[Samba] smbstatus+info
hello all, can u help me with some details abt smbstatus program. i read the man page which tells in a brief that it is run to know the current connections. wat is this term current connections...anyone can help me out with some details pls... does it really mean the current clients in samba server(who r all logged in/authentecated in PDC). pls help me with details thanks in advance. prasad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3alpha20 Bugs (FreeBSD 4.6)
hello, I would say that for Samba 3.0 alpha20 (and latter I suppose ) acting as PDC you must reenable use spnego=yes. I say it because it is not clear, and I had to search a lot before finding why i could not log on. (it work with spnego=no with alpha17 !) I've tried to set up add and delete scripts for everythings : add user script, delete user script etc... add/del user and group work fine but add/del user to/from group and set primary group seem not to do anything. (by placing /bin/echo %g %u/test it do nothing too while it work with add user). I've found also an error with UserMng for NT when group names (created by smbgroupedit) are too long. If I rename it to a less caracters name, I can double-click on a group name and view who is in the group. With usermng for NT, we can delete a global group or a local group (without entry in smbgroupedit) without problem, but if this group appears in smbgroupedit and is local, it's impossible. (say unable to delete this system group). I hope this can help ? I don't no if it is the right place for that... But i'm not sure all are bugs, it could be problems in my config, so I post here. Laurent PS : I'm new to this mailing-list, and I'm french ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Connection Refuse
On Monday 09 August 2004 08:45, Prianggada I Tanaya wrote: There are several things that might cause problems here. ... $ smbclient -U% -L 10.1.45.12 added interface ip=10.1.45.13 bcast=10.1.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 error connecting to 10.1.45.12:139 (Connection refused) Error connecting to 10.1.45.12 (Connection refused) Connection to fk-msi-srv failed This means that 10.1.45.12 is not listening for SMB connections on port 139, which means that Samba server daemon smbd is either not running or has been started with some bogus arguments - more likely the former. There should be startup script somewhere that properly launches the Samba daemons. In mine (SuSE Linux) it's /etc/init.d/smb, which you'd run with start as argument. You can check the running processes on 10.1.45.12 to see if smbd and nmbd are running. You can also verify that they're listening properly with netstat: $ netstat -nlA inet You should see (at least) a line under local TCP addresses reading 0.0.0.0:139 or 10.1.45.12:139, and lines under UDP for :137 and ...:138 If you don't see those, of if the ones you do see are not on either 0.0.0.0 or the machine's public address, you won't be able to connect to it. Some bad parameters in smb.conf can cause startup failures (e.g., a value for interfaces = that is impossible for the the machine). testparm may not catch that. Check the Samba logs if you suspect that (or just for good measure in any case!). It's interesting that the failure message lists the NetBIOS name fk-msi-srv. If I read it right (someone correct me if not) there's either a WINS server on the network or an entry in hosts or lmhosts that gives the NetBIOS name-IP address mapping for that machine. If it is a WINS server, the daemons must have been running at one time for the WINS server to have learned of fk-msi-srv, and then were shut down later somehow. (I suppose it could be a running nmbd on the system, though it seems strange that you would have nmbd and not smbd running at a particular time - or does it?) using nmblookup, send anything ..., found this error. $ nmblookup -B 10.1.45.12 '*' querying * on 10.1.45.12 name_query failed to find name * Here you're specifying 10.1.45.12 as the broadcast address for name service (which, BTW, is an impossible broadcast address). The proper broadcast address for your network ( /16, a.k.a., class B) is 10.1.255.255 (note the messages from smbclient you quoted at the top). You probably meant -U (unicast address) instead of -B (broadcast address). Note that the nmblookup, when properly run, will show you the running SMB servers on the network even if the Samba daemons are not running on the machine you're using to run nmblookup. However, that machine will not appear in your nmblookups until you start the servers. Until then, as far as Samba and other SMB servers on the network (Samba and Windoze boxen) are concened, it doesn't exist. Ray Note: If you really get stumped, you can bump up the debug level and get more details about your command (enormously, if you wish!), with something like $ smbclient -d 3 (rest of your command) Try -d 10 just for fun... :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help with SAMBA configuratin.
Hi, I am configuring a Linux machine (R.H. 8.0) and I could join the Linux machine to the Windows LAN,I followed the tests from a pdf I downloadedd from samba.org about how to configure and test such an installation, but the problem is , that the Linux machine cannot access the shared directories in the Windows machines, the error I get seems to be related with permissions but I don't understand why ,on the other way, I can access the public directory in the Linux machine from a Windows machine... After checking in HOW-TO's and in the documents I have downloaded I can see nothing that helps me out I wonder if someone could give me a hint about which the problem could be. The machines in the WIndows LAN are all Win2k. Regards, Juan
Re: [Samba] smbstatus+info
Try run on server and yuo say Smbstatus list info about file server that not list logged users if this not attempt any share resource on server. And this users can be disconnect by timeout then is relative connected to share but not in list. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:02 AM Subject: [Samba] smbstatus+info hello all, can u help me with some details abt smbstatus program. i read the man page which tells in a brief that it is run to know the current connections. wat is this term current connections...anyone can help me out with some details pls... does it really mean the current clients in samba server(who r all logged in/authentecated in PDC). pls help me with details thanks in advance. prasad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Odd problems with XP
Your problem is complicated browsing with NT and samba. Reason: 1. Use on your network on all machines and servers only one!! protocol TCPIP. 2. Configure WINS server on NT PDC or BDC machine 3. In config tcpip on all clients set wins server to created IP. 4. In all samba server or clients set in smb.conf wins server = IP... REM If need another protocol as netbeui or ipx on server or clients yuo must disable browsing features for this protocols in regedit or confs... Thats all. - Original Message - From: Neal Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: [Samba] Odd problems with XP I have one Samba server with my Raid 5 can on it, and a NT 4 PDC and BDC, and im running samba 2.2.7, for most of my clients browsing the shares is just fine, but on some browsing the shares hangs or takes a long time to return with a result here is my smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = xx load printers = no workgroup = XXX encrypt passwords = Yes security = domain allow trusted domains = yes password server = time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 os level = 34 name resolve order = wins hosts bcast write raw = yes read raw = yes hide files = /:2eDS_Store/resource.frk/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/Des ktopFolderDB/Network Trash Folder/resource.frk/.*/ oplocks = yes max xmit = 65535 level2oplocks = yes dead time = 7 getwd cache = yes nt acl support = no [private] comment = Private Storage for %U path = %H/private create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [public] comment = Public Storage for %U path = %H/public create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [web] comment = Web root for %U path = %H/web Thanks for any help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks?
Thanks Jim for best report of oplock as i read. Super can be if you can add info or link about list of dangerous database engines for oplocks... Btw. Foxpro 2.6 = is ok. Foxpro 7.. = bad. Clipper= dangerous... exist this list for off oplocks? - Original Message - From: Jim Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bob Puff@NLE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jean-Paul ARGUDO [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 6:02 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks? On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 09:52, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: If Samba is corrupting the data files, then why wouldn't this be turned OFF by default? I would think data corruption would be a major, MAJOR problem, and reduce the usability of Samba. Is this really true? It comes down to the fact that Samba is faithfully mimicking a Windows NT/2000 server. Windows NT and Windows 2000 servers *BY DEFAULT* also have OPLOCKS enabled. Oplocks provide a *SIGNIFICANT* performance boost for network file operatings when a single user is accessing a file. They allow the *CLIENT* machine to basically cache the file locally, just like caching a local file on a local hard drive. Writes to the file are cached as well. Where oplocks cause problems is when a second client wants to open the same file (as in a shared file database). Then the Samba/NT/2000 server must issue what is called an 'oplock break request' to the first client that has oplocks on the file. The client is supposed to then flush any changes to disk, and release the oplocks on the file. The server must then wait on this to happen before the second client can be granted access to the file. Problems arise when the client takes too long to respond, or fails to respond to the oplock break request from the server. The second client sees a long delay in opening the file. Furthermore, if file IS opened by the second client and the first client never responded, or responds after the timeout occurs, then you can end up with file corruption, as the first client finally flushes changes to disk, after the second client has read the now outdated data, and is using it. Regardless of the problems, the fact of the matter is that if Samba does not enable oplocks by default, just as Windows NT and 2000 servers do, then Samba servers yeild much lower performance for many server file operations performed by the typical Windows network client. You would have everyone screaming about how slow the network is, and Samba would come nowhere near the performance of Windows NT/2000 servers in benchmarks. I have been using shared file databases on Windows NT and Windows 2000 servers for years now (dBASE files). For all customer installs, we *MUST* disable oplocks on the NT/2000 servers in order to maintain database integrity. So this problem is not unique to Samba. Samba handles it much more gracefully than NT/2000 do! On NT/2000 servers, you have to edit a registry key that disables oplocks globally on the entire server. With Samba, I can disable them on a share or file wildcard pattern basis, using the 'veto oplock files' option in smb.conf. The user that compared Samba with/without oplocks to his Netware server's performance is not comparing apples to apples. Samba clients are using the Windows Networking client - and really can only be compared to a comparably equipped and configured Windows NT/2000 server. Netware servers require the use of a Netware client package. The Netware client has an entirely different implementation of locking mechanisms, caching algorithms, and the entire network protocol and file sharing model is different. As is the Netware server. I think most experts that have ever researched the topic will agree that for sheer file serving performance, nothing can beat Netware. Historically anyway. I've not seen any benchmarks that included Netware in a few years. Where Netware falls down is in 3rd party support (these days), and the ability to run general purpose applications on your server. Plus, the server and client licenses are a LOT more expensive than a Samba server solution. I'll hazard a bet that if one were to examine the Netware IPX/SPX protocol, it is nowhere nearly as convoluted and ad-hoc as the SMB protocol, which Microsoft hodge-podged together. You really have to step back and think about the amount of effort involved by the Samba Team in faithfully reverse engineering and reproducing all the intricate details of a protocol that is such a mess! Keep up the good work, 'Team Samba'! -- /--- | Jim Morris | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |AIM: JFM2001 \--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list
[Samba] Trust relationship.
Hi, we have a trust relationship between servers in the 2 LAN's of my company, my problem is that (even with problems as I commented in a previous mail) I have somekind of access to the LAN where my Linux machine is connected to, but not to the trusted LAN. Could someone give me a hint about how to get this? Any kind of documentation would be helpful Regards, Juan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Trust relationship.
Try write more info about your nets... How servers routers yu use ... Best is graficaly as LAN1 (client w2k 1,2,3,4 server 2k server linux) - router - ??? - router - LAN2 ... - Original Message - From: Juan Rosell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: samba [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:03 AM Subject: [Samba] Trust relationship. Hi, we have a trust relationship between servers in the 2 LAN's of my company, my problem is that (even with problems as I commented in a previous mail) I have somekind of access to the LAN where my Linux machine is connected to, but not to the trusted LAN. Could someone give me a hint about how to get this? Any kind of documentation would be helpful Regards, Juan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] creating read/write files for everyone from a SAMBAclient
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 05:16, Ron Smith wrote: Can anyone tell me what to include or change in my 'smb.conf' files to enable anyone accessing a 'SAMBA' server share to have '777' permissions for directories, and '666' permissions on files they create, move or copy there? I have two SAMBA servers running; one on an IRIX machine and the other on a 'Linux' machine in a LAN environment. The folks on the Win boxes can create files on both machines, but I want the permissions on the directories and files they create on the SAMBA servers to be accessable to eveyone else on the LAN. For the relevant shares add the following force directory mode = 0777 force create mode = 0666 Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] How do I get Samba to ignore SIDs in non-Domain workgroup?
Half of my Win2K clients won't authenticate on my Samba 2.2.6a box on RH8. I installed Win2K from two different Ghost images but I haven't run sidgen -- the half that dont authenticate all came from the same image. The other clients authenticate OK. All the clients have the same username/passwd and smb.conf has: [global] security = user The clients are not part of a domain and dont use a WINS server. Is there any way I can get Samba to disregard the different SIDs? THX _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Annoying Printer problem...Samba 2.2.7a on Debian 3.0 with lprng
Hi all, Have got Winbind working again successfully on another box, but this time the printer won't work, it worked fine last time. The printer installs fine, and it lets me print to it, but nothing comes out on the printer, no sign of anything being sent to it. I think it's a permissions problem or something...but I've not much clue when it comes to printing on *nix how it actually works. /etc/printcap: LJ4500N:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/lj4500n:\ :mx#0:\ :rm=192.168.2.20:\ :done_jobs=0:\ :rp=:\ :sh: Relevant lines from smb.conf: printer admin = root, @DOMAIN+IT, @lpd printing = lprng lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P %p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P %p %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release %p %j queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p # HP Laserjet 4500N Share. [lj4500n] comment = HP LaserJet 4500N path = /var/spool/samba read only = No # guest ok = Yes printable = Yes print command = lpr -P lj4500n -r %s -h; rm %s printer name = lj4500n oplocks = No share modes = No admin users = @Domain+IT, valid users = @Domain+Domain Users create mask = 770 # Hidden printer drivers share. [print$] path = /usr/printers admin users = root @lp, @Domain+IT write list = root @lp, @Domain+IT create mask = 0755 guest ok = Yes The drivers never seem to load from print$ either. I can install the printer, but can't for the life of me get anything to print, can't find any relevant log messages in /var/log/lpd.* or anywhere else either. Any suggestions as always much appreciated. Shaolin * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Profiles and Win2000
Hi I still have a problem with Windows 2000 SP2 and Samba 2.2.7a: I set DeleteRoamingProfiles to 1 and deleted all old profiles. Now Windows sometimes creates/backups a local profile for every user *and* every login, e.g.: user.domain, user.domain.000, user.domain.001, user.domain.002... I thought they were deleted after setting csc policy = delete, but they aren't. Found some reports about this phenomenon, but no fix. Any more hints? -- Fridtjof Busse BOFH excuse #236: Fanout dropping voltage too much, try cutting some of those little traces -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba pdc, Norton Ghost enterprise edition and joinin g the domain?
