I have managed to get Norman AV working where the Linux file server pulls down the DAT files and the Windows clients pull from the server. The on-access scanner has not been installed as the kernel
module it wishes to install needs default kernel security removed. Since Linux viruses are a haa haa
I spent some time looking for this also...
Based on what I found there really isn't a solution that I could find
that meet all of my needs.
you should checkout the following
http://www.clamav.net/
Robert
Gil Freund wrote:
Hi,
As we are moving away from an NT based enviroment to SAMBA we are
looki
One of the reasons I choose to go with openldap as my backend for samba
was I intended to eventually have my cyrus server authenticate against
the same server thus creating a single point of autherization for
network services.
That being said if samba 4 does have it's own ldap "like" backend un
I've given up on Yast... it doesn't always catch dependences; refusing
to install something with no message indicting why.
I found that installing apt from guru's rpm site is the best way to go
in terms of updates and installing additional software.
I know I will no longer use Suse as a server,
Robert Silvia wrote:
I can say this if Tomak is using Suse then this may very well be how
Suse built the package.
I left suse for this exact reason, a perfect example of how they changed
Samba's "ldap ssl = "parameter
for what ever reason they set this parameter to relate to start_tls /
false
Robert Silvia wrote:
Great...
I wonder what type of mirgration will be available when samba 4 comes...
and when it comes? :)
Don't know of migration, but if Samba 4 will use LDAP-compatibile
backed, it should be something like dumping old LDAP and importing it to
Samba.
Tomek
--
To unsubscribe
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 21:01 -0200, Giuliano Silva de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
>
> I read the official HOWTO that explain how to use mysql as password backends
> but I couldn't find anything about PDC and BDC with mysql. Have anybody an
> idea how to implements this solution?
A BDC
Great...
I wonder what type of mirgration will be available when samba 4 comes...
Alex Satrapa wrote:
On 27 Nov 2004, at 06:05, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I got lots of gray hair when I compared how hard it is to establish
Samba + OpenLDAP, and then MS solutions, even with "official"
documentatio
I can say this if Tomak is using Suse then this may very well be how
Suse built the package.
I left suse for this exact reason, a perfect example of how they changed
Samba's "ldap ssl = "parameter
for what ever reason they set this parameter to relate to start_tls /
false instead of start_tls
Yeah good information...
on redhat it's ldap.conf in /etc/ too go figure
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I just tested your settings and they seem to be working.
The auth takes much longer now, maybe because it is working.
When checking shares the getpwnam does not even get cal
On 27 Nov 2004, at 06:05, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I got lots of gray hair when I compared how hard it is to establish
Samba + OpenLDAP, and then MS solutions, even with "official"
documentation.
FWIW, I've just given a presentation to the local Linux Users' Group on
this subject, based on note
For the next 24 hours we are having an unbeatable sale.
We have a large supply of email leads and we thought it
would be a great day to set the price so low that
everybody would take advantage of it.
We know that once you try our leads, you will be very
pleased, and you will refer your friends an
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Found the solution for the problem widely described below, after the
<><> symbols.
Here you are the solution:
I created under /root the following
°°° .nsmbrc file
[default]
workgroup=BOH_SS
# The 'FSERVER' is an NT server.
[SRVS1]
#charsets=koi8-r:cp866
addr=srv
Greetings Admins,
We use samba 3.0.7 and cups 1.1.20 on debian woody to serve
point'n'print to XP clients. This works great, much kudos to the samba
team!
We are seeing high load on the printserver and we would like to know if
it's possible to split the samba and cups installation into 2 separ
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I just tested your settings and they seem to be working.
The auth takes much longer now, maybe because it is working.
When checking shares the getpwnam does not even get called any more.
I noticed many SMB_VFS, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_OBJECT in the log, I guess
that let's me k
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2004 11:19, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
...
Of all howtos etc. I made through, I was only able to setup Samba + LDAP
using Samba Guide (chapter 6, Making users happy) - it has the smallest
number of bugs - without correcting them (like %m needed instead of
On Friday 26 November 2004 11:19, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
...
> Of all howtos etc. I made through, I was only able to setup Samba + LDAP
> using Samba Guide (chapter 6, Making users happy) - it has the smallest
> number of bugs - without correcting them (like %m needed instead of %u),
> running S
> > I just tested your settings and they seem to be working.
> > The auth takes much longer now, maybe because it is working.
> > When checking shares the getpwnam does not even get called any more.
> > I noticed many SMB_VFS, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_OBJECT in the log, I guess
> > that let's me know VFS
Robert Silvia wrote:
Tomak,
I just tested your settings and they seem to be working.
