Re: [Samba] PDC/BDC Questions
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Cybr0t McWhulf wrote: Sorry, that was a bit vague, my apologies. My real question is, in the event where netbios is not being passed between network segments (In this particular case, a WAN), where the PDC is at one site, and the BDC is at another, are there any provisions for failover? Or am I just going to have to run them both as PDC's for their network segment? You don't want inter-site netbios traffic anyway, so run each as a 'pdc' and add local redundancy if you really think you need it. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC/BDC Questions (fwd)
Cool, thanks alot, I really appreciate your time. I'm extremely pleased with 3.0.x's stability, I don't think local segment failover is really going to be a huge issue. Keep up the great work :) -- Cy Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:14:36 +1100 From: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cybr0t McWhulf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] PDC/BDC Questions On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Cybr0t McWhulf wrote: Sorry, that was a bit vague, my apologies. My real question is, in the event where netbios is not being passed between network segments (In this particular case, a WAN), where the PDC is at one site, and the BDC is at another, are there any provisions for failover? Or am I just going to have to run them both as PDC's for their network segment? You don't want inter-site netbios traffic anyway, so run each as a 'pdc' and add local redundancy if you really think you need it. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba, Lotus Notes Domino, PDF
Hello list, now I do not have a problem with Samba3. I have only a question where I need some suggestions: We have Lotus Notes Domino Server 6.5. This Server is reachable via Internet and an Internetbrowser. The application this Domino Server is running is an projectmanagment system. A lot of different Companys are working over that managment system for one project. They are autenticatet by the Domino Server. Users are able to append documents (Word, Excel, ACAD etc) to the workflow. But now not everyone has as example ACAD, so they are not able to view ACAD documents. So one way is, my be not the best, to use PDF format. If we creat an PDF service server, to convert every document to PDF we need to have every application installed on this server to convert the documents. Much better is, to use the applicaton on the client. A client without as example ACAD will never go and append a ACAD document. For that way, i need a PDF printer. To arrange a PDF printer with SAMBA works. But like I told, this printer is then reachable from internet, so I need to authenticate the users. So I think that Domino uses LDAP as userdatabase, and for printing to the PDF printer the LDAP is also used. Comming to the end: I'm not sure if this will work. I do not know if I can get openldap to work with Domino, otherwise, I do not know if the LDAP server from Domino will work for Samba. And, I do not konw if this is realy a good, or maybe the worst way to implement PDF Servervice. So if someone has an idea, that will be very helpfully for me. Thanks for your time. MfG Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba PDC Multiple workgroups/doamins
It is possible to configure multiple workgroups/domains on a single Samba machine? __ Do you want a free e-mail for life ? Get it at http://www.email.ro/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] RE: Back to 3.0.1, Winbind and Solaris 9 (Mike Dorofe ev )
Hi Mike, Thanks for replying! I have tried that but I still have the same problem. I think that PAM is doing its job, I've set up logging so that everything in pam.conf logs to /var/log/pamlog. In pamlog I see user 'ganguly' granted access. There is something else that is stopping this working, I just can't see what it is. Any ideas? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2004 03:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] RE: Back to 3.0.1, Winbind and Solaris 9 (Mike Dorofeev ) Hi Sapan! See the Vol 13 Digest MSG 34 of 28 Jan 04: here it is: --- IT WORKS!!! I can telnet, ftp, rsh... to my Samba 3.0.1 box (Solaris 9 sparc) here is (at the end) my pam.conf (in case somebody is interested in) The trick is commenting other accound... winbind... string in pam.conf! My English is corrupted wnen i'm full #other account sufficient /usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so.1 Thanks Andrew Barlett! and since now i just LOVE SAMBA :) (BTW, samba 3.0.1 and 3.0.2rc tested on solaris 9 and worked OK!) --- The pam.conf mentioned here is attached to the digest vol13 issue 49 Sincerely yours, Mike Yes, I used your pam.conf and I have the patch installed. I can't think what else the problem could be. I can't see what happens after I type in my password. Pamlog looks like this - Jan 29 11:28:27 sun001 login: [ID 634615 auth.debug] pam_authtok_get:pam_sm_authenticate: flags = 0 Jan 29 11:28:31 sun001 login: [ID 378613 auth.debug] pam_dhkeys: user ganguly not found Jan 29 11:28:31 sun001 login: [ID 896952 auth.debug] pam_unix_auth: entering pam_sm_authenticate() Jan 29 11:28:31 sun001 login: [ID 219349 auth.debug] pam_unix_auth: user ganguly not found Jan 29 11:28:31 sun001 pam_winbind[1138]: [ID 572310 auth.info] Verify user `ganguly' Jan 29 11:28:31 sun001 pam_winbind[1138]: [ID 614614 auth.notice] user 'ganguly' granted acces Jan 29 11:28:31 sun001 login[1138]: [ID 509786 auth.debug] roles pam_sm_authenticate, service = teln et user = ganguly ruser = not set rhost = pc8723_w2k.uk.trt.thales It tells me that the user is granted access but then nothing happens, I don't get a shell even though I have an entry in smb.conf 'template shell = /bin/bash' Strange huh? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Username/Password not passed to Samba
Hallo maybe you must do this. look on picture. Default is that WinXP sends not your username and your pasword but he sends his Computer Authentification. Your Properties must look like this in the picture. And you should more watch in your smbd.log file. mfg Markus F. - Original Message - From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Daniel Auman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:58 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Username/Password not passed to Samba On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Daniel Auman wrote: Hi all, Using Samba 3.0.0beta3 on FreeBSD 4.9 and a WinXP SP1 client. I was able to join the domain with the WinXP machine, but I cannot log-on. The Windows error message is about the domain server not found, ^^^ This sounds like a very fundamental problem: Are you sure you set your WINS server correctly on your XP box and can you ping it? (You shouldn't have been able to join the domain at all without that, but sometimes strange things happen). Uli. no machine account, etc. I set the log level to 3 and received the following output when I tried to log-on: [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(256) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(287) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(216) check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the new password interface [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(219) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(256) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(287) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/uid.c:fetch_sid_from_gid_cache(651) fetch sid from gid cache 65534 - S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-132069 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/uid.c:fetch_sid_from_gid_cache(651) fetch sid from gid cache 65534 - S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-132069 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(265) check_ntlm_password: guest authentication for user [] succeeded [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(201) User name: nobody Real name: Unprivileged user [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(219) UNIX uid 65534 is UNIX user nobody, and will be vuid 566 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878) Transaction 30179 of length 90 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(673) switch message SMBtconX (pid 41343) [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] lib/access.c:check_access(314) check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list. [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(325) Allowed connection from (192.168.1.10) [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(536) Connect path is '/tmp' for service [IPC$] [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(267) [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(268) se_access_check: user sid is S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-501 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-514 se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 se_access_check: also S-1-5-32-546 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-132069 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(201) Initialising default vfs hooks [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(267) [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(268) se_access_check: user sid is S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-501 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-514 se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 se_access_check: also S-1-5-32-546 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2504064135-877026010-4157169575-132069 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/01/27 20:00:00, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(692) gdccdarryl (192.168.1.10) connect to service IPC$ initially as user nobody (uid=65534, gid=65534) (pid 41343)
[Samba] smbprngenpdf printer driver?
Hiya! Can anybody recommend what the best Windows XP printer driver is to generate pdf documents with the generator smbprngenpdf which is included in SuSE's smb-client package? Could it be the CUPS printer driver, or the Adobe? Or something completely different? Anders Norrbring -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.1 and OpenLDAP 2.2.4 with TLS
Hi all, I've been searching the lists and web for an answer but i'm stumped hope some one here has an answer for me. As I'm new to this sysadmin role. I have set up OpenLDAP to authenticate our linux users and exim MTAs. This all works fine with OpenLDAP only providing a ldaps:/// connection on 636. However I cannot for the life of me get samba to speak tls to it. I've seen numerous suggestions of simply putting ldap ssl = start_tls or ldap ssl = on in the smb.conf file but neither do the trick my dev platform that doesn't use tls works fine. However I get the following responses from the above two options. with start_tls I get a not supported option [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# smbpasswd ritchiem New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Not Supported Connection to LDAP Server failed for the 1 try! smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (unknown) (Not Supported) Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Not Supported Connection to LDAP Server failed for the 1 try! smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (unknown) (Not Supported) Failed to find entry for user ritchiem. Failed to modify password entry for user ritchiem and with ldap ssl = on , the conection just dies [EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# smbpasswd ritchiem New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: failed to bind to server with dn= cn=Manager,dc=kelvininstitute,dc=com Error: Can't contact LDAP server (unknown) Connection to LDAP Server failed for the 1 try! Broken pipe Now I'm guessing that the reason I get Not Supported from the start_tls is that my backeddb is a ldapam with a ldaps url and so all comms should be secure. However when running strace over the above command the reason that I get a broken pipe with ssl = on is that it is trying to send the dn= cn=Manager,dc=kelvininstitute,dc=com and password as plain text. One final thing about the smb.conf file. Is the ldap port information actually used as when running testparm it doesn't show up in the output and the port to connect on seems to be determined by the backend passdb uri; either ldap for 386 or ldaps for 636. Is this so or am I missing a trick? Any suggestions on how to make this go? tia -- Martin Ritchie the Kelvin Institute 50, George Street Glasgow Scotland, UK G1 1QE www.kelvininstitute.com +44 (0) 141 548 5719 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Blocked delivery of your email to jody.haynes@isunnetworks.com.persistent.co.in
BLOCKED DELIVERY OF YOUR EMAIL TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your email has been stopped for reasons stated at the bottom of this mail. If your message is HTML/RichText and wrongly reported as SPAM below send the email again in plain-text format. If your message is reported to have virus, please check your system for virii and clean it up. If you still think that your message is free of all the above, please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email was blocked due to the presence of a virus Comment: Virus detected in the mail /unpacked/file.zip - Win32/Mydoom.A worm /unpacked/file.exe - Win32/Mydoom.A worm End. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Permissions and authorities
Hello, We've just migrated from Netware to Samba and have only 1 problem that's affecting our users. When a user creates a new document in a directory the owner and group or both set to root. The directories are owned by a specific user and there is also a group associated with the directory. I was expecting that any new documents created would have the same user and owner as the directory within which they are being created. What am I doing wrong here? Thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (Idiot outside) - smbprngenpdf printer driver?
