this up?
Thanks,
--
Mark Nienberg
Sent from an invalid address. Please reply to the group.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
backend. So it is not necessarily related to
ldap.
Again, it only happens for windows 7 clients and everything works fine in spite of
the errors.
--
Mark Nienberg
Sent from an invalid address. Please reply to the group.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
a simple test on your filesystem to see if you
can set and read extended attributes. If you can, you are good to go. If not, add
the switch in fstab.
--
Mark Nienberg
Sent from an invalid address. Please reply to the group.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
=Engineers,credentials=/root/creds 0 0
Does that help?
--
Mark Nienberg
Sent from an invalid address. Please reply to the group.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Mark Nienberg wrote:
I've decided to modernize my samba installation by switching to storing
dos attributes as extended attributes on the linux file system. It would
be nice to convert the dos attributes that are currently mapped into
the new extended attributes.
I found this page
Mark Nienberg wrote:
I've decided to modernize my samba installation by switching to storing
dos attributes as extended attributes on the linux file sytem. It would
be nice to convert the dos attributes that are currently mapped into
the new extended attributes.
I found this page
Avinash Rao wrote:
Ubuntu 8.04 Server 64-bit Edition
Samba 3.0.28a configured as PDC
WinXP - SP2 clients
I am following the instructions in
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/...#magicnetlogon to add domain
users to the winxp clients Power Users group.
Code: autopoweruser.sh
#!/bin/bash
://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migration_Tools
but the link to the perl script is dead and the author's email address is
invalid.
Does anyone have the perl script or an equivalent tool? If so, can you post it to
the wiki or make it available some other way?
Thanks,
--
Mark Nienberg
Sent from an invalid
-3.2.10-38.el5
samba3-3.2.11-38.el5
I think I cleaned up this problem with
# rpm -e --justdb samba3-3.2.1-37
and so forth. Admittedly, the rpm man page does not indicate that this should work,
but I think it does.
--
Mark Nienberg
Sent from an invalid address. Please reply to the group
, then once
every 8 hours after that.
The Time Service doesn't do any logging, but you can test to see if
the sync works with the command:
w32tm -once -test -v
and you can see what the NtpServer is currently set to with:
net time /querysntp
Mark Nienberg
--
To unsubscribe
of your ntp server.
rem - filename XPtime.bat
rem - this works for windows xp to set up syncing with our ntp time server
net time /setsntp:192.168.254.35
net stop w32time
net start w32time
Note that the procedure is different for Win2000 workstations. Let me know if you
need that too.
Mark
I upgraded a samba PDS and a samba domain member server from 2.0.28 to 2.0.33 and
noticed a change in the speed of browsing directories that contain large files. I
don't mean a large number of files in the directory, rather, large files like
installers of 60Mb or larger. XP clients using
For a new file server that doesn't really do much other than run samba, is there any
advantage to quad core CPUs vs dual core? Say the two options are equivalent in price.
Thanks,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
John Drescher wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Mark Nienberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a new file server that doesn't really do much other than run samba, is
there any advantage to quad core CPUs vs dual core? Say
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:28:19PM -0800, Mark Nienberg wrote:
I guess what I'm wondering is will samba actually use all those cores or
will it just use one, in which case maybe I'd be better of with a faster
dual core than a quad. You're right though, that the server I
Ray Anderson wrote:
Mark Nienberg wrote:
I downloaded the tar.gz file for 3.0.27a and I noticed there is not a
Fedora directory inside the packaging directory. I'm fairly certain
there used to be one in older versions. I'm groping now to figure out
how to build rpms for Fedora 4, which I
I downloaded the tar.gz file for 3.0.27a and I noticed there is not a Fedora
directory inside the packaging directory. I'm fairly certain there used to be one in
older versions. I'm groping now to figure out how to build rpms for Fedora 4, which
I know is a little old but I don't have
I was looking for the fedora src.rpm for 3.0.27a but 3.0.26a is the last one I see.
Will the latest one be added soon or should I try to build my own somehow? Thanks,
http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Fedora/SRPMS/
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
I would like to configure a linux ntp server on my lan as the ntp server for
my windows xp clients
For XP clients all you need to do is the following, which can be run once from a
batch file:
net time /setsntp:192.168.254.35
net stop w32time
net start w32time
Of
Ben Tisdall wrote:
I made a post a few weeks ago regarding this but was unable to find a
solution. This is the situation:
+ I'm attempting to upgrade from samba 3.0.23a (Fedora core package
3.0.23a-1.fc4.1) to the latest version compiled from Samba source.
Just a thought. Instead of
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:08:14AM -0700, Mark Nienberg wrote:
We find it convenient to keep thunderbird email client profiles on our home
shares rather than in our user profiles
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Does it happen for you with XP or 2000?
I'm certain it happens with 2000. I'm not sure if it happens with XP or not.
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
We find it convenient to keep thunderbird email client profiles on our home shares
rather than in our user profiles, as is the default. From time to time some users
experience the dreaded delayed write failed error for certain thunderbird files.
