[Samba] My Samba 3.0beta1 stopped working as ADS member
I had a working Samba 3.0beta1 as ADS member of a W2003 server. My w2000 client could log in to the W2003 server and use services on Samba (home directory). Winbind is working. So I tried to re-do all my work again. And suddenly the w2k can use any services on Samba anymore. The output from the logfile tells me it's kerberos problem: [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:(126) krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type) [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:(175) Failed to verify incoming ticket! [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] smbd/error.c:(94) error string = No such file or directory Winbind/wbinfo works as it should. I know what problem it is, but not WHY and not HOW to fix it ? /Patrik -- In a world without fences who needs Gates Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.swedenMobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS Fax: +46 60 671550 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] CPU consumption by samba
Hi, On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:18:53AM +0200, Massimiliano Hofer wrote: Hi, I'm having strange performance problems with samba and an application written with VisualFox Pro. This application is entirely installed in a Windows share and it has a hystory of strange phenomenons. ...snip... I remember that there were issues with VisualFox Pro and oplocks discussed on this list. Try to disable them A recommendation was to look at http://www.drouillard.ca/TipsTricks/Samba/Oplocks.htm You can search this list at marc.theaimsgroup.com for Foxpro Test with http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambaw=2r=1s=Foxpro+Testq=b for further information. HTH, Wolfi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] IP address for workstation
How get IP address the remote workstation in logon process (logon process in Samba Server)? man smb.conf? Maybe you're looking for what's under VARIABLE SUBSTITUTIONS... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3 beta 1, LDAP and USRMGR
Hi, I've now got my Samba 3 domain successfully configured apart from a minor detail. When I use USRMGR to try and add a new user I get The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect. About 10 minutes ago I successfully joined this machine to the domain and tested that the server correct adds all my details to the LDAP server. I'm confused, if you tell usrmgr to Copy a user it allows you to the copy dialog but gives the same error when you add however if you refresh the list it has actually added the user. I've got another, almost identical, setup at home but with using the ldapsam backend, it works perfectly (apart from not being able to use the delete in usrmgr). It's the same version (Samba 3.0beta1) as this one. Any ideas? Matt -- Quantum canis ille in fenestra est? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] File locking
Hi, I have DOS program and I have to move it from Novell to Samba server. In Novell program locks file all but DENY READ : 0 so that other clients can read file and if one client is reading file, other can write to it. I would like achive same affect on samba server, but on samba server program locks file read and write so reading the file (while the other client is opening file for write) is not posible. This is output of smbstatus of the file i would like to read while samba if performing this lock Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 3637 DENY_WRITE 0x3 RDWR NONE /home/public/somefile.dat Tue Jun 17 12:34:59 2003 Thank you for any help! By, Simon Ganik -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] How to share the tape drive in samba server for windows user
Hello All, I have installed RedHat Linux-9 and configured has domian controller for windows users. I have HP's tape drive in this Machine. Is it possible to share this tape drive to all the windows users to this tape drive using Samba? Regards, Sathi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] My Samba 3.0beta1 stopped working as ADS member
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:44, Patrik Gustavsson PS Sweden Senior Technical Consultant wrote: I had a working Samba 3.0beta1 as ADS member of a W2003 server. My w2000 client could log in to the W2003 server and use services on Samba (home directory). Winbind is working. So I tried to re-do all my work again. And suddenly the w2k can use any services on Samba anymore. The output from the logfile tells me it's kerberos problem: [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:(126) krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type) [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:(175) Failed to verify incoming ticket! [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] smbd/error.c:(94) error string = No such file or directory Winbind/wbinfo works as it should. I know what problem it is, but not WHY and not HOW to fix it ? The user you are using has not had their password changed since Win2k installation/AD upgrade. This means that they only have their 'type 23' encryption type - the type that is based on the NT4 password. If you change the password, it should work. The proper solution is to compile with MIT Krb5 1.3, or a recent Heimdal kerberos. These versions support the new encryption type, and should allow it to work out of the box. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.00b1 + passdb: mysql problem
Hi all, is here someone with working samba3 + passdb:mysql ? I've been trying to set up the whole thing from morning on ;-). After succesfull startup, when I try to login, smbd dumps this error to logs: No builtin backend found, trying to load plugin Module '/usr/lib/samba3/pdb/mysql.so' loaded ! Plugin is available, but doesn't register passdb backend Loading /usr/lib/samba3/pdb/mysql.so:mysql failed! The user table is empty, but smbd doesn't even try to connect. Here is an excertp from smb.conf: passdb backend = /usr/lib/samba3/pdb/mysql.so:mysql mysql:mysql host = localhost mysql:mysql user = samba mysql:mysql password = ambas mysql:mysql database = samba mysql:mysql table = user domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes security = user -- Ernest Beinrohr, OERNii eAdmin @ AxonPro.sk, http://www.AxonPro.sk +421-2-62410360, +421-903-482603 HomePage: http://www.OERNii.sk/ - Be liberal in what you accept,and conservative in what you send. -- Postel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
I Hate to reply myself, but since noone answered ... We are planning to replace a quite big domain running W2K with Samba ( at the very least, the DC ). Though i'd love to have the extra security capabilities of W2K ( Kerberos ) as a DC, Samba/NT4 as PDC/BDC with ldapsam will more than suffice for now. The show-stopper right now is this: we need to be able to assign real Full Control permissions: a user who has Full control on a directory should be able to Read, Write, eXecute ( of course) [ this can be easily achieved with ACLs ] *plus* being able to give away Full Control to other users too [ being able to override inherited ACLs would be a plus, too ]. Is this feasible (remember smbd runs as root... )? Has somebody though about implementing this ? Seems like every implementation of ACL comes together with Extended Attributes support ( at least Ext2/ext3, XFS, ReiserFS ). Any exceptions ? How about using one EA to map some Windows' attributes ? Full Control, Archive ( though it can be emulated through ctime/atime/mtime ), Change Only, come in a first pass over this. I thought that maybe coding a wrapper around SecLib could achieve this. Being quite fluent in C/C++ both in Un*x as well as Win32 I don't mind coding whatever tool is needed to achieve this, provided it is indeed possible. If not, some suggestions/comments ( or even an approximate timeline for implementation! ) would be more than welcome. Any comments on this?? Thanks in advance everybody. Keep the good work, Samba Team! Kind regards, J.L. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 2.2.8a - winbindd and domain-USER/GROUPS
hi suse8.2 samba-latest --with-acl-support --with-pam configured as domain member samba and winbindd works fine getent passwd -- all users from the PDC getent group -- all groups chown TESTFIRMA+dummy -on FS - also works fine authentifikation against PDC also works fine the situation: - w2k client connects to samba-share (all fine) - in w2k explorer - marks a file and want to change the permissions to other PDC-USERS now i expected to see the complete PDC USER/Group list, as i saw it with wbinfo -u but i get only a small list and the following error in log.smbd [2003/06/18 14:23:44, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:load_sampwd_entries(162) load_sampwd_entries: Unable to open passdb. what´s wrong here any idea ? thx a lot in advance bb boris blaha -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] guest account login
hi, i use rh9 with samba 2.2.8a. i use samba security = domain with the password servers. i now want to create a share for only some users with full rights and all other users should login via the nobody (or some other) guest account but i want that they arent ask for a loginname and a password. i also dont wanted to enter all names into the smbuser file (nobody = guest pcguest smbguest ...) because we got over hundret of users here. how can i setup a share that only the named users have full rights and all the other users could login without typing in a loginname and passwort so that they directly get into the share. thxxx for help. greetz denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 'Little' problems with Samba v2.2.3a-12.3 (Debian Woody)and PRINTERS !!
Hi,
I am using Samba (v2.2.3a-12.3 on stable Debian Woody) on a bi-cpu server
(named MYSRV) acting as a primary domain controller. All works well except
for printers where I have severals little problems. I use LPRng (v3.8.10-1.2
on stable Debian Woody) as my linux lpd spooler on my server. I have 2
printers : one HP LaserJet 4000N (named nss.1er) and one HP LaserJet 4050N
(named nss.rdc). I have configured the 2 printers on the server using
'printtool'. I choosed the 'Remote Unix (lpd) Queue'. As both HP4000N and
HP4050N can understand postcript documents, I choose '*auto* - Postscript' as
my input filter for the two printers. All works well (samba : PDC, printers)
except that I have problems with uploading and downloading printers driver on
my samba server.
Here is my '/etc/printcap' file :
--- /etc/printcap
# /etc/printcap: printer capability database. See printcap(5).
# You can use the filter entries df, tf, cf, gf etc. for
# your own filters. See the printcap(5) manual page for further
# details.
##PRINTTOOL3## REMOTE POSTSCRIPT 600x600 a4 {} PostScript Default {}
nss.rdc:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/nss.rdc:\
:lp=IP.ADDR.HP4050N%9100:\
:as=-- ORIGINE $n $P $t:\
:ae=|/var/spool/lpd/nssrdc-acct.pl:\
:af=/var/spool/lpd/nssrdc.acct:\
:lf=/var/spool/lpd/nssrdc.log:\
:bl=:\
:user=daemon:\
:sh:\
:mx#0:\
:lpd_bounce=true:\
:if=/usr/lib/printfilters/master-filter:\
:PAPERSIZE=a4:\
:DESIRED_TO=ps:\
:PRINTER_TYPE=REMOTE:\
:ASCII_TO_PS=YES:\
:GSDEVICE=POSTSCRIPT:\
:RESOLUTION=600x600:\
:PS_SEND_EOF=YES:\
:NUP=1:\
:RTLFTMAR=18:\
:TOPBOTMAR=18:\
:TEXT_SEND_EOF=NO:
##PRINTTOOL3## REMOTE POSTSCRIPT 600x600 a4 {} PostScript Default {}
nss.1er:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/nss.1er:\
:rm=IP.ADDR.HP4000N:\
:rp=IP.ADDR.HP4000N:\
:as=-- ORIGINE $n $P $t :\
:ae=|/var/spool/lpd/nss1er-acct.pl:\
:af=/var/spool/lpd/nss1er.acct:\
:lf=/var/spool/lpd/nss1er.log:\
:bl=:\
:user=daemon:\
:sh:\
:mx#0:\
:lpd_bounce=true:\
:if=/usr/lib/printfilters/master-filter:\
:PAPERSIZE=a4:\
:DESIRED_TO=ps:\
:PRINTER_TYPE=REMOTE:\
:ASCII_TO_PS=YES:\
:GSDEVICE=POSTSCRIPT:\
:RESOLUTION=600x600:\
:PS_SEND_EOF=YES:\
:NUP=1:\
:RTLFTMAR=18:\
:TOPBOTMAR=18:\
:TEXT_SEND_EOF=NO:
--- END of /etc/printcap
I have configured Samba manually using 'vi' :-)
The last modification I have done is the 'print$' share which there is only
two directories behind : W32X86 and WIN40. No files are present in these two
directories (I don't really know what files must I put there).