The auth takes much longer now, maybe because it is working.
When checking shares the getpwnam does not even get called any more.
I noticed many SMB_VFS, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_OBJECT in the log, I guess
that let's me
Hi,
no, because you need the "x" permision in order to "enter" the diretory.
Maybe I need to install the ext3 ACL in the kernel.
Oliver
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I wonder if it is posible to write a VFS module to block the listing of
directory in a share?
The files inside the directory should be
Hallo Martin Rode,
>
> The whole thing happens since we have moved servers (new, but same
> Debian testing installation). /etc/samba was copied to the new server.
Have you only copied /etc/samba ?
Forgot to copied the /var/lib/samba/*tdb files ?
Is it the same Samba Version ?
Greetings
Thomas
hi
jI'm trying to shutdown some windows XP clients with
net rpc shutdown -S -U administrator%password
but all i get is this error
[2004/11/26 10:44:32, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:rpc_shutdown_internals(4113)
Shutdown of remote machine failed!
I'm using Version 3.0.8-Debian
and le client are using winXP S
Tomak,
I just tested your settings and they seem to be working.
The auth takes much longer now, maybe because it is working.
When checking shares the getpwnam does not even get called any more.
I noticed many SMB_VFS, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_OBJECT in the log, I guess
that let's me know VFS was complied
Hi all,
I am using debian 3.1 and samba 3.0.7. I configured
samba
as a member of a w2K domain and set up a share in
/tmp. Now, when I issue the command 'smbclient -L
localhost -Uuser_domain%pass' I get
NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE but as guest it works
'smbclient -L localhost -U%'. wbinfo -u and wbinfo
> I wonder if it is posible to write a VFS module to block the listing of
> directory in a share?
> The files inside the directory should be accesible for read/write
> operations, but should be able to list the files in the directory.
> Is that posible?
Can't you do this exact thing with UNIX fi
Hi
I'm trying to set up samba 3.0.9 as domain member server.
When I try to join NT4 domain using "net rpc join" it added an account
in NT4 domain but in lowercase !! I have to delete it on nt4 and add it
again using uppercase letters - then it works. Why?? In smb.conf I have
netbios name written
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Gil Freund wrote:
>
> Sorry for cross-posting, but this seems to be an interdiciplinary issue.
>
> I would like our users to get a popup notification of the completion /
> failure of their jobs.
>
> I think that best way to implement this would be from C
Hi,
Sorry for cross-posting, but this seems to be an interdiciplinary issue.
I would like our users to get a popup notification of the completion /
failure of their jobs.
I think that best way to implement this would be from CUPS, but I
don't know how to generate the required information for SAM
Hi,
As we are moving away from an NT based enviroment to SAMBA we are
looking for a managed virus scanner for our desktops. Managed means:
1. Remote deployment
2. Updates from a local repository
3. Notification and reporting.
The existing solutions (Symantec, TrendMicro, Mcafee) assume that you
James MacLean wrote:
James MacLean wrote:
Hi Folks,
Recently (I believe since recent 3.0.x releases), I have been unable
to login to a Samba instance using CIFS (Linux mount) or Windows
2003. If I change the smb.conf from:
security = server
to
security = user
I _can_ login again fine. The NT PDC
Hello,
I have 300 users and each one needs at least 5 shared disk via samba, but
with my samba version 3.0.8 I have no more than 350 smbd processes enable so
I have the message :
[2004/11/26 11:14:20, 0] smbd/service.c:(340)
Couldn't find free connection.
The variable MAX_CONNECTIONS is no more
Hi guys,
My ealier post did not get answered, so I am trying to rephrase my
problem (which gets bigger every day).
We have a working Samba PDC installation. Clients authenticate for
sharing profiles and get a home directory mounted. Very straight forward.
Now, when I change a users password wit
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 10:05 +, Daniel Wilson wrote:
hi list,
How do you calculate a machine SID and primarygroupSID?
On a user you would do 2*uidNumber+1000 and 2*uidNumber+1001
But machines accounts dont have a uidNumber so how is the SID genrated??
Machines do a
can anyone help me with how to migrate NT4 domain accounts to a samba server
accounts, I'm trying to setup a new workgroup for file sharing purposes, but
I'd like to be able to use the existing user database, the SAMBA howto lists
how to migrate between NT4 domain to SAMBA as PDC, but I'm to make a
Hi,
Ik solved the problem my self by disabling all server and client signing
in Windows 2003.
Mark
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mark van
Gurchom
Verzonden: donderdag 25 november 2004 9:34
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [Samba] Mounti
35 matches
Mail list logo