You could try a batch file with NETDOM /Domain:MYDOMAIN /user:adminuser /password:apassword MEMBER MYCOMPUTER /JOINDOMAIN Then NETDOM /Domain:MYDOMAIN MEMBER MYCOMPUTER /JOINDOMAIN search microsoft.com for comand line join domain for more info. Bob Hi Bob! Thank you, we will try this. The problem is that we need a batch file to do this, wich must be copied to the client and contains username and password of an account with root permissions. This file will be deleted after successful completion, but it's not really nice to do these things... CU Lars. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba to samba via LDAP
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 16:34, jeff wrote: Hi all, I have lots of samba servers and want them to all authenticate against a single password file which will be a LDAP database. Where I want to be: Login to a domain called FROST that passes the username:passwd to a domain called ACR which checks LDAP. Where I'm at: I can login (from a W2K machine) to a test server called LIBIT which uses LDAP beautifully (after long hours/days of profanity). I can also join/login to the samba domains called ACR (anytime) and FROST (if I change passwd server and security settings to a stand alone). I have 2 samba servers I'm testing out with the goal of passing passwords...the servers are FROST and the authenticating server is called ACR. I know that the login:passwd pair is being passed from FROST to ACR. ... any help would be wonderfulunless your a RTFM person because I wouldn't have gotten this far if I hadn't. Why not just have both servers authenticating against a common ldap store? It sounds like you want to run something like winbind (but against a samba DC not a windows DC) on your secondary server. I'm not sure that is possible. brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] private user accounts
You are connected to some shares with one username and password (presumably the one you logged into windows with) and then you are trying to connect to the private share with another username/password. You can't do that. You can log into windows with one username and connect to shares with another, but all the shares must be connected with the same user. If you have login scripts that automatically map drives, you will probably have to log into windows with the privateuser/password. Trey Nolen - Original Message - From: ligeo george [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:04 AM Subject: [Samba] private user accounts hello guys.. I have put up a share for a particular user. The user can access the directory from linux boxes using 'smbclient //IP/share -U privateuser . But cant do it from a windows machine. When I provide the privateuser,password, i get the error 'The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.' Why is this? Thanks for the help. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Does Samba attempt Anonymous logon to IPC$ shares? Can this lockout accounts?!?
Hopefully someone can put my mind at ease... I have about 10 W2K boxes with account lockout threshold of 5 failed logins and Additional Restrictions for Anonymous Connections set to 'No access w/o explicit anon. permissions' (Administrative Tools - Security Settings - Local Policies - Security Options) I've set up a Samba server this week and in the past few days I've noticed that some user accounts have been locked out (and its not just people forgetting their password). In /etc/samba/MACHINEONE.log I've got entries like this: [2002/12/17 18:17:56, 0] rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(133) connect to client: machine MACHINEONE rejected the tconX on the IPC$ share. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. And in the W2K Security Audit for MACHINETWO, I've got: Success Audit 18/12/2002 18:55:57 Source:Security Category:Logon/Logoff Event:538 User:ANONYMOUS LOGON Computer:MACHINETWO Unfortunately, I can't match up these two event types on a single machine because the logs and audits are incomplete (I've been switching the smbd log level and auditing isn't enabled on MACHINEONE ) I just want to be able to track down the cause of this... THX _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks?
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 03:56, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote: Thanks Jim for best report of oplock as i read. Super can be if you can add info or link about list of dangerous database engines for oplocks... Btw. Foxpro 2.6 = is ok. Foxpro 7.. = bad. Clipper= dangerous... exist this list for off oplocks? Thanks. But unfortunately, its not that simple.I doubt for example that one version of FoxPro will be good with oplocks, while another is bad. The entire problem with oplocks and shared-file databases such as dBASE, FoxPro, Paradox, Access, etc, is with file caching on the client side (the OPLCOCK), and that client system not breaking the oplock when requested. Even when the breaks do happen properly, the time to write the file back out to the server may be significant, causing a LONG delay on the 2nd client to open the file. When you see oplock problems, I guess you could say it is more client-OS and hardware dependant than it is on the software involve. It just so happens that the type of software that runs into oplock related issues most often is shared-file database software. Most other applications do not have 2 or more users opening the same file at the same time on a routine basis. -- /--- | Jim Morris | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |AIM: JFM2001 \--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks?
Super can be if you can add info or link about list of dangerous database engines for oplocks... Btw. Foxpro 2.6 = is ok. Foxpro 7.. = bad. Clipper= dangerous... exist this list for off oplocks? Thanks. But unfortunately, its not that simple.I doubt for example that one version of FoxPro will be good with oplocks, while another is bad. Yes. Making such list is not a good idea I think. Seems you all debate here of what the causes of the malfuntion could be (or are), and I think you didnt understand my point of view. Seems you arent considering all of the problem. (read above). When you see oplock problems, I guess you could say it is more client-OS and hardware dependant than it is on the software involve. So?... Most other applications do not have 2 or more users opening the same file at the same time on a routine basis. Sure. But you can't forbid people to drive because one of them maybe one day will drive drunk :-) I mean, in a production environment, It cant be half answers. It works or it doesnt. Thats my point of view. It is really interesting to know more about oplocks, why it works or not, why this client OS, this application will fail with oplocks on. And I really thank you all to share your knowledge on this! But, again, I cant bet on a technology. I'm not playing poker and cant do it with files where maybe all the business of my company is based on. Thats why I've disabled oplocks. I'm DBA maybe you'll understand why my principal fear is data loss. :-) Thanks all again. -- Jean-Paul ARGUDO -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks?
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 07:41, Jean-Paul ARGUDO wrote: But, again, I cant bet on a technology. I'm not playing poker and cant do it with files where maybe all the business of my company is based on. Thats why I've disabled oplocks. I have had it disabled on all shared-file database extensions I know of for years, while allowing it to be used for other files (Word docs for example). You do it selectively using the 'veto oplock files' option, globally or for a share: veto oplock files = /*.DBF/*.dbf/*.MDX/*.mdx/*.ITB/*.itb/*.MDB/*.mdb/ You get the picture. it is a slash (/) separated list of filename or filename patterns -- /--- | Jim Morris | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |AIM: JFM2001 \--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Profiles and Win2000
Hi, FB I still have a problem with Windows 2000 SP2 and Samba 2.2.7a: FB I set DeleteRoamingProfiles to 1 and deleted all old profiles. I think the correct registry key is DeleteRoamingCache. Take a look at http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/142/ FB Now Windows sometimes creates/backups a local profile for every user FB *and* every login, e.g.: FB user.domain, user.domain.000, user.domain.001, user.domain.002... FB I thought they were deleted after setting csc policy = delete, but FB they aren't. I'm not sure, but i think that csc policy = ... has got nothing to do with the deletion of profiles on the clients. See http://de.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#CSCPOLICY Apart from that you should set csc policy = disable for the profile share, to prevent windows client from offline(!) caching (this is not to be confused with saving the profile back to the server) the profiles. You might have noticed some entries in the event log, stating that there might be a problem with offline caching on the profile share). So, the only thing you need to do, is set the correct registry key and delete all old profile on the clients. Of course you have to make sure, that the profiles share is writable. Hope this helps. cu Arno -- Arno Gramatke ZLW/IMA der RWTH Aachen Dennewartstraße 27, D-52068 Aachen Telefon: +49 241 80-911-27 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help : Samba 2.2.7a inlcude generates an error
Hello ! OK : I have set up samba 2.2.7a on a Cobalt RaQ 550. Hand compiled etc... it works ok. Now, I have set up netbios aliases in order to specify different shares to appear when you select differnet shares. My main smb.conf : [global] workgroup = SERVEUR netbios name = PILS netbios aliases = carotte cobalt vlouchi ; wins server = 192.168.0.200 include = /etc/samba/smb.%L.conf wins support = no server string = Cobalt RaQ os level = 32 security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY max log size = 5000 veto files = /Network Trash Folder/ encrypt passwords = yes debug level = 1 ; guest account = ftp domain master = yes ; [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no read only = no create mask = 0755 and a sample smb.carotte.conf [carotte] comment = Site Web Carotte path = /home/.sites/143/site2 writeable = yes browseable = yes valid users = @site2 I can go on every netbios alias but carotte. When I put the carotte share directly in the main smb.conf, it works, and when I put the carotte share in comment it works to. But, in the other case, when the file is actually included, Win2K tells me that it cannot find the network path. Can someone help me ? Kind regards, Gerd -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]\\_// (. .) Powered by SuSE Linux 8.1 ---oOOo-oOOo-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba to samba via LDAP
Why not just have both servers authenticating against a common ldap store? That would be the same desired result. Know any way I could have a real-time single LDAP store on a single machine and have everything auth against it? I've thought about just doing a scp of the .gdbm files, but that's just another point of failure. Any ideas would be tried. thanks, jeff On Thursday 19 December 2002 07:25 am, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 16:34, jeff wrote: Hi all, I have lots of samba servers and want them to all authenticate against a single password file which will be a LDAP database. Where I want to be: Login to a domain called FROST that passes the username:passwd to a domain called ACR which checks LDAP. Where I'm at: I can login (from a W2K machine) to a test server called LIBIT which uses LDAP beautifully (after long hours/days of profanity). I can also join/login to the samba domains called ACR (anytime) and FROST (if I change passwd server and security settings to a stand alone). I have 2 samba servers I'm testing out with the goal of passing passwords...the servers are FROST and the authenticating server is called ACR. I know that the login:passwd pair is being passed from FROST to ACR. ... any help would be wonderfulunless your a RTFM person because I wouldn't have gotten this far if I hadn't. Why not just have both servers authenticating against a common ldap store? It sounds like you want to run something like winbind (but against a samba DC not a windows DC) on your secondary server. I'm not sure that is possible. brad -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks?