Here is my '/etc/samba/smb.conf' file :
(ME is my user name linux/samba account)
--- /etc/samba/smb.conf
# /etc/samba/smb.conf - 'MYSRV'
# Samba config file created by VF
# Lundi 02 Juin 2003 13:30
[global]
workgroup = MYDOM
netbios name = MYSRV
server string = Serveur Intranet (domaine MYDOM)
security = domain
encrypt passwords = Yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
password server = MYSRV
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 1
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
time offset = 0
time server = Yes
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096
SO_RCVBUF=4096
logon drive = u:
logon script = %U.bat
domain logons = Yes
domain master = Yes
hosts allow = MY.DOM.IP.ADDR/255.255.255.128
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g pcwinnt -c
'Compte PC' -s /bin/false -M %u
admin users = root, ME
show add printer wizard = Yes
printer admin = root, ME
[netlogon]
comment = Batch de connexion au domaine MYDOM
path = /netlogon
available = Yes
writeable = No
browseable = No
[homes]
comment = Partage perso (disque U)
available = Yes
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
browseable = Yes
[print$]
comment = Partage driver Imprimantes reseaux
path = /var/spool/lpd/drivers-imp
admin users = root, ME
valid users = @lp
available = Yes
read only = Yes
write list = root, farget
force user = root
force group = lp
create mask = 0750
directory mask = 0750
browseable = Yes
[commun]
comment = Partage commun (disque P)
path = /common
available = Yes
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0775
directory mask = 0775
RE: [Samba] New Samba Server
3ware makes great controllers, but you will be limited to the pci bus bandwidth for the raid arrays. instead of 8x40 I would look for the best cost/size ratio. I think 120GB hard drives can be found for around $100.00 (us) I'd put 3 in a raid5 array for performance. Take care, Seth 727-919-1598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Rowe Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] New Samba Server I'm currently looking at hardware specs for a samba server, its' job will be to hold general office files, cad / solidworks files along with approximately 40 outlook PST files that will be opened off the server. Here are the current specs I'm looking at.. AMD 2600XP Asus A7N8X Deluxe nVidia Serial ATA 2 x 512 MB PC2700 DDR 333 = 1024MB ASUS S520/Generic 52X CD-ROM (OEM) ASUS GrForce4 MX440-8X 64MB DDR D-Link DGE-550T 32/64-Bit PCI-Bus Copper (RJ45) 3Ware Escalade 7500-8 8 x 40gb ata-100 7200.7 drives 3Ware Escalade 7500-4 4 x 40gb ata-100 7200.7 drives The 7500-8 will be holding the office and cad / solid works files and the 7500-4 will be holding the PST files (I thought it was best to keep them on a separate controller cards.) Will this do a reasonable job in keeping up with a gigabit network? And is running PST files off the server like this a feasible option?? Any suggestions on hardware improvements would be appreciated as without the hardware to test with I'm purchasing quite blindly here :| Thanks Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba auth problems in RH9 w/ log
I have samba version 2.2.7a security-rollup fix from redhat running as a simple file server for about a dozen computers. the computers are all win2k except for 1 win98 and 1 winxp pro. I am having problems with nmbd dying and not restarting as some others in the list have has but I am also having a problem w/ 1 particular PC/username this person often is the only one that can't get into files on the computer (through mapped network drives) smbstatus tells me their machine is connected but the username is nobody. here is a recent log: --begin log--- [2003/06/14 20:45:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:46:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:47:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:48:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:49:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:50:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:51:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:52:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:53:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:54:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:55:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:56:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:57:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:58:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:59:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:00:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:01:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:02:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:03:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:04:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:05:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:06:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:07:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:08:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:09:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:10:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:11:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:12:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:13:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:14:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878) Transaction 55918 of length 133 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1) [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858) Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(868) sesssetupX:name=[] [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(336) uid 99
RE: [Samba] New Samba Server
On Wednesday, June 18, Seth Hollen wrote: 3ware makes great controllers, but you will be limited to the pci bus bandwidth for the raid arrays. instead of 8x40 I would look for the best cost/size ratio. I think 120GB hard drives can be found for around $100.00 (us) I'd put 3 in a raid5 array for performance. Hi Seth and Tim: One other comment - the Escalade 7500 series cards are PCI-X cards (64-bit) if you can afford the motherboard that has these slots, having that extra bandwidth will be a big performance boost. I'm using the 7500-4LP and 4x120GB Western Digital drives in my backup server right now - it's a sweet setup! :-) Later, -- Kevin L. Collins, MCSE Systems Manager Nesbitt Engineering, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3
Do we still need to specify the -with-winbind -with-pam and all the other stuff when compiling Samba 3.0? I did the windbind but not pam, and domain authentication wont work. Could this be why? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Shortened service name results in inaccessible files
Hello, we are running samba 2.2.8a on debian 3.0 using kernel 2.5.71 (ok beat me for that, but the motherboard sucks!) for 100 Win2k clients. Two clients have been identified which repeatedly fail to open a certain tif file. I got the following error message: [2003/06/18 16:23:33, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(252) mmag-wrk-055 (10.100.1.133) couldn't find service teamfolde The service teamfolde is shortend (perhaps by the logging code?), the share is named teamfolders. There are currently no other known systematic errors or configuration issues. Trying several logging levels including 10 did not result in helpful results because I cannot correlate the messages without a kind of transaction id. Please give me a hint where to look futher. Thanks in advance, Andreas Heilwagen Operations Manager Jamba! AG, Berlin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Goups and domains trusted
Hello, I'm using a proxy squid with authentification NT (Challenge/response) but i have problem with domains trusted. I have 2 domains DOMAIN1 and DOMAIN2. When i use wbinfo i have these results : wbinfo -t secret is good wbinfo -m DOMAIN2 ./wbinfo -a DOMAIN2\\proxy%proxy01 plaintext password authentication succeeded challenge/response password authentication succeeded It's very good but when i tried to get the groups of my users in my domain trusted DOMAIN2 the result is : ./wbinfo -r DOMAIN2\\proxy%proxy01 Could not get groups for user DOMAIN2\proxy%proxy01 Please could you help me. Sincerly. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
The show-stopper right now is this: we need to be able to assign real Full Control permissions: a user who has Full control on a directory should be able to Read, Write, eXecute ( of course) [ this can be easily achieved with ACLs ] *plus* being able to give away Full Control to other users too [being able to override inherited ACLs would be a plus, too]. Is this feasible (remember smbd runs as root... )? Has somebody thought about implementing this ? If you have Full Control over a directory (e.g. as root, or own it or have rwx on it), you can give FC (rwx) to others. Is it perhaps the other way around, that you want to stop this delegation, unless an FC EA explicitely allows it? I'm not sure if it can be a show-stopper or if it really makes a difference. How about using one EA to map some Windows' attributes ? Full Control, Archive ( though it can be emulated through ctime/atime/mtime ), Change Only, come in a first pass over this. Change Only? Uhm, you mean Erase Only? I wouldn't be surprised if there's an M$ ACL with that name. The EAs are apparently still a disputed novelty. Some M$ ACLs make sense, but Archive bit is nonsense and possibly much else. Consider the backslash, OK it's a different ball game but still, consider the backslash. Was there any need for it, given that Unix slash was in existence for decades when DOS came around? No, just like much of so called ACLs, it is a way to lock the installed base away from recognized standards to proprietary captivity. The way you put it, it looks like there are some major problems standing in the way of migrations to common standards, whereas it is my opinion that Samba is doing great by implementing sensible features in a standards-conforming way and offering an efficient file and print service for a song. Think about what really stops the show - the feature or the perception. Think how M$ may use your letter for FUD: Samba is free but IT specialists complain they can't have full control of their data in practice. I thought that maybe coding a wrapper around SecLib could achieve this. Being quite fluent in C/C++ both in Un*x as well as Win32 I don't mind coding whatever tool is needed to achieve this, provided it is indeed possible. If not, some suggestions/comments ( or even an approximate timeline for implementation! ) would be more than welcome. Any comments on this?? My posting was only comments. But go ahead and do it. Perhaps everyone will use it, once it's there. Samba isn't perfect. The way default permissions get replicated indiscriminately to subdirs and files is one thing that could be improved. If you want to ensure propagation of eXec (tresspassing) bit on directories, you eventually end up with Hidden, System and Archive bits stuck to files and still can't hide a directory or give it System attribute. But the problem is really only aesthetic. Hidden can and is regularly overridden in the file browser properties box, Archive I couldn't care less about and the System bit has nothing to do in most of the shares, except perhaps in [profiles] where you don't need ACLs anyway. When I was migrating, everyone thought it was a sure show-stopper. Now after some hands-on experience and a little tweaking, the perception has changed and there is no problem. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
consider the backslash. Was there any need for it, given that Unix slash was in existence for decades when DOS came around? No, just like much of so called ACLs, it is a way to lock the installed base away from recognized standards to proprietary captivity. In July 1981, Microsoft bought all rights to DOS from Seattle Computer. I doubt Seattle Computer had any intention of locking in the installed base with backslashes. Thanks for the correction. But was backslash used as path separator in ur-DOS? Just curious. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Permissions with CD's Copied from Win
I've recently installed a new server here. This is my first Samba install so I'm a newbie. We are using RH9 and Samba 2.2.7a. Everything with the transition from the old server to the new went great. I do seem to have one little bug though that I've been unable to work out. If one of the users copies the contents of a CD to the server the permissions for the folder and files copied are 755. That is that the Owner can RWX,but the group and others can only Read and Execute, but not write. I realize the the files and folders on the CD are Read only, but I would like to be able to have any member of the group be able to remove the read only properties from the files on the server from their windows workstations. A typical share in my smb.conf file looks something like so: [sales] path = /home/sales writeable = yes create mask = 0777 comment = Sales valid users = tweedledee, tweedledum, humptydumpty, horses, men Any help or pointers would be appreciated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Permissions with CD's Copied from Win
The parameter you want to set is force create mode = 0777 or 0666 if you don't want to set the execute bit. this will affect files only, not directories. It's somewhat difficult to explain (and took me about 2 years to wrap my head around it.), but create mode will remove unwanted permission attributes, whereas force create mode will add permission attributes. For example, if you wanted to remove the word readable permission from new files, you would use create mode = 0740. Also note that in unix terms, you have to make a file writable (as opposed to DOS, where you have to make files read-only.) It's a sublte difference, but can be a little confusing. Jun 17 11:26pm They hang the man and flog the woman That steal the goose from off the common, But let the greater villain loose That steals the common from the goose. --English folk poem, circa 1764 On 18 Jun 2003, Usenet News wrote: I've recently installed a new server here. This is my first Samba install so I'm a newbie. We are using RH9 and Samba 2.2.7a. Everything with the transition from the old server to the new went great. I do seem to have one little bug though that I've been unable to work out. If one of the users copies the contents of a CD to the server the permissions for the folder and files copied are 755. That is that the Owner can RWX,but the group and others can only Read and Execute, but not write. I realize the the files and folders on the CD are Read only, but I would like to be able to have any member of the group be able to remove the read only properties from the files on the server from their windows workstations. A typical share in my smb.conf file looks something like so: [sales] path = /home/sales writeable = yes create mask = 0777 comment = Sales valid users = tweedledee, tweedledum, humptydumpty, horses, men Any help or pointers would be appreciated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PDCUpgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
My apolgies in posting this again. However I was hoping someone had a suggestion... Symptom: After upgrading our Primary Domain Controller from Samba 2.2.2 to Samba 2.2.8a, users attempting to login from Windows 2000 clients are no longer able to do so. Details: After some research it was discovered that if a Windows 2000 client re-joins the domain served by the upgraded version of Samba, users are then able to, once again, log into this domain. It was also discovered that if the Samba PDC was downgraded to its original version of 2.2.2, any windows 2000 client that re-joined the domain while the Samba PDC was at version 2.2.8a, was still able to log into the domain. As additional information, both versions of the Samba PDC were compiled on SPARC architecture running Solaris 8.0 As the above comments suggest, machine accounts are backward-compatible, but *not* forward-compatible between Samba versions 2.2.2 and 2.2.8a. After researching the Samba mailing lists and newsgroups it is more or less understood that in order to deal with problems of this nature each windows 2000 machine account needs to be recreated. Which is a very time-consuming effort. Is there a better way to deal with this upgrade path? Ideally where I don't have to visit each windows 2000 machine in order to re-create their machine accounts? A migration utility or set of server-side steps perhaps? ...geoff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
I suspect the backslash thing actually ties back to DOS 1.0 and even CP/M, which had user-interface roots in the old DEC operating systems. Those OS's used forward slash as the option indicator on command line utilities. In their earliest form, neither had hierarchical directories, so there was no conflict. When UNIX-style paths appeared in DOS 2.0, to avoid breaking compatibility with existing BAT files (and confusing users), IBM (or whoever) used the backslash for the path separator. -Original Message- From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:05 AM To: Michael MacIsaac Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance consider the backslash. Was there any need for it, given that Unix slash was in existence for decades when DOS came around? No, just like much of so called ACLs, it is a way to lock the installed base away from recognized standards to proprietary captivity. In July 1981, Microsoft bought all rights to DOS from Seattle Computer. I doubt Seattle Computer had any intention of locking in the installed base with backslashes. Thanks for the correction. But was backslash used as path separator in ur-DOS? Just curious. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Slow windows - cups print (Facts discovered)
Hi there, Some days ago I've sent a mail talking about some problems printing from a Windows machine to a printer installed on a Linux server (running CUPS 1.1.19 and SAMBA 2.2.7) What was happening is when I send a page to be printed, I way 15/20 secs per page. I've installed the network printer with the correct HP drivers. After trying a LOT of stuff, I've installed the PostScript Printer Driver from ADOBE and it just works GREAT. When I print the page it's immediate. Problem is that it don't print collors. To make things tricker, it prints collors on the test page. I'm confused in understanding why when using the HP drivers the print process takes a lot of time and when using the adobe postscript ones, it's immediate. Then, I wouldn't care if I needed to use the adobe drivers but I need the colors :) Any help? -- Miguel Manso [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] User/Group management with windows MMC management tool?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Sameer Zeidat wrote: Hello everyone .. A quick question if anyone knows .. Will Samba support using the MMC snap-in in Win2k for managing users (similar to 'user manager for domains' that comes with NT)? Samba-3.0.0Beta1 works with the Win2K MMC but not with the WinXP MMC. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Calculating file size.
