code analysis tool or a web application vulnerability scanner
instead of purchasing and deploying a WAF. Michael Date: Mon,
30 Jun 2008 09:17:34 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] CC: SC-L@securecoding.org Subject: Re: [SC-L] InternetNews
Realtime IT News - Merchants
Gunnar -- agreed. And for all the fake security in the
name of PCI going on right now out there -- let's also
keep in mind that it is completely valid and legitimate
to attempt to operationalize software security.
We scoff because to date it hasn't been done well (at all).
That is just as much a
-0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: SC-L@securecoding.org
Subject: Re: [SC-L] InternetNews Realtime IT News - Merchants Cope With
PCI Compliance
for the vast majority of the profession - slamming the magic pizza box in
a rack
is more preferable than talking
At 9:44 AM -0400 6/30/08, Kenneth Van Wyk wrote:
Happy PCI-DSS 6.6 day, everyone. (Wow, that's a sentence you don't
hear often.)
http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3755916
In talking with my customers over the past several months, I always
find it interesting that the
of purchasing
and deploying a WAF.
Michael
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:17:34 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: SC-L@securecoding.org
Subject: Re: [SC-L] InternetNews Realtime IT News - Merchants Cope With PCI
Compliance
for the vast majority of the profession - slamming