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 08:20, Jean-Paul ARGUDO wrote: I read this option in smb docs. Looks great. But in my case, since I have users yet only working on M$ Office standard, to put a veto for oplocks on .doc and .xls files equals disable oplocks :-)) I understand. Other question: is veto oplock files really case sensitive? Couldn't you put some regexp here? SMB dev= Is this supported? Case sensitivity depends on how you have the 'case sensitive' option of Samba configured the default is NO. I have both cases, but maybe it is not necessary. And no - the option does not use regexp style expressions - just ? and * wildcard characters. Look at 'veto files' for the rules on these expressions -- /--- | Jim Morris | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |AIM: JFM2001 \--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help adding Samba users on unix
On Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 16:30, Bill Miller wrote: Could someone help me with this? My Unix Administrator no longer works here. Thanks Hello ! I suppose you local users. You nee to create users on a unix basis useradd -m the_user set his password passwd the_user which will ask you a password and on the sambabasis smbpasswd -a the_user which will ask you a password too If you need more info, just ask HTH Gerd Bill Miller ROSS Marketing, Inc. Directory of Technology (319) 294-8080 Office mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (319) 294-8111 Fax (319) 551-9848 Mobile mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] up to 100 chars -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]\\_// (. .) Powered by SuSE Linux 8.1 ---oOOo-oOOo-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help adding Samba users on unix
Could someone help me with this? My Unix Administrator no longer works here. Thanks Bill Miller ROSS Marketing, Inc. Directory of Technology (319) 294-8080 Office mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (319) 294-8111 Fax (319) 551-9848 Mobile mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] up to 100 chars
[Samba] Re: max log size setting ignored
Thanks but no thanks. I've got literally hundreds of users. As I write this message there are 424 unique users using my samba server. I don't want hundreds and hundreds of little log files. I want one BIG log file. It should be no-brainer, in the [global] section of smb.conf I have: log level = 1 max log size = 0 But, no matter what I set max log size to, be it 0 or a big number, it is always ignored and the log.smbd is always ended at 5 Meg. I doubt I'm going to get any support, you'll all write and say it works fine for me or you must be doing something wrong but oh well. In fact, when I did a little digging into it a while back running samba on my workstation which is also Sparc/Solaris the parameter did in fact seem to work ok. But that was with a basic smb.conf and a load of 1 user (me) testing from my Windows 2000 box. It just doesn't work on my server. :( I guess, all I'm asking is that if anybody else has seen this problem, please speak up. Thankyou, Tom Schaefer You might try setting in your smb.conf [globals]: log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 100 log level = 1 Should keep the log file 100 Kb per client. This works for me. - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Profiles and Win2000
On Thursday 19 December 2002 16:28, Arno Gramatke wrote: Hi, FB I still have a problem with Windows 2000 SP2 and Samba 2.2.7a: FB I set DeleteRoamingProfiles to 1 and deleted all old profiles. I think the correct registry key is DeleteRoamingCache. Sorry, typo. I used DeleteRoamingCache FB Now Windows sometimes creates/backups a local profile for every FB user*and* every login, e.g.: FB user.domain, user.domain.000, user.domain.001, user.domain.002... FB I thought they were deleted after setting csc policy = delete, FB but they aren't. I'm not sure, but i think that csc policy = ... has got nothing to do with the deletion of profiles on the clients. See http://de.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#CSCPOLICY Apart from that you should set csc policy = disable for the profile share, to prevent windows client from offline(!) caching (this is not to be confused with saving the profile back to the server) the profiles. You might have noticed some entries in the event log, stating that there might be a problem with offline caching on the profile share). User store their Profiles in ~/.Profiles (which works fine), I just need to get rid of any local copies on the client. After the patch and the deletion of the profiles, it looked like the local profile would get deleted, but after some logins and logout, those .000/.001 profiles appeared. -- Fridtjof Busse NT is the only OS that has caused me to beat a piece of hardware to death with my bare hands. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba 3alpha20 Bugs (FreeBSD 4.6)
Nothing to say about that :-/ ? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Generic smb.conf file
Hi, Does anybody know where I can get an untouched smb.conf file? When I used samba-swat, it rewrote smb.conf and deleted out the comments that was in the original file that came with samba. Minh --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send samba mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of samba digest... Today's Topics: 1. max log size setting ignored (Tom Schaefer) 2. Re: ownership of smbfs mounts (M. D. Chappell) 3. Samba with Global File System (Montgomery Mouw) 4. Scrambled Jobnames when Printing (Gavin-Francis Fernandes) 5. Re: samba and ipchains (Joel Hammer) 6. Re: Odd problems with XP (Joel Hammer) 7. Re: Scrambled Jobnames when Printing (Joel Hammer) 8. Large File support not quiet working.. (CHS) 9. Re: max log size setting ignored (John H Terpstra) 10. Re: How important are oplocks? (Brad) 11. Re: Create time changing by itself? (Timo Sirainen) 12. Re: ownership of smbfs mounts (Hidong Kim) 13. creating read/write files for everyone from a SAMBA client (Ron Smith) 14. Creating read/write directories and files for everyone from an smb client (Ron Smith) 15. =?GB2312?B?s8/V97T6wO0=?= (=?GB2312?B?0tfN+A==?=) 16. private user accounts (ligeo george) 17. smbstatus+info ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 18. Samba 3alpha20 Bugs (FreeBSD 4.6) (Laurent Hofmann) 19. Re: Connection Refuse (Ray Simard) 20. Help with SAMBA configuratin. (Juan Rosell) 21. Re: smbstatus+info (Marian Mlcoch, Ing) 22. Re: Odd problems with XP (Marian Mlcoch, Ing) 23. Re: How important are oplocks? (Marian Mlcoch, Ing) 24. Trust relationship. (Juan Rosell) 25. Re: Trust relationship. (Marian Mlcoch, Ing) 26. Re: creating read/write files for everyone from a SAMBA client (M. D. Chappell) 27. How do I get Samba to ignore SIDs in non-Domain workgroup? (lcea mdx) 28. Annoying Printer problem...Samba 2.2.7a on Debian 3.0 with lprng (Gareth Davies) 29. Profiles and Win2000 (Fridtjof Busse) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:14:08 -0600 From: Tom Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] max log size setting ignored I work at a university and we are in the process of moving basically everything, and I mean everything to samba, eg.: bash-2.03$ /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus | wc -l 1669 As you might imagine my log.smbd grows quite rapidly. Even at log level 1 it routinely exceeds 5 Meg. a day and then is renamed log.smbd.old and a new log.smbd is created. NO MATTER WHAT I SET max log size equal to! Be it a large value like 30 which is what I want, or 0 for infinite, its just always seems to be ignored and the default 5000 is always in effect. Is anybody else experiencing this? I have a feeling it has to do with the sheer load this server experiences and/or the complexity of the smb.conf file although its really not THAT complex. I'm doing the dual personality thing with include = /usr/local/samba/lib/%L.smb.conf and make a lot of use of %U and %G and a bit of %S and some force user and some force group and root prexec and root prexec close but REALLY NOTHING THAT complicated and EVERYTHING works perfectly except for the max log size setting. This used to happen when I used to build Samba with gcc on Solaris and it still happens although now I use Sun's Forte compiler. I've been annoyed by this version after version of Samba and everytime I upgrade I always eagerly check if my log files will grow beyond 5 Meg and they never do. I just upgraded to 2.2.7 last week and am still experiencing this problem so I've decided to finally post about it. Tom Schaefer I --__--__-- Message: 2 Subject: Re: [Samba] ownership of smbfs mounts From: M. D. Chappell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18 Dec 2002 22:39:12 + On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 21:04, Hidong Kim wrote: If I put the mount statement into /etc/fstab as //windows1/public /home/windows1 smbfs username=me,password=pass 0 0 and then do 'mount -a' as root, the ownership of /home/windows1 changes to root:root. How can I put the mount command into /etc/fstab, and maintain me:users ownership of the mount point? Thanks, Try //windows1/public /home/windows1 smbfs username=me,password=pass,uid=uid,gid=gid 0 0 by uid gid I mean the numbers not the names. Mark Chappell --__--__-- Message: 3 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Montgomery Mouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:45:57 -0600 Subject: [Samba] Samba
[Samba] Previous questions about Samba 3.0alpha PDC
In a few previous mails, I've asked questions about the PDC support in Samba 2.2.7a and 3.0alpha respectively, but have not received any replies. Perhaps there are better lists where one could ask such questions? -- Jonas Öberg Systems administrator/webmaster, Department of Informatics, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Gothenburg University. Phone. +46-31-7732717, Fax. +47-31-7734754 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Keeping Ownership and Permissions
Every time a user goes and updates a file on a share, it overwrites the Ownership and permissions. Ownership should be root with AR as the group. Permission for group to write to file gets lost. Is there anything I can do to fix this? Thanks, Roger Miranda Sumac Clothing Company www.sumaclothing.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Odd problems with XP
I Do have a central WINS server running and the PDC, BDC, the Samba box, and the XP client know about the wins server Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote: Your problem is complicated browsing with NT and samba. Reason: 1. Use on your network on all machines and servers only one!! protocol TCPIP. 2. Configure WINS server on NT PDC or BDC machine 3. In config tcpip on all clients set wins server to created IP. 4. In all samba server or clients set in smb.conf wins server = IP... REM If need another protocol as netbeui or ipx on server or clients yuo must disable browsing features for this protocols in regedit or confs... Thats all. - Original Message - From: "Neal Lawson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: [Samba] Odd problems with XP I have one Samba server with my Raid 5 can on it, and a NT 4 PDC and BDC, and im running samba 2.2.7, for most of my clients browsing the shares is just fine, but on some browsing the shares hangs or takes a long time to return with a result here is my smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = xx load printers = no workgroup = XXX encrypt passwords = Yes security = domain allow trusted domains = yes password server = time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 os level = 34 name resolve order = wins hosts bcast write raw = yes read raw = yes hide files = /:2eDS_Store/resource.frk/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/Des ktopFolderDB/Network Trash Folder/resource.frk/.*/ oplocks = yes max xmit = 65535 level2oplocks = yes dead time = 7 getwd cache = yes nt acl support = no [private] comment = Private Storage for %U path = %H/private create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [public] comment = Public Storage for %U path = %H/public create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [web] comment = Web root for %U path = %H/web Thanks for any help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Odd problems with XP
How does your Samba box know about the WINS server? (Unless, of course, you neglected to post your *complete* smb.conf) Dec 19 12:57pm They hang the man and flog the woman That steal the goose from off the common, But let the greater villain loose That steals the common from the goose. --English folk poem, circa 1764 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Neal Lawson wrote: I Do have a central WINS server running and the PDC, BDC, the Samba box, and the XP client know about the wins server Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote: Your problem is complicated browsing with NT and samba. Reason: 1. Use on your network on all machines and servers only one!! protocol TCPIP. 2. Configure WINS server on NT PDC or BDC machine 3. In config tcpip on all clients set wins server to created IP. 4. In all samba server or clients set in smb.conf wins server = IP... REM If need another protocol as netbeui or ipx on server or clients yuo must disable browsing features for this protocols in regedit or confs... Thats all. - Original Message - From: Neal Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: [Samba] Odd problems with XP I have one Samba server with my Raid 5 can on it, and a NT 4 PDC and BDC, and im running samba 2.2.7, for most of my clients browsing the shares is just fine, but on some browsing the shares hangs or takes a long time to return with a result here is my smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = xx load printers = no workgroup = XXX encrypt passwords = Yes security = domain allow trusted domains = yes password server = time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 os level = 34 name resolve order = wins hosts bcast write raw = yes read raw = yes hide files = /:2eDS_Store/resource.frk/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/Des ktopFolderDB/Network Trash Folder/resource.frk/.*/ oplocks = yes max xmit = 65535 level2oplocks = yes dead time = 7 getwd cache = yes nt acl support = no [private] comment = Private Storage for %U path = %H/private create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [public] comment = Public Storage for %U path = %H/public create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [web] comment = Web root for %U path = %H/web Thanks for any help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Odd problems with XP
I'm sorry i in trying to hide sentivitve infomation i deleted those lines so there they are with out the ip's remote announce = 123.123.123.123/DOMAIN wins server = 123.123.123.123 remote browse sync = 123.123.123.123 sorry Rashkae wrote: How does your Samba box know about the WINS server? (Unless, of course, you neglected to post your *complete* smb.conf) Dec 19 12:57pm They hang the man and flog the woman That steal the goose from off the common, But let the greater villain loose That steals the common from the goose. --English folk poem, circa 1764 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Neal Lawson wrote: I Do have a central WINS server running and the PDC, BDC, the Samba box, and the XP client know about the wins server Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote: Your problem is complicated browsing with NT and samba. Reason: 1. Use on your network on all machines and servers only one!! protocol TCPIP. 2. Configure WINS server on NT PDC or BDC machine 3. In config tcpip on all clients set wins server to created IP. 4. In all samba server or clients set in smb.conf wins server = IP... REM If need another protocol as netbeui or ipx on server or clients yuo must disable browsing features for this protocols in regedit or confs... Thats all. - Original Message - From: "Neal Lawson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: [Samba] Odd problems with XP I have one Samba server with my Raid 5 can on it, and a NT 4 PDC and BDC, and im running samba 2.2.7, for most of my clients browsing the shares is just fine, but on some browsing the shares hangs or takes a long time to return with a result here is my smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = xx load printers = no workgroup = XXX encrypt passwords = Yes security = domain allow trusted domains = yes password server = time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 os level = 34 name resolve order = wins hosts bcast write raw = yes read raw = yes hide files = /:2eDS_Store/resource.frk/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/Des ktopFolderDB/Network Trash Folder/resource.frk/.*/ oplocks = yes max xmit = 65535 level2oplocks = yes dead time = 7 getwd cache = yes nt acl support = no [private] comment = Private Storage for %U path = %H/private create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [public] comment = Public Storage for %U path = %H/public create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [web] comment = Web root for %U path = %H/web Thanks for any help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Failed to delete entry for share
Hi All,
I'm having some minor trouble with an obscure samba feature. I'm using
the remote administration Server Manager features of smb.conf.
Specifically the add share command change share command and delete
share command. I've written a small C program to do the text-processing
portion of smb.conf file needed for each operation. The C program just
does simple changes and returns 0. The actual commands are defined in my
smb.conf as:
# remote administration
add share command= /usr/sbin/smbchangeshare /etc/samba/smb.conf.add
change share command = /usr/sbin/smbchangeshare /etc/samba/smb.conf.add
delete share command = /usr/sbin/smbchangeshare -d
(the extra parameters are used by my C program to do different things)
Adding shares works fine and changing the comments in shares works too.
However, when I delete shares from ServerManager, I get this message in
the samba log file:
[2002/12/19 12:16:13, 0]
rpc_server/srv_srvsvc_nt.c:delete_share_security(277)
delete_share_security: Failed to delete entry for share w98bin
The delete operation does work though and the share is removed from the
smb.conf and no longer appears in NetworkNeighborhood.
Also, when I do a change share operation in ServerManager where I change
the path of an existing share, I get the same message in the samba log
file, but the change operation does not fully complete. The smb.conf
file portion completes OK (the part my C program does), but the
NetworkNeighborhood view of the sharename shows the previous path. So It
would work (show the updated path) if the samba server were restarted,
but does not do it dynamically like the delete operation does.
I've tested and duplicated this problem on WindowsXP using the old Nt4
serverManager and on Windows98SE using the win9x serverManager. The
results are the same for both, so I do not think it is a client-side
issue. Also, I've tried various sharenames, paths and comments with no
difference found. And I've seen the same behavior on shares created with
either serverManager or text-based smb.conf editing.
The one effect I have observed is that if go into ServerManager and
modify the Permissions on the soon-to-be-deleted, newly-created,
share, then the delete/change-path works ok and there is no error
message in the samba log file.
