etire
from fileservice once this migration is finished. At the moment I have my
samba
server on the network in a bogus domain and of course there's no useful
communication.
The samba server is set up to use LDAP and is running 3.0.13 under Mandriva.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues
I tell you they're *very* interested
> in me spending all my time on Samba :-) :-).
I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your
working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the folks in Redmond or is
there more to it than that?
Chris
--
Chris Garr
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:42:03 -0800
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:54:52PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> >
> > I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your
> > working on S
st looked in my own config files and found:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF.
Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first place.
Should any of the others be removed as well?
an
old broken API, but if it really worked fine to an NT server, then there must
be something better we can do...if we just get more standard looking 8.3
mangling, that would help.
Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President
an
old broken API, but if it really worked fine to an NT server, then there must
be something better we can do...if we just get more standard looking 8.3
mangling, that would help.
Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President
server to the
local ldap server.
The only tricky part I can think of is that you'll have to make sure all four
sites use the same SID.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 1611-B West 6th Street
is morning
at 9:30 there was an error with the printer that claimed the user was btalbot
although kpotts was logged in at the time!
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX
= 1080325192
time(NULL) = 1080325192
write(8, "0o\2\1\2cj\4\34ou=Hosts,dc=borderent,d"..., 113) = 113
select(1024, [8], [], NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [8])
read(8, "0\37\2\1\2e\32\n", 8) = 8
read(8, "\1 \4\23dc=borderent,dc=com\4\0", 25)
cached on the NT box somewhere, probably in
the registry, but I have no idea where to look. Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
her fashion.
So how do I tell the NT4 box that it is *not* a DC? I don't understand why it
thinks it is one.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 51
o, my cohort, Jeff, is fairly certain that it wasn't a DC before.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don'
in
controller on the domain.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you h
ches
> the domain for a duplicate machine account? If it occurs after it
> searches the domain for another machine with the same name, you may want
> to delete the machine account from /etc/passwd and /etc/samba/smbpasswd
> (or whatever backend you are using... smbpasswd -m -x MACHINE_NAM
> From: "Chris Tepaske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:58:24 +1000
>
> Can you join other computers to the domain?
Yes, all the 2000 and XP boxes are fine. It's just this one box.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.Dee
domain and put them back in again. I've never thought it
was a samba problem and from the beginning thought that something bogus was
cached in the NT box.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
16
I have upgraded to 3.0.2a-2mdk in order to solve another issue, but this still
happens about once a day (but not always the same time). Can anybody suggest
a useful debugging strategy?
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:47:02 -0600
>
> n
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:33:06 -0700
>
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:07:29AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > I have upgraded to 3.0.2a-2mdk in order to solve another issue, but this still
> > happens about once a day
, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT
If Brad didn't solve this, I hope someone else has a clue for me.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
For the record, the clue was in the Account flags. The account needs to be a
machine account, not a user account. Oops.
Chris
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:46:56 -0500
>
> Brad,
>
> I found your posting of 2/20/2004
n several issues fixes since
> the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well.
> See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates.
...
> Binary packages are available at
>
> ~ http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/
Any idea when we might se
var/cache/samba3/browse.dat
[2004/05/18 10:28:08, 3] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_query_request(451)
process_name_query_request: Name query from 10.1.1.187 on subnet 10.1.1.1 for name
SHREDDER<00>
--
Chris Garrigues http
accountingiii (10.2.240.134)
(Don't let accountingiii and accounting3 confuse you.)
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
Hi,
I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office
and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use
when we know it isn't.
(BTW, there's a typo on the man page under "lock spin count". "acquired",
> From: Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:12:19 +0200
>
> Hi!
>
> Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office
> > and Lotus where the a
> From: Rashkae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 11:02:35 -0400
>
> I would start with smbstatus to see what workstation/user has the file
> open.
None.
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://ww
ccounting/Quickbooks/Point Meridian.QBI Wed May 26 10:10:03
2004
4191 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE
/export/pointmeridian/Accounting/Quickbooks/Point Meridian.QBW Wed May 26 10:10:02
2004
When she re-entered quickbooks it gave the usual error that the file was
already in us
F ~ K F N F H ~ 6 . D O C ~ $ N E L C O _ U . S . _ P e r s o n a l _ F i n a n c i a l . d o c x ¿@<Äù îM=Ä¿@<Ä¿@<Ä ¦ ~ W R L 2 6 9 8 . t m p Ô Òp =Ä cíM=Ä Òp =Ä Òp =ÄÓ t
code up a fix would you be willing
> to try a test version of Samba 3.0.x ?
I would. I get calls about this from users several times per day!
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Au
suffix = ou=people
ldap group suffix = ou=group
ldap machine suffix = ou=people
# generally the default ldap search filter is ok
# ldap filter = (&(uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))
# When the user changes his password, update ntPassword,
# lmPa
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500
>
> [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782)
> ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N
> o such object)
These lines ap
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:04:37 -0500
>
> > From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500
> >
> > [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_o
uns:0 frame:0
TX packets:47574112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
RX bytes:591919497 (564.4 Mb) TX bytes:2269551243 (2164.4 Mb)
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:02:07 -0700
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:00:48AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> >
> > ~sigh~ Thanks, but neither the server nor the switch are showing any netw
> ork problems.
> &g
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce it yet.
Got it!
Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch.
When you return, go to File>Save As... and click on "Save" to save it over
we've tried to figure things out. I
intend to turn them back on again.
> (What is your favourite color, what is the flight speed of a fully laden
> sparrow... :-) ?
Blueno red.
African or European?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~c
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:19 -0700
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:06:01PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > > From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:48:43 -0700
> >
http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500
>
> I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due
> to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at:
>
> http://www.trin
iolations" and it's set to "yes" by default (to emulate Windows
> correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with
> this parameter set to "yes". If you can, try setting it to "no" and seeing
> if the problem goes away.
Thanks!
m halfway there. It just failed with "defer sharing violations = Yes".
I've changed the flag to "No". Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day
to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put
it on my client's
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:01:55 -0500
>
> I'm halfway there. It just failed with "defer sharing violations = Yes".
> I've changed the flag to "No". Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try
k-old SVN, I'm running one from this morning.
Sounds like I should put this morning's SVN on their machine and leave oplocks
off.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin
r cwg (uid=200,
gid=203) (pid 23708)
[2004/06/29 15:00:46, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782)
ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such
object)
Do you want another debug level 10 report?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic S
es
[lp1]
comment = HP 1300 Printer
path = /var/spool/samba
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
The test case that I'm running is in the [homes] share.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:27:31 -0700
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > > From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700
>
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:54:53 -0500
>
> (I'm still trying to get a new debug log for you.)
Sorry this took a while, but unfortunately I have other responsibilities.
New log at
http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblog
T
he get back to
work on Tuesday, I'll declare this fixed by Wednesday.
Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the
beer that I owe you.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsi
f the beauties of open source software. If I found a bug in
commercial software, I don't think I could pay for the fix by promising to buy
someone a beer at an uncertain date in the future. Besides, who wants to
drink a beer with Bill Gates?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:25:23 -0500
>
> Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I
> are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to
> my
50 matches
Mail list logo
