to windows ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
this is wrong imho.
when you're authenticated you must see them.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
will need to make our version of gettext... :-)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
from samba.org
right ? Simo Sorce maintains those.
Nope Jerry, they are from Debian *Unstable*, I produce packages only for
debian *stable* (as Debian folks do not upgrade packages in stable).
So don't try dodge this problem by dropping it on me
... drop it on debian folks :-)
Simo.
--
Simo
;
+ tc = ((struct talloc_chunk *)ptr)-1;
+
+ return tc-context;
+}
Shouldn't we check the pointer was really allocated by talloc ?
something like:
if (tc-magic == TALLOC_MAGIC) {
return tc-context;
} else {
return NULL;
}
?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED
I've finally updated our debian repository adding 2.2.10 debs for woody.
They will be available in a few hours from your favorite mirror.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list
and ldb separate.
Could you do that to trunk as well?
Sure, will do today.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
Debian packages of the 3.0.5 security release are available on main
samba site.
In a few hours they should also be available on your preferred mirror.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
--
To unsubscribe
it exists in the group mapping db, we should not bother
winbindd here.
Andrew Bartlett
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=936nolog=1
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
are these obvious reasons?
Sorry but have followed the discussion around this problem only and
haven't seen the code, can you just put down 2 words?
Wouldn't it be better to be consistent and lett all backend behave the
same way?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http
/net_privilege.c'?
Volker
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Garofalo, 39 - 20133 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2953 4143 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
understand privileges yet, so
work around that by not failing if pdb_get_privilege_set fails.
Volker
Revisions:
auth_util.c 1.87 = 1.88
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/auth/auth_util.c.diff?r1=1.87r2=1.88
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l
for me is not a
too severe limitation.
Comments?
I agree.
I would be more strict and move all the mapping stuff on winbindd and
require it for this stuff to work out properly, but I'm a bit too hard
probably.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Garofalo
://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/dir.c.diff?r1=1.66.2.15r2=1.66.2.16
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Garofalo, 39 - 20133 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2953 4143 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 13:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:40:07PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
Why should admins see special files?
Afaik we did that to avoid problems with windows explorer trying to
reading from them and creating problems ...
Am I wrong?
The code
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 14:45, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Hence why it is always a good idea to look at the diff
first :-)
right, shame on me :-/
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Garofalo, 39 - 20133 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2953
!
Is this a way to do that ?
Thank you,
Raphaël
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
=1.86.2.44r2=1.86.2.45
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Urrraah! :-)
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed Aug 13 01:53:07 2003
Author: tridge
Update of /home/cvs/samba4
In directory dp.samba.org:/home/tridge/samba4-dist/samba4
Log Message:
first public release of samba4 code
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED
After users request I've just added the Release file to our Debian
packages rep on samba.org mirrors.
Hope this helps.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02
/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/passdb.c.diff?r1=1.151.2.31r2=1.151.2.32
pdb_tdb.c 1.58.2.20 = 1.58.2.21
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_tdb.c.diff?r1=1.58.2.20r2=1.58.2.21
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10
.
Revisions:
README.idmap-and-winbind-changes NONE = 1.1.2.1
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/README.idmap-and-winbind-changes?rev=1.1.2.1
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328
checks in winbindd to return failure
if we are a DC and the domain matches our own.
Jerry,
does this mean it will be more difficult to code use winbind_passdb on
PDCs in future?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix a memory leak in pdb_tdb.c.
Simo, I remember you complaining about a memleak there, could it be
this one, or did you resolve it at that time?
Can't remember exactly, may well be this one, thanks for the fix.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce
, shouldn't we have HEAD in sync
with SAMBA_3_0 ??
Should we make him commit to an old bracnh with unfixed bugs, and have
regressions later on?
If you
want it up to date there should be a wholesale 3.0 - HEAD
replacement.
Please do so if it is the only way.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL
, ME 04074
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (207) 885-5565
IBM tie-line: 776-9984
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
yesterday ...
I agree we should have to way to startup and shutdown the modules, as we
have to way to load it (preload and fork).
This is mandatory for modules that uses databases or other repository
they connect to through a socket or other communication mechanism.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:25, Simo Sorce wrote:
Eh, the shutdown stuff was just a thing, I was thinking yesterday ...
I agree we should have to way to startup and shutdown the modules, as we
have to way to load it (preload and fork).
to - two
This is mandatory for modules that uses databases
this feature!
90% of time I attach a gdb to get a backtrace, it wuold also speed up
development imho.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
the code so that it support both the old and this
method.
Will it be in 2.2.x serie?
I think it will not. But I think Jeremy can better answer you on this
one.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
might be discussed, this is my very
first attempt at LDAP schema design.