The Permissions are initially set to Everyone--FullControl. I can
eliminate the error by either adding another permission settings or
simply deleting the default Everyone setting, saving it, and then
recreating the exact same setting.
The actual error message come from the following section in the source:
rpc_server/srv_srvsvc_nt.c
static BOOL delete_share_security(int snum)
{
TDB_DATA kbuf;
fstring key;
slprintf(key, sizeof(key)-1, SECDESC/%s,
lp_servicename(snum));
kbuf.dptr = key;
kbuf.dsize = strlen(key)+1;
if (tdb_delete(share_tdb, kbuf) != 0) {
DEBUG(0,(delete_share_security: Failed to delete entry
for share %s\n,
lp_servicename(snum) ));
return False;
}
return True;
}
So It appears to me that some security setting is not getting setup for
shares correctly. Before I dig further into the sources, I thought maybe
some of you kind readers could help me out with this one.
Ken McDonald
Computer Geek Extraordinaire
Here is my current smb.conf. It is a work-in-progress.
[global]
# main settings
workgroup = TGA
server string =
#security settings
security = user
admin users = root
hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1 except
10.0.0.1
hosts deny= all
interfaces= eth0 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1
bind interfaces only = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/sambapasswd
#invalid users = root @wheel
hide unreadable = yes
browseable= yes
utmp = yes
add user script = /usr/sbin/smbaddmachine %m$
allow trusted domains = no
# debug settings
log level= 0
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m
max log size = 1000
# performance options
oplocks= yes
level2oplocks = yes
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192
SO_RCVBUF=8192
# domain controller settings
domain logons= yes
domain master= yes
preferred master = yes
local master = yes
os level = 99
logon drive = H:
logon home = \\%h\%U\.profiles
logon path = \\%h\profiles\%U
logon script = ms.bat
wins support = yes
dns proxy= no
# name mangling
mangling method = hash2
case sensitive = no
default case= lower
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
# remote administration
add share command= /usr/sbin/smbchangeshare
Re: [Samba] Help adding Samba users on unix
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 10:30, Bill Miller wrote: Could someone help me with this? add a new unix user (dunno your unix - probably use 'adduser username' or maybe 'useradd username') import that user to samba 'smbpasswd -a usename' set their passwords if you were not prompted passwd username smbpasswd username My Unix Administrator no longer works here. should be easy to find a new one in this market... brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Password and Synchronization
Does anyone know the best way to Sync up the Samba and Linux password with either Windows 2000 Active directory or Novell NDS? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Add Win2kPro Workstation to new Linux PDC
I created a new virtual Linux server running the Red Hat v7.2 distribution. After getting a MySQL/PHP application running, the next step was to add a Win2kPro Workstation to a new Linux PDC. Towards that end I modified the smb.conf file as described below to turn the virtual Linux server into a stand alone PDC. A 'MACHINE.SID' was created in the /usr/local/samba/private directory. Additionally, I created some Linux users and populated the smbpasswd file with them. When I now try to use the Network Identification tab of my workstations system properties to add it to the domain, I get an error dialog indicating that the computer cannot be added to the domain because 'the account used was a computer account. Use a 'global user or local user account to access this server'. How can I make one of the accounts that was used to populate the smbpasswd file a 'Global User' in SAMBA? [global] smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd wins server = 172.16.0.121 domain master = True encrypt passwords = yes max log size = 0 interfaces = 172.17.60.6/255.255.255.0 printer = BHRSHP1 comment = Treasury Printer username map = /etc/samba/user.map path = /var/spool/lpd/BHRSHP1 printing = lprng update encrypted = Yes postscript = yes oplocks = no valid users = @Treasury,@illingsk,@ehmann,@wheel socket options = TCP_NODELAY admin users = @wheel logon script = %U.bat writeable = yes map to guest = Bad User domain admin group = @wheel domain logons = Yes printer admin = @ntadmin server string = Samba %v PDC on (%L). workgroup = COFRNY delete readonly = Yes netbios name = COFR3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log load printers = No logon drive = H: os level = 64 locking = no -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line
I am running SAMBA on Red Hat 7.0 and after a bad upgrade my SAMBA server is dead. I ended up re-installing from the source and now my server is not accessible to our Win9x clients. smbstatus show the server running but no one on the network can see the server. I am still a bit of a newbie and I am having trouble troubleshooting this. I really am in a jam and I need some help ASAP. I am not sure where to start. Thanks, Dan
Re: [Samba] Profiles and Win2000
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Arno Gramatke wrote: Hi, FB I still have a problem with Windows 2000 SP2 and Samba 2.2.7a: FB I set DeleteRoamingProfiles to 1 and deleted all old profiles. I think the correct registry key is DeleteRoamingCache. Take a look at http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/142/ Correct. I added a registry update file to the ~samba/docs/Registry directory called Win-NT-2K-XP-DeleteRoamingProfile.reg to cause all cached roaming profiles to be deleted in log-out. It will be in the documentation tree for Samba-3.0.0 when it ships. Meanwhile, those who want it will find it on the CVS server. - John T. FB Now Windows sometimes creates/backups a local profile for every user FB *and* every login, e.g.: FB user.domain, user.domain.000, user.domain.001, user.domain.002... FB I thought they were deleted after setting csc policy = delete, but FB they aren't. I'm not sure, but i think that csc policy = ... has got nothing to do with the deletion of profiles on the clients. See http://de.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#CSCPOLICY Apart from that you should set csc policy = disable for the profile share, to prevent windows client from offline(!) caching (this is not to be confused with saving the profile back to the server) the profiles. You might have noticed some entries in the event log, stating that there might be a problem with offline caching on the profile share). So, the only thing you need to do, is set the correct registry key and delete all old profile on the clients. Of course you have to make sure, that the profiles share is writable. Hope this helps. cu Arno -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line
Dan, First things first, read the troubleshooting chapter: http://us6.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/Samba24Hc13.pdf of this Samba book. It should set you on the way to a working Samba installation immediately. Good luck, Troy Dan Tappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/02 03:04PM I am running SAMBA on Red Hat 7.0 and after a bad upgrade my SAMBA server is dead. I ended up re-installing from the source and now my server is not accessible to our Win9x clients. smbstatus show the server running but no one on the network can see the server. I am still a bit of a newbie and I am having trouble troubleshooting this. I really am in a jam and I need some help ASAP. I am not sure where to start. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba problems with Sco Openserver
- Original Message - From: Adrian Stokes To: John H Terpstra Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:43 PM Subject: Samba problems with Sco Openserver Hi John, I emailed that chap you suggested, just got an out of office reply. I think I'm halfway there though, I ran the following command #smbclient -U% -L localhost Added inetrface ip=192.168.x.x bcast= 192.168.x.x nmask=255.x.x.x Session Setup Failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are Invalid.) So I had a look in the /etc/inetd.conf file and added the following two lines netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd smbd netbios-ns dgram tcp nowait root /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd nmbd then ran kill -HUP id_no re running the smbclient command above resulted in the same error message, I can connect to the share from a windows client by \\servername\sharename it asks for password and accepts it this time. I'm still confused about the error message above but I seem to be making headway. Any input you can give will be greatfully recieved. regards Adrian
Re: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line
For starters, I would find the file DIAGNOSIS.txt and walk through it. It is a very good trouble shooting guide. In my source distribution, it hangs out in /docs/text. Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Dan Tappin wrote: I am running SAMBA on Red Hat 7.0 and after a bad upgrade my SAMBA server is dead. I ended up re-installing from the source and now my server is not accessible to our Win9x clients. smbstatus show the server running but no one on the network can see the server. I am still a bit of a newbie and I am having trouble troubleshooting this. I really am in a jam and I need some help ASAP. I am not sure where to start. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line
I am looking at it right now... the problem is that smbd will not even start. I have tried re-installing and nothing is working. I try starting smbd -d from the command line and I get no feed back and SAMBA does not start. It is not even logging at all. I must have really messed things up. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Hammer Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:11 PM To: Dan Tappin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line For starters, I would find the file DIAGNOSIS.txt and walk through it. It is a very good trouble shooting guide. In my source distribution, it hangs out in /docs/text. Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Dan Tappin wrote: I am running SAMBA on Red Hat 7.0 and after a bad upgrade my SAMBA server is dead. I ended up re-installing from the source and now my server is not accessible to our Win9x clients. smbstatus show the server running but no one on the network can see the server. I am still a bit of a newbie and I am having trouble troubleshooting this. I really am in a jam and I need some help ASAP. I am not sure where to start. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line
Run netstat-a | more and make sure the port smbd wants to use is NOT in use by some other process. Just something to check. Also, check syslog for log messages from smbd. Ports 137-139 are the ports you're interested in, I believe. Peace Tom Dan Tappin dan.tappin@orourk To: Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-eng.com cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on samba-admin@lists.line samba.org 12/19/02 02:19 PM Our mission is to help our clients achieve more cost-effective data center operations. I am looking at it right now... the problem is that smbd will not even start. I have tried re-installing and nothing is working. I try starting smbd -d from the command line and I get no feed back and SAMBA does not start. It is not even logging at all. I must have really messed things up. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Hammer Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:11 PM To: Dan Tappin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line For starters, I would find the file DIAGNOSIS.txt and walk through it. It is a very good trouble shooting guide. In my source distribution, it hangs out in /docs/text. Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Dan Tappin wrote: I am running SAMBA on Red Hat 7.0 and after a bad upgrade my SAMBA server is dead. I ended up re-installing from the source and now my server is not accessible to our Win9x clients. smbstatus show the server running but no one on the network can see the server. I am still a bit of a newbie and I am having trouble troubleshooting this. I really am in a jam and I need some help ASAP. I am not sure where to start. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Samba problems with Sco Openserver
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Adrian Stokes wrote: - Original Message - From: Adrian Stokes To: John H Terpstra Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:43 PM Subject: Samba problems with Sco Openserver Hi John, I emailed that chap you suggested, just got an out of office reply. I think I'm halfway there though, I ran the following command #smbclient -U% -L localhost That command says: List resources on 'localhost' as user null and password null. ie: -Uusername%password, which are empty. ie: -U'nothing'%'nothing' == -U%. Added inetrface ip=192.168.x.x bcast= 192.168.x.x nmask=255.x.x.x Session Setup Failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are Invalid.) This means that your system lacks an account for the unix user that should be used to allow your clients to retrieve the browse list from the IPC$ share. Please refer to man smb.conf and search for 'guest account'. So I had a look in the /etc/inetd.conf file and added the following two lines netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd smbd netbios-ns dgram tcp nowait root /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd nmbd It is much better to run smbd and nmbd as Daemons, otherwise you may experience browsing problems. Running through inetd is possible but bit preferred. then ran kill -HUP id_no re running the smbclient command above resulted in the same error message, I can connect to the share from a windows client by \\servername\sharename it asks for password and accepts it this time. I'm still confused about the error message above but I seem to be making headway. Any input you can give will be greatfully recieved. regards Adrian - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Strange locking errors with LabView under Samba 2.2.7 and HP-UX 11.11
Hello All, I recently upgraded one of my HP-UX servers from Samba 2.2.4 to 2.2.7. Since that time, I have noticed that disk activity on the file system where the Samba var directory is kept seems to be higher than I would expect. We have now begun to experience a problem with PC clients running National Instruments' LabView software, installed on a Samba share. When any PC client tries to execute it, disk utilization goes to 100% according to HP's Glance performance monitor, with nearly all activity being in the aforementioned file system containing the Samba var files and being caused by the smbd for the client running LabView. Using Glance to look at open files, I found that the only open file located in the Samba var file system is the smbd log file, and it is filled with messages like this: [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(660) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(662) an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(663) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(677) Count greater than 31 bits - retrying with 31 bit truncated length. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(660) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(662) an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(663) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(677) over and over again. I have log level set to 1, with a different log for each client. After several minutes, LabView finally loads and things settle back down. Any ideas as to what is happening? The log mentions NFS, but the directories containing LabView are local to my system and are exported by Samba only, not NFS. My copy of Samba was compiled here using HP's ANSI C compiler under HP-UX 11.11. I ran configure with very few options, just to set the prefix and to set --with-utmp. None of these problems occurred under Samba 2.2.4, and I haven't yet had a chance to try out 2.2.7a to see if there's any difference. The problem occurs when running LabView with both NT4 and W2K clients. With our holiday shutdown almost here, I hope to get a chance to try 2.2.7a sometime tomorrow. Thanks in advance for any assistance! Dave Windsor AdW/MOE2.12 Team Leader, Test Systems Engineering Robert Bosch Corporation Anderson, SC, USA email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Strange locking errors with LabView under Samba 2.2.7and HP-UX 1 1.11
