On May 19, 8:58 am, Tobias Katz wrote:
> Indeed I am looking for s.th. like
>
> g(t) = convolve(f,sin)
>
> I am not familiar with Maxima - I had a short look at it but I didn't
> find a function like this.
Maxima doesn't have a built-in symbolic convolution
function although you could formulate
On May 19, 12:08 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > On May 19, 11:36 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> On 05/19/2010 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> >> > On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, Jason Grout
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias K
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On May 19, 11:36 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 05/19/2010 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, Jason Grout
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias Katz wrote:
>> >> Is the best way to convolve numerical
On May 19, 11:36 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias Katz wrote:
> >> Is the best way to convolve numerically?
>
> >> You might look at scipy or numpy (both of which are in
On 05/19/2010 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, Jason Grout wrote:
On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias Katz wrote:
Is the best way to convolve numerically?
You might look at scipy or numpy (both of which are included in Sage). They
have functions which do convolutions
On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias Katz wrote:
Hi,
Indeed I am looking for s.th. like
g(t) = convolve(f,sin)
I am not familiar with Maxima - I had a short look at it but I didn't
find a function like this.
Is the best way to convolve numerically?
You might look at scipy or numpy (both of which
Hi,
Indeed I am looking for s.th. like
g(t) = convolve(f,sin)
I am not familiar with Maxima - I had a short look at it but I didn't
find a function like this.
Is the best way to convolve numerically?
Does anybody know a way in Maxima or another CAS?
Tobias
On 05/19/2010 03:11 PM, kcrisman
On May 19, 7:41 am, David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Tobias Katz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to use sage for signal analysis and didn't find a solution
> > to perform symbolic convolution. Is there a way to do this?
> > Has anybody done something similar in sage before?
