-
commit a10b3416e558e16f82b80a0794485c1fcbda9371
Author: Tim Potter t...@samba.org
Date: Mon Oct 18 07:54:31 2010 -0700
Include misc.idl for policy_handle in srvsvc.idl.
Autobuild-User: Tim Potter t...@samba.org
Autobuild-Date: Mon Oct 18
-
commit 391b24e3edcb3a291534d91fc999ef2fd1995f03
Author: Tim Potter t...@samba.org
Date: Mon Oct 11 05:34:57 2010 -0600
Fix some warnings at higher -W levels in pidl generated code.
Match data type for info levels to data type returned
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 08:42 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Björn Jacke wrote:
| On 2008-04-11 at 13:52 +0200 Helmut Hullen sent off:
| No patch attached.
|
| yes, it's useless as long as Mailman is removing the attached patch
| each time.
|
| Look at the mail header:
|
|
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:08 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a two-part question. Is it possible to run Samba as a non-root
user? What we want to do, ideally, is to create a user account such as
samba, and let our applications people log in as the samba user, and do
all the setup and
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 16:04 +0100, Thomas Riedrich wrote:
I didn't find any information on the net: Is there any client connection
limit in Samba? We have about 70 clients accessing one Samba PDC, and
sometimes we get errors from client machines that can't connect and they
say that the
Testing mail block.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 11:59 +0100, Peter Fortuin wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a server and I enabled quota's on the filesystem. This works
fine. But Samba doesn't see that quota. I have read that you need to compile
samba with quota support. My problem is that I have a running Samba (from
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 13:57 -0500, Vahid Moghaddasi wrote:
Hi,
I have Samba 3.0.21b running on Solaris 10 with ADS authentication.
I get the following in log.winbindd when I do getent passwd but wbinfo -u
lists all the users.
Does anyone know why and how to fix it?
[2006/02/04 13:37:56, 0]
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 17:42 +1100, Emrys Hughes wrote:
I have a samba (version 3.0.14a-Debian) running an NT style domain
and want to add a member file server implementing winbind.
When I use wbinfo -u it returns a list of all my domain users. When
I use wbinfo -g it returns 3 results:
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 20:21 +1100, Oygle wrote:
I have noticed since commencing posts on this newsgroup, that there
has been a significant increase in attempted intrusions, especially
port 80. It's a pity that IP addresses are in the NG headers. :)
Yeah, this has been reported before. It's
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 14:45 +1100, James Peach wrote:
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=12877
Log:
Stop passing structs around in smb messages, instead
always linearize into little-endian. Should fix all
Solaris issues with this, plus
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Louis van Belle wrote:
you can also define it as this.
interfaces = eth0 lo
bind interfaces only = yes
I've written up a little article about multiple interfaces, and the
testing thereof. I'm also trying to learn about docbook.
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:58 -0700, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:13, Mike wrote:
Sorry to trouble you, but how long does it take for a posted message to
show up on the groups please?
Anywhere from 5 minutes to 1 hour or so - it depends on the load on the mail
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 13:25 +0100, markus wrote:
Isn't it that netbios over tcp/ip is not needed since samba 3 anymore? I
thought it isn't, but I had to enable it. Otherwise my windows machines
are refusing (as posted) the samba shares after a while. Any explanation?
NetBIOS over TCP/IP has
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 11:59 -0800, Joseph T. Duncan wrote:
from the man page:
bind interfaces only (G)
--snip--
nmbd also binds to the all addresses interface (0.0.0.0) on ports 137
and 138 for the purposes of reading broadcast messages.
--snip--
so i guess its not a bug but expected
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 21:51 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changeset:
Modified: trunk/source/smbd/process.c
===
--- trunk/source/smbd/process.c 2005-09-12 21:50:32 UTC (rev 10188)
+++ trunk/source/smbd/process.c
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:45 +0200, Michal Kurowski wrote:
Anyway, I can give them my perspective, but I want them to know what an Open
Source project is like. Andrew Tridgell is one of or the original
developer. Can
anyone give me brief history to tell the class?
In the source
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 13:02 +0200, Louis van Belle wrote:
strange..
im getting..
In: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3367
Out: 250 Ok
In: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out: 450 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sender address
rejected: Domain not found
but my domain is running fine.. problems at
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:34 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
It is the blocking of communication with related projects
that makes me worry. In fact we are trying to build a fence
that will be never high enough, because we don't act on the actual
problem.
I've decided to moderate the non-member
Hi everyone. In reaction to the escalating spam problem I'm trialling
turning on member-only posting for a week or so. Hopefully this should
make the list a bit nicer for everyone but at the expense of posters
requiring to join the list.