Dave, Samba-2.2.7a was released to fix 64bit file access issues. Strongly suggest you update. - John T. On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Windsor Dave (AdW/MOE2.1) wrote: Hello All, I recently upgraded one of my HP-UX servers from Samba 2.2.4 to 2.2.7. Since that time, I have noticed that disk activity on the file system where the Samba var directory is kept seems to be higher than I would expect. We have now begun to experience a problem with PC clients running National Instruments' LabView software, installed on a Samba share. When any PC client tries to execute it, disk utilization goes to 100% according to HP's Glance performance monitor, with nearly all activity being in the aforementioned file system containing the Samba var files and being caused by the smbd for the client running LabView. Using Glance to look at open files, I found that the only open file located in the Samba var file system is the smbd log file, and it is filled with messages like this: [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(660) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(662) an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(663) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(677) Count greater than 31 bits - retrying with 31 bit truncated length. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(660) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(662) an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(663) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(677) over and over again. I have log level set to 1, with a different log for each client. After several minutes, LabView finally loads and things settle back down. Any ideas as to what is happening? The log mentions NFS, but the directories containing LabView are local to my system and are exported by Samba only, not NFS. My copy of Samba was compiled here using HP's ANSI C compiler under HP-UX 11.11. I ran configure with very few options, just to set the prefix and to set --with-utmp. None of these problems occurred under Samba 2.2.4, and I haven't yet had a chance to try out 2.2.7a to see if there's any difference. The problem occurs when running LabView with both NT4 and W2K clients. With our holiday shutdown almost here, I hope to get a chance to try 2.2.7a sometime tomorrow. Thanks in advance for any assistance! Dave Windsor AdW/MOE2.12 Team Leader, Test Systems Engineering Robert Bosch Corporation Anderson, SC, USA email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Strange locking errors with LabView under Samba 2.2.7 and HP-UX 1 1.11
Hthat sounds reasonable. I have 2.2.7a compiled up and ready to install as soon as our production test equipment shuts down, hopefully tomorrow. I'll post my results as soon as I get the chance. Thanks! Dave Windsor email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:24 PM To: Windsor Dave (AdW/MOE2.1) Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Samba] Strange locking errors with LabView under Samba 2.2.7 and HP-UX 1 1.11 Dave, Samba-2.2.7a was released to fix 64bit file access issues. Strongly suggest you update. - John T. On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Windsor Dave (AdW/MOE2.1) wrote: Hello All, I recently upgraded one of my HP-UX servers from Samba 2.2.4 to 2.2.7. Since that time, I have noticed that disk activity on the file system where the Samba var directory is kept seems to be higher than I would expect. We have now begun to experience a problem with PC clients running National Instruments' LabView software, installed on a Samba share. When any PC client tries to execute it, disk utilization goes to 100% according to HP's Glance performance monitor, with nearly all activity being in the aforementioned file system containing the Samba var files and being caused by the smbd for the client running LabView. Using Glance to look at open files, I found that the only open file located in the Samba var file system is the smbd log file, and it is filled with messages like this: [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(660) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(662) an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(663) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(677) Count greater than 31 bits - retrying with 31 bit truncated length. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(660) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(662) an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(663) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/12/19 17:47:17, 0] locking/posix.c:(677) over and over again. I have log level set to 1, with a different log for each client. After several minutes, LabView finally loads and things settle back down. Any ideas as to what is happening? The log mentions NFS, but the directories containing LabView are local to my system and are exported by Samba only, not NFS. My copy of Samba was compiled here using HP's ANSI C compiler under HP-UX 11.11. I ran configure with very few options, just to set the prefix and to set --with-utmp. None of these problems occurred under Samba 2.2.4, and I haven't yet had a chance to try out 2.2.7a to see if there's any difference. The problem occurs when running LabView with both NT4 and W2K clients. With our holiday shutdown almost here, I hope to get a chance to try 2.2.7a sometime tomorrow. Thanks in advance for any assistance! Dave Windsor AdW/MOE2.12 Team Leader, Test Systems Engineering Robert Bosch Corporation Anderson, SC, USA email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line
H.. You said the server was running in your first post. OK. What happens when you type: which smbd If you get a response, then try smbd This should start the daemon. I don't get any feedback when it starts up. Try: ps ax | grep smbd to see if it is running Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:19:13PM -0700, Dan Tappin wrote: I am looking at it right now... the problem is that smbd will not even start. I have tried re-installing and nothing is working. I try starting smbd -d from the command line and I get no feed back and SAMBA does not start. It is not even logging at all. I must have really messed things up. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Hammer Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:11 PM To: Dan Tappin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Desperate Help Required Getting SAMBA back on line For starters, I would find the file DIAGNOSIS.txt and walk through it. It is a very good trouble shooting guide. In my source distribution, it hangs out in /docs/text. Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Dan Tappin wrote: I am running SAMBA on Red Hat 7.0 and after a bad upgrade my SAMBA server is dead. I ended up re-installing from the source and now my server is not accessible to our Win9x clients. smbstatus show the server running but no one on the network can see the server. I am still a bit of a newbie and I am having trouble troubleshooting this. I really am in a jam and I need some help ASAP. I am not sure where to start. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbmount
What are you restarting? Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:08:02PM -0800, George, John wrote: Hi, I have successfully mounted 2 directories using smbmount. However, when I restart, they are no longer mounted. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbmount
One way to is put the smbmount commands into your network startup script.
Remember that you don't need to be running nmbd or smbd to run smbmount.
So, in your network script, at the end of the start section, put in the
smbmount commmand. This will run with root priviledge, so you might
want to read about the uid and gid options of smbmount.
I would also put an umount command in the shutdown part
of the script, so these mounts will be gracefully umounted when the network
goes down.
I use this script to kill all smbmounts when my network goes down:
mount | grep type smbfs | sed 's/^.*on *//' | sed 's/ *type.*//' \
| sed 's/ /\\\ /g' | xargs -n1 -i{} umount {}
I suspect there are simpler ways of getting this done, like killall
smbmount, but, this works, at least on my machine.
Joel
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:21:01PM -0800, George, John wrote:
Sorry, I restarted the machine.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:17 PM
To: George, John; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] smbmount
What are you restarting?
Joel
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:08:02PM -0800, George, John wrote:
Hi,
I have successfully mounted 2 directories using smbmount. However, when I
restart, they are no longer mounted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Has anybody got ACL to work w/ debian, winbindd in a w2k mixeddomain?
Hi again,
Can u give me the exact names of the packages you apt-getted? I need those
because winbindd is acting strange and I need to find out what the problem
is.
regads,
Jacob
From: Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jacob Malmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Has anybody got ACL to work w/ debian, winbindd in a
w2k mixed domain?
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:07:43 +0800 (WST)
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Jacob Malmberg wrote:
Neat. How did you do that, any how-to or something? Im really stuck with
this problem. Those sid packages you are talking about, what are those
and
where do I find them. I hope you help me out on this one as Im really
bugged.
I can tell you roughly what I did. If you need clarification then don't
hesitate to ask.
0) Install woody to your satisfaction.
1) Modified my /etc/apt/preferences file to:
---
Package: *
Pin: release l=Debian-Security
Pin-Priority: 999
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 600
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 500
---
and add the appropriate unstable lines to /etc/apt/sources.list.
The only reason I need the unstable lines and the apt preferences is to
get
the current acl/attr libraries prepackaged. I don't see that I need to
do
extra work (especially when a nice DD has done it for me).
2) follow the instructions at: http://acl.bestbits.at/steps.html
for a new install. I only varied it by using the prepackaged .debs
for acl/attr (including the -dev packages).
3) After booting into the new kernel (in my case 2.4.19, As set there
aren't
any patches for 2.4.20) and mounting /home with the acl option.
I testing {set,get}facl and all was good.
4) I then build samba from source. I was doing 2.2.6-pre1 but I've since
upgraded to 2.2.7 with no issues.
5) From there I followed the instructions in man 8 winbindd to get the
winbind daemon working and join the domain. I then tested ssh and
{set,get}facl with the DOMAIN_user accounts. Once I had that working
(actually there was nothing to do it just worked) I tried
setting/adding/removing ACLS from a win2k box.
So far the only problem I've come across is the 8 (of 2000 odd)
accounts
don't have a an rid to convert name-sid. This would be more of a
problem
if the accounts weren't going to be deleted in about 3 days.
I also have enabled quota support in the kernel and samba and that works
great!
Yours Tony
Jan 22-25 2003 Linux.Conf.AUhttp://linux.conf.au/
The Australian Linux Technical Conference!
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 3 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmailxAPID=42PS=47575PI=7324DI=7474SU=
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsgHL=1216hotmailtaglines_stopmorespam_3mf
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: max log size setting ignored
It should be no-brainer, in the [global] section of smb.conf I have: log level = 1 max log size = 0 But, no matter what I set max log size to, be it 0 or a big number, it is always ignored and the log.smbd is always ended at 5 Meg. Just a wild guess (I'm coming from a Linux background here, never used Solaris), but is it ending based on the size, or the time? Do you possibly have something like logrotate running from cron? -- ANDREW FUREY [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sysadmin/developer for Terminus. Providing online networks of Australian lawyers (http://www.ilaw.com.au) and Linux experts (http://www.linuxconsultants.com.au) for instant help! Disclaimer: http://www.terminus.net.au/disclaimer.html. GCS L+++ P++ t++ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Strange behavior with samba mountpoint
I have a Redhat 8.0 box with many external connections. Several nfs and 3 samba. Today I tried to reattach to one on my mounts and I am geting Could not resolve mount point /mnt/dir. If I do an ls -a I can see the dir, but when adding the l option to ls it does not show up. fuser returns for the dir, Input/output error I apologize if this has nothing to do with Samba, but I am perplexed as to how to continue troubleshooting this, and came across the problem when doing a mount -t smbfs. kernel - 2.4.18-18.8.0smp samba 2.2.7-2 If I create a new directory I am able to mount the NT box on it. -- Ted K. tedkaz-no-at-spam-optonline.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Has anybody got ACL to work w/ debian, winbindd in aw2k mixed domain?
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Jacob Malmberg wrote: Hi again, Can u give me the exact names of the packages you apt-getted? I need those because winbindd is acting strange and I need to find out what the problem is. acl attr fileutils libacl1 libattr1 Althought none of them will affect windbinndds behaviour. Yours Tony Jan 22-25 2003 Linux.Conf.AUhttp://linux.conf.au/ The Australian Linux Technical Conference! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] remember free
Show this line! http://216.218.174.6/ it\'s an switzerline all free http://216.218.174.6/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] slowness when using roaming profiles
Dariush Forouher wrote: Am Die, 2002-12-17 um 20.19 schrieb John H Terpstra: Just FYI - the user in question had an Outlook PST file that was nearly 1 Gigabyte in size. PST files are stored as part of the profile!! Any Interessting, if I try to copy a profile 80mb back to samba, I doesn't work (IIRC samba denies access to the profile share). Do you know if this is a bug of my old samba 2.2.3 installation or something related to Windows2K? I haven't looked further into it because this border is just fine for me. ciao Dariush Thanks all for the reply. After further checking it seems the biggest culprits are the Desktop folder and the Application Data folder. These are the porkers : ) The Application Data folder is 209M alone. How important is this folder? Is there a way to edit what gets backed up when a user logs off? It would be nice to skip over these folders.( not sure if this would defeat the purpose of roaming profiles though) I am not a windows person so the answer is not readily apparant. -- Anthony Hologounis Only two things in this world are infinite. The Universe and human stupidity. And we're not even sure about the first one. -Einstein -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Strange behavior with samba mountpoint
Thanks Joel, that correlates exactly to my scenario. The network connection back to the server is unreliable.I suspect their could be some tweaks done to better handle these situations but that is beyond my present level of knowledge to tackle. On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 20:06, Joel Hammer wrote: I have this sort of problem a lot. I think this happens when there is network connection lost. The smbfs mounts don't go away gracefully. In this situation, when I run mount I often see the share listed as mounted, although I cannot cd into the mount point. Attempts to umount the share fail, too. So, what to do? You could reboot. You could try killall smbmount. You could exit out of the xterm or tty that smbmounted the share. I really don't have a good way around this. My best results have been obtained by putting a command to umount all my smbfs connections in my network shutdown script. Joel On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 07:53:40PM -0500, Ted Kaczmarek wrote: I have a Redhat 8.0 box with many external connections. Several nfs and 3 samba. Today I tried to reattach to one on my mounts and I am geting Could not resolve mount point /mnt/dir. If I do an ls -a I can see the dir, but when adding the l option to ls it does not show up. fuser returns for the dir, Input/output error I apologize if this has nothing to do with Samba, but I am perplexed as to how to continue troubleshooting this, and came across the problem when doing a mount -t smbfs. kernel - 2.4.18-18.8.0smp samba 2.2.7-2 If I create a new directory I am able to mount the NT box on it. -- Ted K. tedkaz-no-at-spam-optonline.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Profiles and Win2000
I found the same problem. I added parameter [global] nt acl support = no for more information at http://zeck.netliberte.org/linux/howto/lecture.php?fic=samba That problem was disappeared but I'm not sure about other problem may occur. John H Terpstra lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote: On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Arno Gramatke wrote: Hi, FB I still have a problem with Windows 2000 SP2 and Samba 2.2.7a: FB I set DeleteRoamingProfiles to 1 and deleted all old profiles. I think the correct registry key is "DeleteRoamingCache". Take a look at http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/142/Correct. I added a registry update file to the ~samba/docs/Registrydirectory called Win-NT-2K-XP-DeleteRoamingProfile.reg to cause all cachedroaming profiles to be deleted in log-out. It will be in the documentationtree for Samba-3.0.0 when it ships. Meanwhile, those who want it will findit on the CVS server.- John T. FB Now Windows sometimes creates/backups a local profile for every user FB *and* every login, e.g.: FB user.domain, user.domain.000, user.domain.001, user.domain.002... FB I thought they were deleted after setting "csc policy = delete", but FB they aren't. I'm not sure, but i think that "csc policy = ..." has got nothing to do with the deletion of profiles on the clients. See http://de.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#CSCPOLICY Apart from that you should set "csc policy = disable" for the profile share, to prevent windows client from offline(!) caching (this is not to be confused with saving the profile back to the server) the profiles. You might have noticed some entries in the event log, stating that there might be a problem with offline caching on the profile share). So, the only thing you need to do, is set the correct registry key and delete all old profile on the clients. Of course you have to make sure, that the profiles share is writable. Hope this helps. cu Arno-- John H TerpstraEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read theinstructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/sambaWith Yahoo! Mail you can get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs
[Samba] Oplocks...again...