Well, I wasn't really awake I guess.. It's just a script that calls GhostScript for pdf generation.. But the question still stands, what IS the best quality printer driver to use for GhostScript - pdf printing? We need both colours and high resolution.. Hiya! Can anybody recommend what the best Windows XP printer driver is to generate pdf documents with the generator smbprngenpdf which is included in SuSE's smb-client package? Could it be the CUPS printer driver, or the Adobe? Or something completely different? Anders Norrbring -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Permissions and authorities
Le ven 30/01/2004 11:37, Glenn Robinson a crit : I was expecting that any new documents created would have the same user and owner as the directory within which they are being created. Nope, they are created with the identity of the user on the box, fe. uid = dmorel gid = users you can map users to different identities, but you'd probably rather not to if you're starting. What your story suggests is you mapped your users to the root account which is quite bad. Describe your setup a little more. What am I doing wrong here? Probably not reading the manual thoroughly enough :-) D.Morel -- *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc 28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536 Glenn - Original Message - From: David Morel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Glenn Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Permissions and authorities I'm aware that I can do things like mapping Windows user 'Administrator' to Linux user 'root' in the smbusers file but I haven't touched this file. I have a folder called apps which is owned by user root with a group of root. I have the following share attributes in my smb.conf: [apps] comment = Applications writeable = yes path = /apps write list = root, cuffm create mode = 0666 directory mode = 0777 guest ok = no I've had to set rw for users in create mode so that everyone can get access to new files created in this share. Glenn -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] (Idiot outside) - smbprngenpdf printer driver?
But the question still stands, what IS the best quality printer driver to use for GhostScript - pdf printing? We need both colours and high resolution.. Hiya! Can anybody recommend what the best Windows XP printer driver is to generate pdf documents with the generator smbprngenpdf which is included in SuSE's smb-client package? Could it be the CUPS printer driver, or the Adobe? Or something completely different? I use the HP Laserjet Color 5/5M PS So you could use the PPD for that, along with Adobe or the CUPS dlls Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and Network Neighborhood
Hi All, I turned my Debian box into a file server on my home network. What happened is now no boxen except the localhost shows up in Network Neighborhood on the Windows boxen. All shares work fine and if I search for the Linux server, I find it. Has anyone ever run into this and resolved it? Three days of Googling have left me with the same problem and a headache. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SMBCACLS PROBLEMS !!! HELP NEEDED
I am having a problem with smbcacls [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ricardo# smbcacls -S g:testgroup:r //localhost/homes testfile -U ricardo Password: Failed to parse security descriptor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ricardo# Any ? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Permissions and authorities
Le ven 30/01/2004 11:37, Glenn Robinson a crit :
I was expecting that any new documents created would have the same user
and
owner as the directory within which they are being created.
Nope, they are created with the identity of the user on the box,
fe. uid = dmorel
gid = users
you can map users to different identities, but you'd probably rather not
to if you're starting. What your story suggests is you mapped your users
to the root account which is quite bad. Describe your setup a little
more.
What am I doing wrong here?
Probably not reading the manual thoroughly enough :-)
D.Morel
--
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: David Morel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Glenn Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Permissions and authorities
I'm aware that I can do things like mapping Windows user 'Administrator' to
Linux user 'root' in the smbusers file but I haven't touched this file.
I have a folder called apps which is owned by user root with a group of
root. I have the following share attributes in my smb.conf:
[apps]
comment = Applications
writeable = yes
path = /apps
write list = root, cuffm
create mode = 0666
directory mode = 0777
guest ok = no
I've had to set rw for users in create mode so that everyone can get access
to new files created in this share.
Glenn
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
This section looks ok. Can you post your full smb.conf ?
--
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536
Here is the smb.conf file:
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from localhost (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2004/01/28 16:14:57
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = xx
netbios name = SAMBA
server string = Samba PDC
interfaces = 123.456.789.012
encrypt passwords = Yes
log level = 1
syslog = 0
time server = Yes
unix extensions = Yes
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
printcap name = lpstat
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false %u
logon script = logon.bat
logon path =
logon drive = g:
logon home = \\samba\%U
domain logons = Yes
os level = 255
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
host msdfs = Yes
guest ok = Yes
printing = cups
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
[netlogon]
path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon
write list = root
[homes]
comment = %U
path = /home/borg/users/%U
read only = No
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0775
map archive = No
browseable = No
[Data]
path = /home
read only = No
create mask = 0666
directory mask = 0775
guest ok = No
map archive = No
[apps]
comment = Applications
writeable = yes
path = /apps
write list = root, cuffm
create mode = 0666
directory mode = 0777
guest ok = No
#valid users = @Public
[Printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /tmp
printable = Yes
browseable = No
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /apps
write list = @ntadmin root
force group = ntadmin
create mask = 0664
[dfs]
path = /export/dfsroot
msdfs root = Yes
Glenn
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] printing
I'm having trouble printing multiple copies from winXP machines on a print/file server. It's a RedHat9 box, using a raw printer driver and CUPS, that will do multiple copies locally and from a win98 machine. Samba is my next logical point, but I'm ot having much luck. Any suggestions please/ Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WINS, must be master browser?
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:47, Tim Smith wrote: of course i have set the samba server to wins support = yes I'm not that much of a dunce :) only 1 wins server be lan subnet - you must shut wins off on the NT 4 server. Also, if the clients are expected to use the wins server, they must be configured to do so - either manually or via dhcp Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] User access level.
Well, now everything seems to be in place for the big leap to Linux for file server and logon server. But there is one big catch that I can't find any info about. The default user level mappings in a Windows XP SP1 / Samba 2.2.5 PDC setting. Admin level is perfectly clear, but there is a group level Domain Users, what is the corresponding Windows XP user level? Will the user be a User or Privileged User ? If it's the lower level, how can I enable the Priv. User level to be the active? The Samba PDC is running with roaming profiles, uses LDAP and is version 2.2.5 (alt. 2.2.8a). Upgrading to Samba3 isn't an option, due to its tight integration with the rest of my SuSE system. (SuSE Linux Standard Server 8). Anders Norrbring -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Login time logging?
Hi all! I need a setup that will log exactly when a user has logged in or out of samba. Preferably I would like to have a separate list per user, but this can also be achieved with grep. I found some solutions that rely on login script processing which is nice if your clients are running Win95/Win98 but for anything else it won't work. Anybody know of a solution? Thanks!! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] User access level.
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 05:32, Anders Norrbring wrote: Well, now everything seems to be in place for the big leap to Linux for file server and logon server. But there is one big catch that I can't find any info about. The default user level mappings in a Windows XP SP1 / Samba 2.2.5 PDC setting. Admin level is perfectly clear, but there is a group level Domain Users, what is the corresponding Windows XP user level? Will the user be a User or Privileged User ? If it's the lower level, how can I enable the Priv. User level to be the active? The Samba PDC is running with roaming profiles, uses LDAP and is version 2.2.5 (alt. 2.2.8a). Upgrading to Samba3 isn't an option, due to its tight integration with the rest of my SuSE system. (SuSE Linux Standard Server 8). User access level is a function of the local machine - not the PDC. You can however take these things in a lump by using groups...let's say that all of your users are members of a group called 'all-users'. Then you could add the 'DOMAIN\all-users' into the Power Users group on each local machine. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] User access level.
