On 09/16/2016 06:10 PM, Nelson Liu wrote:
Perhaps my experience is skewed, but I've found that lots of newcomers
have difficulty finding something to work on; we'd probably want to
improve ourselves in that regard if we were to expect a significant
amount of new contributions from this prog
On 09/16/2016 06:02 PM, Jacob Schreiber wrote:
I think it's always good to get more contributors, even if they only
add small amounts of code and disappear. However, I'd be worried about
people submitting low quality PRs in order to claim "success" and/or
not following up.
One month is a reas
> I'm not sure I want to add a label.
+1 on this. I'm also a bit wary of low quality pull requests, but I don't
think it will be that common of an occurrence.
Perhaps my experience is skewed, but I've found that lots of newcomers have
difficulty finding something to work on; we'd probably want to
I think it's always good to get more contributors, even if they only add
small amounts of code and disappear. However, I'd be worried about people
submitting low quality PRs in order to claim "success" and/or not following
up.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hey all.
>
Hey all.
Wdyt (see below)? I'm always for new contributors ;) - Though it does
add overhead.
I'm not sure I want to add a label, but being on the page seems a good
thing, I think.
Adny
Forwarded Message
Subject:Featuring scikit-learn in Hacktoberfest 2016
Date: F
