I need to make changes to avatars.py
I find 3 versions of this script in the sage tree:
./devel/sage-main/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
./devel/sage-main/build/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
./devel/sage-main/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
(the same is true for no
./devel/sage-main/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
Usually one clones the main branch "sage --clone nameofclone"
sage -br takes your changes live
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Thierry Dumont
wrote:
>
> I need to make changes to avatars.py
>
> I find 3 versions of this script in the sage tree:
Timothy Clemans a écrit :
> ./devel/sage-main/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
>
Ok thank you...
> Usually one clones the main branch "sage --clone nameofclone"
> sage -br takes your changes live
>
I do not really understand this. I apologize, but is there a link to
some place where it is explai
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> Timothy Clemans a écrit :
>> ./devel/sage-main/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
>>
> Ok thank you...
>
>> Usually one clones the main branch "sage --clone nameofclone"
>> sage -br takes your changes live
>>
>
> I do not really understand thi
>
> > On Mar 26, 1:44 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> >> Incidentally, that is a good argument for always declaring your
> >> functions as callable; it relieves one of this tedious var business.
> >> I will make a mental note of it for intro material in Sage.
>
> > That would be a good idea if it was natur
> sage: n(a) # Why doesn't this return the result of numerical_integral?
> ---
> TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
>
> /home/jason/.sage/temp/littleone/29880/_home_jason__sage_init_sag
That's perfect. Thanks!
On Mar 26, 5:41 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
> > Patrick wrote:
>
> >> I'd like to count the iterations of a loop nest by evaluating a sum.
> >> Consider the following loop nest:
>
> >> for (k =
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Thierry Dumont
wrote:
>
> I need to make changes to avatars.py
>
> I find 3 versions of this script in the sage tree:
>
> ./devel/sage-main/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
> ./devel/sage-main/build/sage/server/notebook/avatars.py
> ./dev
On Mar 26, 7:16 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> def Y(t):
> return 2500+numerical_integral(S(u)-R(u),0,t)[0]
>
> but then it won't be a symbolic object. (It will be a Python function.)
Wait. What is the difference between a "symbolic object" and a
"Python function" ?
Not sure whey the "def
I have compiled and installed sage on a server and it is working
fine.
To access the server from home, I have to go through a firewall and so
I need to use port 80 to access the server and so far as I can tell,
use mod_proxy to redirect requests to sage to port 8000.
Unfortunately, in sage the ht
On Mar 27, 2009, at 10:36 AM, cseber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 26, 7:16 pm, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> def Y(t):
>> return 2500+numerical_integral(S(u)-R(u),0,t)[0]
>>
>> but then it won't be a symbolic object. (It will be a Python
>> function.)
>
> Wait. What is the difference betwe
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:00 PM, nerak99 wrote:
> I have compiled and installed sage on a server and it is working
> fine.
> To access the server from home, I have to go through a firewall and so
> I need to use port 80 to access the server and so far as I can tell,
> use mod_proxy to redirect reque
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:00 PM, nerak99 wrote:
>
>> I have compiled and installed sage on a server and it is working
>> fine.
>> To access the server from home, I have to go through a firewall and so
>> I need to use port 80 to access the
1) I am using sage 3.2.3, which was current when I installed it in
January. It was convenient for me to compile it from scratch, but it
then takes a long time to install.
2) Here is my sage code. The program estimates the probability of
ever getting a 6-way tie if you repeatedly roll a die and
Hi Greg,
On 27 Mrz., 21:21, Greg Kuperberg wrote:
> 1) I am using sage 3.2.3, which was current when I installed it in
> January. It was convenient for me to compile it from scratch, but it
> then takes a long time to install.
Side note: In order to change to the latest sage version, it is not
On Mar 27, 6:04 am, kcrisman wrote:
> Maybe one
> (you? :) ) can implement a catch...
At first I was interested in this change but now I'm wondering if it
is best the way it is now.
f(x) = defines a symbolic object as was previously mentioned. A
symbolic object is for analytical results
Chris Seberino wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 27, 6:04 am, kcrisman wrote:
>> Maybe one
>> (you? :) ) can implement a catch...
>
> At first I was interested in this change but now I'm wondering if it
> is best the way it is now.
>
> f(x) = defines a symbolic object as was previously mentioned. A
>
Jason Grout wrote:
> Chris Seberino wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 27, 6:04 am, kcrisman wrote:
>>> Maybe one
>>> (you? :) ) can implement a catch...
>> At first I was interested in this change but now I'm wondering if it
>> is best the way it is now.
>>
>> f(x) = defines a symbolic object as was previ
On Mar 27, 6:20 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> We already have plenty of approximation functions attached to the
> symbolic functions.
> sage: sin(1).numerical_approx()
Yes. I was unclear. What I meant was it wouldn't make sense to use
approximation function in the *definition* of a symbolic func
On Mar 27, 5:58 am, kcrisman wrote:
> And I wasn't implying one should always define callable functions, I
> just meant it is an argument for doing so as often as possible when it
> is reasonable. I do not personally always like callable functions,
> but this is an argument for doing it fairly
Chris Seberino wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 27, 5:58 am, kcrisman wrote:
>> And I wasn't implying one should always define callable functions, I
>> just meant it is an argument for doing so as often as possible when it
>> is reasonable. I do not personally always like callable functions,
>> but this is
On Mar 27, 1:39 pm, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
> Side note: In order to change to the latest sage version, it is not
> needed to compile from scratch again. Just do
> sage -upgrade
> on the command line. Provided that you are connected with internet, it
> will retrieve the changes from sage 3
22 matches
Mail list logo