Subject: Re: [Samba] User access level. On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 05:32, Anders Norrbring wrote: Well, now everything seems to be in place for the big leap to Linux for file server and logon server. But there is one big catch that I can't find any info about. The default user level mappings in a Windows XP SP1 / Samba 2.2.5 PDC setting. Admin level is perfectly clear, but there is a group level Domain Users, what is the corresponding Windows XP user level? Will the user be a User or Privileged User ? If it's the lower level, how can I enable the Priv. User level to be the active? The Samba PDC is running with roaming profiles, uses LDAP and is version 2.2.5 (alt. 2.2.8a). Upgrading to Samba3 isn't an option, due to its tight integration with the rest of my SuSE system. (SuSE Linux Standard Server 8). User access level is a function of the local machine - not the PDC. You can however take these things in a lump by using groups...let's say that all of your users are members of a group called 'all-users'. Then you could add the 'DOMAIN\all-users' into the Power Users group on each local machine. Craig I was afraid of that... Alright, I'll set every user up individually after their first logon, I was kind of hoping it would be controllable via user group mappings in the Samba PDC. Thanks anyway! Anders Norrbring -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] using VSS on a samba server - no smb locks ?
Hi all, We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server. All clients are Win2K clients. I used the VSS tool testlock.exe to make sure the native lock mode can be used. The test was successful, and I saw that an SMBlock transaction was performed, and a reply_lockingX was replied. When I opened a VSS database on the samba server and started to use it - I saw no SMBlock operations. Doesn't make sence to me, because some kind of locking must be done. Any ideas ? Thanks, Nir -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] {Samba}Cannot list domain users and groups
Hi, I have a samba 2.2.8a configured on Freebsd 5.2. I have configured winbind to where if you do a wbinfo -u command, i will get a list of all my domain users. But when i do a getpwent, I only get a listing of all my local accounts on my BSD box. What could be the problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot install print driver on Windows XP while connected to domain
Using the administrator samba account I am trying to install a printer driver on a Windows XP machine while connected to a Samba domain. It appears that I do not have the appropriate permissions. The install is successful if I log in locally (not on the domain) to the machine. What do I need to do to get this to work? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Login time logging?
Le ven 30/01/2004 à 13:49, Remco Barendse a écrit : Hi all! I need a setup that will log exactly when a user has logged in or out of samba. Preferably I would like to have a separate list per user, but this can also be achieved with grep. I found some solutions that rely on login script processing which is nice if your clients are running Win95/Win98 but for anything else it won't work. Anybody know of a solution? Thanks! have you had a look at the preexec and postexec directives ?! -- *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc 28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536 signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?= -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Cannot install print driver on Windows XP while connectedto domain
Using the administrator samba account I am trying to install a printer driver on a Windows XP machine while connected to a Samba domain. It appears that I do not have the appropriate permissions. The install is successful if I log in locally (not on the domain) to the machine. What do I need to do to get this to work? Is the domanin user set up as a printer admin in [global]? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Add Printer Wizard - 3.0.2rc1 - still problem
Tait Shrum wrote: | We have a Samba 3.01 pre3 server that acts as a print server among other | things. When our users go to the add printer wizard in Windows, it | doesn't show our samba server! The only way to add a printer is by | manually entering the path. That's really inconvenient if you don't | know the path. :) Is there some way we can resolve this? I think this is what you are seeing ~ https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101 It's in the queue to be fixed. But probably not for 3.0.1 cheers, jerry Resolved yet? Im on 3.0.2rc1 and still can't see printer in APW. Lee. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] questions regarding SAMBA and Windows Terminal Server
I currently have a debian web server, Win2k Exchange server as a PDC, and a Win2k Terminal Server. I want to get rid of exchange and I am looking at putting openldap on the Debian box with email. If I did this I would want to get the Win2k TS to authenticate to the Debian openldap box. If I set up SAMBA could I get it to do so? I want only one place to manage user accounts and since I have to have them on the Debian machine to get the email accounts I am hoping SAMBA can help me with TS authentication. I can't seem to find much information on this however. I would also wonder if anyone has gotten it to work with Win2k3 TS. Eventually I will be upgrading the server. If not is there any way anyone knows of to drop exchange, use a second machine as Windows PDC to authenticate the TS to, but replicate that information to SAMBA as a secondary DC? That way I could still manage my user accounts on the openldap on the Debian machine and just get the accounts replicated up to the PDC running Windows? Thanks for any info and advice you can offer in this situation. Rick Harding -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.2 and Windows 2003 ADS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Arguello wrote: | Hi. | | Giuseppe | | Ok, when i login in Windows 2000 as Administrador of the machine (not as | a member of the Windows 2k domain) everything works fine, if i use the | command net use * \\server\share, this command works ok, and also if I | use smbclient //windows2000/share command to see my shared folders in | windows 2000 it works fine. But if I login in the PC as a user of the | Windows 2k domain, I can not use that command, but I still can see the | Windows2000 and its shared folders from my Linux using the command | smbclient //windows2000/share -k, and I also notice that in this case if | I use the IP address of the Windows 2000 PC instead of its Netbios name, | it works fine, I mean that if i use this command net use * | \\IP_Address\share instead of \\Netbios_name\share it works. I've been trying to track this down, but have not been able to pinpoint it yet. My best guess is a kerberos configuration issue. The IP address connection is using NTLMSSP and the name connection is using kerberos. We're failing to decrypt the krb5 ticket which is probably due to an encryption type. Could you send me your krb5.conf? cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAGnQ0IR7qMdg1EfYRAiYIAKCMAXsRs86WAV+37LIVv1v9V2zEGQCfY6D4 /FZErPSHM+pwx6rkgHAWM+A= =8/hB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.2 and Windows 2003 ADS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Arguello wrote: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# klist tickets | klist: No credentials cache found | (ticket cache FILE:tickets) smbd doesn't use a keytab yet. Its all done in memory. | [libdefaults] | ticket_lifetime = 24000 | default_realm = DOMAIN2003.COM | dns_lookup_realm = false | dns_lookup_kdc = false | default_tkt_enctypes = DES-CBC-MD5 | default_tgs_enctypes = DES-CBC-MD5 Looks ok. Do you have other kerberized services on the box that require the default realm? | And my smb.conf like this: | | [global] | workgroup = domain2003 | security = ADS | realm = domain2003.com There was a time when the realm had to be defined in the correct case (usually upper). I can't remember if we work around that now or not. cheers, jerry ~ -- ~ Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com ~ SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org ~ GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ~ If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAGnU9IR7qMdg1EfYRAmCUAKDP/xWj6e7FQbvlMkV30S4MckCQ6QCgjn2j ZsIxJboIim8hhx5Kv0C4j24= =qrhF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] A possible error in the way nmbd fails to respond to certain request packets
I have just speant several hours trying to nut out an error with a new installation of SAMBA 3, and the results may indicate something has changed with the way the Name Server (nmbd) responds to certain request. It could also be network stack related, but I am about at my limit of skills to diagnose it any further. I have just installed Fedora Core 1 to a test server in order to play around with SAMBA 3. The exact version is SAMBA 3.0.0-15. My network consists of three machines. All the machines are in a workgroup called DRWHO. 192.168.1.50 : TESTSERVER - The new Fedora machine 192.168.1.100 : K9 - A Windows 98 client 192.168.1.1 : TARDIS - An older SAMBA Server (Linux Kernel 2.4.9 / SAMBA 2.0.10) I used the SWAT wizard to configure the new server and set up a single share point called pub, which just allowed guest access to /tmp. I then thought I would check out the new nbmlookup -S name tool to see what it would say about the different machines on the network. The results were as expected, so I won't repeat them here. I then went to the Win98 machine to compare these results with a nbtstat -a name command, and this is where the fun started. Basically the Win98 machine kept responding saying that TESTSERVER was an unknown host. It correctly reported the results for itself and the older SAMBA server, TARDIS. My first thought was that Fedora had set up some firewalling rules, even though I had turned it off during the configuration. But iptables -L showed that everything was set to ACCEPT. So I fired up Ethereal on the new Fedora box, and watched what went across the network when I queried TESTSERVER from both its local console and from the Win98 box. From the local console the results were:- Src=192.168.1.50 Dst=192.168.1.255 (broadcast) Name Query NB TESTSERVER00 followed by a response, then Src=192.168.1.50 Dst=192.168.1.50 Name Query NBSTAT TESTSERVER00 followed by a response. Everything as I expected to see it. However, from the Win98 box I just got three request packets, spaced about a second apart, but no response. A quick check from the console of TESTSERVER showed that nmbd had bound itself to the network correctly:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# netstat -na udp0 0 192.168.1.50:1370.0.0.0:* udp0 0 0.0.0.0:137 0.0.0.0:* udp0 0 192.168.1.50:1380.0.0.0:* udp0 0 0.0.0.0:138 0.0.0.0:* So, if Ethereal was showing the query packets turning up on the network interface, and nmbd was listening on that interface, why wasn't it responding? So after much more fruitless time, running the nmbd daemon in interactive mode, with various levels of debug, searching google, and other online resources, I eventually (finally!) noticed in the Ethereal dumps that the exact request line from the Win98 box was:- Src=192.168.1.100 Dst=192.255.255.255 (broadcast) Name Query NB TESTSERVER00 It seems that there was (and always has been) an error in my DHCP configuration file that meant that the Win98 machine was getting a 255.0.0.0 netmask, even though the rest of the network was working off a 255.255.255.0 netmask. While this was an error, I can't see why it shouldn't have worked. The destination address (IP=192.255.255.255 / Ethernet=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) should still be acceptable to a service listening on 0.0.0.0, and there was certainly enough routing information to return a response back to the Win98 box on 192.168.1.100. Also, the Win98 box has been successfully working with the older SAMBA server for several years, so it seems that *something* has changed. It could be that the new Fedora IP stack was dropping the request before it got to SAMBA, or it might be that SAMBA was ignoring the request - I couldn't tell which. Also, there might be a very good reason why such changes were made, in which case this message can just server as a warning to others. Thanks very much for your time, and thanks for the great software. Aaron Power. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Hi
bR?NlN:d[;!0krW
$/
NO^p
CY_,6V{wk6O!%*_!)^I2?r*JQK`90VHpI;PCJW$)]`m?T
?x A72;
b[j5o?.C/nw??wgYka|?[~eH!-}ku~:?#_i5v~CNkDFFbWuDbKEx(8D!I]Dd7ey?