Hello! As it happens I am having some real nightmares with this too. Using NETGEAR ND520 NAS devices [Yes! I know - rod for own back...] But the fact it is a Linux device sold me ahead of a W2K Appliance Win2K reports: Folder #1 19,969 Files, 1578 folders Size: 2.36Gb S-O-D: 11.3Gb Notes: This is a user's 'Home Drive' Lots of disparate files Directories Folder #2 15,151 Files, 595 folders Size: 292Mb S-O-D: 7.54Gb Notes: As above Folder #3 114 Files, 1 folder Size: 857Mb S-O-D: 895Mb Notes: JAVA developer's archive - all but one are ZIP files Sure, I'll be obseleting these NAS soon but my plan was to build a custom Linux Samba server to handle the task. Now I'm not so sure -DG IT Manager ISV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
UH-OH! Maybe it's IBM's fault:
Those OS's used forward slash as the option
indicator on command line utilities. In their
earliest form, neither had hierarchical directories,
so there was no conflict. When UNIX-style paths
appeared in DOS 2.0, to avoid breaking compatibility
with existing BAT files (and confusing users), IBM
(or whoever) used the backslash for the path
separator.
Here we go again: why slash and not dash? Seattle
Computers had global ulterior designs for sure {:-)
Thanks.
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LDAP Samba 3.0b1 Password Sync Problem
I can not get password sync to work with ldap and samba 3.0 beta 1. I'm
not sure if I have screwed something up or if it is a bug.
I'm currently using:
openldap = 2.0.27
samba = 3.0 beta1
nss_ldap = 207
My setup is as follows sorry if it is too much info
my smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = AEROSPACE
server string = AE-ORVILLE
netbios name = AE-ORVILLE
name resolve order = lmhosts bcast host wins
hosts allow = xxx.xxx.xxx. xxx.xxx.xxx.
load printers = yes
idmap uid = 1-15000
idmap gid = 1-15000
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, guest
unix password sync = Yes
pam password change = yes
ldap delete dn = no
ldap suffix = dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
ldap user suffix = ou=People
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
ldap ssl = start tls
printcap name = cups
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
log level = 8
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
interfaces = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/23
local master = yes
os level = 255
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
domain logons = yes
wins server = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
dns proxy = no
logon drive = H:
logon path = \\%N\%U\MSWinProfile
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No
writable = Yes
[netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service
path = /var/samba/lib/netlogon
read only = yes
write list = ntadmin
guest ok = yes
writable = no
share modes = no
[profiles]
path = \\%N\%U\MSWinProfile
read only = no
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /usr/spool/samba
browseable = no
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes
Here is my slapd.conf file:
include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/krb5-kdc.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
loglevel296
pidfile /var/state/openldap/slapd.pid
argsfile/var/state/openldap/slapd.args
TLSCipherSuite HIGH
TLSCertificateFile /etc/openldap/certs/slapd-cert.pem
TLSCertificateKeyFile /etc/openldap/certs/slapd-key.pem
password-hash {MD5}
access to attrs=userPassword
by self write
by *auth
access to attrs=sambaLMPassword,sambaNTPassword
by dn=uid=administrator, ou=System, ou=People,
dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx write
by self write
by *auth
access to dn.children=dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
by self write
by *read
databaseldbm
suffix dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
rootdn cn=Manager,dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
rootpw secret
directory /var/lib/openldap-ldbm
index objectClass eq
index uid pres,eq
index sambaSIDeq
index uidNumber eq
index gidNumber eq
index cn eq
index memberUid eq
index sambaPrimaryGroupSIDeq
index displayName pres,eq
index maileq,subinitial
index surname eq,subinitial
index givenname eq,subinitial
ldap.conf file:
host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
base dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
nss_base_passwd dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx?sub
nss_base_shadow dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx?sub
nss_base_group ou=Groups,dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx?one
ssl start_tls
pam_password exop
my pam.d samba file:
# pam_smbpass.so authenticates against the smbpasswd file
auth required pam_smbpass.so nodelay
accountrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
password required pam_smbpass.so nodelay
smbconf=/etc/samba/smb.conf
my pam.d sys-auth file:
auth required /lib/security/pam_env.so
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_unix.so likeauth nullok
nodelay
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_ldap.so use_first_pass
auth required /lib/security/pam_deny.so
accountrequired /lib/security/pam_unix.so
accountsufficient /lib/security/pam_ldap.so
password required /lib/security/pam_cracklib.so retry=3
password sufficient /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok md5 shadow
use_authtok
password sufficient /lib/security/pam_ldap.so use_authok
password required /lib/security/pam_deny.so
sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_limits.so
sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_unix.so
sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_ldap.so
As an ldap authenticated user I can change the unix password with passwd
and the samba password with smbpasswd when sync is not
Re: [Samba] How to share the tape drive in samba server for windowsuser
I'm assuming you want to give your users the ability to backup and restore files at their will. If you're looking to share the tape drive so you can use Windows' native backup utility to write directly to the tape, sorry -- can't be done with Samba. This is because a tape drive is not seen by the system as a disk drive; the software wants to communicate directly with the drive. A tape drive is a sequential, exclusive access device, not a random access device. That means that only one process can read/write to the drive at a time, and the tape is written/read from front to back. First way to go about it is to create a share on the Samba server where the Windows users can create backup files (the backup utility will allow you to do this), then have the Samba server back this share up to tape then deletes the backup files. This isn't really ideal, because it's not getting written to tape right away, and there's no easy way for the user to restore from tape. A better way is to use a client/server backup solution which has a backup server running on the Linux box, and backup clients running on the Linux box and all the workstations. When a user wants to run a backup or restore job, the appropriate tape is placed in the drive on the Linux server, then they use the client to submit the job. The advantage here is that multiple jobs can be submitted simultaneously and they are queued; once they reach the top of the queue, the job runs, backing up the files from the workstation. A quick search reveals this software to look at: NovaNet (www.network-backup.com), Arkeia (www.arkeia.com), NetVault Workgroup Edition (www.bakbone.com), (Veritas BackupExec not available for Linux,) anyone know of open-source, multi-platform network-aware backup software? Arkeia Light is a free version for Linux that also supports two clients ( http://www.arkeia.com/arkeialight.html ). I'm not aware of any software that creates a virtual tape drive that can be seen by Windows' native backup software as a tape device. --Jon On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Sathi wrote: Hello All, I have installed RedHat Linux-9 and configured has domian controller for windows users. I have HP's tape drive in this Machine. Is it possible to share this tape drive to all the windows users to this tape drive using Samba? Regards, Sathi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How to share the tape drive in samba server for windowsuser
Also check out Sync2Nas ( http://sync2nas.sourceforge.net/ ) and rsync ( http://rsync.samba.org/ ). --Jon On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Jonathan Johnson wrote: A better way is to use a client/server backup solution which has a backup server running on the Linux box, and backup clients running on the Linux box and all the workstations. When a user wants to run a backup or restore job, the appropriate tape is placed in the drive on the Linux server, then they use the client to submit the job. The advantage here is that multiple jobs can be submitted simultaneously and they are queued; once they reach the top of the queue, the job runs, backing up the files from the workstation. A quick search reveals this software to look at: NovaNet (www.network-backup.com), Arkeia (www.arkeia.com), NetVault Workgroup Edition (www.bakbone.com), (Veritas BackupExec not available for Linux,) anyone know of open-source, multi-platform network-aware backup software? Arkeia Light is a free version for Linux that also supports two clients ( http://www.arkeia.com/arkeialight.html ). I'm not aware of any software that creates a virtual tape drive that can be seen by Windows' native backup software as a tape device. --Jon On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Sathi wrote: Hello All, I have installed RedHat Linux-9 and configured has domian controller for windows users. I have HP's tape drive in this Machine. Is it possible to share this tape drive to all the windows users to this tape drive using Samba? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Calculating file size.
At 17:13 18/06/2003 +0100, you wrote: Hello! As it happens I am having some real nightmares with this too. Using NETGEAR ND520 NAS devices [Yes! I know - rod for own back...] But the fact it is a Linux device sold me ahead of a W2K Appliance [snip] If those S-O-D figures are real ( I mean, W2K is not making them up ), you'd rather use ReiserFS for your Linux Samba server -- it would save you *tons* of disk Sure, I'll be obseleting these NAS soon but my plan was to build a custom Linux Samba server to handle the task. Now I'm not so sure Why ? -DG IT Manager ISV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] vampire: account mapping strangeness
I am testing samba 3.0's net rpc vampire tool and am getting strange results... after I import the account info, the samba usernames seem to be mapping to hardcoded unix uid #'s instead of account names. For example: # pdbedit -u jah000 idmap uid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs idmap gid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs jah000:4:TNCorp - Heyer, Jeff A. # getent passwd jah000 jah000:x:1003:100::/home/jah000:/bin/bash why is jah000's account in the pdb linked to uid 4? I'm guessing that it has something to do with the idmap stuff, but I'm not sure where to go from here... any thoughts? Thanks, Mark Roach -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
Never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity.