The only solution seems to be to log off and log
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:08:14AM -0700, Mark Nienberg wrote:
We find it convenient to keep thunderbird email client profiles on our home
shares rather than in our user profiles, as is the default. From time to
time some users experience the dreaded delayed write failed
Do all of the files you have problems with have strange characters in them? I had
this problem back when I upgraded a samba server and I think it had to do with the
new server's i18n character support or something like that. In particular, the
character for the 1/2 symbol was a problem.
I
On a Fedora Core 4 x86_64 system the following packages are installed:
(These are the official Fedora packages, not the samba.org fedora packages)
samba.x86_64
samba-client.x86_64
samba-common.x86_64
samba-common.i386
samba-swat.x86_64
Note that for samba-common, both the x86_64 and the i386
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Nienberg wrote:
On a Fedora Core 4 x86_64 system the following
packages are installed: (These are the official
Fedora packages, not the samba.org fedora
packages)
samba.x86_64
samba-client.x86_64
samba
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:07:37AM -0800, Mark Nienberg wrote:
I'm not sure what package I updated that changed this from working to
crashing, but this seems like a little samba bug to me.
No, it's a Fedora (5 and 6) bug.
Volker
Thanks for the info. Do they know
Mark Nienberg wrote:
I have a fedora core 5 server running samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 from fedora
updates. Recently I changed smb.conf to use security=domain instead of
security=user. The server that it authenticates against is running
fedora core 4 with samba-3.0.14a-2.
Anyway, this setup worked
I have a fedora core 5 server running samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 from fedora
updates. Recently I changed smb.conf to use security=domain instead of
security=user. The server that it authenticates against is running
fedora core 4 with samba-3.0.14a-2.
Anyway, this setup worked just fine for a
Felix Miata wrote:
I upgraded my SUSE 10.0 server to the Suse Projects 3.0.23c rpms. When I try to
use cifs to mount, I get the error:
mount error 112: Host is down
by using this syntax:
# mount -t cifs -o ro //p-t18/G /mnt/test
What do I need to do to make this work?
Try
Paul Smith wrote:
Mark, thanks for the link.
How does this look?
OLDSERVER:
Stop Samba.
Backup smb.conf, smbpasswd, passdb.tdb and secrets.tdb from /etc/samba
Backup *.tdb from /var/lib/samba
Make note of the users/groups UID/GIDs
Power down
NEWSERVER:
Power up server
Change hostname to
/upgrades.html
Read the whole chapter and pay particular attention to the section
Migrating Samba 3 to a new server, Replacing a domain controller.
I did it about a week ago with no difficulties.
Mark Nienberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
the firewall
explicitly allows udp to port 138 on the local intranet.
What else could it be and is it anything to worry about?
Thanks, Mark Nienberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
William Reid wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm planning on moving out old Samba PDC from its old hardware to a
completely new system. the old system will still be running with no
changes except samba...
What files should I worry about moving besides the passwd and smbpasswd
files? Do I need to
building?
Or finally, should I do nothing and just use the 3.0.14 version that
comes with Fedora 4. The server will be a PDC in a 25 node network
(replacing a current machine running 3.0.7).
Thanks for any help.
Mark Nienberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
Michel Bouchet wrote:
Hi,
I used to set up Samba password on the command line with smbpasswd using the
following syntax :
smbpasswd -a newuser usersecretpasswd
smbpasswd -e newuser
but it does work any more.
How can I do the same without having to type in the password ?
Thanks in
I made rpms for Fedora Core 1 by using rpmbuild --rebuild on the
.src.rpm file that is in the Fedora section of the samba download area.
Are my results the same as they would be if I downloaded the tar file
and ran the packaging/Fedora makerpms.sh script? Is one way preferred?
Thanks,
Mark
. The lock is released when the user logs
off, because that kills the pid as you mentioned. I don't think you
should kill the pid if the user is still active.
Mark Nienberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo
Mark Nienberg wrote:
I have about 20 users accessing a Samba 3.07 server on Fedora core 1.
The samba server is the PDC for the domain. The users are all Win 2000.
The logs for one user show many entries like this:
[2004/11/30 15:02:05, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(892
Chuck Theobald wrote:
Hi Mark,
You may be able to reduce the size of your log files by an appropriate
setting for log level in your smb.conf file, somthing like log level
winbind:0 may work. Also, the messages point to acl usage, are these
enabled on your system?
I'm not using winbind. Do
I have about 20 users accessing a Samba 3.07 server on Fedora core 1.
The samba server is the PDC for the domain. The users are all Win 2000.
The logs for one user show many entries like this:
[2004/11/30 15:02:05, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(892)
unpack_nt_owners: no security info
Richmond Dyes wrote:
I have been setting up my domain server using FC2 and samba 3.0.9. First
thing, for your information: In the notations in several sources, it
tells you to user logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u this is wrong. It
should be, logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U. Now that I spent 5
43 matches
Mail list logo