Tim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Testing non-member posting to the Samba list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 11:32 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
- revert the %PRIi64 stuff. Tim, we explicitly check for %llu support
in configure, and replace snprintf if the system doesn't support
it. Our replacement code does not handle the %PRIi64 stuff, so
using it would break us
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:14 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Download Details
The uncompressed tarball and patch file have been signed
using GnuPG (ID F17F9772). The source code can be
downloaded from:
http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/
I've created a
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:54:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tpot
Date: 2004-09-08 11:54:01 + (Wed, 08 Sep 2004)
New Revision: 2253
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=2253nolog=1
Log:
Add test program, as
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:25:16AM +, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
will be back up in the next 24 hours.
In fact it's up again now. Thanks to Jerry for fixing it.
Tim.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
I've just fixed a bug (#528 in bugzilla) to do with wins hook functionality.
The wins hook parameter is broken in Samba 3.0.0 but will be fixed in 3.0.1.
The attached patch against the release samba-3.0.0.tar.gz file can be used
to fix it.
Tim.
Index: nmbd_winsserver.c
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 07:04:48PM -0700, Steve Jr Ramage wrote:
Still having that problem with samba seemingly corrupting files,
This class of problems is usually caused by either by bad network
hardware or bad network drivers. Check the half/full duplex settings
on your switch or try
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:22:32AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed Sep 3 01:22:32 2003
Author: tpot
Update of /data/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9463
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE
DOMAIN_MEMBER.xml
Log
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:53:45PM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
I'm tracking a compiling issue with 2.2.8a on AIX 5.2-ML01 with IBM C for
AIX 6.0 and i'm having an issue with lib/snprintf.c
The first thing i noticed is that includes.h is not included which is
in many other places, but I'm
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Guenther Deschner wrote:
I think we are done with MIT Kerberos for the moment. The Heimdal detection
looks like it has been broken for ages so it's next on the list.
no. for a long time heimdal detection *was* running absolutly fine on a
lot of
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:57:11PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Remove the -A option of wbinfo, leaving only the long version,
--set-auth-user. There was enough confusion, as in bug #158,
when a user accidentally typed -A instead of -a, and would get themselves
stuck with a
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:20:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
wbinfo.c
Log Message:
Remove the -A option of wbinfo, leaving only the long version,
--set-auth-user. There was enough confusion, as in bug #158,
when a user accidentally typed
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:10:49AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2380/nsswitch
Modified Files:
Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD
winbindd_group.c
Log Message:
CR 2230 - allow domain local groups to appear
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:02:56AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Also, fixed nsstest so it doesn't segfault when a nss function can't
be dlopened(). Log an error and abort the test gracefully instead.
It think this patch is wrong - the idea behind nsstest is that it is
generic, you can
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:59:05PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
net_rpc_join.c
Log Message:
This glosses over John's problem at SambaXP 2003. When we want to join
a NT4 domain as a BDC with an existing workstation account (existing
bdc is
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:47:59PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified Files:
Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD
winbindd_group.c
Log Message:
Fix for cr 2214: use the group list in the cached info3 structure in
preference to the group list returned by the get user groups rpc which
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 08:30:50AM -0500, Brett A. Funderburg wrote:
This looks like a problem in Samba's unmarshalling of security
descriptors. I'd be interested in seeing a debug level 10 log of what
is happening here. Add 'debug level = 10' to your smb.conf file to
get this.
I'm
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:21:08PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops, sorry! I guess I don't have enough experience with exotic
compilers ;-)
gcc is not an exotic compiler :-). That's what I used to catch this...
You should get a warning for this if you use ./configure.developer
Tim.
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:49:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu May 29 23:49:31 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18192/include
Don't forget your janitorial duties. (-:
This gets us closer to W2k+ in what
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:56:45PM +0200, Michael Steffens wrote:
the attached enhancements of SID related debug messages were quite
useful for me for tracking down where strange SIDs winbindd
complained about are coming from.
Being there I found that my suspicous SIDs are included in the
I was poking around in the segv signal handling code today as I'm in a
situation where an actual core dump would be handy to have.
The intent of the current code looks like core dumps are to be made in
$LOGDIR/corefiles but the dump_core() function is never executed as the
argument to
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:41:55PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Tim Potter wrote:
I was poking around in the segv signal handling code today as I'm in a
situation where an actual core dump would be handy to have.
The intent of the current code looks like core
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:37:33PM -0500, Roylance, Stephen D. wrote:
I'm trying to use some of the functions in winbind_nss.c in my winbind_aix.c
module. It compiles, but when I try to link it fill_pwent is unresolved.
What do I need to link against in order to get fill_pwent and such from
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Tim,
why did you remove SID_NAME_NONE
vars from type 'enum SID_NAME_USE' should be initialize with SID_NAME_NONE
I removed it because it wasn't used anywhere!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Orwig, Paul wrote:
[...]
My fix is neither pretty nor proper.
What is needed to fix the configure script to handle HPUX 11.0 properly??