I would like to know if like the [homes] section mapped to a single user at login time (H: drive) would have any of the problems discussed in previous emails. Specifically the oplock break issue. Since one and only one user can have this space mapped in our implementation (because of credential conflicts that windows does not allow), how could a user have a detrimental experience with oplocks? Since only that user can open the files whether .xls, .mdb or .doc (don't mean to pick on M$-Office) there should be no issue, right? I ask primarily because I've had oplocks off for some time now, but am always wondering about performance increases - I'll take them where I can get them. My other question is regarding a read-only share. We serve *lots* of software from what we call our M: drive. How will oplocks and/or level2 oplocks help there? I'm not sure I see how they will. I'm at the mercy of the randomness of served software, right? Any info on this will help. Thanks Samba Team - You've done a great job so far - it is greatly appreciated! Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Oplocks...again...
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, William Jojo wrote: I would like to know if like the [homes] section mapped to a single user at login time (H: drive) would have any of the problems discussed in previous emails. Specifically the oplock break issue. Since one and only one user can have this space mapped in our implementation (because of credential conflicts that windows does not allow), how could a user have a detrimental experience with oplocks? It is the MS Windows client that decides whether or not to use file caching based on the server's ability to handle it. Only Samba allows this to be controlled on a per share basis. The performance difference is most noticible where the same file is repetitively accessed by the same application, but can be very significant also for MS Excel and MS Word files because of the way that they implement file access. Since only that user can open the files whether .xls, .mdb or .doc (don't mean to pick on M$-Office) there should be no issue, right? In single user access the issues are likely to be minor and I would enable oplocks. If the same user logs in multiple times and opens the same file on each machine then there is still a risk. I ask primarily because I've had oplocks off for some time now, but am always wondering about performance increases - I'll take them where I can get them. Try it! Let us know what differences you notice. My other question is regarding a read-only share. We serve *lots* of software from what we call our M: drive. How will oplocks and/or level2 oplocks help there? I'm not sure I see how they will. I'm at the mercy of the randomness of served software, right? If hte file has been cached in workstation memory it will open much faster on second and subsequent access. - John T. Any info on this will help. Thanks Samba Team - You've done a great job so far - it is greatly appreciated! Bill -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbmount
Hi, I have successfully mounted 2 directories using smbmount. However, when I restart, they are no longer mounted. Is there any way to get a peristent connection using smbmount? Thanks! John R. George Systems Support Analyst Infrastructure Team County of San Bernardino Phone: (909) 388-5997 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient and large file support
smbclient (and smbtar) in version 2.2.7a (and prior) has problems with
large files ( 4GB). The following patch (against 2.2.7a) fixes all
known problems with this. This code has been checked into the CVS tree
in all branches as well.
--
==
Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics
Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510
Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043-1351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 650-933-2177
http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177
PGP Key: 0x8408D65D
==
--- samba-2.2.7a/source/client/client.c Wed Dec 4 09:16:34 2002
+++ samba-2.2.7a-fixed/source/client/client.c Thu Dec 19 15:41:51 2002
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@
/* timing globals */
off_t get_total_size = 0;
-int get_total_time_ms = 0;
+unsigned int get_total_time_ms = 0;
off_t put_total_size = 0;
-int put_total_time_ms = 0;
+unsigned int put_total_time_ms = 0;
/* totals globals */
static double dir_total;
--- samba-2.2.7a/source/client/clitar.c Tue Apr 30 06:26:18 2002
+++ samba-2.2.7a-fixed/source/client/clitar.c Thu Dec 19 15:50:20 2002
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@
struct file_info_struct
{
- size_t size;
+ SMB_BIG_UINT size;
uint16 mode;
- int uid;
- int gid;
+ uid_t uid;
+ gid_t gid;
/* These times are normally kept in GMT */
time_t mtime;
time_t atime;
@@ -125,11 +125,11 @@
int blocksize=20;
int tarhandle;
-static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, int size, time_t mtime,
+static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, SMB_BIG_UINT size, time_t mtime,
char *amode, unsigned char ftype);
static void do_atar(char *rname,char *lname,file_info *finfo1);
static void do_tar(file_info *finfo);
-static void oct_it(long value, int ndgs, char *p);
+static void oct_it(SMB_BIG_UINT value, int ndgs, char *p);
static void fixtarname(char *tptr, char *fp, int l);
static int dotarbuf(int f, char *b, int n);
static void dozerobuf(int f, int n);
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
/
Write a tar header to buffer
/
-static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, int size, time_t mtime,
+static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, SMB_BIG_UINT size, time_t mtime,
char *amode, unsigned char ftype)
{
union hblock hb;
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
int i, chk, l;
char *jp;
- DEBUG(5, (WriteTarHdr, Type = %c, Size= %i, Name = %s\n, ftype, size, aname));
+ DEBUG(5, (WriteTarHdr, Type = %c, Size= %.0f, Name = %s\n, ftype, (double)size,
+aname));
memset(hb.dummy, 0, sizeof(hb.dummy));
@@ -207,10 +207,10 @@
hb.dbuf.name[NAMSIZ-1]='\0';
safe_strcpy(hb.dbuf.mode, amode, strlen(amode));
- oct_it(0L, 8, hb.dbuf.uid);
- oct_it(0L, 8, hb.dbuf.gid);
- oct_it((long) size, 13, hb.dbuf.size);
- oct_it((long) mtime, 13, hb.dbuf.mtime);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT)0, 8, hb.dbuf.uid);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT)0, 8, hb.dbuf.gid);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT) size, 13, hb.dbuf.size);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT) mtime, 13, hb.dbuf.mtime);
memcpy(hb.dbuf.chksum, , sizeof(hb.dbuf.chksum));
memset(hb.dbuf.linkname, 0, NAMSIZ);
hb.dbuf.linkflag=ftype;
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
for (chk=0, i=sizeof(hb.dummy), jp=hb.dummy; --i=0;) chk+=(0xFF *jp++);
- oct_it((long) chk, 8, hb.dbuf.chksum);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT) chk, 8, hb.dbuf.chksum);
hb.dbuf.chksum[6] = '\0';
(void) dotarbuf(f, hb.dummy, sizeof(hb.dummy));
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
/
Convert from decimal to octal string
/
-static void oct_it (long value, int ndgs, char *p)
+static void oct_it (SMB_BIG_UINT value, int ndgs, char *p)
{
/* Converts long to octal string, pads with leading zeros */
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@
static void do_atar(char *rname,char *lname,file_info *finfo1)
{
int fnum;
- uint32 nread=0;
+ SMB_BIG_UINT nread=0;
char ftype;
file_info2 finfo;
BOOL close_done = False;
@@ -643,6 +643,7 @@
finfo.mtime = finfo1 - mtime;
finfo.atime = finfo1 - atime;
finfo.ctime = finfo1 - ctime;
+finfo.name = finfo1 - name;
}
else {
finfo.size = def_finfo.size;
@@ -652,13 +653,14 @@
finfo.mtime = def_finfo.mtime;
finfo.atime = def_finfo.atime;
finfo.ctime = def_finfo.ctime;
+finfo.name = def_finfo.name;
}
if (dry_run)
{
- DEBUG(3,(skipping file %s of size %d bytes\n,
+ DEBUG(3,(skipping file %s of size %12.0f bytes\n,
finfo.name,
- (int)finfo.size));
+ (double)finfo.size));
shallitime=0;
ttarf+=finfo.size + TBLOCK
Re: [Samba] samba to samba via LDAP
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 10:37, jeff wrote: Why not just have both servers authenticating against a common ldap store? That would be the same desired result. Know any way I could have a real-time single LDAP store on a single machine and have everything auth against it? just point all your samba machines at the same ldap server... you can add tls security if needed. I have ~10 machines authenticating against a single ldap server. It took me a while to work out the security issues. Make sure to read the latest ldap docs - even if you're using an older version. The newer docs are clearer on the security stuff. I've thought about just doing a scp of the .gdbm files, but that's just another point of failure. I fear that idea (you have no way of knowing that the db files are synced before you scp) - instead use slurpd for replication if you need to distribute the load. I've not replicated my db yet... brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3alpha20 Bugs (FreeBSD 4.6)
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 02:54, Laurent Hofmann wrote: hello, I would say that for Samba 3.0 alpha20 (and latter I suppose ) acting as PDC you must reenable use spnego=yes. I say it because it is not clear, and I had to search a lot before finding why i could not log on. (it work with spnego=no with alpha17 !) i've got spnego=no in a21 and a20 as a PDC with XPSP2 clients hostname:~# grep spnego /etc/samba/smb.conf use spnego = No hostname:~# smbd -V Version 2.999+3.0.alpha21-0.nxp for Debian I've tried to set up add and delete scripts for everythings : add user ... i've not tried to use the NT tools for user management. (why would you want to?) I hope this can help ? I don't no if it is the right place for that... But i'm not sure all are bugs, it could be problems in my config, so I post here. it's the right spot - it's hard to tell when to post to technical when you're using a alpha. I think for config questions samba is best. -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] quota support on AIX
Hellow, members (B (BIBM appreciated this problem as AIX bug, and they will release patches (Bagainst this problem as APAR IY38330. This patches will be released (Babout two months later. (B (BT, Miyashita (B (B -Original Message- (B From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On (B Behalf Of Tsutomu Miyashita (B Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:51 AM (B To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B Subject: RE: [Samba] quota support on AIX (B (B (B Hellow, members (B (B I found this problem was probably caused by OS bug. (B The reason why SAMBA could not get quota infomation was because (B the quotactl system call used by smbd/quotas.c returned a error (B of "operation not permitted". (B AIX's quotactl returns error if uid and euid are not the same. (B I reported this problem to IBM and the patch against this problem will (B be released. I will report about this patch ID to this ML. (B If you want to use SAMBA quota function on AIX, you can get this on (B SAMBA 1.x. That is because both uid and euid are the user ID of file (B access on SAMBA 1.x's smbd, not root. (B (B Tsutomu Miyashita (B (B -Original Message- (B From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On (B Behalf Of Tsutomu Miyashita (B Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:40 PM (B To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B Subject: [Samba] quota support on AIX (B (B (B Hellow, members (B (B I want to use SAMBA with disk quota support on AIX machine, (B but have not succeeded yet. Are there any members who could (B succeeded setting up SAMBA on that environment? (B (B OS:AIX4.3.3 (B SAMBA:2.2.5 (B configure option:--with-quotas (B (B First, I configured AIX's quota environment, and confirmed quota (B worked fine. And I accessed to SAMBA, but disk size displayed (B on Windows explorer did not match with quota size. Imformed disk (B size is filesystem size of SAMBA server. (B I comfirmed this step on Redhat6.2, but informed disk size was (B just quota size. (B I wonder SAMBA quota function does not support AIX. Is that true? (B (B (B Thanks (B Tsutomu Miyashita (B (B -- (B To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the (B instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba (B (B -- (B To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the (B instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba (B-- (BTo unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the (Binstructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Odd problems with XP
This is bad idea samba cannot browse sync with NT on another segment of network and if is in one segment then sync is automatic not need remote sync and anounce. Try you read doc BROWSING on samba docs... - Original Message - From: Neal Lawson To: Samba List Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:10 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Odd problems with XP I'm sorry i in trying to hide sentivitve infomation i deleted those lines so there they are with out the ip'sremote announce = 123.123.123.123/DOMAINwins server = 123.123.123.123remote browse sync = 123.123.123.123sorryRashkae wrote: How does your Samba box know about the WINS server? (Unless, of course, you neglected to post your *complete* smb.conf) Dec 19 12:57pm They hang the man and flog the woman That steal the goose from off the common, But let the greater villain loose That steals the common from the goose. --English folk poem, circa 1764 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Neal Lawson wrote: I Do have a central WINS server running and the PDC, BDC, the Samba box, and the XP client know about the wins server Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote: Your problem is complicated browsing with NT and samba. Reason: 1. Use on your network on all machines and servers only one!! protocol TCPIP. 2. Configure WINS server on NT PDC or BDC machine 3. In config tcpip on all clients set wins server to created IP. 4. In all samba server or clients set in smb.conf wins server = IP... REM If need another protocol as netbeui or ipx on server or clients yuo must disable browsing features for this protocols in regedit or confs... Thats all. - Original Message - From: "Neal Lawson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: [Samba] Odd problems with XP I have one Samba server with my Raid 5 can on it, and a NT 4 PDC and BDC, and im running samba 2.2.7, for most of my clients browsing the shares is just fine, but on some browsing the shares hangs or takes a long time to return with a result here is my smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = xx load printers = no workgroup = XXX encrypt passwords = Yes security = domain allow trusted domains = yes password server = time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 os level = 34 name resolve order = wins hosts bcast write raw = yes read raw = yes hide files = /:2eDS_Store/resource.frk/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/Des ktopFolderDB/Network Trash Folder/resource.frk/.*/ oplocks = yes max xmit = 65535 level2oplocks = yes dead time = 7 getwd cache = yes nt acl support = no [private] comment = Private Storage for %U path = %H/private create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [public] comment = Public Storage for %U path = %H/public create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 valid users = %U follow symlinks = yes writeable = yes [web] comment = Web root for %U path = %H/web Thanks for any help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks?
