Re: [Scidb-users] Schedule of development

2014-03-22 Thread Gregor Cramer
> My opinion: 9, 10, 11, 14, 18, 19 and 21 are not of > primary importance 9, 10, 11 (export to documents) may come after the first alpha release. 14 (internet update of player data) is nowadays a must, please consider that with the first alpha version the distributors (Debian, Arch Linux, ...) m

Re: [Scidb-users] Schedule of development

2014-03-20 Thread Gregor Cramer
> Do you setup a scidb tablebase server or do you plan > using something existing or it's just a configurable > option for whatever might be available? I'm using an existing server which allows online queries for everyone, Scid vs. PC is already using this server. > Can we take a snapshot of a ga

Re: [Scidb-users] Schedule of development

2014-03-20 Thread Drew Ferguson
Hey Gregor On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:55:46 +0100 "Gregor Cramer" wrote: > A rough overview about the development schedule, and the So you are going to be a little busy for a while :) Awesome schedule! On a rather trivial note - something I have been getting Scid to do for me of late... Can we t

Re: [Scidb-users] Schedule of development

2014-03-19 Thread Gregor Cramer
Hi Paolo, thanks for your response. > About the tablebase support, did you consider > linking to an online tablebase service? Yes, querying an online tablebase server is included in this support as the primary choice. > Those tablebases are getting so huge that local > support might not be pract

Re: [Scidb-users] Schedule of development

2014-03-19 Thread Paolo Casaschi
About the tablebase support, did you consider linking to an online tablebase service? Those tablebases are getting so huge that local support might not be practical. Finding a way to host the tablebase online and querying from scidb for the relevan position might be a lot more effective. On Wednes