Or in this case, an attempt at compatibility for users who had come from the DEC
minicomputer world.
DOS 1.0 took a lot of it's command line conventions from CP/M, which got them from the
old DEC stuff. RT-11, OS-8, etc. UNIX wasn't really on anyone's radar screen at that
point, at least not for
PC's.
There's no logic here, just however someone felt like doing it. No usability
studies, and design-by-committee in those days.
Can you imagine a review committee letting someone get away with ls, cat, and
grep these days? DIR and TYPE at least made some sense, even if PIP didn't. :)
-Original Message-
From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:26 PM
To: Michael MacIsaac
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
UH-OH! Maybe it's IBM's fault:
Those OS's used forward slash as the option
indicator on command line utilities. In their
earliest form, neither had hierarchical directories,
so there was no conflict. When UNIX-style paths
appeared in DOS 2.0, to avoid breaking compatibility
with existing BAT files (and confusing users), IBM
(or whoever) used the backslash for the path
separator.
Here we go again: why slash and not dash? Seattle
Computers had global ulterior designs for sure {:-)
Thanks.
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Calculating file size.
OK. Maybe the 'not-so-sure' was a bit provocative on this list. G As I can't afford a 'Filer', Samba is ~obviously~ my best option. WinXP reports the same figures though - maybe the answer is another DLT drive direct onto the (New-Improved!) Samba box; rather than mapping drives to the W2K backup server. Nevertheless, the sizes can't be *real* - according to the stats my drive is 3 times bigger than it was when I bought it! Point taken on the journaling FS. Can anyone compare small file performance between RH ext3 and ReiserFS? Made me think - thanks for the input -DG -Original Message- From: Jose Luis Tallon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Calculating file size. At 17:13 18/06/2003 +0100, you wrote: Hello! As it happens I am having some real nightmares with this too. Using NETGEAR ND520 NAS devices [Yes! I know - rod for own back...] But the fact it is a Linux device sold me ahead of a W2K Appliance [snip] If those S-O-D figures are real ( I mean, W2K is not making them up ), you'd rather use ReiserFS for your Linux Samba server -- it would save you *tons* of disk Sure, I'll be obseleting these NAS soon but my plan was to build a custom Linux Samba server to handle the task. Now I'm not so sure Why ? -DG IT Manager ISV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbpasswd -a failure
Hello, I am trying to run Samba 2.2.8a in an embedded linux system and running into problems with smbpasswd. With both smbd and nmbd processes running fine ( the log files at log level 3 don't show errors), when I try to add a user to the smbpasswd file I get the following error. # smbpasswd -a pbathini New SMB password: Retype new SMB passwd: User pbathini does not exist in system passwd file ( usually /etc/passwd). Cannot add accounet without a valid local system user. Failed to modify password entry for user pbathini # My /etc/passwd file looks like this. root::0:0:root:/:/bin/sh nobody::99:99:Nobody:/:/bin/sh pbathini::500:500::/cramfs:/bin/sh Why is smbpasswd unable to find user entry in /etc/passwd file? Can somebody please help? Pushpa -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot Authenticate against AD ...
Hey all, I have a Windows 2000 AD PDC that hosts a domain. He also trusts our existing Windows NT domain (2-way trust, they both trust each other). I also have a Gentoo Linux machine that I have compiled Samba 3.0 on. I can get almost everything to work with regards to talking to the Windows 2k PDC, like this: mccoy samba # wbinfo -u LIGHTSPEED+Administrator LIGHTSPEED+Guest LIGHTSPEED+TsInternetUser LIGHTSPEED+IUSR_KINGATRHYME LIGHTSPEED+IWAM_KINGATRHYME LIGHTSPEED+krbtgt LIGHTSPEED+RI-ONLINE$ LIGHTSPEED+ecline LIGHTSPEED+jlally But whenever I try anything regarding authentication, it fails: mccoy samba # wbinfo -a ecline%blahblah plaintext password authentication failed error code was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS (0xc05e) error messsage was: No logon servers Could not authenticate user ecline%blahblah with plaintext password challenge/response password authentication failed error code was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS (0xc05e) error messsage was: No logon servers Could not authenticate user ecline with challenge/response Also, I have tried to get the pam setup to work, without much success. See here: Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy sshd(pam_unix)[11074]: check pass; user unknown Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy sshd(pam_unix)[11074]: check pass; user unknown Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: request failed: No logon servers, PAM error was 4, NT error was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: request failed: No logon servers, PAM error was 4, NT error was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: internal module error (retval = 4, user = `jlally' Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: internal module error (retval = 4, user = `jlally' Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: request failed: No logon servers, PAM error was 4, NT error was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: request failed: No logon servers, PAM error was 4, NT error was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: internal module error (retval = 4, user = `jlally' Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy pam_winbind[11074]: internal module error (retval = 4, user = `jlally' Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy sshd[11074]: Failed password for jlally from 172.22.4.97 port 54689 ssh2 Jun 18 10:09:44 mccoy sshd[11074]: Failed password for jlally from 172.22.4.97 port 54689 ssh2 Jun 18 10:09:46 mccoy sshd(pam_unix)[11074]: check pass; user unknown Jun 18 10:09:46 mccoy sshd(pam_unix)[11074]: check pass; user unknown So I am not sure where to go from here. I can provide some verbose log.winbind files, or tcpdump if neccessary. What i am ultimately trying to accomplish is allowing people who have 2000 accounts in AD access to my linux machines. We have a lot of web tools that rely on having a valid account on the unix machine, and this would make my life a lot easier. Interestingly enough, just using su - domain user works just fine, as long as I first set them up with a home directory: mccoy samba # su - jlally [EMAIL PROTECTED] jlally $ id uid=10007(LIGHTSPEED+jlally) gid=1(LIGHTSPEED+Domain Users) groups=1(LIGHTSPEED+Domain Users),10001,10002,10003(LIGHTSPEED+Domain Admins) [EMAIL PROTECTED] jlally $ If you need any further information, please let me know ... -e -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How to share the tape drive in samba server for windowsuser
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:46:52AM -0700, Jonathan Johnson wrote: If you're looking to share the tape drive so you can use Windows' native backup utility to write directly to the tape, sorry -- can't be done with Samba. This is because a tape drive is not seen by the system as a disk drive; the software wants to communicate directly with the drive. A tape drive is a sequential, exclusive access device, not a random access device. That means that only one process can read/write to the drive at a time, and the tape is written/read from front to back. You could probably do something clever with a magic script in the Samba config, but it still wouldn't work with native Windows backup utilities. (Are there native Windows backup utilities that can access a remote tape drive?) You could probably get it to work with tar under Cygwin if you tried hard enough. But if Cygwin's tar doesn't have remote-tape access disabled, you'd be better off using that instead--it's much lower overhead. ... A quick search reveals this software to look at: NovaNet (www.network-backup.com), Arkeia (www.arkeia.com), NetVault Workgroup Edition (www.bakbone.com), (Veritas BackupExec not available for Linux,) anyone know of open-source, multi-platform network-aware backup software? There's always Amanda (http://www.amanda.org/). It can back up Windows clients in one of several ways. The three obvious ones are: 1: build the Amanda client software under Cygwin. See http://randomnotes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Amanda-Cygwin-HOWTO.html for instructions. I use this method to back up my Windows 2K laptop. 2: use Amanda's smbclient interface as described in the Amanda documentation. 3: smbmount (or other network filesystem) the Windows client drive on a Unix/Linux/BSD machine and have Amanda back that up. There's been some effort to create a native Windows Amanda client, but I don't think it's completed or usable yet. -- JF -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Drive letter map to Samba using ssh or scp?
OK, what I want to do is access files on my Samba server remotely. Currently, I can use WinSCP, but this isn't ideal because it is more like an FTP client, where you have to download a file, edit it, upload it. I could set up a VPN (using open source software), but these can be kind of a headache to get working (I've done it before) and they don't necessarily support multiple simultaneous connections. I could set up an SSH tunnel, but this is awkward and I don't want to teach (l)users how to do this (getting them to type anything from a command line -- correctly -- is like herding cats or pushing a rope). I want realtime access -- that is, open/save files from an application using the standard API's but have the files on the remote system instead of my local workstation. Shouldn't there be someway of using SSH or SCP to transparently connect to a Samba share, and have the share appear as a drive letter? I envision a GUI that prompts for an internet hostname, an SSH user/pass; a Samba server name and Samba user/pass. Done properly, the SSH server could be on the LAN, and allow you to connect to ANY smb server (Window inc.) on the LAN. Logging in using this UI sets up an SSH tunnel automatically, presents a list of available shares; you can then select one and a drive letter to map it to. A configuration could be saved so that the connection is made automatically when the user logs in to his own workstation. Basically, I guess, this would be a GUI for SSH tunnels. OK, so maybe this is getting awfully close to VPN. But since SSH is already there and would require no additional setup, wouldn't there be easy way to take advantage of it? Anyone done anything like this? I don't want to reinvent the wheel if I don't have to. --Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000
Mark- You're The Man! Opened RedHat 8.0 firewall to ports 137-139 and it authenticated instantly! One more question, where in the Samba docs does it talk about this kind of thing? Thanks for such a quick correct solution, I appreciate it. --Paul Original Message Follows From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Paul Mallasch' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:59:09 -0700 Are you by chance running Redhat with the default firewall blocking ports 137-139? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Mallasch Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000 I have the same problem, but ping works fine. Browsing Network Neighborhood also displays Samba server server string from smb.conf, but same WinDoze error as below is experienced. I can logon to Samba on server using smbclient locally however. Clues? ThX --paul On Tue, 13 May 2003, Webmaster wrote: i can see the linux share from windoz 2000 but can't log in ... here is the error from windoz (2000) C:\net use x: \\ericred\www System error 53 has occurred. What happens when you do: ping ericred from the Win2K machine? - John T. The network path was not found. I think problem is related to using encrypted passwords. I was using unencrypted passwords before... can't see any errors in logs. any suggestions on how to track down the problem would be appreciated. linux newbie _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Printing trouble in Citrix
To all, I've been having some trouble with printing in my Citrix server. Here's the setup: IBM w/ AIX 4.3.3 using Samba 2.0.3 suppose to be able to connect to Citrix. We have just migrated over to a new domain and since I've configured the smb.conf file from the old domain to the new one, I haven't been able to print. Any ideas? Sincerely, Rob Kenner AIX System Administrator EOIR System Support (703)605-1114 pager: (800)759- pin: 1252689 email to pager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3, Domain Trusts, Exchange server
Has anyone come up with a series of steps to successfully set up a trust with a Windows 2000 domain using AD? I have a Samba 3beta server set up as the PDC for a new domain(OPS). It's on the same physical network as the Windows domain (ADMIN). The W2K domain is an AD-based native domain. On that domain is a member server running NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5. I need to allow user access from the OPS domain to mail accounts on the Exchange box in the other domain. I don't need any kind of AD-like features or compatibility on the new OPS domain. The Samba server will provide all the Windows functionality necessary to a handful of clients. I've followed the recommendations in the beta configuration pdf document, but it only covers setting the trust up using NT4 User Manager. This won't work in the ADMIN domain, as the Exchange box is not a DC. I attempted to use the Domain tool on W2K server, but all I wind up with is a bunch of cryptic errors. The two domains can browse one another all day, but when I try to do specific things that require trusts (i.e., establish connections to the Exchange server for a mialbox in Outlook), I can't get it done. Any suggestions or advice would be welcome. Here's my smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = OPS netbios name = JAGUAR server string = OPS Department Samba DC security = user passdb backend = smbpasswd,guest preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes log level = 2 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U logon drive = u: domain logons = Yes os level = 99 dns proxy = No admin users = smith username map = /usr/local/samba/private/username.map logon script = login.bat passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u unix password sync = yes ; added 6/16/03 idmap uid = 1-15000 idmap gid = 1-15000 [homes] read only = No browseable = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [profiles] path = /profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 csc policy = disable [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon admin users = root write list = root @admins [shared] comment = Shared Files Directory path = /home/shared read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = yes [storage] comment = Server Storage Directory path = /storage read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = yes valid users = @admins write list = @admins -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Slow windows - cups print (Facts discovered)
I am not really sure of your set up. I assume you have installed the drivers on the windows client. And, I assume you send the job to a raw queue on the linux box. If not, maybe your linux filter is removing colors. I would look at the driver configuration on the windows client and make sure you don't have some option checked for BW only. You might print the job to a file, send it over to the linux box, and open it with gv, and see if you have color. Sometimes, depending on your setup, the test page goes to a different queue than the real print jobs. Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] New Samba Server
