Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:20:26 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: [...] Looks like the tdb went over the 4Gb line. As a quick work around, Stop nmbd; rm /var/run/samba/unexpected.tdb; and start nmbd back up. No, this has never been a work-around. The problem comes up again VERY quickly.

Re: A Union of two directories

2003-02-04 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
At 01:29 04.02.2003 +1100, Arthur Barrett wrote: Hi All! I am new to Samba and this group and I have a question... My company wants to make a custom version of Samba which is capable of creating a share which is actually a union of two directories. ie: instead of the share \\samba\arthur being

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote: The system in question is a Debian i386 stable (3.0) system, kernel is 2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in use for shares exported via Samba!!), Samba is 2.2.7a (a Debian package that I created

RE: Samba 3.0alpha21, Windows XP SP1 and Kerberos authentication

2003-02-04 Thread Antti Tikkanen
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, P Ranjit Kumar wrote: I have been having this problem for a long time now. I have a few questions on how you have configured it. 1) How did you create the service principal host/machine.domain.com@REALM in Windows 2000 KDC? I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after

Re: A Union of two directories

2003-02-04 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
At 10:14 04.02.2003 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: At 01:29 04.02.2003 +1100, Arthur Barrett wrote: Hi All! I am new to Samba and this group and I have a question... My company wants to make a custom version of Samba which is capable of creating a share which is actually a union of

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-04 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back again. :-( So you could argue, Ok, it's EVMS then which is the culprit, because filesystem is on an EVMS logical volume. But I simply cannot believe

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-04 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back again. :-( Thanks nevertheless. As one resort, could you try use mmap = no Volker msg05756/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: A Union of two directories

2003-02-04 Thread David Lee
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: It would be fine to have config options for match witch files should be taken from with directory. something like this: dir1 path = /home/samba dir1 mode = readonly dir1 files = *.c,*.h,configure,Makefile dir1 exclude files = *.o

RE: Samba 3.0alpha21, Windows XP SP1 and Kerberos authentication

2003-02-04 Thread Luke Howard
I have been having this problem for a long time now. I have a few questions on how you have configured it. 1) How did you create the service principal host/machine.domain.com@REALM in Windows 2000 KDC? I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after I joined the machine to the domain. An LDIF

Re: A Union of two directories

2003-02-04 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:03, David Lee wrote: On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: It would be fine to have config options for match witch files should be taken from with directory. something like this: dir1 path = /home/samba dir1 mode = readonly dir1 files =

Printing server role in testparm

2003-02-04 Thread Volker Lendecke
Hi! Trivial patch, but for me quite useful. It was a surprise to see that simply saying 'domain logons = yes' (nothing in domain master) gives us ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC... Volker Index: samba/source/utils/testparm.c === RCS file:

[no subject]

2003-02-04 Thread mmessaoudi
Hi everybody, We are experiencing strange problems with shared printers on samba 2.2.7a (the same phenomenon was observed in 2.2.5). Printing from Win9x, WinNT, Win2k works. But when we try openning the printer, from Win9x and Win2K: ok From WinNT, we receive an Access denied Message. Here

Re: Win9x, samba 3, user list

2003-02-04 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
hello! Sorry for late reply :-( Here it is. Thank you! Richard Sharpe wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: Hello! I can't get users list on win 98 with current CVS, it says something like- try later. And I see this in log 2003/01/31 13:41:05, 1]

RE: Samba 3.0alpha21, Windows XP SP1 and Kerberos authentication

2003-02-04 Thread Antti Tikkanen
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Luke Howard wrote: I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after I joined the machine to the domain. An LDIF like this should work: Interesting. According to Microsoft documentation, the servicePrincipalName can never be modified over LDAP, only over RPC. Well, what can

Bottleneck with Winbind and NT ACLs in 2.2.7a

2003-02-04 Thread Michael Steffens
Hi, we are running a big Samba 2.2.7a server with Winbind (100 concurrent users, 600 id mappings created since then) since last weekend. It's running quite well! :) However, users are complaining about Samba being very slow when NT ACL support is enabled. I'm suspecting that winbindd is the

RE: Samba 3.0alpha21, Windows XP SP1 and Kerberos authentication

2003-02-04 Thread Luke Howard
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Luke Howard wrote: I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after I joined the machine to the domain. An LDIF like this should work: Interesting. According to Microsoft documentation, the servicePrincipalName can never be modified over LDAP, only over RPC. Well, what can

RE: 2.0.7-XP compability ?

2003-02-04 Thread Ulf Bertilsson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: I wonder what this means ?: error packet at line 878 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=32 You could grab the #defines from incluee/doserr.h /* Error classes */ #define ERRDOS 0x01

RE: 2.0.7-XP compability ?

