QQ[sqrt(5)]; K
Number Field in sqrt5 with defining polynomial x^2 - 5
sage: K.embeddings(CC)
[
Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in sqrt5 with defining polynomial
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Eric Kangas eric.c.kan...@gmail.com wrote:
code:
b = 11^2
a = b^2
pri = [int(is_prime(i)) for i in range(a)]
j = [i for i in range(a)][b+1:a:b]
k = [i for i in range(a)][(b*2)+1:a:b]
j.insert(0,0)
k.insert(0,b)
m =
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober
I'd go for several 100M of RAM each, likely 0.5G to be comfortable,
plus some memory for the OS and server itself. Throw 4G at it and it
should behave much better, 8G and you should be good to go.
Something like https://github.com/jasongrout/sage-forker would likely
greatly reduce this
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
I recently used sage to write a code generation script for exact
geometric predicates:
https://github.com/otherlab/simplicity
Since it's a python script that imports sage, the simplicity script is
GPL.
Not
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
I recently used sage to write a code generation script
backwards
incompatible (considering the number of Python packages, including
internally in our own libraryies, that understand and expect Python
ints).
- Robert
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Christophe BAL projet...@gmail.com wrote:
What I think very confusing is that 1/4 is the Sage division
!
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http
parameters are documented in
GLPKBackend.solver_parameter which I didn't find. (I suppose one has to
import it first.)
Also I didn't find it in the sage tutorials describing
MixedIntegerLinearProgram().
Anyway, thanks again!
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
1 - 100 of 926 matches
Mail list logo