Well, on a 30-second reading, I have to say it looks good!
Thanks for putting the time into this,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
+dudDOmSXH9Mhhs8RAibwAJ9ML3KwV0BWGHjbP2PngS5OtKSUOwCfTicD
RGsJtCkOr2oEUI4fd93CWpQ=
=XlK0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
in the conf to tell samba which of
the 2 (passdb or system) to look for group membership until the new code
is ready.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
CL!
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 23:08, Ulf Bertilsson wrote:
I look into this in a few days.
Use www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba as mirror
I'm on vacation and don't have the info here.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158
the string it was processing would have been more useful!
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is to get a newer kerberos library, but MIT hasn't
released the latest kerberos, so it's up to you to get their snapshots,
or a recent heimdal.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442
I'd want to change
in the source to accomplish this?
Thanks.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
;
}
break;
default:
DEBUG(0, (Server's Role undefined due to
unknown security mode\n));
break;
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
for is exposed at least during
the browser election proccess,
but that is not enough since i am on a different subnet. NetBIOS is open
to those machines.
Is there a cmd line utility or source code for solaris/bsd/linux or
windows that can be used for that purpose?
thanx,
Agis
--
Simo Sorce
:
winbindd.c1.3.2.35 = 1.3.2.36
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd.c?r1=1.3.2.35r2=1.3.2.36
winbindd.h1.3.4.9 = 1.3.4.10
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd.h?r1=1.3.4.9r2=1.3.4.10
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL
samba-it
http://lists.xsec.it per iscriversi alla lista
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
domain = yes
is not supported
.. is there anything i can do ?
Simo Sorce [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
winbind,
so that we can use it in pdb and other subsystems of samba also.
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39
Message:
Make init_module() and thus smb_load_module() return an int.
modules/developer.c: init_module() should return an int
Revisions:
module.c 1.6 = 1.7
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/module.c?r1=1.6r2=1.7
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec
The trend was at converting to NT_STATUS where possible ...
Simo.
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 14:37, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:04:25PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote about 'Re: CVS update:
samba/source/lib':
Jelmer, what about returning an NT_STATUS error?
All of the current
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 22:35, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
torture/vfstest.c
we should use conn_new() instead of use malloc()
Right! Applied.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
(buf2));
return strcmp(buf1,buf2);
}
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Tridge request
Revisions:
team.html 1.28 = 1.29
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/sambaweb/team.html?r1=1.28r2=1.29
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 11:52, Simo Sorce wrote:
Yes, that what I , and before me Jean Francois, tought about that.
Furthermore I think the while it is certainly a possibility that MS
programmers made the transfer by string as a mistake, in realty I think
it has been on purpose, so
files _not_ present in user directory are taken
from the background dir, so that user created one are in foreground.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description
\arthur). Oh woe is me!
So my question is: which source code file is the one that actually opens
files in the unix file system ?
Additionally - is anyone else interested in the result ?
Regards,
Arthur Barrett
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
you can try to delete unexpected.tdb
it does not hold any vital information.
The problem has reappeared even after I removed the above file:
Feb 2 11:18:29 Fileserver nmbd
'server role = share' be?
Volker
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
and this version has definitev a problem with
Access 97 databases... *arg* And I'm not able to produce new debian
packages myself.
Any help is appreciated...
There are team packages for 2.2.7a on samba mirrors, just go to the
download section and search for them.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce
breaking users' 2.2 configs to
get this point across?
FWIW, this is the third time I've seen this issue come up with the 3.0
alphas.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
through ftp
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:17, Isdralit - CPD wrote:
How can I send ASCII's files from an AIX(UNIX) server to NT server,
not in binary mode by samba?
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442
.
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
simply have a system wide guest
account with no password and be fine with that.
or have the same user for all shares, having just 1 (or a few) user
instead of one for each person that connects to the server is a big gain
with large user bases.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via
as I'm all out of ideas.
Any help much appreciated!
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
Ok, I ordered by city name,
maybe I will reorder them by province, it may make more sense
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 01:43, Martin Pool wrote:
On 10 Jan 2003, Simo Sorce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uhmm what do you want to achive with these changes?
Most of these changes are made in response
/support/italy.html?r1=1.13r2=1.14
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
if not testing
the same against an NT/2k server. If the same happens there, then it is
normal.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
info on your environment?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
happens?
... uhmm seem we do not have a -d option in wbinfo ... but winbindd
have it
Try running winbindd with -d 10 and look at logs.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 21:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
If we do not want to have it so rigid, we may
talloc_free() and
talloc_realloc_strdup()
Does anybody else has an opinion on that???
If you want to use talloc you do not want to manage memory
If you want to manage memory you do not want to use talloc
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
So if unix extensions are true, then all
+0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
Jeremy,
in case of unix extensions, shouldn't we pass the symlink as is and not
resolve it?
