$BL$>5Bz9-9p"("#Ds7H$N$40MMj"#%5(B$B%$%P!<(Be$B3t<02q<R(B$B$N?@8M$H?=$7$^$9(B

$B%5%$%H!J(Bhttp://www.samba.gr.jp/ml/sugj-tech/htdocs/200011.month/2061_2.rfc822$B!K4IM}

query

hi there, i m doing a projectto develop aNAS appliance for which i need to cutomize and compress the kernel size as much as i can and then integrate samba with that can anyone help me do that and how to go about it. Regards Ankit BhatnagarDo you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable.

winreg operations

greetings, I have setup samba 3.0 with redhat 7.2 . At the time of observing traces I came across winreg.Surfing net for many hours gave me hardly any information about winreg. I got this winreg - Windows Registry Provides clients with a remote registry interface that allows remote

Re: REPOST: Finding group members - fix to winbindd_ads.c

Ken Cross wrote: Currently, if you do WINBINDD_GETGRNAM to an NT domain using RPC, you get *all* the members of a group, whether primary or supplemental. The same call to an AD using LDAP just returns supplemental members. My patch causes the call to either an NT domain or AD to return the

RE: REPOST: Finding group members - fix to winbindd_ads.c

Michael: I don't disagree with anything you said. However, we currently get different results from a getgrnam/getgrgid depending on whether you net rpc join or net ads join. That, IMHO, is a Bad Thing. Thanks, Ken -Original Message- From: Michael Steffens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Ignoring printer errors

I'm wondering, why (in HEAD and 3.0) rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:_spoolss_enddocprinter_internal() doesn't handle any errors? It sort of makes sense if we don't check the output of running the unix 'lpr' command (due to the separate thread of execution), but now we have back-ends like CUPS, that

Re: REPOST: Finding group members - fix to winbindd_ads.c

Hello Ken, Ken Cross wrote: I don't disagree with anything you said. However, we currently get different results from a getgrnam/getgrgid depending on whether you net rpc join or net ads join. That, IMHO, is a Bad Thing. Agreed 100%, too! :) Wrote this because from previous postings I had

Re: query

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, ankit bhatnagar wrote: i m doing a project to develop a NAS appliance for which i need to cutomize and compress the kernel size as much as i can and then integrate samba with that can anyone help me do that and how to go about it. Ha ha ha. Great troll.

Re: Ignoring printer errors

Andrew Bartlett wrote: I'm wondering, why (in HEAD and 3.0) rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:_spoolss_enddocprinter_internal() doesn't handle any errors? It sort of makes sense if we don't check the output of running the unix 'lpr' command (due to the separate thread of execution), but now we have

Re: LSA Privileges

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found the GUI interface in w2k (its in local_security_settings-user_rights_assignment) and it looks like there are 34 currently. Strictly speaking, this GUI presents privileges and logon rights. In Windows 2000, the following logon rights are defined : Access

Re: winreg operations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, D Jemms wrote: samba implements RPC for winreg.is that mean samba creates total registry on server (like windows)? if yes,where is it kept ? if no, what operation does winreg perform ? Can anyone give me some insight view on

Re: Status of docs merge to 3.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to have a slightly different syntax in HEAD (XML compliant?) So,

Re: query

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:14:12AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, ankit bhatnagar wrote: i m doing a project to develop a NAS appliance for which i need to cutomize and compress the kernel size as much as i can and then integrate samba with that can

Re: LSA Privileges

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:04:52PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Marchand wrote: Sorry for being pedantic about that ;-) No, that's perfect. I really wondered what the 'get/setsystemaccount' functions do. That should be clear now. Thanks a lot! Volker msg05935/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: patch -- have samba_2_2 handle executable extensions

This is a patch for samba_2_2 that changes it to handle any executable extensions. A while back I submitted a similar patch for head and 3_0, which were applied in due course. Due to an error in the build_farm scripts, after this patch is applied, the samba_2_2 subcase within the action_build