I've been lead to believe that the more drives on the raid 5 the faster the output, as I don't want the hard drive setup as the bottleneck... The cost between having 3 x 100gb drives and 8 x 40gb drives isn't a huge issue... -Original Message- From: Seth Hollen Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 1:46 a.m. 3ware makes great controllers, but you will be limited to the pci bus bandwidth for the raid arrays. instead of 8x40 I would look for the best cost/size ratio. I think 120GB hard drives can be found for around $100.00 (us) I'd put 3 in a raid5 array for performance. -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] New Samba Server I'm currently looking at hardware specs for a samba server, its' job will be to hold general office files, cad / solidworks files along with approximately 40 outlook PST files that will be opened off the server. Here are the current specs I'm looking at.. AMD 2600XP Asus A7N8X Deluxe nVidia Serial ATA 2 x 512 MB PC2700 DDR 333 = 1024MB ASUS S520/Generic 52X CD-ROM (OEM) ASUS GrForce4 MX440-8X 64MB DDR D-Link DGE-550T 32/64-Bit PCI-Bus Copper (RJ45) 3Ware Escalade 7500-8 8 x 40gb ata-100 7200.7 drives 3Ware Escalade 7500-4 4 x 40gb ata-100 7200.7 drives The 7500-8 will be holding the office and cad / solid works files and the 7500-4 will be holding the PST files (I thought it was best to keep them on a separate controller cards.) Will this do a reasonable job in keeping up with a gigabit network? And is running PST files off the server like this a feasible option?? Any suggestions on hardware improvements would be appreciated as without the hardware to test with I'm purchasing quite blindly here :| Thanks Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Paul Mallasch wrote: Mark- You're The Man! Opened RedHat 8.0 firewall to ports 137-139 and it authenticated instantly! One more question, where in the Samba docs does it talk about this kind of thing? It is well covered in the Samba-3.0.0 Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf that will ship soon. You can obtain my work-in-progress version from: http://samba.org/~jht/NT4migration/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf - John T. Thanks for such a quick correct solution, I appreciate it. --Paul Original Message Follows From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Paul Mallasch' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:59:09 -0700 Are you by chance running Redhat with the default firewall blocking ports 137-139? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Mallasch Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000 I have the same problem, but ping works fine. Browsing Network Neighborhood also displays Samba server server string from smb.conf, but same WinDoze error as below is experienced. I can logon to Samba on server using smbclient locally however. Clues? ThX --paul On Tue, 13 May 2003, Webmaster wrote: i can see the linux share from windoz 2000 but can't log in ... here is the error from windoz (2000) C:\net use x: \\ericred\www System error 53 has occurred. What happens when you do: ping ericred from the Win2K machine? - John T. The network path was not found. I think problem is related to using encrypted passwords. I was using unencrypted passwords before... can't see any errors in logs. any suggestions on how to track down the problem would be appreciated. linux newbie _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Full wNT/w2K ACL conformance
On 18 Jun 2003 at 15:39, Dragan Krnic wrote: The show-stopper right now is this: we need to be able to assign real Full Control permissions: a user who has Full control on a directory should be able to Read, Write, eXecute ( of course) [ this can be easily achieved with ACLs ] *plus* being able to give away Full Control to other users too [being able to override inherited ACLs would be a plus, too]. Is this feasible (remember smbd runs as root... )? Has somebody thought about implementing this ? If you have Full Control over a directory (e.g. as root, or own it or have rwx on it), you can give FC (rwx) to others. Is it perhaps the other way around, that you want to stop this delegation, unless an FC EA explicitely allows it? I'm not sure if it can be a show-stopper or if it really makes a difference. In our case, the only users who require Full Control access are admins, so we use admin users = @domain/domain admins. Not ideal, but it gives us the NT equivalence we require, and has allowed us to migrate a large portion of our file storage to Samba. We find the option nt acl support = no to be a nice feature that is not available on NT. It prevents our students from messing with ACLs (for their own files) which had been a problem on NT. We provide a second admin access only share which provides ACL support for admins. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friends don't let friends use Outlook. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Access Denied
Why don't you post your smb.conf? I avoid all password hassles with the following global and share definitions: [global] encrypt passwords = yes security = SHARE guest account = ftp [AllFiles] comment = All Files path = / read only = no guest ok = yes For a walk on the wild side, try making: guest account = root Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Access Denied
Here is the smb.conf. # Samba config file created using SWAT # from mfg_jsuther_95.sat.faidor.com (172.16.15.242) # Date: 2003/06/18 14:45:09 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server null passwords = Yes unix password sync = Yes log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 dns proxy = No [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No [moorej] comment = Home Directory path = /home/moorej valid users = moorej read only = No [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp user = moorej --- Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't you post your smb.conf? I avoid all password hassles with the following global and share definitions: [global] encrypt passwords = yes security = SHARE guest account = ftp [AllFiles] comment = All Files path = / read only = no guest ok = yes For a walk on the wild side, try making: guest account = root Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Access Denied
Add to [global] Encrypt passwords = yes, Restart samba -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Moore Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Access Denied Here is the smb.conf. # Samba config file created using SWAT # from mfg_jsuther_95.sat.faidor.com (172.16.15.242) # Date: 2003/06/18 14:45:09 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server null passwords = Yes unix password sync = Yes log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 dns proxy = No [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No [moorej] comment = Home Directory path = /home/moorej valid users = moorej read only = No [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp user = moorej --- Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't you post your smb.conf? I avoid all password hassles with the following global and share definitions: [global] encrypt passwords = yes security = SHARE guest account = ftp [AllFiles] comment = All Files path = / read only = no guest ok = yes For a walk on the wild side, try making: guest account = root Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Access Denied
This is hardly wide open. Try adding security = share to global. Security is by default user. You have no guest user allowed shares, either. Joel On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:46:16PM +, Jerry Moore wrote: Here is the smb.conf. # Samba config file created using SWAT # from mfg_jsuther_95.sat.faidor.com (172.16.15.242) # Date: 2003/06/18 14:45:09 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server null passwords = Yes unix password sync = Yes log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 dns proxy = No [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No [moorej] comment = Home Directory path = /home/moorej valid users = moorej read only = No [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp user = moorej --- Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't you post your smb.conf? I avoid all password hassles with the following global and share definitions: [global] encrypt passwords = yes security = SHARE guest account = ftp [AllFiles] comment = All Files path = / read only = no guest ok = yes For a walk on the wild side, try making: guest account = root Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WinBind and gdm/login
The only way I could get it to work was to have the following gdm pam config: #%PAM-1.0 auth requiredpam_env.so auth sufficient pam_winbind.so auth sufficient pam_unix.so use_first_pass auth requiredpam_stack.so service=system-auth auth requiredpam_nologin.so accountsufficient pam_winbind.so accountrequiredpam_stack.so service=system-auth password requiredpam_stack.so service=system-auth sessionrequired pam_mkhomedir.so skel=/etc/skel/ umask=0022 sessionrequiredpam_stack.so service=system-auth sessionoptional pam_console.so That will allow gdm to authenticate the user, but it will not allow usernames with a + or \ separator so the way around that is to set the following option: winbind use default domain = yes that will allow loging in with just the username. The only problem occurs when you have a user from another domain that needs to login. Patrick Brett Hales wrote: Hi, I am currently trying to set up a RedHat 9 Linux client to authenticate against a Windows 2000 Active Directory server. Using the Winbind documentation I have successfully authenticated however I now have a problem with gdm. Jun 18 12:18:48 jerry pam_winbind[1192]: user 'AU+Bhales' granted acces Jun 18 12:18:48 jerry pam_winbind[1192]: user 'AU+Bhales' granted acces Jun 18 12:18:49 jerry gdm(pam_unix)[1192]: session opened for user AU+Bhales by (uid=0) Jun 18 12:18:49 jerry gdm[1202]: gdm_slave_session_start: User not allowed to log in Does anybody know why gdm_slave_session_start is not allowing me to login when pam_winbind has already authenticated me? Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Slow windows - cups print (Facts discovered)
Hi there, I've created a CUPS filter to capture de content it's receiving and the Postscript sent by adobe's postscript printer driver arrived B/W. On the windows printer (with the adobe driver) I don't have any option to activate color. I've something on the Printer Preferences that says: Color: No. Can't I print colors with this driver? Should I look for a different one? Any help will be appreciated. -- Miguel Manso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am not really sure of your set up. I assume you have installed the drivers on the windows client. And, I assume you send the job to a raw queue on the linux box. If not, maybe your linux filter is removing colors. I would look at the driver configuration on the windows client and make sure you don't have some option checked for BW only. You might print the job to a file, send it over to the linux box, and open it with gv, and see if you have color. Sometimes, depending on your setup, the test page goes to a different queue than the real print jobs. Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PDC Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
-Original Message- From: Geoff Stitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PDC Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a) My apolgies in posting this again. However I was hoping someone had a suggestion... Symptom: After upgrading our Primary Domain Controller from Samba 2.2.2 to Samba 2.2.8a, users attempting to login from Windows 2000 clients are no longer able to do so. Details: After some research it was discovered that if a Windows 2000 client re-joins the domain served by the upgraded version of Samba, users are then able to, once again, log into this domain. It was also discovered that if the Samba PDC was downgraded to its original version of 2.2.2, any windows 2000 client that re-joined the domain while the Samba PDC was at version 2.2.8a, was still able to log into the domain. As additional information, both versions of the Samba PDC were compiled on SPARC architecture running Solaris 8.0 As the above comments suggest, machine accounts are backward-compatible, but *not* forward-compatible between Samba versions 2.2.2 and 2.2.8a. After researching the Samba mailing lists and newsgroups it is more or less understood that in order to deal with problems of this nature each windows 2000 machine account needs to be recreated. Which is a very time-consuming effort. Is there a better way to deal with this upgrade path? Ideally where I don't have to visit each windows 2000 machine in order to re-create their machine accounts? A migration utility or set of server-side steps perhaps? ...geoff I cant comment on the compatibility issues, but you could make an account that will allow the addition of the machines to the domain and then set the add user script to do the rest. Granted you will have to ask your users to do some work, but it is better than schleping all over. Another suggestion would be fo r future to put a remote viewer app on your clients (tightvnc.com) that will allow you to do it all remotely. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited
I don't know what your setup is but here is mine. I run samba 2.2.7. I don't use oplocks on my share that QuickBooks is on. You most definately don't want to. Other than that I have a pretty basic setup. I did not notice any difference between the file on my linux server (primary file server) or on a Win2000 Server share. What version of QuickBooks are you using? How many users on your network? How many users accessing QuickBooks? Does your linux server run a lot of other server daemons? -Original Message- From: Justin Kreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited What about file locking? I've run into lots of file locking problems, leading me to slowly just turn off file locking on several shares due to quickbooks. My user also reports that quickbooks is now slower since I took the server to linux/samba from the win2k server that was limited to . On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have QucikBooks on our network too. I have had a number of problems with this crappy software. If my client actually wanted me too I'd rather create my own accounting software with a better interface and a mysql backend but that isn't going to happen. A few things with QuickBooks that I have noticed that maybe will help. #1. QuickBooks in multi-user mode is much slower than in single user mode. This is the (crappy) design of QuickBooks. It has to do with the fact that QuickBooks checks everything everywhere when in multiuser mode to make sure that no data gets corrupted (even though it has corrupted before). Our company datafile is around ~180mb. #2. This problem will not be solved easily at all. Quickbooks appears to be as slow as the weakest client link. In our case a P2 300 w/ 64 megs of ram. Again, this has to do with #1. #3. Upgrading Quickbooks won't help. We've had many versions in the past and currently run the Enterprise Edition. It still can be as slow as a turtle under certain operations. #4. My biggest complain with this software is that it requires it's users to be Power Users. Boy do I hate that With samba it's very difficult for me to limit a Power user's ability and I have had people take advantge of it repeatedly. Damn QuickBooks -Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Slow windows - cups print - CONCLUSION
Hi list, I've just figured it out. When we're installing the drivers from adobe there's a part where we must Select the Printer Model. By default it uses the Generic Postscript Printer (it has an associated PPD for that). We must get a PPD for our printer (installed on the linux server) from the www.linuxprinting.org, click the Browse button and select that PPD. After that you'll have a new printer installed an all will work like a charm. Note: Inside the PPD of my printer (HP OfficeJet 5110) I had these line (despite all the others :) ): *ShortNickName: HP OfficeJet 5110, hpijs *NickName: HP OfficeJet 5110, Foomatic + hpijs (recommended) On the instalation of the Adobe drivers I had erros saying my printed had illegal chars on it's name. So, I've replaced the previous lines with: *ShortNickName: HP OfficeJet 5110 *NickName: HP OfficeJet 5110 Hope this helps anyone. Bye, -- Miguel Manso [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] LAN Browsing shows IP Addresses instead of Computer Names.