I'd love to know as well. Can you send me the output of config.log in
private mail?
Tim.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy names like
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:28:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:58:16AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri Mar 21 00:58:16 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26159/printing
Modified Files:
Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD
printing.c
Log Message:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:09:19PM +1030, Adam Fox wrote:
When I ran configure the following was reported about the printf functions:
checking for asprintf declaration... no
checking for vasprintf declaration... no
checking for vsnprintf declaration... yes
checking for snprintf
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:22:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried to compile the current CVS today and found a typo and missing
arguments.
i append a small diff, that fixes these problems..
Hi - someone forgot their janitorial duties with regard to the
smbwrapper support. I've
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:03:05PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
has a primary
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:13:17PM -0500, Dave Collier-Brown wrote:
For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
to download and build samba, based on the instructions
in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
These are the same instructions that we put in Using Samba,
and are
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:36:56PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
working on
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:10:23PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Is there any reason I should not apply this patch to Samba HEAD?
I think the patch was eaten by Mailman. Please re-send as text/plain.
Without even seeing the patch (-: it's definitely a good idea.
Tim.
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:39:25PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
using setdriver in rpcclient wasn't working for me, so I traced
execution and discovered that it uses open_printer_ex with an access
level of MAXIMUM_ALLOWED_ACCESS. This only grants me read access to
the printer when I am in fact a
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
do so?
Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if
the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 06:54:37AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Vance Lankhaar wrote:
What about adding a value to the printing param? - printing =
disabled
This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
do so?
Why do we need it? Just
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:10:53PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
do so?
Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if
the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print shares are
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:10:12PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:38:50PM -0800, Chere Zhou wrote:
This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
the email.
There's a neat-o program called 'unwrapdiff' that can do all the
hard for for you. Under debian it is
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
actually it looks quite good :-)
That's good to hear!
Attached is a capture from two W2K machines talking to each other.
Packet No. 19 shows the NT NOTIFY response packet.
This capture was made using the Windows version of
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, Herb Lewis wrote:
Isn't the second check for newline redundant?
Looks like it to me.
Only redundant if we can guarentee that the cmd string will only have
one \n at the end and no other ones embeded in the string. I don't
know enough about
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:47:38AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
Scenario: Fresh compile of Samba 3.0, both a20 and a21. Attempt to use attached
smb.conf.
EXANET-QA is a part of the EXANET-IL domain (e.g - EXANET-IL is the parent domain).
EXANET-QA is supposedly set in compatibility mode.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:26:21PM -0500, Michael B. Allen wrote:
This is set at compile-time, not run-time. This line:
#define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
must occur before the first invocation of sys/types.
This could be a build option, but it might
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:23:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better still why not use poll() instead of select() in the winbindd
main loop?
Because not everyone has poll() :-(. Some have poll build on select.
Some people have poll() and it doesn't work So many bugs, so
little
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:44:54PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
You may or may not have noticed, but wbinfo -m doesn't work on
SAMBA_3_0, and -u or -g don't return users/groups from trusted domains.
The problem was in winbindd_util.c. init_domain_list would reset the
list using free_domain_list
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:53:05PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
We have a site with SAMBA_3_0 where it takes 12-15 minutes to initialize
winbindd's cache (locks/winbindd_cache.tdb) every time winbindd
restarts. While this is going on, users can't authenticate. (~12,000
users and 9,000 groups
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:23:30PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
The bug apparently came in Andrew Bartlett's merge in 1.45; the
provenance of it I don't know. (TNG?) This patch ought to be applied
to 2.2, HEAD, 3.0, and APPL_HEAD.
Tim, how's this patch?
How about this - I've collapsed the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:12:58AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in
samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's.
Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)?
Did it work, would it be possible to extract
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:01:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sync of Heimdal kerberos stuff with HEAD. If this breaks I'm blaming
the dog again.
hm. this broke heimdal-build in 3_0 :)
Yes, Tim shouldn't have done that without talking to me.
libads/kerberos_verify.c in HEAD
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:06:32PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
hi folks,
ran this command:
rpcclient -U Administrator%password PDC -c getdriver PRINTER
and got this output:
[Windows 4.0]
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Hi - I've fixed this in the latest CVS. Thanks for reporting it!
Er, should I be worried about this warning?
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_read':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:54: warning: right shift count = width of type
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_write':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:301: warning: right shift count = width of type
It's
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Damian, G. C. (Gerald) wrote:
[...]
Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
in AD and how do you set it up?
Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
latest Samba code. Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:54:19PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
in AD and how do you set it up?
Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
latest Samba code. Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the Samba
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:54:19AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Can anyone point me at documentation on the limitations of a downlevel
server being a member server in an AD network?
The specific case I am thinking of is a Samba-2.2.x-based server.