Yes yuo have right with idea that if hardware is bad then oplocks is bad but my idea is that dbase aplications and engines must known about quality of network hardware, client and status and must have system to repair or disable oplocks if is bad ! Nothing another only dbase engine must realise this operation. If not then this engine is bad and not for network use. Then must exist list of this engines with realy dangerous level... Secondary is that yuo write as more aplication open only one user ??? This is then why i need file server? File servers is created primary for use with database aplications! Yes sql is best but how many users of samba or NT uses realy network sql apli? Thats all folks. - Original Message - From: Jim Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marian Mlcoch, Ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bob Puff@NLE [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jean-Paul ARGUDO [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] How important are oplocks? On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 03:56, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote: Thanks Jim for best report of oplock as i read. Super can be if you can add info or link about list of dangerous database engines for oplocks... Btw. Foxpro 2.6 = is ok. Foxpro 7.. = bad. Clipper= dangerous... exist this list for off oplocks? Thanks. But unfortunately, its not that simple.I doubt for example that one version of FoxPro will be good with oplocks, while another is bad. The entire problem with oplocks and shared-file databases such as dBASE, FoxPro, Paradox, Access, etc, is with file caching on the client side (the OPLCOCK), and that client system not breaking the oplock when requested. Even when the breaks do happen properly, the time to write the file back out to the server may be significant, causing a LONG delay on the 2nd client to open the file. When you see oplock problems, I guess you could say it is more client-OS and hardware dependant than it is on the software involve. It just so happens that the type of software that runs into oplock related issues most often is shared-file database software. Most other applications do not have 2 or more users opening the same file at the same time on a routine basis. -- /--- | Jim Morris | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |AIM: JFM2001 \--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] =?gb18030?b?xvPStdDFz6K7r7e9sLijrDUwMNSqL8Tq?==?gb18030?b?vs2/ycq1z9ZERE7XqM/fxvPStbmmxNyjoQ==?=
ÆóÒµÐÅÏ¢»¯ÒѾ³ÉΪÆóÒµÌá¸ßЧÂÊ¡¢ÔöÇ¿¾ºÕùµÄÖØÒªÊֶΣ¡µ±ÄãÉí´¦ÍâµØ£¬ÐèÒªÌáÈ¡¹«Ë¾ÄÚ²¿ÐÅÏ¢¡¢²ÆÎñÐÅϢʱ£¬Í¨¹ý»¥ÁªÍø¾ÍÄÜ·ÃÎʵ½¹«Ë¾·þÎñÆ÷»òÕß×Ô¼ºµÄµçÄÔʱ£¬µÇ½½øÈ¥¾Í¿ÉÒÔ»ñÈ¡ÀïÃæµÄÐÅÏ¢ÁË£¡ ÒÔǰҪʵÏÖÒÔÉϹ¦ÄÜ£¬¾ÍҪÿÄ껨·Ñ¾Þ´óµÄ·ÑÓÃÀ´ÀÆóÒµDDNרÏߣ¬²ÅÄÜʵÏÖͨ¹ý»¥ÁªÍø·ÃÎÊÆóÒµÄÚ²¿·þÎñÆ÷¡£ÏÖÔÚʱ´´ÍøÂçÐÂÍƳöµÄ¶¯Ì¬ÓòÃû£¬500Ôª/Äê¾Í¿ÉÒÔʵÏÖÒÔÉÏDDNÄÜ×öµÄ¹¦ÄÜ,»¹¿ÉÒÔ´æ·ÅÍøÒ³¡¢ÂÛ̳£¬×÷ΪÆóÒµÓʼþ·þÎñÆ÷µÈ£¬¸øÄãÒ»¸öÍêÃÀµÄÆóÒµÐÅÏ¢»¯·½°¸¡£¶¯Ì¬ÓòÃûÊÇʹµçÄÔËæʱ±ä»¯µÄIP±äΪ¹Ì¶¨µÄIP£¬ÀûÓÿí´øÓòÃûÓëµçÄԵĶÔÓ¦¹Øϵ£¬Í¨¹ýÓòÃû¾Í¿ÉÒÔËæʱÕÒµ½×Ô¼ºµÄµçÄÔ£¬Ëæʱ´æÈ¡ÀïÃæµÄ×ÊÁÏÁË£¡Õâ²úÆ·ÊÇרÃÅΪÆóÒµµÄÐÅÏ¢»¯ÐèÇó¶ø¿ª·¢µÄ£¬Ö÷Òª¹¦ÄÜÈçÏ£º IP±ä»¯È«×Ô¶¯¼°Ê±¸üÐÂ(¼¶±ðA), ¾²Ì¬¼°ÀëÏßIPÖ¸Ïò ¶¥¼¶ÓòÃûÖ§³Ö, Ö§³Ö¶à¸öÓòÃû·¢²¼ Ö§³Ö WINDOWS ϵÁÐ Unix/linux ¼°ÆäËüƽ̨(¼¶±ðA) ¶à×ÓÓòÃû×ÓÍøÕ¾Ö§³Ö(VDNS) ,·ºÓòÃû½âÎö (VDNS) Óʼþ¼Ç¼MXÖ§³Ö (VDNS) ,Ö÷»ú¼Ç¼֧³Ö(VDNS) ÅäºÏÓòÃûµÄʹÓãº×¢²áÓòÃûºó£¬ÔÚÄúËù×¢²áµÄÓòÃûÖмÓÈëµÄÒ»¸öCNAME(·ºÓòÃûÖ¸Ïò)ÌîÈëÐÎÈç IP.VDNS.ORGµÄ¶¯Ì¬IP ¾Í¿ÉÒÔ½«Õâ¸öÓòÃû±ä³É¶¯Ì¬ÓòÃû,ÒÔºóÄãͨ¹ý·ÃÎÊÕâ¸öÓòÃû£¬¾Í¿ÉÒÔËæʱËæµØ·ÃÎÊÄãµÄµçÄÔÁË¡£ Èí¼þ°²×°¼òÒ×£¬¿ÉÃâ·ÑÊÔÓ㬼ûhttp://dtip.001isp.com °²×°ºó£¬ÈçºÎÅäºÏÓòÃûʹÓ㬼û£ºhttp://dtym.001isp.com ÏêÇ黶ӷÃÎÊ£ºhttp://www.001isp.com µç»°×Éѯ£º0756-2125583 2125536 2125563 QQ×Éѯ£º108786611 77248929 Óʼþ×Éѯ£º[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Prevent winbind idmap corruption
Ooops, bug in patch: Duplicate deletion of mapping on
rollback. Corrected version is attached. Sorry!
Michael
Index: nsswitch/winbindd_idmap.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_idmap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3.4.13
diff -u -r1.3.4.13 winbindd_idmap.c
--- nsswitch/winbindd_idmap.c 27 Apr 2002 03:04:08 - 1.3.4.13
+++ nsswitch/winbindd_idmap.c 19 Dec 2002 12:32:25 -
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
if ((hwm = tdb_fetch_int32(idmap_tdb,
isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER)) == -1) {
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to fetch %s : %s\n, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER,
+tdb_errorstr(idmap_tdb)));
return False;
}
@@ -63,7 +65,45 @@
/* Store new high water mark */
-tdb_store_int32(idmap_tdb, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER, hwm);
+if (tdb_store_int32(idmap_tdb, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER, hwm)) {
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to store %s %d : %s\n, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER,
+hwm, tdb_errorstr(idmap_tdb)));
+return False;
+}
+
+return True;
+}
+
+/* Deallocate either a user or group id, used for failure rollback */
+
+static BOOL deallocate_id(uid_t id, BOOL isgroup)
+{
+int hwm;
+
+/* Get current high water mark */
+
+if ((hwm = tdb_fetch_int32(idmap_tdb,
+ isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER)) == -1) {
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to fetch %s : %s\n, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER,
+tdb_errorstr(idmap_tdb)));
+return False;
+}
+
+if (hwm != id + 1) {
+/* Should actually never happen, internal redundancy... */
+DEBUG(0, (winbind %s mismatch on deallocation!\n, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP :
+HWM_USER));
+return False;
+}
+
+hwm--;
+
+/* Store new high water mark */
+
+if (tdb_store_int32(idmap_tdb, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER, hwm)) {
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to store %s %d : %s\n, isgroup ? HWM_GROUP : HWM_USER,
+ hwm, tdb_errorstr(idmap_tdb)));
+return False;
+}
return True;
}
@@ -109,16 +149,36 @@
fstring keystr2;
/* Store new id */
-
+
slprintf(keystr2, sizeof(keystr2), %s %d, isgroup ? GID : UID, *id);
data.dptr = keystr2;
data.dsize = strlen(keystr2) + 1;
-tdb_store(idmap_tdb, key, data, TDB_REPLACE);
-tdb_store(idmap_tdb, data, key, TDB_REPLACE);
+/* If any of the following actions fails try to
+ revert modifications successfully made so far. */
result = True;
+
+if (result tdb_store(idmap_tdb, key, data, TDB_REPLACE)) {
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to store id mapping %s:%s : %s\n,
+ key.dptr, data.dptr, tdb_errorstr(idmap_tdb)));
+
+if (!deallocate_id(*id, isgroup))
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to rollback id mapping\n));
+
+result = False;
+}
+
+if (result tdb_store(idmap_tdb, data, key, TDB_REPLACE)) {
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to store reverse id mapping %s:%s : %s\n,
+ data.dptr, key.dptr, tdb_errorstr(idmap_tdb)));
+
+if (!deallocate_id(*id, isgroup) || tdb_delete(idmap_tdb, key))
+DEBUG(0, (Failed to rollback id mapping\n));
+
+result = False;
+}
}
}
RE: Samba CPU Usage with large directories ...
Scott Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: We have a samba server running version 2.2.5 on kernel 2.4.18 with the SGI XFS patch. The shared volume consists of an XFS partition on a 3-ware raid5 controller. The network connection is via a 4 port bonded pipe to the switch. We notice that the samba CPU usage during write operations increases dramatically once a directory contains more than a certian number of files - thought to be somewhere around the 1500 to 2000 mark. We have tried allowing samba more memory, which did not seem to help - and have had little or no success finding any information on the web, hence this post. My guess (and that's all it is) is that this is an operating system issue. I presume you are using Linux 2.4.18 although you didn't say. Try writing a small C benchmark program that just does straight fopen/fread/frwrite/fclose operations, and time them, and see how you fare. I'll bet you find that the system calls (esp. the open call) take a lot longer on the big directories. Make sure your benchmark program uses the same file naming conventions as your real code, in case the problem has something to do with the efficiency of hashing or searching the specific names. PG -- Paul Green, Senior Technical Consultant, Stratus Technologies. Day: +1 978-461-7557; FAX: +1 978-461-3610 Speaking from Stratus not for Stratus
Re: Bug and Fix - Follow Up
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:01:16PM -0600, Matt Roberts, GRDA wrote:
In my search for the cause of the behavior seen in my earlier post,
I traced the function call path to these two interesting functions,
int source/lib/util.c at about line 133:
BOOL set_global_scope(const char *scope)
{
SAFE_FREE(smb_scope);
smb_scope = strdup(scope);
if (!smb_scope)
return False;
strupper(smb_scope);
return True;
}
const char *global_scope(void)
{
return smb_scope;
}
Since the latter function returns the string 'smb_scope', regardless
of what is in it, wouldn't the first function protect against being
set to a NULL value by rewriting it similar to this?
BOOL set_global_scope(const char *scope)
{
SAFE_FREE(smb_scope);
if (!smb_scope) {
smb_scope = strdup();
return False;
}
smb_scope = strdup(scope);
strupper(smb_scope);
return True;
}
Already committed - thanks !
Jeremy.
smbclient and large file support
smbclient (and smbtar) in version 2.2.7a (and prior) has problems with
large files ( 4GB). The following patch (against 2.2.7a) fixes all
known problems with this. This code has been checked into the CVS tree
in all branches as well.
