[Savannah-register-public] [task #15221] Submission of Reproducible paper template

Follow-up Comment #11, task #15221 (project administration): Great! What about files like .dir-locals.el? ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15228] Submission of Haed

Follow-up Comment #3, task #15228 (project administration): What versions of the GPL your package uses? (In any case, please include an exact copy of the GPL from gnu.org; don't modify it.) Then, Savannah is the software forge of the GNU Project; when using our hosting facilities, packages

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15221] Submission of Reproducible paper template

Follow-up Comment #9, task #15221 (project administration): It looks like you repeatedly miss some files. Wouldn't you mind to train on your approved GNU package, gnuastro? In its git, files like NEWS lack copyright and license notices. Could you check all files (as in `find . -type f`), and

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15227] Submission of PeaFactory

Follow-up Comment #2, task #15227 (project administration): Hi Ineiev, Source files should now contain copyright and license notices. Which of the dependencies is GPL incompatible? The Eclipse Jar compiler could probably be replaced, the others not. I thought the Java platform was no longer a

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15227] Submission of PeaFactory

Follow-up Comment #3, task #15227 (project administration): > Source files should now contain copyright and license notices. All files should contain them, not just "source files". What about giving the GNU Project due credit? Also, please include an exact copy of the GPL from gnu.org (in your

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15221] Submission of Reproducible paper template

Follow-up Comment #10, task #15221 (project administration): That was a good point! I had completely missed these files for a copyright notice. It is done . Thanks...

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15228] Submission of Haed

Follow-up Comment #2, task #15228 (project administration): I guess when it comes to code quality (very much alpha or beta version), and from the GNU coding standards it might be true that it does not follow them. So i guess i might kindly ask to leave it as non-GNU for now.