hmm looks like I'm gonna do it how I did it before and just add the ip address and computer name pairs in /etc/hosts and have my router assign static ip addresses. Thanks for all the suggestions. you guys are great. Although, I'd still like to know how MS Network Neighborhood does it. I don't want to set up my linux box as a server of any type since it's a laptop and is often taken out of the network when I travel. I mean let's just say for the sake of argument, that i've got a linux machine and a windows 98SE computer. How does Network Neighborhood get the computer name of my linux machine? Since I'm know I didn't set up the windows computer with any DNS or WINS server. but i'll go with what works for both. Any thoughts, please feel free to post 'em. =) Sincerely, Vince From: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Mega Spaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] LAN Browsing shows IP Addresses instead of Computer Names. Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:06:14 +0200 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Message: 7 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:35:42 -0700 From: Mega Spaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] LAN Browsing shows IP Addresses instead of Computer Names. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed I'm trying to figure out how I can have my lan browser display computer names instead of IP Addresses. I think the ip addresses are generated by my router since if I add a new computer, the ip addresses will be different for each computer. anyway let me give you the specs first. Running Samba 2.2.8a-1 on Red Hat 7.3. I have not set up WINS or DNS at all. That's your problem, reverse lookups need to work, either via DNS or nss_wins (apparently it works without a WINS server, in which case it used broadcasts). I don't know is RH ships with a working nss_wins, if they do, it should work by adding wins to the hosts line of your /etc/nsswitch.conf file. BTW, setting up working reverse DNS would be a better solution, for services that don't use get*ent, but direct DNS lookups. I have set up lisarc to use nmblookup. I'm assuming that my network is using broadcasting to get computers in my LAN since i have not set up any computer names in hosts or lmhosts. The current set up works right now in that computers come up and can be browsed independant of the ip addresses assigned to the computers. ie. if computer Tron is up on the network, and then I boot up Sark, Sark will show up at the first next broadcast. but the computers show up in konqueror as ip addresses, not as Tron and Sark. My very old first setup attempt had me manually adding ip addresses and names manually in the /etc/hosts file. but that would mess up the lan browsing if another new computer was added to the network. So if Sark is 192.168.0.2 and Tron is 192.168.0.3 and let's say my brother brings his laptop and i put his laptop on the network, the ip addresses on the network will change to something like Sark = 192.168.0.3, Tron = 192.168.0.2 and my brother's laptop maybe something like Bros_comp = 192.168.0.4. but the /etc/hosts file will have the old assignments which really messes up the browsing part. Anyway right now i think i have it set up almost right since i can browse the network and the computers on the network will be found no matter the time they are actually booted up, but ip addresses in the lan browsing isn't very useful and I would like to see the computer names displayed in the lan browsing in konqueror. thank you for your patience, time, and any help you can provide. - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+7vYlrJK6UGDSBKcRAtEQAJ9WoGfA34SrYpFl/IwkVOXUPpbyAQCeLrtG ASziSnkS4UvBQE6GxW9YB1E= =TamT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. ** _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] vampire: account mapping strangeness
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 03:09, Mark Roach wrote: I am testing samba 3.0's net rpc vampire tool and am getting strange results... after I import the account info, the samba usernames seem to be mapping to hardcoded unix uid #'s instead of account names. For example: # pdbedit -u jah000 idmap uid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs idmap gid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs jah000:4:TNCorp - Heyer, Jeff A. # getent passwd jah000 jah000:x:1003:100::/home/jah000:/bin/bash why is jah000's account in the pdb linked to uid 4? I'm guessing that it has something to do with the idmap stuff, but I'm not sure where to go from here... any thoughts? Try again with a fresh setup, and current 3.0 cvs. We fixed up some vampire/idmap issues recently. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
I`m folowing the steps on the unofficial Samba how to. I already join my WinXP box to the domain but I can`t login from my WinXP box after restart. There is an error message that sais: Windows can`t connect to the domain because the domain controller is unable or I`m using Samba-2.2.7a on red hat 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-18.9 this is my smb.conf [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes guest account = smbguest log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba.log logon drive = p: netbios name = server os level = 99 preferred master = yes security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins support = yes workgroup = workgroup [public] path = /tmp guest ok = yes writeable = yes EOF I already made the changes on regedit in my WinXP box. this is how vipw looks like: gino:x:500:500::/home/gino:/bin/bash R32$:x:1200:300:workstation:/dev/null:/bin/false this vigr: gino:x:500: R32:x:1200: workstation::300: -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
You need the XP signorseal registry patch. Download it, apply and reboot the pc. http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/Registry/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Vergara Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC I`m folowing the steps on the unofficial Samba how to. I already join my WinXP box to the domain but I can`t login from my WinXP box after restart. There is an error message that sais: Windows can`t connect to the domain because the domain controller is unable or I`m using Samba-2.2.7a on red hat 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-18.9 this is my smb.conf [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes guest account = smbguest log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba.log logon drive = p: netbios name = server os level = 99 preferred master = yes security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins support = yes workgroup = workgroup [public] path = /tmp guest ok = yes writeable = yes EOF I already made the changes on regedit in my WinXP box. this is how vipw looks like: gino:x:500:500::/home/gino:/bin/bash R32$:x:1200:300:workstation:/dev/null:/bin/false this vigr: gino:x:500: R32:x:1200: workstation::300: -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
Just noticed that your smb.conf does not contain Domain master = yes And there is no [netlogon] share Good info on Samba setup can be found here www.samba.netfirms.com You need the XP signorseal registry patch. Download it, apply and reboot the pc. http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/Registry/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Vergara Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC I`m folowing the steps on the unofficial Samba how to. I already join my WinXP box to the domain but I can`t login from my WinXP box after restart. There is an error message that sais: Windows can`t connect to the domain because the domain controller is unable or I`m using Samba-2.2.7a on red hat 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-18.9 this is my smb.conf [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes guest account = smbguest log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba.log logon drive = p: netbios name = server os level = 99 preferred master = yes security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins support = yes workgroup = workgroup [public] path = /tmp guest ok = yes writeable = yes EOF I already made the changes on regedit in my WinXP box. this is how vipw looks like: gino:x:500:500::/home/gino:/bin/bash R32$:x:1200:300:workstation:/dev/null:/bin/false this vigr: gino:x:500: R32:x:1200: workstation::300: -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Access Denied
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:37:03 GMT, Jerry Moore wrote Despite my efforts, over the last 3 days, to get my PC to mount even the simpiliest /tmp share from the HP server. I have failed. :( I have followed the DIAGNOSIS.txt by Andrew Tridgell and most of the tests work. Only when it comes to connecting from the PC do I get denied. ??? I have tried to set every know paramitter that remotely has to do with authenticating, without success. Restarts of smbd and nmbd were also done between each change. I have it wide-open and still I get denied. What is missing??? I have added account also using smbpasswd -a user also. On unix server mounts/logins work. Tests showing shares work on unix. Swat works on PC also. Running samba 2.2.3a on HP-UX 10.20. Installed as a pre-compiled depot. If I try to run net use on my PC. I get the following below. And yes. I am using my NT login password which is the same id and password on this unix server: -- C:\net use x: \\199.254.200.1\tmp The password is invalid for \\199.254.200.1\tmp. Type the password for \\199.254.200.1\tmp: System error 1240 has occurred. The account is not authorized to login from this station. -- Desperate help needed here. Leaving Friday. Jerry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba You are logging in from a NT box? Do you have a machine trust set up in smb.conf and a root in smbpasswd for machine trust account access? Tom -- Internet Service Provided By Abyss Communications Internet Service only $10 a month 1-866-842-2977 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
So what does this XP Patch do? In regards to XP, I have XP Home and Pro laptops that have issues when talking to samba, they connect, then eventually time out, or disconnect, upon reconnect, XP tries to log in with administrator or a blank username. Its driving me to insomnia because I work third shift, and my coworkers batty because they keep having to call me during the day. On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 23:39, Mark wrote: You need the XP signorseal registry patch. Download it, apply and reboot the pc. http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/Registry/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Vergara Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC I`m folowing the steps on the unofficial Samba how to. I already join my WinXP box to the domain but I can`t login from my WinXP box after restart. There is an error message that sais: Windows can`t connect to the domain because the domain controller is unable or I`m using Samba-2.2.7a on red hat 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-18.9 this is my smb.conf [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes guest account = smbguest log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba.log logon drive = p: netbios name = server os level = 99 preferred master = yes security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins support = yes workgroup = workgroup [public] path = /tmp guest ok = yes writeable = yes EOF I already made the changes on regedit in my WinXP box. this is how vipw looks like: gino:x:500:500::/home/gino:/bin/bash R32$:x:1200:300:workstation:/dev/null:/bin/false this vigr: gino:x:500: R32:x:1200: workstation::300: -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:30:26 -0400, drgn65 wrote I don't know what your setup is but here is mine. I run samba 2.2.7. I don't use oplocks on my share that QuickBooks is on. You most definately don't want to. Other than that I have a pretty basic setup. I did not notice any difference between the file on my linux server (primary file server) or on a Win2000 Server share. What version of QuickBooks are you using? How many users on your network? How many users accessing QuickBooks? Does your linux server run a lot of other server daemons? -Original Message- From: Justin Kreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited What about file locking? I've run into lots of file locking problems, leading me to slowly just turn off file locking on several shares due to quickbooks. My user also reports that quickbooks is now slower since I took the server to linux/samba from the win2k server that was limited to . On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have QucikBooks on our network too. I have had a number of problems with this crappy software. If my client actually wanted me too I'd rather create my own accounting software with a better interface and a mysql backend but that isn't going to happen. A few things with QuickBooks that I have noticed that maybe will help. #1. QuickBooks in multi-user mode is much slower than in single user mode. This is the (crappy) design of QuickBooks. It has to do with the fact that QuickBooks checks everything everywhere when in multiuser mode to make sure that no data gets corrupted (even though it has corrupted before). Our company datafile is around ~180mb. #2. This problem will not be solved easily at all. Quickbooks appears to be as slow as the weakest client link. In our case a P2 300 w/ 64 megs of ram. Again, this has to do with #1. #3. Upgrading Quickbooks won't help. We've had many versions in the past and currently run the Enterprise Edition. It still can be as slow as a turtle under certain operations. #4. My biggest complain with this software is that it requires it's users to be Power Users. Boy do I hate that With samba it's very difficult for me to limit a Power user's ability and I have had people take advantge of it repeatedly. Damn QuickBooks -Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba I have to agree, we use QB also and it is crap when it comes to networking it. I have set Samba in various configs and QB does not seem to improve. Maybee we all need to put a big letter together signed by all of the Linux users demanding Intuit to improve this product, remove the constant ads and compile it for the Linux desktop... It's a nice dream at least. Tom -- Internet Service Provided By Abyss Communications Internet Service only $10 a month 1-866-842-2977 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