I don't have any documentation but I can
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:15:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13171/libsmb
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
clikrb5.c
Log Message:
Thanks Meeester Potter, for reverting *all* my Heimdal changes
I've just upgrade the CVS pserver running on samba.org. If anyone sees
any problems please let me know via email.
Luckily we are running the anonymous CVS pserver in a chroot jail which
is updated via rsync from the actual repository so the effects of anyone
exploiting the bug would be minimal.
I've just upgrade the CVS pserver running on samba.org. If anyone sees
any problems please let me know via email.
Luckily we are running the anonymous CVS pserver in a chroot jail which
is updated via rsync from the actual repository so the effects of anyone
exploiting the bug would be minimal.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:21:22AM +0100, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
depending on how the string is passed (data or ptr), on the pipe (LSA
comes to mind), and the phase of the moon and the different SP, all the
unicode strings are not equal !
Some strings are raw strings (not NULL
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
the mutex reference count.
Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to this.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:40:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue Jan 14 11:40:12 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3980
Modified Files:
cvs.html
Log Message:
Change some pre tags to tt, to avoid overly-wide
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +0930, Barry Robinson wrote:
Not sure if this is the right mailing list to direct this to, but just
wondering if anyone would know of any functionality in using the KXRPC
service through Samba?
Basically you have to install the KXRPC service on a Windows
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0600, Matt Roberts, GRDA wrote:
First, please accept my thanks for a really great product. I use Samba
extensively and really enjoy it.
I'm glad you enjoy Samba so much. (-:
[...]
In the NMBd debug output (nmbd run with -d 255), I find this excerpt:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:06:19PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
just spotted this while leafing through the CVS tree (some code elided
for clarity)
Thanks - I've committed a fix for this.
Tim.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 08:26:40AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
[Question 3. What exactly does Kerberos do in the server? If Kerberos is used only
for initial authentication,
then all I need to do is PKINIT in the filesystem on UNIX, right? Or, does
Kerberos actually check a ticket per
each
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:29:03PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
stored in clear text in secrets.tdb (HEAD) when i join an NT 4.0
domain? It doesn't store the the last change time either.
Unless someone yells, i'm going to fix this.
Er, it's always been in clear text. Or are you
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:44:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following?
I think I fixed this in head already. I'll have to do some janitorial
merging when I get in to work. I'm surprised I haven't been busted
already by Jeremy.
On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:48:34 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
http://lightconsulting.com/~thalakan/gpdump.cap
A comparitive capture of what Win2k does could be useful here.
Yes - maybe the MMC program tries to do all its operations by bashing away
at a file over SMB. I think Access works like
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 05:01:52PM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
Great that you decided, but no one told me about that.
And the Makefile had them going to $(LIBDIR).
Every time any of us make any change to a path for any file - PLEASE BE
AWARE: It may affect our binary packaging, may
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:11:38 +, alex wrote:
The problem we've come accross is that once the DFS root has been
created (hosted by a Win2k server), the primary SMB server can be added
as a 'link' to the root (and the failover) (and the DFS link opened
through a DFS client), however, when an
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:01:35PM -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
# wbinfo -t
Secret is good
# wbinfo -u
0xc022
I takes it about 4 seconds to respond, but then all I get is that hex
code...where does that come from? I found one reference in the archive,
and it was samba running
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:45:06PM +, Patrick Beaumont wrote:
I have tried running ./configure -disable-cups but I get the same
problem, I do not have cups installed but I wouldnt have thought that
would stop it form working.
The option is called --disable-cups (i.e with two -- in
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:38:02AM +0800, Patrick Kwan wrote:
Anyone can provide the suggestion of what options should use
basically when compiling samba 2.2.7?
My requirement:
-Samba server as PDC with user auth in the same machine.
-client: win98/NT4/win2000/win xp.
-printing support.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:48:50 +1100, Paul Szabo wrote:
I disagree that DNS lookups are an issue. You use hostnames at least for
log file names and for hosts allow lookups. The fashion lately is to put
DNS lookups are definitely an issue. If you have a broken DNS server then
mysterious
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:14:12AM -0600, Benjamin Herbert wrote:
Im running samba 2.2.7 on a redhat 7.2 machine. I run winbindd and it
says it can't connect to the Win2k machine. I know that this is due to
the fact the anonymous connections arent allowed. So to fix this I run
'wbinfo -A
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 07:16:57PM +0100, Sven Hazejager wrote:
I need to change the local administrator password on a number of Windows
2000 machines in our network. I would like to do this automatically from
our FreeBSD server. Is it possible to use Samba for this? Of course, the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:58:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/torture
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31632/torture
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
cmd_vfs.c
Log Message:
Please compile with :
-g -Wall -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:16:09PM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Where do I get the samba codesigning key? How do I import it? How
do I know I got the right one?
What do I do if it doesn't verify?
I always wondered if someone uploaded a tarball with a trojan, what's
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