pys/% 1!5Ex.}2 $Qz
oK $hyRl?UOc3sIFu
#8F?Z$Qns|e%T75lO.1!k,?*v|[?545#q?%1a5fCi3ZXJm-WDx9CRB[a
ZO
HJ)(3
*3I'k}RvbwLe
gijpAA2(q8}XuuPT~b3M?#i
qM7]}^n?cx8DPz1zp%fw?/f*pC]qNF
%CmwJ{{upgkn
Ih?GZ{EPcQP7OW6fz;mCYWQbV1G8C/$$*Gus_iU(~?3qMU*dS'v[jsymen|s3V)|QMxw^G*OGWkBNFCm!ywHz8VGC6.qBC
Vy
L2}$D[#L
q{9lRu)Fn?TK$uE
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba for SCO Open Server
I'm lookking for Samba for SCO Open Server Best regards,Abdullah Sekman ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Debian package of 3.0.2rc1 available?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, has anyone made a debian package of the current release candidate? I would like to test. Christopher - -- == Dipl.-Ing. Christopher Odenbach HNI Rechnerbetrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +49 5251 60 6215 == -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAGgpphxiCJKeLY0IRAsERAJ9CymvFYLH8An+HnY4VznCIwpgetQCfVEHY xQPn6ssNmiFLsTwo8uxTqvw= =Fct3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [CodeProject] Use command smbmount
Hello I have read help of command smbmount(or smbmnt) but i can not use this command. Would you show me how to use it and give some examples about this command. Please send me as soon as possible my email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] [CodeProject] Use command smbmount
-Original Message- From: ngThien22 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 3:48 PM To: CodeProject Subject: [Samba] [CodeProject] Use command smbmount Hello I have read help of command smbmount(or smbmnt) but i can not use this command. Would you show me how to use it and give some examples about this command. Please send me as soon as possible mount -t smbfs -o username=tridge,password=foobar //fjall/test /data/test Pretty explanatory.. Just type smbmount and press enter you'll get tat -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Virus Alert
01/30/2004 11:02:30 : Un virus detecte (WORM_MYDOOM.A) dans le fichier readme.scr que vous avez envoye a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: deleted. Le mail examine contient votre adresse dans l'en-tete From:. Votre ordinateur est peut etre infecte ou quelqu'un ayant votre adresse de mail dans le carnet d'adresses a ete infecte. (Pour plus de securite, verifier votre ordinateur en utilisant un produit antivirus a jour). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba for SCO Open Server
I can't speak for everyone, but you will likely have to contact SCO for any support or packages. SCO has openly made itself the 'enemy' of any and all Open Source developers and supporters. Your best chance for community help is to migrate your server platform to something else. Sorry. On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Abdullah Sekman wrote: I'm lookking for Samba for SCO Open Server Best regards,Abdullah Sekman ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] benchmark adn threshold
Hi all, i'd like to know if there is a tool like an injector that permits to increase progressively the load onto a Samba server. My aim is to define a threshold as the number of concurrent users connected and accessing shares simultanously on a samba3 PDC. I don't care about network transfer rate. thanks for your answer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] cups printing
hi i have some trouble with samba and cups. i have a printerserver (debian), cups prints in raw mode. if i print something in winxp i get a paper with the letters bdb followed by the pages i wanted to print. after that i get an empty page too. is there anybody who can help me? greetings jens extract of smb.conf: smb.conf## # If you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this load printers = yes # You may wish to override the location of the printcap file printcap name = /etc/printcap # 'printing = cups' works nicely printing = cups guest account = nobody # invalid users = root [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = yes path = /var/spool/cups printable = yes public = yes writable = yes create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 guest ok = yes use client driver = yes # -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Skynet Mail Protection scan results
--- This e-mail is generated by Skynet Mail Protection to warn you that the e-mail sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Deze e-mail is gegenereerd door Skynet Mail Protection om u te waarschuwen dat de e-mail gestuurd door [EMAIL PROTECTED] naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] geinfecteerd is met Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce mail est généré par Skynet Mail Protection afin de vous prévenir que l'e-mail envoyé par [EMAIL PROTECTED] à [EMAIL PROTECTED] est infecté par le virus : Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please contact your system administrator for further information. Gelieve uw systeembeheerder te contacteren voor meer informatie. Veuillez contacter votre administrateur système pour de plus amples informations. If you are the sender: Indien u de zender bent: Si vous êtes l'expéditeur: --- The scanned e-mail has your address in the From header field. Either your computer is infected or someone's computer having your e-mail address in the address book has been infected. De gescande e-mail heeft uw adres in het From veld. Dat betekent dat ofwel jouw computer geinfecteerd is, ofwel dat iemand is geinfecteerd, die jouw e-mail adres in zijn/haar adresboek heeft. Le mail scanné contient votre adresse e-mail dans son en-tête De. Soit votre ordinateur est infecté soit votre adresse e-mail est reprise dans le carnet d'adresse d'un ordinateur infecté. If you are the receiver: Indien u de bestemmeling bent: Si vous êtes le destinataire: - Please contact the sender: most likely he/she doesn't know he/she has a computer virus. Gelieve de zender te contacteren: hoogst waarschijnlijk weet hij/zij niet dat hij/zij geinfecteerd is met een computer virus. Veuillez contacter l'expéditeur: le plus souvent, il/elle ne sait pas que son ordinateur est infecté. Actions taken for the infected files: Ondernomen actie voor de geinfecteerde bestanden: Actions prises pour les fichiers infectés: - The infected file was saved to quarantine with name: 1075458906-RAVi0UAZ5mt027611. The file (part0002:tmapz.pif) attached to mail (with subject:Server Report) sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cannot clean this file. The mail was silently discarded because it contained dangerous code. this is a copy of the e-mail header: Received: from kay.skynet.be (kay.skynet.be [195.238.3.235]) by inas005.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-IN-AS-2.03) with ESMTP id i0UAVAm8020499 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:31:41 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from samba.org (f07v-7-84.d1.club-internet.fr [212.194.138.84]) by kay.skynet.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id i0UARbri008942 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:27:37 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) RAV AntiVirus for Linux i386 version: 8.4.2 (snapshot-20030212) Scan engine 8.11 for i386. Last update: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:31:44 +01 Scanning for 89397 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Skynet Mail Protection scan results
--- This e-mail is generated by Skynet Mail Protection to warn you that the e-mail sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Deze e-mail is gegenereerd door Skynet Mail Protection om u te waarschuwen dat de e-mail gestuurd door [EMAIL PROTECTED] naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] geinfecteerd is met Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce mail est généré par Skynet Mail Protection afin de vous prévenir que l'e-mail envoyé par [EMAIL PROTECTED] à [EMAIL PROTECTED] est infecté par le virus : Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please contact your system administrator for further information. Gelieve uw systeembeheerder te contacteren voor meer informatie. Veuillez contacter votre administrateur système pour de plus amples informations. If you are the sender: Indien u de zender bent: Si vous êtes l'expéditeur: --- The scanned e-mail has your address in the From header field. Either your computer is infected or someone's computer having your e-mail address in the address book has been infected. De gescande e-mail heeft uw adres in het From veld. Dat betekent dat ofwel jouw computer geinfecteerd is, ofwel dat iemand is geinfecteerd, die jouw e-mail adres in zijn/haar adresboek heeft. Le mail scanné contient votre adresse e-mail dans son en-tête De. Soit votre ordinateur est infecté soit votre adresse e-mail est reprise dans le carnet d'adresse d'un ordinateur infecté. If you are the receiver: Indien u de bestemmeling bent: Si vous êtes le destinataire: - Please contact the sender: most likely he/she doesn't know he/she has a computer virus. Gelieve de zender te contacteren: hoogst waarschijnlijk weet hij/zij niet dat hij/zij geinfecteerd is met een computer virus. Veuillez contacter l'expéditeur: le plus souvent, il/elle ne sait pas que son ordinateur est infecté. Actions taken for the infected files: Ondernomen actie voor de geinfecteerde bestanden: Actions prises pour les fichiers infectés: - The infected file was saved to quarantine with name: 1075465564-RAVi0UCQ4LI003068. The file (part0002:readme.exe) attached to mail (with subject:Hello) sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cannot clean this file. The mail was silently discarded because it contained dangerous code. this is a copy of the e-mail header: Received: from cee.skynet.be (cee.skynet.be [195.238.2.101]) by inas007.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-IN-AS-2.03) with ESMTP id i0UCPpBA028452 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:25:57 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from samba.org (f07v-7-84.d1.club-internet.fr [212.194.138.84]) by cee.skynet.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id i0UCIxLR025303 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:19:00 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) RAV AntiVirus for Linux i386 version: 8.4.2 (snapshot-20030212) Scan engine 8.11 for i386. Last update: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:31:44 +01 Scanning for 89397 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] How to configure the /etc/pam.d/login to allow ADS accounts to log on linux box
