So, is it correct to say that if we use ADS security, there is no
possibility of having any unauthenticated shares at all ?
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Madhusudan Singh
singh.madhusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for clearing that up. I would not want the AD to get involved at all
for this
Ok.
In my mind, guest access should be just that - no authentication.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2010 20:54, Madhusudan Singh singh.madhusu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have no control over the active directory. I just
On 22 October 2010 19:36, Madhusudan Singh singh.madhusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok.
In my mind, guest access should be just that - no authentication.
Well, I believe that it is. But that you need to enable the Guest
account in AD for it to be allowed.
I might be wrong, of course, but I think
On 10/22/2010 2:12 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
On 22 October 2010 19:36, Madhusudan Singhsingh.madhusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok.
In my mind, guest access should be just that - no authentication.
Well, I believe that it is. But that you need to enable the Guest
account in AD for it to be allowed.
Yes. I guess this is a question about whether share-wise security models can
be specified.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 October 2010 19:36, Madhusudan Singh singh.madhusu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok.
In my mind, guest access should be just that
Thanks for clearing that up. I would not want the AD to get involved at all
for this share anyways.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Mike Leone tur...@mike-leone.com wrote:
On 10/22/2010 2:12 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
On 22 October 2010 19:36, Madhusudan Singhsingh.madhusu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have no control over the active directory. I just authenticate a subset of
its members to give them access to the fileserver.
Does this mean that there is no true guest access when using ADS ?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 October
On 21 October 2010 20:54, Madhusudan Singh singh.madhusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have no control over the active directory. I just authenticate a subset of
its members to give them access to the fileserver.
Does this mean that there is no true guest access when using ADS ?
I do not
Seems pathetic to reply to my own message, but since I cannot find any
working examples via Google, I have to ask this question.
Should be simple enough for the resident gurus to answer ?
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Madhusudan Singh
singh.madhusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these possible ?
On 20 October 2010 17:52, Madhusudan Singh singh.madhusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems pathetic to reply to my own message, but since I cannot find any
working examples via Google, I have to ask this question.
Should be simple enough for the resident gurus to answer ?
I would guess you need to
Are these possible ?
I am trying to setup a guest access printer attached to a working fileserver
that authenticates its users against a Windows AD. I keep getting
authentication requests on attempting to connect to the printer.
Before I post my smb.conf, I need to know if what I am trying to do
11 matches
Mail list logo
