Hi Alex,
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Alex Raichev tortoise.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Sweet, Burcin. I'll check out your patch. Can you increase the
derivative orders to 20 something?
Sorry, I won't have more time to play with this in the next two weeks.
If you still run into
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:02:16 +0100
Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
I can't believe I'm looking at these hashes for the third time. I
finally took some time to think about this, and found an (almost)
perfect hash function to replace my previous braindead implementation.
I hope we
Sweet, Burcin. I'll check out your patch. Can you increase the
derivative orders to 20 something?
Alex
On Nov 23, 7:30 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:02:16 +0100
Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
I can't believe I'm looking at these hashes for
Hi Alex,
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Alex Raichev tortoise.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, William. I'll check that out.
Also, for those interested in the bug i reported, i'd like to rephrase
the description of my situation, because i stated it a little
confusingly above. Take
Thanks, William. I'll check that out.
Also, for those interested in the bug i reported, i'd like to rephrase
the description of my situation, because i stated it a little
confusingly above. Take two. I have a big symbolic expression E
involving lots of derivatives. I want to replace the
Thanks for the workaround, William. I was thinking the same thing as
a temporary fix but am having difficulties with that approach.
Here's my situation. I have a big symbolic expression E involving
lots of derivatives. I want to substitute the derivatives with other
symbolic expressions, and
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Alex Raichev tortoise.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the workaround, William. I was thinking the same thing as
a temporary fix but am having difficulties with that approach.
Here's my situation. I have a big symbolic expression E involving
lots of