Re: query

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:14:12AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, ankit bhatnagar wrote: i m doing a project to develop a NAS appliance for which i need to cutomize and compress the kernel size as

Re: Ignoring printer errors

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:35:01PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: I'm wondering, why (in HEAD and 3.0) rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:_spoolss_enddocprinter_internal() doesn't handle any errors? It sort of makes sense if we don't check the output of running the unix 'lpr' command (due to the

[PATCH] ADS changes for joining accounts w/o full Administratorrights

Hi! I have done some changes to enable users w/o full administrative access on computer accounts to join a computer into AD domain. The patch and detailed changelog is available at: http://www.itcollege.ee/~aandreim/samba This is a list of changes in general: 1. When creating machine account

Re: LSA Privileges

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:04:52PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Marchand wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for being pedantic about that ;-) Absolutely not! This explains a few issues I've had (and I am sure we could find yet more people in the same situation). -- cheers,

Re: missing config.h.in for CVS SAMBA_3_0?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Richard Bollinger wrote: OK... its just a pain because one of the platforms I automatically build from CVS on doesn't have the tools required to run autogen.sh, so I have to do some convoluted tricks to run autoheader and

Re: missing config.h.in for CVS SAMBA_3_0?

I still haven't heard a really good reason for the file being dropped from CVS. If we're on a crusade to delete any derivative files, why not drop configure as well? - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard Bollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Guenther

Re: missing config.h.in for CVS SAMBA_3_0?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Richard Bollinger wrote: I still haven't heard a really good reason for the file being dropped from CVS. If we're on a crusade to delete any derivative files, why not drop configure as well? It has been. jerry -BEGIN

Re: missing config.h.in for CVS SAMBA_3_0?

Oh... so it was. Nevermind. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard Bollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Guenther Deschner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba Technical [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:19 PM Subject: Re: missing config.h.in for

Samba 3.0: vfs_netatalk.c

There appears to be a typo in the atalk_rrmdir function. The function calls the built in scandir() function and tries to pass alphasort as its last argument. It complains about alphasort not being a declared variable. From what I understand of scandir that last argument is supposed to be

Re: Samba 3.0: vfs_netatalk.c

scandir() (and it's [alpha|version]sort() brethren) is a BSD/Linux-ism and therefore isn't very portable. Since this is in a VFS module (and therefore only optional) I guess this is ok. Anthony Liguori Linux/Active Directory Interoperability Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin E-mail:

Re: Ignoring printer errors

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 00:15, Michael Sweet wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: I'm wondering, why (in HEAD and 3.0) rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:_spoolss_enddocprinter_internal() doesn't handle any errors? It sort of makes sense if we don't check the output of running the unix 'lpr'

Re: Samba 3.0: vfs_netatalk.c

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 07:54, Anthony Liguori wrote: scandir() (and it's [alpha|version]sort() brethren) is a BSD/Linux-ism and therefore isn't very portable. Since this is in a VFS module (and therefore only optional) I guess this is ok. No, it's not really. Given all we really want

Re: Ignoring printer errors

Andrew Bartlett wrote: ... I'll volunteer my time with an IPP-Windows error code mapping function... Unless you have an official table we can (legally) get a copy of, I would suggest this method to find the 'correct' mapping: Well, there is no official table for mapping from IPP codes to

Re: LSA Privileges

On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main things to understand about privileges are: - logically each privilege is a string name and a set of SIDs associated with that string name. - The SIDs do not have to be group SIDs (they can, for example, be users) all kinds of SIDs

Re: msdfs referrals at share-level

Hi Guenther, Thanks for the dfsenum fix. I've checked it into HEAD and 3.0. The msdfs-proxy patch for 2.2 looks good too. I don't think it should be any different from the changes for 3.0? I won't be checking it into 2_2 CVS though as I understand that 2.2.8 is only a maintenance/bugfix/security