Hello, How can I configure my /etc/pam.d/login file to allow the users from the AD to log on a linux client? Today I can log but I receive this message: - sisreg:~# su domainuser su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. (Ignored) sisreg:/root$ sisreg:/root$ whoami domainuser sisreg:/root$ - Is it possible to the login entry on the PAM to create the home directory automatically, and set everything else (like profiles)? Thks a lot!!! - Pedro --- Pedro Henrique C. Ponchio Sao Paulo - Brazil - Fundacao Atech (5511) 3040-7300 ramal 150 --- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] using VSS on a samba server - no smb locks ?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote: Hi all, We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server. All clients are Win2K clients. I used the VSS tool testlock.exe to make sure the native lock mode can be used. The test was successful, and I saw that an SMBlock transaction was performed, and a reply_lockingX was replied. When I opened a VSS database on the samba server and started to use it - I saw no SMBlock operations. Doesn't make sence to me, because some kind of locking must be done. Did you only test with one user ? Is so, an oplock will cause no locking attempts to be seen on the wire (the client redirector optimises them out when it has an oplock). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[samba] Help request setting w2000 to use Lexmark z25 printer on linux RH7.3 ru
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Abwesenheitsnotiz: Hi
Sehr geehrter Mailpartner, danke für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin leider nicht im Haus. Ihre Nachricht wird an Herrn Johann Bauer weitergeleitet. Während meiner Abwesenheit betreuen Sie Frau Manuela Lentner oder Herr Johann Bauer. Frau Lentner ist direkt erreichbar unter Tel.: 08552-41-293, Fax: 08552-41-255 oder per E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Herrn Bauer können Sie tel. unter der Durchwahl -258, per Fax: -255 oder per E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] erreichen. Persönlich können Sie mich wieder ab 02. Februar 2004 erreichen. Freundliche Grüße i.A. Karin Wilhelm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba for SCO Open Server
SCO includes Samba on some of it's add on disks. If you recently purchased Open Server or have up to date media, just look on the Disks you have. - They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin - Michael Harmer Miller-Valentine Group 4000 Miller-Valentine Ct. Dayton, OH 45439 937-534-7804 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rashkae Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 11:11 AM To: Abdullah Sekman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba for SCO Open Server I can't speak for everyone, but you will likely have to contact SCO for any support or packages. SCO has openly made itself the 'enemy' of any and all Open Source developers and supporters. Your best chance for community help is to migrate your server platform to something else. Sorry. On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Abdullah Sekman wrote: I'm lookking for Samba for SCO Open Server Best regards,Abdullah Sekman ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Able to Mount home, but getting failure errors in logs
Hi, I have a few users that are creating errors like below. These users have mapped a directory via Samba and also have it connected. They can access their home directory or other directory via Samba fine, but it is strange that every hour on the hour there is a failure put into the log (even though they are working). My server is joined to the Domain and it is using security=DOMAIN. Has anyone else ever seen anything like this? [2004/01/19 09:58:19, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705) sc276563 (158.147.58.188) connect to service jbogus initially as user jbogus (uid=X, gid=X) (pid 2189) [2004/01/19 10:06:07, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1990) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90028): Currently not implemented. [2004/01/19 18:00:41, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/19 19:00:41, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/19 20:00:39, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/19 21:00:39, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/19 22:00:39, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/19 23:00:39, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/20 00:00:39, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/20 01:00:39, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/20 02:00:40, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/20 03:00:40, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/20 04:00:40, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed [2004/01/20 05:00:40, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(56) chdir (/home/jbogus) failed -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] roaming profiles - Unable to unmarshall
I'm currently having this problem has a solution been posted? Does anyone know how to resolve this problem? Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] System error 1240
When using Dos command: net use Z: \\servername\public I get prompted for a user name and password. I have admin priveleges and have tried using user root, user admin, user guest, my own account etc. And I get System error 1240 has occurred. The account is not authorized to log in from this station. What could be causing this? This is happening via a remote connection from my laptop using our VPN. When I use my computer local in the office, I have no problem mapping the drive connecting using root login. Any help is greatly appreciated! Hindy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] failover/redundancy with dfs, ldap, and samba
Hello, I have some general failover/redundancy questions: 1) Is it possible to have samba use multiple ldap servers without an external load balancing solution like a Cisco CSS? 2) I want to have samba be my dfs root. How can I have redundant/failover dfs root servers again without some sort of load balancing device like a CSS if that would even work in this situationI think it would, it would work in a failover but certainly not in a load balancing scenario...hrm...the more I think about it leads me to think that it could be possible of the load balancing switch handles sessions correctly but I imagine that could get quite messy. Thoughts please! = Terry __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO
When my Windows 2000 Pro client trys to login to the Samba PDC it get that error message. I created the machine account and user id. Does anyone know how to fix this problem? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] using VSS on a samba server - no smb locks ?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote: Hi all, We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server. All clients are Win2K clients. I used the VSS tool testlock.exe to make sure the native lock mode can be used. The test was successful, and I saw that an SMBlock transaction was performed, and a reply_lockingX was replied. When I opened a VSS database on the samba server and started to use it - I saw no SMBlock operations. Doesn't make sence to me, because some kind of locking must be done. Did you only test with one user ? Is so, an oplock will cause no locking attempts to be seen on the wire (the client redirector optimises them out when it has an oplock). Well, actually all oplocks where turned off in my smb.conf. I tried to checkin and checkout some files with few users, but no SMBlocks. Using samba-2.2.8a (I forgot to mention) Nir Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] using VSS on a samba server - no smb locks ?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:13:55PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote: Well, actually all oplocks where turned off in my smb.conf. I tried to checkin and checkout some files with few users, but no SMBlocks. Using samba-2.2.8a (I forgot to mention) No lockingX calls ? There are several possible locking calls. Or maybe the app does some higher level synchronisation. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] questions regarding SAMBA and Windows Terminal Server
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 01:50, Richard Harding wrote: I currently have a debian web server, Win2k Exchange server as a PDC, and a Win2k Terminal Server. I want to get rid of exchange and I am looking at putting openldap on the Debian box with email. If I did this I would want to get the Win2k TS to authenticate to the Debian openldap box. If I set up SAMBA could I get it to do so? I want only one place to manage user accounts and since I have to have them on the Debian machine to get the email accounts I am hoping SAMBA can help me with TS authentication. I can't seem to find much information on this however. Terminal server operates much like any other domain member, with a few extra things that it stores. This information is handled correctly in Samba 3.0.1, but I would suggest running 3.0.2rc1. I would also wonder if anyone has gotten it to work with Win2k3 TS. Eventually I will be upgrading the server. http://swflug.org/modules.php?name=Downloadsd_op=viewdownloadcid=4 I would also suggest you read HP's paper above. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Login time logging?
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 23:49, Remco Barendse wrote: Hi all! I need a setup that will log exactly when a user has logged in or out of samba. Preferably I would like to have a separate list per user, but this can also be achieved with grep. I found some solutions that rely on login script processing which is nice if your clients are running Win95/Win98 but for anything else it won't work. Anybody know of a solution? Many people enable utmp support on the server for this. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] cannot join Windows 2003 domain
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 01:53, Nerijus Baliunas wrote: Hello, When I try smbpasswd -j DOMAIN_NAME -r alfa -U Administrator I get Error connecting to alfa - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Unable to join domain TID. The same command works with Windows 2000 domain. Windows domain is configured for pre 2k/2k3 access, samba-2.2.8a. I tried to search google unsuccessfully. Can I debug it? You need to use Samba 3.0, as win2k3 enforces SMB signing, which 2.2 does not support. When using Samba 3.0, you need to use 'net join'. Set 'security=ads' in your smb.conf, if you have the right LDAP and kerberos libraries. Finally, read the HOWTO, it contains this and many other useful hints. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] After identification
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 01:56, Jean Frontin wrote: Hello, I am testing 3.0.1 on solaris 8. When I open a session on a samba server from a XP box, after user/password entered I obtain an error message : server service not started I apologize because I translate into English a French expression in French XP. Here is the logs I read on the server : We need you to attach a debugger to that, and get a backtrace. The 'panic action' should help here. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Groups
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 02:48, Anders Norrbring wrote: I've noticed in the HOW-TO collection (for v3, unforunately..) that there is a command net groupadd to create group mappings for the Samba server to use when controlling users in the domain. Since my Samba is 2.2.8a, the net command doesn't exist on my system. Is there another utility to use to create NT groups (f.x. Power Users) that Samba can use in its PDC role? No, Samba 2.2 does not support this - one of the many reasons to upgrade to 3.0 Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Login time logging?