From the actual reg file itself This registry key is needed for a Windows XP Client to join and logon to a Samba domain. Keep in mind that if you are using Samba in a workgroup setting, the patch is not needed. Also the patch is only good for XP ProXP does not support domain logins. As far as XP timing out or disconnecting, do you mean the actual mapped drives timeout and lose connection.?? One thing my I have found that helps eleviate this particular issue is to turn off the web client service if you do not use it. Now with XP loginng in with the admin password, I am not sure about this one. It will probably get fixed in service pack 12 :-). Seriously maybe some one else knows. Regards, Mark -Original Message- From: Justin Kreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:18 PM To: Mark Cc: 'Gino Vergara'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC So what does this XP Patch do? In regards to XP, I have XP Home and Pro laptops that have issues when talking to samba, they connect, then eventually time out, or disconnect, upon reconnect, XP tries to log in with administrator or a blank username. Its driving me to insomnia because I work third shift, and my coworkers batty because they keep having to call me during the day. On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 23:39, Mark wrote: You need the XP signorseal registry patch. Download it, apply and reboot the pc. http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/Registry/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Vergara Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC I`m folowing the steps on the unofficial Samba how to. I already join my WinXP box to the domain but I can`t login from my WinXP box after restart. There is an error message that sais: Windows can`t connect to the domain because the domain controller is unable or I`m using Samba-2.2.7a on red hat 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-18.9 this is my smb.conf [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes guest account = smbguest log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba.log logon drive = p: netbios name = server os level = 99 preferred master = yes security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins support = yes workgroup = workgroup [public] path = /tmp guest ok = yes writeable = yes EOF I already made the changes on regedit in my WinXP box. this is how vipw looks like: gino:x:500:500::/home/gino:/bin/bash R32$:x:1200:300:workstation:/dev/null:/bin/false this vigr: gino:x:500: R32:x:1200: workstation::300: -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited
I recall the issue with quickbooks (and a fix) from a comp.os.linux.security post from last year. I am not sure if will help in this particular case, but take a look. http://tinyurl.com/eowl Regards, Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom McKellips Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:30:26 -0400, drgn65 wrote I don't know what your setup is but here is mine. I run samba 2.2.7. I don't use oplocks on my share that QuickBooks is on. You most definately don't want to. Other than that I have a pretty basic setup. I did not notice any difference between the file on my linux server (primary file server) or on a Win2000 Server share. What version of QuickBooks are you using? How many users on your network? How many users accessing QuickBooks? Does your linux server run a lot of other server daemons? -Original Message- From: Justin Kreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited What about file locking? I've run into lots of file locking problems, leading me to slowly just turn off file locking on several shares due to quickbooks. My user also reports that quickbooks is now slower since I took the server to linux/samba from the win2k server that was limited to . On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have QucikBooks on our network too. I have had a number of problems with this crappy software. If my client actually wanted me too I'd rather create my own accounting software with a better interface and a mysql backend but that isn't going to happen. A few things with QuickBooks that I have noticed that maybe will help. #1. QuickBooks in multi-user mode is much slower than in single user mode. This is the (crappy) design of QuickBooks. It has to do with the fact that QuickBooks checks everything everywhere when in multiuser mode to make sure that no data gets corrupted (even though it has corrupted before). Our company datafile is around ~180mb. #2. This problem will not be solved easily at all. Quickbooks appears to be as slow as the weakest client link. In our case a P2 300 w/ 64 megs of ram. Again, this has to do with #1. #3. Upgrading Quickbooks won't help. We've had many versions in the past and currently run the Enterprise Edition. It still can be as slow as a turtle under certain operations. #4. My biggest complain with this software is that it requires it's users to be Power Users. Boy do I hate that With samba it's very difficult for me to limit a Power user's ability and I have had people take advantge of it repeatedly. Damn QuickBooks -Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba I have to agree, we use QB also and it is crap when it comes to networking it. I have set Samba in various configs and QB does not seem to improve. Maybee we all need to put a big letter together signed by all of the Linux users demanding Intuit to improve this product, remove the constant ads and compile it for the Linux desktop... It's a nice dream at least. Tom -- Internet Service Provided By Abyss Communications Internet Service only $10 a month 1-866-842-2977 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 00:32, Mark wrote: From the actual reg file itself This registry key is needed for a Windows XP Client to join and logon to a Samba domain. I felt like a dummy when I opened up that file and looked at it. Keep in mind that if you are using Samba in a workgroup setting, the patch is not needed. Also the patch is only good for XP ProXP does not support domain logins. Yeah, I hate that some users have home, I'm itching to move everybody to a domain.. I figure even though I hate windows, I might as well use it's best features. As far as XP timing out or disconnecting, do you mean the actual mapped drives timeout and lose connection.?? One thing my I have found that helps eleviate this particular issue is to turn off the web client service if you do not use it. Web Client Service? What is that? Keep in mind, I've been slowly going to Linux over the last 7 years, and I don't have a windows box to my name, I only have to support XP because ppl like it where I work :( I think I need to start hinting with all the Redhat 9 Demo Cds I have in my appartment. Now with XP loginng in with the admin password, I am not sure about this one. It will probably get fixed in service pack 12 :-). Seriously maybe some one else knows. Geee... I have a strange feeling its some stupid setting that the windows admin has been setting laptops up with, I finally had her fedex me a laptop that she had just setup so I can check inter-op correctly. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC
Re: web client service, I had a client (XP Pro on 40 desktops, Redhat 8.0, Samba 2.2.6?? cannot quite remember)earlier this year who was experiencing mapped drives timing out, poor performance in file copying etc. At the time I had recalled reading a recent post in comp.protocols.smb http://tinyurl.com/eoy0 where another person was having simmilar issues. Another poster had suggested turning off the web client service in XP and it cleared up all the issues. I did the same for my client and needless to say it cured his computer woes. I do not have a lot of info on what the Web client service actually does. Here is a web site expalaining how web services work in office XP though..be prepare for a healthy dose of propagand when reading it :-) http://www.microsoft.com/office/developer/webservices/toolkit.asp -Original Message- From: Justin Kreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Subject: RE: [Samba] WinXP can`t log on Samba PDC On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 00:32, Mark wrote: From the actual reg file itself This registry key is needed for a Windows XP Client to join and logon to a Samba domain. I felt like a dummy when I opened up that file and looked at it. Keep in mind that if you are using Samba in a workgroup setting, the patch is not needed. Also the patch is only good for XP ProXP does not support domain logins. Yeah, I hate that some users have home, I'm itching to move everybody to a domain.. I figure even though I hate windows, I might as well use it's best features. As far as XP timing out or disconnecting, do you mean the actual mapped drives timeout and lose connection.?? One thing my I have found that helps eleviate this particular issue is to turn off the web client service if you do not use it. Web Client Service? What is that? Keep in mind, I've been slowly going to Linux over the last 7 years, and I don't have a windows box to my name, I only have to support XP because ppl like it where I work :( I think I need to start hinting with all the Redhat 9 Demo Cds I have in my appartment. Now with XP loginng in with the admin password, I am not sure about this one. It will probably get fixed in service pack 12 :-). Seriously maybe some one else knows. Geee... I have a strange feeling its some stupid setting that the windows admin has been setting laptops up with, I finally had her fedex me a laptop that she had just setup so I can check inter-op correctly. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] call timed out smbclient error on get command
hi im using samba to enable backup of nt server shares using the amanda backup system. however i am running into some problems. even though i can use smbclient to connect to the share and browser directories etc, when i try and get a file i get the following error smb: \Administration\jill-andrew\jill-andrew\slide presentations\ get ppslides complete.ppt Call timed out: server did not respond after 2 milliseconds opening remote file \Adm inistration\jill-andrew\jill-andrew\slide presentations\ppslides complete.ppt smb: \Administration\jill-andrew\jill-andrew\slide presentations\ Segmentation fault (core dumped) through the amanda system i get the following error /-- william//cytopia01.intra.cytopia.com.au/shared lev 1 STRANGE sendbackup: start [william://cytopia01.intra.cytopia.com.au/shared level 1] sendbackup: info BACKUP=/usr/bin/smbclient sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/bin/gzip -dc |/usr/bin/smbclient -f... - sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz sendbackup: info end | session request to CYTOPIA01.INTRA failed (Called name not present) ? Call timed out: server did not respond after 2 milliseconds opening remote file \Administration\jill-andrew\jill-andrew\slide presentations\ppslides complete.ppt (\Administration\jill-andrew\jill-andrew\slide presentations\) its more confusing because another share on the same nt server with the same permisions doesnt give the same error. you are able to get files using smbclient. however when running amanda i recieve the following error /-- william//cytopia01.intra.cytopia.com.au/usershared lev 1 STRANGE sendbackup: start [william://cytopia01.intra.cytopia.com.au/usershared level 1] sendbackup: info BACKUP=/usr/bin/smbclient sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/bin/gzip -dc |/usr/bin/smbclient -f... - sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz sendbackup: info end | session request to CYTOPIA01.INTRA failed (Called name not present) ? NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND opening remote file \Administration\andrew\backup\andrew.000\Application Data\Microsoft\Office\Recent\3½ Floppy (A).LNK (\Administration\andrew\backup\andrew.000\Application Data\Microsoft\Office\Recent\) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Wed Jun 18 06:10:49 2003 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2380/nsswitch Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD winbindd_group.c Log Message: CR 2230 - allow domain local groups to appear in a user's group list. Revisions: winbindd_group.c1.3.2.11 = 1.3.2.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c.diff?r1=1.3.2.11r2=1.3.2.12
Re: CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:10:49AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2380/nsswitch Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD winbindd_group.c Log Message: CR 2230 - allow domain local groups to appear in a user's group list. These are of course domain local groups in win2k native mode. Jeremy, you mentioned something about reflecting this change into smbd somewhere but I couldn't see that it needed to be done. One day lad, all this will be yours! What, the curtains?
