Subject: Re: question regarding the future
Try Springdale Linux (formerly PUIAS), it was started long before CentOS.
PU-IAS = Princeton University - Institute for Advanced Study
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__springdale.math.ias.edu_=DwIDaQ=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:59 PM Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 03/05/2019 08:19, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Red hat can limit access to its source RPMs to its paying customers
>> and prevent free rebuilds
>
> Although Red Hat have an extensive end user licence agreement, it is
> generally accepted that no terms
On 03/05/2019 17:51, Olek Proskurowski wrote:
Unless IBM decides to charge "modest" download fee.
On 03/05/2019 08:19, Tom H wrote:
Red hat can limit access to its source RPMs to its paying customers
and prevent free rebuilds
Whilst it is true that Red Hat could legitimately limit access to its source
code to authorised users of its software, I don't think this could or would
prevent free
hursday 2nd May 2019 21:48
> To: David Sommerseth
> Cc: scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
> Subject: Re[2]: question regarding the future
>
> I know it's two words, it has become muscle memory for some reason
> to type redhat instead of Red Hat or maybe because of seeing seeing
&
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:17 PM David Sommerseth
wrote:
> First of all, it is Red Hat (two words) :)
Yes!
:)
> But I don't really understand this Red Hat scepticism.
Anti-corporate world attitude?
> What would Red Hat, even from a commercial standpoint, win by
> crippling CentOS or its
I know it's two words, it has become muscle memory for some reason
to type redhat instead of Red Hat or maybe because of seeing seeing
the domain redhat.com come across my screen alot :)
I see your point as in why would Red Hat want to cause users to move from
rpm based distros to deb based
On 27/04/2019 14:15, Maarten wrote:
> Hello fellow SL users,
>
> I having been using SL for a while now, after the CentOS project became
> part of Redhat I was glad that I was using SL because I would think that
> CentOS would become a middle testing ground for Redhat to test new things,
>
From: David Sommerseth
On 28/04/2019 22:42, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 4/28/19 11:03 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 02:15:42PM +0200, Maarten wrote:
>>> Hello fellow SL users,
>>> I having been using SL for a while now, ...
>>> there will be no SL8...
>>> the future
Bill Maidment writes:
> If anything does go awry in the future, I do not see major science
> institutions sitting back and doing nothing about it. Maybe even SL
> would then arise again? Call it Phoenix?
My personal guess is that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to
again create a Linux
On 4/28/19 11:03 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 02:15:42PM +0200, Maarten wrote:
Hello fellow SL users,
I having been using SL for a while now, ...
there will be no SL8...
the future [?]
I look at the future throught the mirror of today's problems.
And today's
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 02:15:42PM +0200, Maarten wrote:
> Hello fellow SL users,
> I having been using SL for a while now, ...
> there will be no SL8...
> the future [?]
I look at the future throught the mirror of today's problems.
And today's problems in the RH/CentOS/SL universe do not
; Sent: Sunday 28th April 2019 3:55
> To: scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
> Subject: Re: question regarding the future
>
> I still find it uncertain of what might happen in the future, changes
> can take more then a couple of years to develop.
> Also with IBM having boug
I think this misses the point.
SL was a major 'security blanket' for the uncertainty that was
happening with RedHat essentially taking control of CentOS. People were
not sure which way things were going to go, so SL filled the gap.
As time has passed, RedHat has done the right thing so far
Try Springdale Linux (formerly PUIAS), it was started long before CentOS.
PU-IAS = Princeton University - Institute for Advanced Study
Hello fellow SL users,
I having been using SL for a while now, after the CentOS project became
part of Redhat
I was glad that I was using SL because I would think that CentOS would
become a middle
testing ground for Redhat to test new things, getting the idea SL would
stay closer to the
16 matches
Mail list logo