Yes we do - if the client uses the UNIX extensions to
readlink. The problem is a UNIX extension client could
set a symlink on the server (which in a UNIX -- UNIX
scenario
is cleanely happy to have users and machines with the same name,
infact I think the whole machine$ thing has been done exactly for this
purpose, so that the user can have the same name of a machine as machine
has $ postpended.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:34, Kurt Weiss wrote:
Simo Sorce schrieb:
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 10:37, John H Terpstra wrote:
You can not have a machine name and a user name that are the same.
- John T.
Sorry john but seem you are wrong.
I've seen tons of setup made that way
link creations and also
returns link as is instead of resolving them.
I think a proper unix-like file system should be able to return links.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
);
}
-
+/* FIXME? Pedantically defensive progrmming might call for a second check for
(nwritten 0) here. */
if (tcount nwritten+numtowrite) {
DEBUG(3,(Client overestimated the write %d %d %d\n,
Ray Simard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simo Sorce
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 20:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
This is plain wrong
pdbedit can be used fine without a username
without username it simply fixes all the accounts
oops, fixes - works :-)
can you revert this one (note
pdbedit.c
Log Message:
Patch for coredump with missing arg from Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy.
Revisions:
pdbedit.c 1.39.2.7 = 1.39.2.8
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/pdbedit.c?r1=1.39.2.7r2=1.39.2.8
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/pdbedit.c?r1=1.63r2=1.64
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
own risk :-)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
think we fixed some bugs with dos times in 2.2.x series.
Btw why do you use smb to share beetwen 2 unix machines?
Currently nfs is still better as it respect unix semantics ...
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax
-4. and I've
had this weird behaviour confirmed by someone on OPN #redhat running a RH
8.0 system with samba 2.2.7.
wtf?
thx - ekkis
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 22:26, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:06, Simo Sorce wrote:
Can you send a backtrace?
Mine does not segfault (tough I'm using head not 3.0)
Simo.
simo:
how are you testing it?
I just rebuilt from SAMBA_3.0 (no debian patches or anything
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 23:49, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
Samba 2.2.3a has been realeased on february the 6th, they are 10 (ten)
months !!! And 2.2.7a contains *lot* of bugfixes that will make also
woody users a lot more happy.
Simo.
Well, there is this:
http
(and it does not have infact)
!!
Then run apt-get update.
apt-get install samba --simulate will show you what the installation
*would* do then.
Been there, done that.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
did you forgot a genparse.h
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
connect to a
share on my Debian (x86) box (kernel 2.4.19) running Samba 2.2.3a-12 for
Debian, the speed is only about a sixth as fast (transferring files to
or from the Win2k box is about 6 times faster).
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site
-2.2.7pre2-xsec1.rpm/deb (Xsec is my company and pre2 never
existed, I made it as I needed a special fix that was only in cvs).
Thanks a lot for your efforts!
Thank you,
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba Team- http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
fingers. I just noticed I
got some oplock errors day before yesterday, so time to downgrade again
and watch.
I can't not understand with debian cannot update packeges that are in
the stable version ... but that's a debian problem not samba related ...
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l
, condolences are all welcome.
karen
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
UNIX machine to another, just use NFS. It's
native to UNIX, so things like symlinks will work.
--
Michael Heironimus
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 23:24, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
I can't not understand with debian cannot update packeges that are in
the stable version ... but that's a debian problem not samba related ...
Well, I think I understand and approve of the reasons: it's so packages
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 00:06, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
That's fine with development versions, but samba stable is ... well ...
stable :-)
There's (at least) three other things involved here, though:
* Because upstream (samba developers) say something is stable may
+++ P++ t++
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(at
the moment ext3 rules because of the same initial error
of judgement) but tests so far were very encouraging -
oh boy, reiser really kicks butts, especially with log
on a separate spindle.
Maybe, but I would like to see some test before :-)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via
system, Redhat 8.0, also with no
problems. The SuSE 7.3 systems have been running non-stop since the
release of that version of the OS.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 16:33, Jim McDonough wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not.
JFS does have acls, and it even uses the same libs as XFS and ext3. See
http://acl.bestbits.at
wow, very nice.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec
------
Alex Lazarevich | Systems | Imaging Technology Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (217)244-1565 | www.itg.uiuc.edu
------
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130
go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via
hitting any filesize limit. Maybe setting
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_SPARSE would do it. Another approach... is there a
Windoze/filesystem combo with a filesize limit of 4G or less? That would
make this easy.
Try with a FAT filesystem, it should have a limit of 2 or 4 GB
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL
- Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
301 - 400 of 516 matches
Mail list logo
