At 21:55 05.03.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to report the smaller of the two quotas?
Make this a BOOL for type 'group_quota' or even better an enum with
values 'USER_QUOTA, GROUP_QUOTA'.
I have allready defined an emun :-)
If you can repatch this against HEAD, and
At 13:13 05.03.2003 +, David Lee wrote:
In the devel/TODO there is a suggested coding project:
Rewriting Samba's current filesystem quota support as a VFS module.
I'm currently working on this
There has also just been another thread from someone requesting some sort
of
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 13:13 05.03.2003 +, David Lee wrote:
In the devel/TODO there is a suggested coding project:
Rewriting Samba's current filesystem quota support as a VFS module.
I'm currently working on this
There has also just been another
can assign separate quota to each share (the shares
are on the same HD partition):
- each user has a quota on the home share
- each not home share has its own quota
The only problem is that I can't see the quota in windows box. So I
modified the smbd/quotas.c to read the quota group associated
modified the smbd/quotas.c to read the quota group associated to the group
of the file/directory if the user quota result is 0 (zero). I added a
parameter to the function get_smb_linux_* to get an user or a group quota.
Wouldn't it be better to report the smaller of the two quotas?
I
is that I can't see the quota in windows box. So I
modified the smbd/quotas.c to read the quota group associated to the group
of the file/directory if the user quota result is 0 (zero). I added a
parameter to the function get_smb_linux_* to get an user or a group quota.
Wouldn't it be better to report
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
[...]
If you can repatch this against HEAD, and check with metze (Stefan
(metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]) on how this might conflict with
his work in this area. In particular, it might work out best that metze
picks this up into his patch.