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Wed Jun 18 06:39:36 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4352/lib Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD username.c Log Message: another fix fro CR 2179. I think this is the last one 1) orders print_access_check() by: a) root can do anything (easy check) b) check security descriptor (bit comparisons in memory) c) printer admins (may result in numerous calls to winbind) 2) cache the groups for the last user we looked up in user_in_winbindd_group_list(). Might need a timeout here, but since the user token is created at session setup time, i don't really think this is a problem. 3) removes the 1/2 delay in open_printer_ex() since I don't believe it is helpful in the general sense (see the comments as to why it was there in the first place). 4) use the IP address fdrom the original socket when establishing the change notify session to a client instead of resolving the name from scratch. (backport from 3.0) Revisions: username.c 1.31.2.23 = 1.31.2.24 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/username.c.diff?r1=1.31.2.23r2=1.31.2.24
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Wed Jun 18 06:39:36 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4352/printing Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD nt_printing.c Log Message: another fix fro CR 2179. I think this is the last one 1) orders print_access_check() by: a) root can do anything (easy check) b) check security descriptor (bit comparisons in memory) c) printer admins (may result in numerous calls to winbind) 2) cache the groups for the last user we looked up in user_in_winbindd_group_list(). Might need a timeout here, but since the user token is created at session setup time, i don't really think this is a problem. 3) removes the 1/2 delay in open_printer_ex() since I don't believe it is helpful in the general sense (see the comments as to why it was there in the first place). 4) use the IP address fdrom the original socket when establishing the change notify session to a client instead of resolving the name from scratch. (backport from 3.0) Revisions: nt_printing.c 1.83.2.124 = 1.83.2.125 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/nt_printing.c.diff?r1=1.83.2.124r2=1.83.2.125
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Wed Jun 18 06:39:37 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4352/rpc_server Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: another fix fro CR 2179. I think this is the last one 1) orders print_access_check() by: a) root can do anything (easy check) b) check security descriptor (bit comparisons in memory) c) printer admins (may result in numerous calls to winbind) 2) cache the groups for the last user we looked up in user_in_winbindd_group_list(). Might need a timeout here, but since the user token is created at session setup time, i don't really think this is a problem. 3) removes the 1/2 delay in open_printer_ex() since I don't believe it is helpful in the general sense (see the comments as to why it was there in the first place). 4) use the IP address fdrom the original socket when establishing the change notify session to a client instead of resolving the name from scratch. (backport from 3.0) Revisions: srv_spoolss_nt.c1.95.2.255 = 1.95.2.256 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c.diff?r1=1.95.2.255r2=1.95.2.256
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Wed Jun 18 08:42:04 2003 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15091 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 machine_sid.c Log Message: Better panic cleanly than segfault later when no sid can be found and created. Everybody who calls get_global_sam_sid expects this to return non-NULL, and there are way too many places where this is called. Volker Revisions: machine_sid.c 1.9.2.4 = 1.9.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/machine_sid.c.diff?r1=1.9.2.4r2=1.9.2.5
CVS update: samba/source/groupdb
Date: Wed Jun 18 12:00:52 2003 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv593/groupdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 mapping.c Log Message: And some more memory leaks in mapping.c and pdb_tdb.c. tdb_nextkey mallocs its key, so we should free it after use. Volker Revisions: mapping.c 1.33.2.13 = 1.33.2.14 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/groupdb/mapping.c.diff?r1=1.33.2.13r2=1.33.2.14
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Wed Jun 18 12:00:52 2003 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv593/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_tdb.c Log Message: And some more memory leaks in mapping.c and pdb_tdb.c. tdb_nextkey mallocs its key, so we should free it after use. Volker Revisions: pdb_tdb.c 1.58.2.17 = 1.58.2.18 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_tdb.c.diff?r1=1.58.2.17r2=1.58.2.18
Re: CVS update: samba/source/groupdb
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:00:52PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Wed Jun 18 12:00:52 2003 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv593/groupdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 mapping.c Log Message: And some more memory leaks in mapping.c and pdb_tdb.c. tdb_nextkey mallocs its key, so we should free it after use. This certainly should FIX and not ADD memory leaks :-) Volker pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
CVS update: samba/source/sam
Date: Wed Jun 18 13:28:37 2003 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/sam In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8466 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 idmap_tdb.c Log Message: There's nothing particularly secret in idmap.tdb, so create it with 0644 as the other databases. Volker Revisions: idmap_tdb.c 1.12.2.9 = 1.12.2.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/sam/idmap_tdb.c.diff?r1=1.12.2.9r2=1.12.2.10
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Wed Jun 18 14:20:23 2003 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13252/nsswitch Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 wbinfo.c Log Message: Remove the -A option of wbinfo, leaving only the long version, --set-auth-user. There was enough confusion, as in bug #158, when a user accidentally typed -A instead of -a, and would get themselves stuck with a non-working winbind. I've made the changes to docs/docbook/manpages/wbinfo.xml, but I'm not sure what to do beyond that. Is checking that in enough? Revisions: wbinfo.c1.38.2.14 = 1.38.2.15 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/wbinfo.c.diff?r1=1.38.2.14r2=1.38.2.15
CVS update: samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:17:32 2003 Author: peloy Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18916/debian/patches Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 fhs.patch Log Message: Updated Debian patches so they apply cleanly and without warnings at build time. Revisions: fhs.patch 1.1.6.4 = 1.1.6.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches/fhs.patch.diff?r1=1.1.6.4r2=1.1.6.5
CVS update: samba/source/groupdb
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:24:09 2003 Author: idra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19430/groupdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 mapping.c Log Message: Ok, this patch removes the privilege stuff we had in, unused, for some time. The code was nice, but put in the wrong place (group mapping) and not supported by most of the code, thus useless. We will put back most of the code when our infrastructure will be changed so that privileges actually really make sense to be set. This is a first patch of a set to enhance all our mapping code cleaness and stability towards a sane next beta for 3.0 code base Simo. Revisions: mapping.c 1.33.2.14 = 1.33.2.15 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/groupdb/mapping.c.diff?r1=1.33.2.14r2=1.33.2.15
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:24:09 2003 Author: idra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19430/include Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 mapping.h passdb.h privileges.h Log Message: Ok, this patch removes the privilege stuff we had in, unused, for some time. The code was nice, but put in the wrong place (group mapping) and not supported by most of the code, thus useless. We will put back most of the code when our infrastructure will be changed so that privileges actually really make sense to be set. This is a first patch of a set to enhance all our mapping code cleaness and stability towards a sane next beta for 3.0 code base Simo. Revisions: mapping.h 1.7.2.2 = 1.7.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/mapping.h.diff?r1=1.7.2.2r2=1.7.2.3 passdb.h1.11.2.7 = 1.11.2.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/passdb.h.diff?r1=1.11.2.7r2=1.11.2.8 privileges.h1.1.2.1 = 1.1.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/privileges.h.diff?r1=1.1.2.1r2=1.1.2.2
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:24:10 2003 Author: idra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19430/rpc_server Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 srv_lsa_nt.c srv_samr_nt.c srv_util.c Log Message: Ok, this patch removes the privilege stuff we had in, unused, for some time. The code was nice, but put in the wrong place (group mapping) and not supported by most of the code, thus useless. We will put back most of the code when our infrastructure will be changed so that privileges actually really make sense to be set. This is a first patch of a set to enhance all our mapping code cleaness and stability towards a sane next beta for 3.0 code base Simo. Revisions: srv_lsa_nt.c1.52.2.9 = 1.52.2.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_lsa_nt.c.diff?r1=1.52.2.9r2=1.52.2.10 srv_samr_nt.c 1.86.2.27 = 1.86.2.28 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c.diff?r1=1.86.2.27r2=1.86.2.28 srv_util.c 1.65.2.8 = 1.65.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_util.c.diff?r1=1.65.2.8r2=1.65.2.9
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:24:10 2003 Author: idra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19430/smbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 lanman.c Log Message: Ok, this patch removes the privilege stuff we had in, unused, for some time. The code was nice, but put in the wrong place (group mapping) and not supported by most of the code, thus useless. We will put back most of the code when our infrastructure will be changed so that privileges actually really make sense to be set. This is a first patch of a set to enhance all our mapping code cleaness and stability towards a sane next beta for 3.0 code base Simo. Revisions: lanman.c1.73.2.13 = 1.73.2.14 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/lanman.c.diff?r1=1.73.2.13r2=1.73.2.14
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:24:10 2003 Author: idra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19430/utils Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 net.c net_groupmap.c net_rpc_samsync.c pdbedit.c Log Message: Ok, this patch removes the privilege stuff we had in, unused, for some time. The code was nice, but put in the wrong place (group mapping) and not supported by most of the code, thus useless. We will put back most of the code when our infrastructure will be changed so that privileges actually really make sense to be set. This is a first patch of a set to enhance all our mapping code cleaness and stability towards a sane next beta for 3.0 code base Simo. Revisions: net.c 1.43.2.24 = 1.43.2.25 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net.c.diff?r1=1.43.2.24r2=1.43.2.25 net_groupmap.c 1.1.2.11 = 1.1.2.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_groupmap.c.diff?r1=1.1.2.11r2=1.1.2.12 net_rpc_samsync.c 1.8.2.21 = 1.8.2.22 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c.diff?r1=1.8.2.21r2=1.8.2.22 pdbedit.c 1.39.2.26 = 1.39.2.27 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/pdbedit.c.diff?r1=1.39.2.26r2=1.39.2.27
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Wed Jun 18 15:54:21 2003 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23851 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 Makefile.in Log Message: Add installmodules to install Revisions: Makefile.in 1.468.2.121 = 1.468.2.122 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/Makefile.in.diff?r1=1.468.2.121r2=1.468.2.122
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Wed Jun 18 16:37:55 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28588/nsswitch Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD winbindd_cache.c Log Message: fix a debugging statement; CR 2179 Revisions: winbindd_cache.c1.5.2.22 = 1.5.2.23 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c.diff?r1=1.5.2.22r2=1.5.2.23
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/projdoc
Date: Wed Jun 18 19:03:30 2003 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9671/projdoc Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 VFS.xml Log Message: VFS modules are located in the subdirectory vfs of $LIBDIR Revisions: VFS.xml 1.1.2.4 = 1.1.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc/VFS.xml.diff?r1=1.1.2.4r2=1.1.2.5
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/projdoc
Date: Wed Jun 18 23:13:17 2003 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31532 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 CUPS-printing.xml Log Message: Fix typo Revisions: CUPS-printing.xml 1.1.2.8 = 1.1.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc/CUPS-printing.xml.diff?r1=1.1.2.8r2=1.1.2.9