Preferably I would like to have a separate list per user, but this can also be achieved with grep. I found some solutions that rely on login script processing which is nice if your clients are running Win95/Win98 but for anything else it won't work. Anybody know of a solution? Many people enable utmp support on the server for this. We grab WINS 03 registrations and propogate these into LDAP to maintain a moderately current state of whos-logged-in-where. I suppose you could use them for other things too. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Need help with advanced PDF printing
Hello, I've got Samba doing PDF printing (via cups) and everything works just fine. However, I have a dumb application that calls microsoft word to print documents, and each document is handled as a seperate print job. Consequently, I end up with multiple PDFs that should all be a single document. I know how to combine them by hand (pdf2ps document.pdf; pdf2ps document2.pdf ; cat document.ps document2.ps \ bigdoc.ps ; ps2pdf bigdoc.ps) but my users do not have command line access (nor do I want them to). Has anyone built a pdf combiner that can do this automaticaly? I'm thinking I can do something with PHP to have the user upload to a server, then have the unix tools do the combining automaticaly and then offer the combined pdf for download, but if someone has already done this I wouldn't have to waste any time... Thanks in advance... --J(K) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Virus Alert
The mail message (file: file.zip) you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains a virus. (on hyd.satyam.com) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] A samba locking question
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:55, Patrik Gustavsson wrote: Hi, Maybe this is a stupid question, but any way Will samba use fcntl locking if level 1 and 2 oplocks is disabled and samba is not compiled with spin-locks enabled ? I am using Samba on solaris Samba uses fcntl() locking in two places. Firstly, it is used to mirror SMB locks, asked for by the client. Secondly they are used to mediate access to tdbs. Spinlocks are an alternative (if much less reliable) method for tdb mediation. oplocks do not override fcntl locks - but clients that have successfully gained an oplock might not ask for an SMB lock, and therefore Samba might not attempt to gain the matching fcntl() lock. The nasty performance issues in Solaris are due to bad fcntl() lock contention performance in Samba's TDB access. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] After identification
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 01:56, Jean Frontin wrote: Hello, I am testing 3.0.1 on solaris 8. When I open a session on a samba server from a XP box, after user/password entered I obtain an error message : Are you using 'security=server' or are you running with 'encrypt passwords = no'? If so, then this issue has been fixed in 3.0 CVS, try the 3.0.2rc2 release due shortly. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and Terminal Server Whitepaper
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 07:40, Eric Roseme wrote: Attached is a 500KB read-only .doc file with a Samba and Terminal Server whitepaper. I have tried to hit every known issue and all available workarounds. If anyone has comments or suggestions, let me know. JT has it, so it should end up in the next How-To. Sorry about the file format, but the .pdf was 2.5MB, which I thought was too big to post. I found there were a number of things in this paper that should be updated for 3.0, or are less than accurate. The first is the issue of 'session users'. How have you found that variable impacting on operations? As far as I know, it's use is only to support 'security=share', and apart from some noise in the logs, it should have no impact on terminal server operations. (Then again, I've been in 3.0 land for a long time, and in 2.2 it can get scary...) Also all the 'list' parameters in Samba 3.0 are now handled as real lists, so do not suffer from the 1024 character limit. In environments where WINS may be controlled, I would also suggest the use of static wins entries, or 'dns proxy' and multiple CNAME records for the terminal server. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba] Samba3 Printer drivers installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Pfeifle wrote: | Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: | | Thanks a lot for the help. | | | Please always reply to list. Often I don't get private mails while I | am on travel. But sometimes I can scan the list (via its web interface) | while on the road. | | When I was initially installing the drivers, I was following a how-to | that didn't specify that you need exact order for the driver files. | | | It does. It does so in very much detail. I spent my complete annual | holiday last summer to find everything out and write it down as a | documentation. So don't tell me it doesn't specify the exact order, | because I know it went into my draft at more than 1 place. | Sorry for not making it clear earlier on, I have followed a 3rd party how-to that i've found by google-ing. After i have followed your how-to (for which I am very thankful) I've managed to install printer drivers. I've followed the following procedure: 1. to get windows drivers files i've used: rpcclient -U'user%pass' -c \ 'getdriver Samsung 4500 3' TURBO_XP 2. Then i've downloaded drivers from windows machine: smbclient //TURBO_XP/print\$ -U'user%pass' \ ~ -c 'cd W32X86/2; mget *' 3. Upload files to samba print$: smbclient //SAMBA-CUPS/print\$ -U'user%pass' -c \ ~ 'cd W32X86; mput *' 4. Added printer driver: rpcclient -Uuser%pass -c 'adddriver Windows NT x86 \ ~ Samsung: file1:file2,etc..' where the file order is as following: Driver File Name:Data File Name:Config File Name:Help File Name:Language Monitor Name:Default Data Type: The driver files where added successfully: Printer Driver Samsung successfully installed 5. Checking samba server for driver succeded: rpcclient -U'user%pass' -c 'enumdrivers' SAMBA-server [Windows NT x86] Printer Driver Info 1: ~Driver Name: [Samsung] 6.Setting driver to printer: rpcclient -U'user%pass' -c 'setdriver Samsung Samsung' SAMBA-server As far as i can see from the how-to the server side setup is finished. Now, from the client side, i should double click on the printer and windows should fetch the driver and install it. When I do this, windows 2000/XP responds that unable to find driver, do you want to make a local search for driver. However, if i check the properties for the printer, i can see that the driver is there and that it is available for the right architecture. But if I use the windows Add printer wizard to install the same driver to samba print$ share, the printer driver gets installed perfectly; i.e. rpcclient -U'user%pass' -c 'enumdrivers' SAMBA-server [Windows NT x86] Printer Driver Info 1: ~Driver Name: [Samsung] as well as the drivers are placed in exactly the same location as they where using samba setup procedure that i've mentioned above. I don't actually know what might be the difference between the driver installation between windows Add printer wizard and samba rpcclient. Do you have any idea what I am doing wrong? As I prefer not to use windows at all possible costs, i would really like to sort out the printer installation by using command line on linux rather then fluff-clicking on windows. Thanks for all the help! - -- Andrei Mikhailovsky Arhont Ltd Web: http://www.arhont.com Tel: +44 (0)870 4431337 Fax: +44 (0)1454 201200 PGP: Key ID - 0xFF67A4F4 PGP: Server - keyserver.pgp.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAGwJN5bSBOf9npPQRAvh8AJ4joCafdHQkRN6bHqKGeVr+HHNd6gCbB9J7 k90ycWdpLfh59fF+KgrZtGM= =+Ii3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] benchmark adn threshold
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 03:29, Lapin(c) wrote: Hi all, i'd like to know if there is a tool like an injector that permits to increase progressively the load onto a Samba server. My aim is to define a threshold as the number of concurrent users connected and accessing shares simultanously on a samba3 PDC. I don't care about network transfer rate. Some of the smbtoture suite might be able to assist you there - but if you just want logins, why not just script up smbclient? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba] Samba3 Printer drivers installation
Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: [] | When I was initially installing the drivers, I was following a how-to | that didn't specify that you need exact order for the driver files. | | | It does. It does so in very much detail. I spent my complete annual | holiday last summer to find everything out and write it down as a | documentation. So don't tell me it doesn't specify the exact order, | because I know it went into my draft at more than 1 place. | Sorry for not making it clear earlier on, I have followed a 3rd party how-to that i've found by google-ing. So why am *I* receiving the support call for that 3rd party doco?? [...] As far as i can see from the how-to the server side setup is finished. Now, from the client side, i should double click on the printer This is not a piece I ever advocated, exactly because it doesn't work reliably. Re-read the docu and find the following steps (quoted from memory). * browse to Samba in network neighbourhood. * open Printers and Faxes folder * right-click printer and select Connect... or Install... and windows should fetch the driver and install it. When I do this, windows 2000/XP responds that unable to find driver, do you want to make a local search for driver. However, if i check the properties for the printer, i can see that the driver is there and that it is available for the right architecture. Find the different places which (redundantly) hint to the need to... * make sure to do the first installation on any Win client as a printer admin user, and * tickle the driver into a valid device mode by executing it once on a Win machine, before you start offering it to normal users for download/installation -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Blocked delivery of your email to jody.haynes@isunnetworks.com.persistent.co.in
See other post to this list! Tom On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 03:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BLOCKED DELIVERY OF YOUR EMAIL TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your email has been stopped for reasons stated at the bottom of this mail. If your message is HTML/RichText and wrongly reported as SPAM below send the email again in plain-text format. If your message is reported to have virus, please check your system for virii and clean it up. If you still think that your message is free of all the above, please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email was blocked due to the presence of a virus Comment: Virus detected in the mail /unpacked/file.zip - Win32/Mydoom.A worm /unpacked/file.exe - Win32/Mydoom.A worm End. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Command Antivirus For Exchange - Virus Alert