--
==
Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics
Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510
Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043-1351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 650-933-2177
http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177
PGP Key: 0x8408D65D
==
--- samba-2.2.7a/source/client/client.c Wed Dec 4 09:16:34 2002
+++ samba-2.2.7a-fixed/source/client/client.c Thu Dec 19 15:41:51 2002
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@
/* timing globals */
off_t get_total_size = 0;
-int get_total_time_ms = 0;
+unsigned int get_total_time_ms = 0;
off_t put_total_size = 0;
-int put_total_time_ms = 0;
+unsigned int put_total_time_ms = 0;
/* totals globals */
static double dir_total;
--- samba-2.2.7a/source/client/clitar.c Tue Apr 30 06:26:18 2002
+++ samba-2.2.7a-fixed/source/client/clitar.c Thu Dec 19 15:50:20 2002
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@
struct file_info_struct
{
- size_t size;
+ SMB_BIG_UINT size;
uint16 mode;
- int uid;
- int gid;
+ uid_t uid;
+ gid_t gid;
/* These times are normally kept in GMT */
time_t mtime;
time_t atime;
@@ -125,11 +125,11 @@
int blocksize=20;
int tarhandle;
-static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, int size, time_t mtime,
+static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, SMB_BIG_UINT size, time_t mtime,
char *amode, unsigned char ftype);
static void do_atar(char *rname,char *lname,file_info *finfo1);
static void do_tar(file_info *finfo);
-static void oct_it(long value, int ndgs, char *p);
+static void oct_it(SMB_BIG_UINT value, int ndgs, char *p);
static void fixtarname(char *tptr, char *fp, int l);
static int dotarbuf(int f, char *b, int n);
static void dozerobuf(int f, int n);
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
/
Write a tar header to buffer
/
-static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, int size, time_t mtime,
+static void writetarheader(int f, char *aname, SMB_BIG_UINT size, time_t mtime,
char *amode, unsigned char ftype)
{
union hblock hb;
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
int i, chk, l;
char *jp;
- DEBUG(5, (WriteTarHdr, Type = %c, Size= %i, Name = %s\n, ftype, size, aname));
+ DEBUG(5, (WriteTarHdr, Type = %c, Size= %.0f, Name = %s\n, ftype, (double)size,
+aname));
memset(hb.dummy, 0, sizeof(hb.dummy));
@@ -207,10 +207,10 @@
hb.dbuf.name[NAMSIZ-1]='\0';
safe_strcpy(hb.dbuf.mode, amode, strlen(amode));
- oct_it(0L, 8, hb.dbuf.uid);
- oct_it(0L, 8, hb.dbuf.gid);
- oct_it((long) size, 13, hb.dbuf.size);
- oct_it((long) mtime, 13, hb.dbuf.mtime);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT)0, 8, hb.dbuf.uid);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT)0, 8, hb.dbuf.gid);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT) size, 13, hb.dbuf.size);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT) mtime, 13, hb.dbuf.mtime);
memcpy(hb.dbuf.chksum, , sizeof(hb.dbuf.chksum));
memset(hb.dbuf.linkname, 0, NAMSIZ);
hb.dbuf.linkflag=ftype;
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
for (chk=0, i=sizeof(hb.dummy), jp=hb.dummy; --i=0;) chk+=(0xFF *jp++);
- oct_it((long) chk, 8, hb.dbuf.chksum);
+ oct_it((SMB_BIG_UINT) chk, 8, hb.dbuf.chksum);
hb.dbuf.chksum[6] = '\0';
(void) dotarbuf(f, hb.dummy, sizeof(hb.dummy));
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
/
Convert from decimal to octal string
/
-static void oct_it (long value, int ndgs, char *p)
+static void oct_it (SMB_BIG_UINT value, int ndgs, char *p)
{
/* Converts long to octal string, pads with leading zeros */
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@
static void do_atar(char *rname,char *lname,file_info *finfo1)
{
int fnum;
- uint32 nread=0;
+ SMB_BIG_UINT nread=0;
char ftype;
file_info2 finfo;
BOOL close_done = False;
@@ -643,6 +643,7 @@
finfo.mtime = finfo1 - mtime;
finfo.atime = finfo1 - atime;
finfo.ctime = finfo1 - ctime;
+finfo.name = finfo1 - name;
}
else {
finfo.size = def_finfo.size;
@@ -652,13 +653,14 @@
finfo.mtime = def_finfo.mtime;
finfo.atime = def_finfo.atime;
finfo.ctime = def_finfo.ctime;
+finfo.name = def_finfo.name;
}
if (dry_run)
{
- DEBUG(3,(skipping file %s of size %d bytes\n,
+ DEBUG(3,(skipping file %s of size %12.0f bytes\n,
finfo.name,
- (int)finfo.size));
+ (double)finfo.size));
shallitime=0;
ttarf+=finfo.size + TBLOCK
Returning the size of the file to Clients
This was just brought up on the samba-vms list. Samba makes calls on behalf of the client to return a file size. The problem for this on OpenVMS, is that some of the text file sizes include the record information. When these files are sent to the client they are converted to a byte stream format like UNIX uses. But this results in a file that is a slightly different size than the physical size of the file, usually smaller. Only some applications, such as wordpad seem to be sensitive to this, as others use the amount of data transferred. It has been reported that wordpad adds garbage bytes to the end of the buffer for the difference. The 2.2.4 port of Samba to OpenVMS solves this by reading the entire file in order to give the correct size. This of course creates a big performance hit when displaying a directory. Is there anyway to differentiate for when the Client is opening a file for an application, and when a directory is being listed? I am also going to look to see if there is a more optimal way to calculate the size of these text files. Thanks, -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
Time to add blocking to the mailing list?
I assume others have also seen the junk from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and similar addresses advertising something from http://www.szbookshop.com (though I'm not sure what, since it's in 8 bit characters). I've reported this through SpamCop, but I'm not sure it will do any good. The mail originates from a network in China, and according to SpamCop they ignore abuse reports, at least from SpamCop. My experience is that they ignore abuse reports from everyone. If the administrator of this mailing list can't get any response from them, or the system where the URL is, I propose that it's now time to block the source from submitting mail to to the mailing list. It appears to be the only way to deal with these people. (Unless someone can read the posts and says that they are in fact related to the SAMBA product we're discussing here.) Bart.
NEW STOCK PICK: TWLO - AMCG UP 461%..................................................................................................................................................................................... ejes
html head /head body p align=centerfont style=font-size: 11pt face=CourierDid you miss out on AMCG, UP 461%?/font/p p align=centerfont style=font-size: 11pt face=CourierHere's another pick - Another SHORT PLAY/font/p p align=centerba href=http://www.tristarzeus.com/103816/wall_street_bulletin.htm;CLICK HERE/a/b/p p align=centerimg border=0 src=http://www.tristarzeus.com/103816/stopwatch01.gif;/p p align=leftnbsp;/p p align=leftnbsp;/p p align=centerfont size=2A href=http://www.tristarzeus.com/remove/cstremove.htm;Click here to unsubscribe/A /body /html tiqmaasjojaejtkxquoabpqsw
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Thu Dec 19 16:12:41 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3661/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 clireadwrite.c Log Message: set OffsetHigh if offset is 32 bits Revisions: clireadwrite.c 1.2.4.8 = 1.2.4.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c?r1=1.2.4.8r2=1.2.4.9
CVS update: samba/source/client
Date: Thu Dec 19 16:16:50 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/client In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4145 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 clitar.c Log Message: patch from Brian Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] for some large file size issues in smbclient tar. Revisions: clitar.c1.74.4.8 = 1.74.4.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/client/clitar.c?r1=1.74.4.8r2=1.74.4.9
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Thu Dec 19 16:59:08 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8619/lib Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 snprintf.c Log Message: actually print values in %g and %e formats Revisions: snprintf.c 1.12.4.16 = 1.12.4.17 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/snprintf.c?r1=1.12.4.16r2=1.12.4.17
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Thu Dec 19 17:56:21 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11801/lib Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD adt_tree.c Log Message: Allow dmalloc usage (rename free function pointers). Jeremy. Revisions: adt_tree.c 1.4.2.1 = 1.4.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/adt_tree.c?r1=1.4.2.1r2=1.4.2.2
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Thu Dec 19 17:56:21 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11801/include Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD adt_tree.h includes.h smb.h Log Message: Allow dmalloc usage (rename free function pointers). Jeremy. Revisions: adt_tree.h 1.1.2.1 = 1.1.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/adt_tree.h?r1=1.1.2.1r2=1.1.2.2 includes.h 1.189.2.22 = 1.189.2.23 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/includes.h?r1=1.189.2.22r2=1.189.2.23 smb.h 1.323.2.42 = 1.323.2.43 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/smb.h?r1=1.323.2.42r2=1.323.2.43
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Thu Dec 19 19:57:37 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20087 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 snprintf.c Log Message: merge from 2.2 actually print args for %g and %e Revisions: snprintf.c 1.25.2.1 = 1.25.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/snprintf.c?r1=1.25.2.1r2=1.25.2.2
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Thu Dec 19 19:56:31 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19913 Modified Files: snprintf.c Log Message: merge from 2.2 actually print args for %g and %e Revisions: snprintf.c 1.31 = 1.32 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/snprintf.c?r1=1.31r2=1.32
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Thu Dec 19 20:23:45 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21579 Modified Files: clireadwrite.c Log Message: merge from 2.2 fix for smbclient large files Revisions: clireadwrite.c 1.20 = 1.21 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c?r1=1.20r2=1.21
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Thu Dec 19 20:25:16 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21670 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 clireadwrite.c Log Message: merge from 2.2 fix for smbclient large files Revisions: clireadwrite.c 1.16.2.3 = 1.16.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c?r1=1.16.2.3r2=1.16.2.4
CVS update: samba/source/client
Date: Thu Dec 19 20:26:44 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/client In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21839 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 clitar.c Log Message: merge from 2.2 fix for smbclient large files Revisions: clitar.c1.88.2.3 = 1.88.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/client/clitar.c?r1=1.88.2.3r2=1.88.2.4
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Thu Dec 19 20:30:44 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22047/lib Added Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD dmallocmsg.c Log Message: merging dmalloc support from HEAD in order to track down memory leaks Revisions: dmallocmsg.c1.1.2.2 = 1.1.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/dmallocmsg.c?r1=1.1.2.2r2=1.1.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Thu Dec 19 20:30:46 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22047/utils Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD smbcontrol.c Log Message: merging dmalloc support from HEAD in order to track down memory leaks Revisions: smbcontrol.c1.7.2.21 = 1.7.2.22 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/smbcontrol.c?r1=1.7.2.21r2=1.7.2.22
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Dec 19 20:30:46 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22047/smbd Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD server.c Log Message: merging dmalloc support from HEAD in order to track down memory leaks Revisions: server.c1.304.2.28 = 1.304.2.29 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/server.c?r1=1.304.2.28r2=1.304.2.29
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Thu Dec 19 22:14:40 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29717/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nmbd_namequery.c Log Message: Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists showing these. Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_namequery.c1.18.2.1 = 1.18.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c?r1=1.18.2.1r2=1.18.2.2
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Thu Dec 19 22:14:53 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29771/nmbd Modified Files: nmbd_namequery.c Log Message: Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists showing these. Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_namequery.c1.19 = 1.20 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c?r1=1.19r2=1.20
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Thu Dec 19 22:14:56 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28526/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD nmbd_namequery.c Log Message: Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists showing these. No CR#. Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_namequery.c1.10.2.3 = 1.10.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c?r1=1.10.2.3r2=1.10.2.4
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Thu Dec 19 22:30:22 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31512/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 nmbd_namequery.c Log Message: merge from head Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists showing these. Revisions: nmbd_namequery.c1.10.4.8 = 1.10.4.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c?r1=1.10.4.8r2=1.10.4.9
Re: CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:14:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu Dec 19 22:14:40 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29717/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nmbd_namequery.c Log Message: Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists showing these. Jeremy. Just curious... Are these the malformed replies from the W2K WINS server? Mike Allen (jCIFS) noted these as well. Chris -)- -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:33:39PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:14:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu Dec 19 22:14:40 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29717/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nmbd_namequery.c Log Message: Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists showing these. Jeremy. Just curious... Are these the malformed replies from the W2K WINS server? Mike Allen (jCIFS) noted these as well. Dunno actually - I just got a stack backtrace showing where nmbd was going down and it was dereferencing a pointer that should always be valid in a valid reply packet. So I added a NULL check :-). Happy Christmas ! Jeremy.
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Thu Dec 19 22:55:35 2002 Author: jht Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1020 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 pdbedit.c Log Message: Changed -b option to -t to avoid conflict with Samba-3.0.0 and Samba-Head branches. Revisions: pdbedit.c 1.9.2.10 = 1.9.2.11 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/pdbedit.c?r1=1.9.2.10r2=1.9.2.11
CVS update: samba/source/python/examples/tdbpack
Date: Fri Dec 20 01:16:07 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/python/examples/tdbpack In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15064/python/examples/tdbpack Added Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 .cvsignore Log Message: Ignore python compiled files. Revisions: .cvsignore NONE = 1.1.2.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/python/examples/tdbpack/.cvsignore?rev=1.1.2.1
CVS update: samba/source/python
Date: Fri Dec 20 01:19:04 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/python In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15384/python Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 py_tdbpack.c Log Message: Merge from HEAD: CR1333: Fix memory leak when unpacking some structures. * (pytdbunpack_item): PyList_Append creates an additional reference to the appended object. Therefore, release the initial reference after it's added to the list. Revisions: py_tdbpack.c1.1.2.8 = 1.1.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/python/py_tdbpack.c?r1=1.1.2.8r2=1.1.2.9
