On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> * The joblib tests do not seem to be running. I'll see what I can do about
> it.
Actually, that was easy: it was simply that I had screwed up last time
that I updated joblib, and forgot to remove the executable bit:
https://github
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:01:03AM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> If we think that it's worth updating our arpack clone and copying the
> test suite from scipy, I'd be happy to prepare a PR. It would make our
> arpack port more stable and increase our test coverage by ~500 lines,
> which is a
2012/7/26 Jake Vanderplas :
> Hi,
> On 07/26/2012 02:37 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>
>> Awesome! I just want to thank the team: after I sent this email a lot of
>> different people pitched in and we are now with a coverage level that is
>> above where we were a couple month ago:
>> https://jenkins.
Hi,
On 07/26/2012 02:37 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Awesome! I just want to thank the team: after I sent this email a lot of
> different people pitched in and we are now with a coverage level that is
> above where we were a couple month ago:
> https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/scikit-learn/job/pyth
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> > > Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of
> > > the
> > > code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
>
> > This email discusses how
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> > Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
> > code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
> This email discusses how to do something about
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 07:37:54PM +1000, Robert Layton wrote:
> Thanks for the workflow -- I was not aware of it before!
> I'll do some tests for the Spectral clustering now.
Thanks Robert, that's extremely useful.
As a general rule, we are in dire need of maintenance and improvement of
existin
On 24 July 2012 19:32, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> > Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
> > code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
>
> This email discusses how to do something about this.
>
> I am
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
> code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
This email discusses how to do something about this.
I am not sure that everybody knows the efficient workflow to imp
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:07:57AM +0200, Lars Buitinck wrote:
> >>> Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
> >>> code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
Yeah. We get a lot of pull requests, but they are seldom about increasing
test coverage. Actually, I must confe
2012/7/21 Olivier Grisel :
> I have no tests failing on my box and neither on jenkins. It's just
> the coverage that is decreasing. Please report your failures as bug
> reports or on the mailing list.
Excuse me. I'll try to write some reports when I find the time; the
problem is I usually encounte
2012/7/21 Lars Buitinck :
> 2012/7/21 Andreas Mueller :
>>> On 07/20/2012 11:18 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
>
> Thanks, I was just about to ask here whether it's normal that more
>> Btw you can increase test-coverage by installing PIL (or whatever is
>> used by scipy.misc.imread)
>> on jenkins ;)
> @SkipTest?
>
The dataset test are skipped if it is not possible to load images.
--
Live Security Vi
2012/7/21 Andreas Mueller :
>> On 07/20/2012 11:18 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>> Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
>>> code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
Thanks, I was just about to ask here whether it's normal that more and
more tests seem to be failing
On 07/20/2012 11:43 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 11:18 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
>> code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
>>
>> https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/scikit-learn/job/python-2.7-numpy
On 07/20/2012 11:18 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
> code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
>
> https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/scikit-learn/job/python-2.7-numpy-1.5.1-scipy-0.10.0/
>
> We should be careful not to fo
Hi all,
Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/scikit-learn/job/python-2.7-numpy-1.5.1-scipy-0.10.0/
We should be careful not to follow that trend for the next pull request reviews.
--
Oli
17 matches
Mail list logo