The message Server Report you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] had the file attachment text.zip which was infected with the text.scr Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (exact) virus. The file attachment was deleted from the message. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and Network Neighborhood
Can you please explain a little. What are you looking for in the network neighborhood? Windows boxes or samba shares? If you want to see samba shares you need to make them browseable. Tom On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 04:12, Lionel Laratte wrote: Hi All, I turned my Debian box into a file server on my home network. What happened is now no boxen except the localhost shows up in Network Neighborhood on the Windows boxen. All shares work fine and if I search for the Linux server, I find it. Has anyone ever run into this and resolved it? Three days of Googling have left me with the same problem and a headache. Thanks. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Mail delivery failure
** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT ** Sent RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Could not deliver mail to this user. [EMAIL PROTECTED] * End of message *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] call_nt_transact_query_security_desc
I don't get this error with Windows 98 clients only my Windows 2000 workstation. This work station can access all the hard drives offered by the samba server but has problems accessing the printers. When I try to open a printers property dialog box it fails. I used to get a SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO related error, but when I turned up the Samba log level to 3 the SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO error was replaced by the error call_nt_transact_query_security_desc [timestamp] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94) error string = Operation not supported I'm running the version of samba that came with SuSE 9.0, samba 2.2.8a-SuSE. The server is also acting as the PDC. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Error when Synchronising
Sir, I've just install SuSE 9.0 and am running their Samba 2.8.8a-SuSE version of samba and am encountering the same problem with my windows 2000 pro machine when I attempt to access printers offered by the samba server. Windows 98 has no problem with the printers but Windows 2000 gets this error. Did you ever resolve your issue? If so would you share your solution with me? Thank you, Robert L. Perkins -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Win9x - Samba - NT Domain question
Greetings, I have a configuration question regarding using samba, a win98 machine in a Nt domain. Situation: 2 linux boxes both running samba 3.0.1 winxp and win98 winnt as domain server. From my win98 machine, I can see the shares on linux box a. (Running Fedora/samba 3.0.1) From my win98 machine, I CAN NOT see the share on linux box b (Redhat 9/samba 3.0.1) However, from the xp machine, I *can* see the shares on linux box b. I went so far as to copy the smb.conf file from box a to box b, with no effect (turns out, I have the same shares on both machines, so no conflicts). Following the diagnosis routines in the documentation, when I try to do the net view 'box b', I get Error 5: You do not currently have access to this file. The file may be marked read-only, or it may be part of a shared resource such as a folder, a named pipe, a queue, or a semaphore. You can use the ATTRIB command to change the read-only attribute, or try again later when the file may be available. If I try to user explorer, and click on the server name, it asks for the password for ipc$ service. I *know* it's something obvious, but i'm at my wits ends. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. TIA Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind using the wrong username for IPC$ connections.
Hi All, When I run winbindd -i -d5 I am getting the following error IPC$ connections done by user DOMAIN\domainmanju connecting to PDC from SAMBASERVER with username [DOMAIN]\[domainmanju] finally it throws up an the following error. Could not open a connection to DOMAIN for \PIPE\lsarpc (NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE) I have joined the Samba server to the Win2k AD domain, users are able to access the server, but I am trying to implement Single Sign on, which I have not yet succeeded. I think it is giving a logon failure because it is using a wrong user name i.e. it should use the user manju only but it is trying to use domainmanju . How do I change this so that Samba uses only manju as the username and not domainmanju or is this right I am doing something else wrong. TIA Manjunath H N -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Virus Alert
Don't get it? Viruses send fake sender address. Turn this message off! Tom On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 03:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 01/30/2004 11:02:30 : Un virus detecte (WORM_MYDOOM.A) dans le fichier readme.scr que vous avez envoye a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: deleted. Le mail examine contient votre adresse dans l'en-tete From:. Votre ordinateur est peut etre infecte ou quelqu'un ayant votre adresse de mail dans le carnet d'adresses a ete infecte. (Pour plus de securite, verifier votre ordinateur en utilisant un produit antivirus a jour). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WINS, must be master browser?
As far as I understand, as long as you have an NT on the subnet, it will be the master browser and wins server. You also need to tell your W boxes who the wins server is. you can do it in the DHCP server or on every W box if not using DHCP Tom On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:47, Tim Smith wrote: of course i have set the samba server to wins support = yes I'm not that much of a dunce :) alton bailey wrote: you have to tell samba to be a wins server in smb.conf - Original Message - *From:* Tim Smith mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Thursday, January 29, 2004 8:45 PM *Subject:* [Samba] WINS, must be master browser? i have an NT4 server and a linux samba server. the NT4 server is currently the WINS server. it works perfectly. i want to ditch it and use my samba server as the WINS server, however WINS simply does not work. could this be becuase the WINS server also needs to be the local master browser? here is the global section of my smb.conf [global] workgroup = laboratory os level = 2 kernel oplocks = No security = user encrypt passwords = Yes guest account = Nobody map to guest = Bad User in this config samba will not win browser elections. I know the NT4 machine will win all browser elections, it's the only difference i can think of. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.sambaorg/mailman/listinfo/samba http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Skynet Mail Protection scan results
How long does it take until these sysadmin learn how to configure their virus scanners and turn off these messages. They just send out completely useless e-mail Tom On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 03:35, Skynet Mail Protection wrote: --- This e-mail is generated by Skynet Mail Protection to warn you that the e-mail sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Deze e-mail is gegenereerd door Skynet Mail Protection om u te waarschuwen dat de e-mail gestuurd door [EMAIL PROTECTED] naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] geinfecteerd is met Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce mail est gnr par Skynet Mail Protection afin de vous prvenir que l'e-mail envoy par [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] est infect par le virus : Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please contact your system administrator for further information. Gelieve uw systeembeheerder te contacteren voor meer informatie. Veuillez contacter votre administrateur systme pour de plus amples informations. If you are the sender: Indien u de zender bent: Si vous tes l'expditeur: --- The scanned e-mail has your address in the From header field. Either your computer is infected or someone's computer having your e-mail address in the address book has been infected. De gescande e-mail heeft uw adres in het From veld. Dat betekent dat ofwel jouw computer geinfecteerd is, ofwel dat iemand is geinfecteerd, die jouw e-mail adres in zijn/haar adresboek heeft. Le mail scann contient votre adresse e-mail dans son en-tte De. Soit votre ordinateur est infect soit votre adresse e-mail est reprise dans le carnet d'adresse d'un ordinateur infect. If you are the receiver: Indien u de bestemmeling bent: Si vous tes le destinataire: - Please contact the sender: most likely he/she doesn't know he/she has a computer virus. Gelieve de zender te contacteren: hoogst waarschijnlijk weet hij/zij niet dat hij/zij geinfecteerd is met een computer virus. Veuillez contacter l'expditeur: le plus souvent, il/elle ne sait pas que son ordinateur est infect. Actions taken for the infected files: Ondernomen actie voor de geinfecteerde bestanden: Actions prises pour les fichiers infects: - The infected file was saved to quarantine with name: 1075458906-RAVi0UAZ5mt027611. The file (part0002:tmapz.pif) attached to mail (with subject:Server Report) sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cannot clean this file. The mail was silently discarded because it contained dangerous code. this is a copy of the e-mail header: Received: from kay.skynet.be (kay.skynet.be [195.238.3.235]) by inas005.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-IN-AS-2.03) with ESMTP id i0UAVAm8020499 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:31:41 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from samba.org (f07v-7-84.d1.club-internet.fr [212.194.138.84]) by kay.skynet.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-IN-2.32) with ESMTP id i0UARbri008942 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:27:37 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) RAV AntiVirus for Linux i386 version: 8.4.2 (snapshot-20030212) Scan engine 8.11 for i386. Last update: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:31:44 +01 Scanning for 89397 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [PATCH] Group mapping primary group SID update
Hi all !
This is a patch for Group mapping bug #1 reported here :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/034057.html
It activates users' primary group SID update when adding/modifying/deleting a
group mapping. It patches utils/net_groupmap.c (net_groupmap_add,
net_groupmap_modify, net_groupmap_delete) and can be applied to samba-3.0.2rc1.
net_groupmap_add :
Scan users having the *new* Unix gid mapped as primary group and update their
primaryGroupSid info in passdb.
net_groupmap_modify :
Scan users having the *old* Unix gid mapped as primary group and update their
primaryGroupSid info in passdb by computing it.
