19 August 2003 11:55, Frode Tenneboe wrote:
> Still non-subbed address. :-)
>
> -Frode
>
*sigh* Cheers frode, I'll resend from the right account :)
Geoff
Andrew Collier wrote:
> implies that sharing copies is somehow illegitimate" -
Come come andrew, that's a cheap trick - taking words out of context.
Quote from the link given on that page:
If you don't believe that illegal copying is just like kidnaping and murder,
you might prefer not to use t
Cookie wrote:
> 99% of the people who post there are rabid GNU followers, who want
> everything to be free, regardless of reality.
GNU followers don't want everything to be free - they want there to be a
free software alternative to everything. Which is entirely different.
I should have known an
Matthew Craven wrote:
> Wow - you've found a decent Archimedes emulator? Where?
Red Squirrel
( http://www.redsquirrel.fsnet.co.uk )
works ok for me. It's not perfect, but it runs most things OK.
Things it doesn't manage generally run with Archie
(http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Campus/54
> Nahhh, your missing the point. I know the emulator is
> basically perfect, but its just not like having the
> real thing sitting there (I trust you have got the real
> thing as the rom is still copyrighted and hence the
> emulator is only legal to those with a sam).
IIRC Andy Wright has s
> What i bet it doesnt say is, if you really want to enjoy this
> machine - try and locate one on ebay :D Nothing beats the
> real thing.
Actually I disagree. The emulator is now fast, accurate and featured enough
that it's far easier to code than using the sam ever was. Using Comet in
fast mod
Colin wrote:
> A PC disk drive can be used with the same circuitry - using
> the WD1772 disk drive controller IC - that is on the small
> board which is soldered directly onto the back of the
> original disk drive units.
Don't you need to buy a drive which supplies the RD (Ready) signal?
Geoff
Nev Young wrote:
> they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.
> I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
> tech manual and it's a poor photo copy to start with.
JPEG for line drawings? Yeuck.
Scan them in, run them through some line routines in
Si Owen wrote:
> The SimCoupé website seems to be down at the moment -
> just-the-name must have problems with their URL
> masking again *sighs*
Have you tried mydomain.com? - they've been pretty flawless since I moved
over.
Geoff
Si Owen wrote:
> Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > I use 50Hz :)
>
> How d'ya manage that? I'd definitely be interested in using that rate
> myself if possible, as even a smooth 100Hz still suffers from
> ghosting.
> I didn't think modern monitors were happy running at such a low rate
> though?
Uhh. I
Si Owen wrote:
> It's quite possible that's just a visual effect caused by the monitor
> sync not being a perfect match to the timer used by SimCoupé.
I'm happy to believe this - also I tried it on my machine at home and it was
actually worse so I figure it has to be a SimCoupe problem.
> I use 1
Dave Laundon wrote:
> Ok, my first post here in ages, here goes...
>
> the official Z80 cycles rounded up to the next multiple of 4 (or 8 in
> screen time), or, 4 (or 8) times the number of memory accesses;
> whichever is greater.
Thanks! I vaguely remembered something like that but wasn't sure.
I wrote:
> is it quicker to do:
> AND &EE = 7 cycles
Second note: my apologies for sending the message twice. I got a message
back from the nvg admin telling me to do so, before the first email arrived
:(
> The domain nvg.unit.no has expired.
> Please use nvg.ntnu.no i
I wrote:
> is it quicker to do:
> AND &EE = 7 cycles
Note: I should have written
AND C - 4 cycles
since the &EE is preloaded to a register (ostensible to increase speed).
Geoff
OK, so my memory isn't too hot. Given that this code will probably execute
in screen time, is it quicker to do:
LD A, (HL) = 7 cycles
AND &EE = 7 cycles
LD (HL), A = 7 cycles
or
RES 0, (HL) = 15 cycles
RES 4, (HL) = 15 cycles
NB The "cycles" here are raw z80 figures.
Obviously on first glance
OK, so my memory isn't too hot. Given that this code will probably execute
in screen time, is it quicker to do:
LD A, (HL) = 7 cycles
AND &EE = 7 cycles
LD (HL), A = 7 cycles
or
RES 0, (HL) = 15 cycles
RES 4, (HL) = 15 cycles
NB The "cycles" here are raw z80 figures.
Obviously on first glance
16 matches
Mail list logo