2003-02-04 Thread Green, Paul
Ulf Bertilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asks: How can I best identify if this is in my os custiom posix wrapper, or an issue in the samba 2.0.7 core code ? I can give you a version of source/lib/system.c for 2.0.7 that has built-in tracing capabilities. We don't have truss on our system, so

RE: A Union of two directories

2003-02-04 Thread Esh, Andrew
Nice description Simo. It caused me to think. I can see two cases for the use of such a union. The first is where the user wants to make a foreground overlay which they can edit, where files are made read-write by copying from the background to the foreground. This appears the same as a normal

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote: The system in question is a Debian i386 stable (3.0) system, kernel is 2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in use for shares

Re: Patch for samba 2_2 for Stratus VOS

2003-02-04 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Paul Green wrote: Attached is a patch for the 2_2 branch of samba that makes changes similar to the ones I recently submitted to the head and 3_0 branches. I have tested it locally on VOS and it works as expected. I have also

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:37:17 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] Why should Samba be the ONLY (apparent) application that doesn't feel hap= py with=20 XFS over EVMS? I'm running Samba on XFS+EVMS (on Debian ;) with no problems. Even on buggy versions of XFS, I've never seen this error; I don't

RE: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000

2003-02-04 Thread MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Hi Garry, I missed that in the original post, thanks. Do you do a lot of printing? I seem to remember a problem involving smbd's remaining open because of print status requests or something that Jeremy Allison was working on, but I can't find it. Either way, I think upping your flocks table

Re: Win9x, samba 3, user list

2003-02-04 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: hello! Sorry for late reply :-( Here it is. OK, I wasn't precise enough. I was actually looking for a packet trace of the problem. You can obtain such with: tcpdump -i eth0 -s 1500 -w somefile.cap started before you try to retrieve the userlist.

Re: A Union of two directories

2003-02-04 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:03:36AM +, David Lee wrote: Way, way back in the days of SunOS 4.1.x, Sun had their translucent file service: tfs. (We never used this; I simply recall its existence.) Might this model be the sort of thing you are looking for? I see that the man pages for

Debian configure problems

2003-02-04 Thread Volker Lendecke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Probably this is more of a debian than a Samba problem. To compile Samba 2_2 CVS of today with acl support und Debian 3.0, I not only had to apt-get acl-dev but also attr-dev. For me it was not possible to compile acl-aware programs with -lacl

Re: Solaris fcntl CPU/Lock update

2003-02-04 Thread jra
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:38:31AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote: Here's gdb with bt from two processes 12279 and 12327 root@reiger# gdb /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd 12279 GNU gdb 5.0 Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and

Re: Solaris fcntl CPU/Lock update

2003-02-04 Thread David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:38:31AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote: Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 jra wrote: This is a much more interesting backtrace than the other. Why is smbd linking in pthread libraries ? smbd is *NOT* a

Re: Bottleneck with Winbind and NT ACLs in 2.2.7a

2003-02-04 Thread jra
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote: Hi, we are running a big Samba 2.2.7a server with Winbind (100 concurrent users, 600 id mappings created since then) since last weekend. It's running quite well! :) However, users are complaining about Samba being very

Re: [Samba] deleting symlinks only

2003-02-04 Thread Herb Lewis
The problem is not in teaching samba anything. When you delete a directory in windows explorer it doesn't just send a command to delete the directory. It recurses down the directory and first sends commands to delete each individual file and then sends a command to delete the directory. Samba

Winbind on HPUX 11, some small progress

2003-02-04 Thread Miles Roper
Hi All, Well, i've managed to enable some debugging in syslog, I had to put in /etc/syslog.conf ;*.debug on the syslog line. So at least I have an error which is being returned into syslog from winbind. This is what I get from winbind Feb 4 21:13:17 coastdr pam_winbind[20753]: Verify user

Dir with 900+ files look Empty

2003-02-04 Thread Greg Norris
Title: Dir with 900+ files look Empty I am running Samba on Linux RedHat 7.3. It is OK most of the time. We use it for our ViewCvs viewer. Problem is when there are files called cmd (god knows who created that one) and others with dot prefix the directory does silly things. With the

Re: Solaris fcntl CPU/Lock update

2003-02-04 Thread Pierre Belanger
Hello all, Andrew, true GDB is thread aware but I think last time I used it (back in ~ 1998) I was writing a multi-threaded application and I really remember like if it was yesterday: GDB was not thread aware at that time. I'm glad to hear it's now thread aware! I found the following if it can

Re: Solaris fcntl CPU/Lock update

2003-02-04 Thread Pierre Belanger
Jeff, Ok, you're using nss_ldap from PDAL to use /etc/nsswitch.conf like passwd: ldap files (or reverse) group: ldap files etc Right? (From what I recall that's what nss_ldap is used for). If you did not compile with Samba, it means that if you do ldd on smbd it should not print libthread or

[no subject]

2003-02-04 Thread stephan . theiler
Hi Together I have a problem with initialise the locking database. When i send the command the following command . unx10015# ./smbstatus -d -L I received the this message. using configfile = /tools/samba/samba-2.2.7/lib/smb.conf Opened /var/log/css/samba-2.2.7/locks/connections.tdb Failed to

[no subject]

2003-02-04 Thread stephan . theiler
Hi Together I have a problem with initialise the locking database. When i send the command the following command . unx10015# ./smbstatus -d -L I received the this message. using configfile = /tools/samba/samba-2.2.7/lib/smb.conf Opened /var/log/css/samba-2.2.7/locks/connections.tdb Failed to