Scan users having the *new* Unix gid mapped as primary group and update their
primaryGroupSid info in passdb.
net_groupmap_delete :
Scan users having the *old* Unix gid mapped as primary group and update their
primaryGroupSid info in passdb by computing it.
!!!NOTE!!! : THIS PATCH DOESNT WORK WITH TDB BACKEND, but it works perfectly
with ldap backend. Since I'm not a Samba guru, I couldn't make this patch work
with TDB backend. I think it is very simple to fix : the problem is pdb_ldap and
pdb_tdb doesn't update sam account the same way : pdb_tdb.c invalidates the
iterator during a sam update (while pdb_ldap doesn't), so the main loop crashes
after the first pdb_update_sam_account while trying to use pdb_getsampwent. The
patch may be easy to fix and can be a good start for an final bugfix.
- Start of updatesid.patch -
--- utils/net_groupmap.c.orig 2003-09-24 19:16:13.0 +0200
+++ utils/net_groupmap.c2004-01-29 13:38:06.0 +0100
@@ -80,6 +80,65 @@
return True;
}
+/**
+ Update primary group SID in passdb with string_sid
+ for users whose Unix primary group is gid. Useful
+ after a net_groupmap add/modify/delete.
+**/
+static BOOL update_users_primgroup_sid(const gid_t gid, fstring string_sid)
+{
+ SAM_ACCOUNT *sam_pwent=NULL;
+ struct passwd *pass=NULL;
+ fstring usrname = ;
+
+ /* Initialize static context */
+ if(!initialize_password_db(True)) {
+ DEBUG(0,(update_users_primgroup_sid: Cannot initialize password
database.\n));
+ return False;
+ }
+ /* Open password database for update */
+ if(!pdb_setsampwent(True)) {
+ DEBUG(0,(update_users_primgroup_sid: Cannot open password
database.\n));
+ return False;
+ }
+
+ while (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(pdb_init_sam(sam_pwent))
pdb_getsampwent(sam_pwent)) {
+ fstrcpy(usrname,pdb_get_username(sam_pwent));
+ if(!(pass = Get_Pwnam(usrname))) {
+ DEBUG(0,(update_users_primgroup_sid: Cannot find Unix
account for %s.\n, usrname));
+ return False;
+ }
+
+ if ((pass-pw_gid) != (gid_t)-1) {
+ /* Check if user's primary group SID must be updated (if
mapped gid is the user's primary group gid) */
+ if (pass-pw_gid == gid) {
+ if (string_sid) { /* String specified, use it */
+ pdb_set_group_sid_from_string(sam_pwent,
string_sid, PDB_CHANGED);
+ }
+ else { /* no string specified, must compute the
RID */
+ pdb_set_group_sid_from_rid(sam_pwent,
pdb_gid_to_group_rid(pass-pw_gid), PDB_CHANGED);
+ }
+
+ /* Commit changes */
+ if (pdb_update_sam_account(sam_pwent)) {
+ /* Works well with pdb LDAP, BUT
!!Error!! while using pdb TDB : pdb_tdb.c invalidates
+ the iterator in tdb_update_sam (called
by pdb_update_sam_account). The result is
+ an iterator error in the next
pdb_getsampwent of the loop. MUST BE CORRECTED*/
+ d_printf(Successully updated primary
group SID for user %s\n, usrname);
+ }
+ else {
+ d_printf(Could not update primary group
SID for user %s\n, usrname);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ pdb_free_sam(sam_pwent);
+ }
+ pdb_free_sam(sam_pwent);
+ pdb_endsampwent();
+
+ return True;
+}
+
/*
Dump a GROUP_MAP entry to stdout (long or short listing)
**/
@@ -287,6 +346,9 @@
}
d_printf(Successully added group %s to the mapping db\n, ntgroup);
+
+ update_users_primgroup_sid(gid, string_sid);
+
hello
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available. attachment: body.zip
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Fri Jan 30 14:59:40 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13489/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_interface.c Log Message: disable any account that doesn't have a password and doesn't had the ACB_PWNOTREQ bit set Revisions: pdb_interface.c 1.10.2.26 = 1.10.2.27 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_interface.c.diff?r1=1.10.2.26r2=1.10.2.27
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Fri Jan 30 15:00:57 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14157/passdb Modified Files: pdb_interface.c Log Message: disable any account that doesn't have a password and doesn't had the ACB_PWNOTREQ bit set Revisions: pdb_interface.c 1.53 = 1.54 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_interface.c.diff?r1=1.53r2=1.54
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Fri Jan 30 15:01:43 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14489/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE pdb_interface.c Log Message: disable any account that doesn't have a password and doesn't had the ACB_PWNOTREQ bit set Revisions: pdb_interface.c 1.47.2.5 = 1.47.2.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_interface.c.diff?r1=1.47.2.5r2=1.47.2.6
CVS update: samba/packaging/Fedora
Date: Fri Jan 30 16:00:42 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Fedora In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25804 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 samba.spec.tmpl Added Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 smb.conf Log Message: fixes for fedora packaging Revisions: smb.confNONE = 1.1.2.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Fedora/smb.conf?rev=1.1.2.1 samba.spec.tmpl 1.1.2.7 = 1.1.2.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Fedora/samba.spec.tmpl.diff?r1=1.1.2.7r2=1.1.2.8
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:45 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24429/lib Modified Files: util.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: util.c 1.410 = 1.411 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util.c.diff?r1=1.410r2=1.411
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:45 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24429/nmbd Modified Files: nmbd_processlogon.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_processlogon.c 1.67 = 1.68 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c.diff?r1=1.67r2=1.68
CVS update: samba/source/param
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:45 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24429/param Modified Files: loadparm.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: loadparm.c 1.531 = 1.532 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.531r2=1.532
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:46 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24429/printing Modified Files: nt_printing.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: nt_printing.c 1.261 = 1.262 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/nt_printing.c.diff?r1=1.261r2=1.262
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:45 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24429/libsmb Modified Files: ntlmssp.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: ntlmssp.c 1.26 = 1.27 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/ntlmssp.c.diff?r1=1.26r2=1.27
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:46 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24429/rpc_server Modified Files: srv_lsa_ds_nt.c srv_lsa_nt.c srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: srv_lsa_ds_nt.c 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_lsa_ds_nt.c.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4 srv_lsa_nt.c1.79 = 1.80 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_lsa_nt.c.diff?r1=1.79r2=1.80 srv_spoolss_nt.c1.411 = 1.412 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c.diff?r1=1.411r2=1.412
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:47 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24404/lib Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 util.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: util.c 1.358.2.42 = 1.358.2.43 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util.c.diff?r1=1.358.2.42r2=1.358.2.43
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:47 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24404/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nmbd_processlogon.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_processlogon.c 1.51.2.13 = 1.51.2.14 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c.diff?r1=1.51.2.13r2=1.51.2.14
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:47 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24404/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 ntlmssp.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: ntlmssp.c 1.4.2.36 = 1.4.2.37 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/ntlmssp.c.diff?r1=1.4.2.36r2=1.4.2.37
CVS update: samba/source/param
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:48 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24404/param Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 loadparm.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: loadparm.c 1.397.2.121 = 1.397.2.122 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.397.2.121r2=1.397.2.122
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:48 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24404/printing Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nt_printing.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: nt_printing.c 1.204.2.48 = 1.204.2.49 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/nt_printing.c.diff?r1=1.204.2.48r2=1.204.2.49
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Fri Jan 30 18:38:48 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24404/rpc_server Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 srv_lsa_ds_nt.c srv_lsa_nt.c srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: Fix up name canonicalization (needed for krb5 keytab support later). Remove source_env handler (no longer used in any codepath). Jeremy. Revisions: srv_lsa_ds_nt.c 1.1.2.3 = 1.1.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_lsa_ds_nt.c.diff?r1=1.1.2.3r2=1.1.2.4 srv_lsa_nt.c1.52.2.18 = 1.52.2.19 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_lsa_nt.c.diff?r1=1.52.2.18r2=1.52.2.19 srv_spoolss_nt.c1.277.2.77 = 1.277.2.78 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c.diff?r1=1.277.2.77r2=1.277.2.78
CVS update: samba/packaging/Fedora
Date: Fri Jan 30 20:26:03 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Fedora In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12477 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 makerpms.sh.tmpl Added Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 smbusers Log Message: fix a few more bugs in Fedora scripts (files not getting installed) Revisions: smbusersNONE = 1.1.2.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Fedora/smbusers?rev=1.1.2.1 makerpms.sh.tmpl1.1.2.2 = 1.1.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Fedora/makerpms.sh.tmpl.diff?r1=1.1.2.2r2=1.1.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Fri Jan 30 23:37:38 2004 Author: abartlet Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13876/source/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_ldap.c Log Message: If we are setting the NT or LM password to NULL, remove the attribute rather than writing X Andrew Bartlett Revisions: pdb_ldap.c 1.28.2.100 = 1.28.2.101 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_ldap.c.diff?r1=1.28.2.100r2=1.28.2.101
