hi,
I don't get the problem with this docstring.
it would be great to merge:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/3176
Alex
--
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
hi,
I don't get the problem with this docstring.
it would be great to merge:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/3176
Alex
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kyle Kastner kastnerk...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks like it would fix the issue with autochosen n_nonzero_coefs -
which
Hi
Here the update of my latest blog post.
http://maheshakya.github.io/2014/06/01/lsh-forest-with-sorted-arrays-and-binary-search.html
It is about the proposed LSH forest implementation.
Regards,
Maheshakya
--
Undergraduate,
Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Faculty of
Typo in the link. Found it here:
http://maheshakya.github.io/gsoc/2014/06/01/lsh-forest-with-sorted-arrays-and-binary-search.html
Ken
On Jun 1, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Maheshakya Wijewardena pmaheshak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Here the update of my latest blog post.
Oops. Sorry. Forgot to commit after editing.
Thanks.
Maheshakya
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Ken Geis geis@gmail.com wrote:
Typo in the link. Found it here:
http://maheshakya.github.io/gsoc/2014/06/01/lsh-forest-with-sorted-arrays-and-binary-search.html
Ken
On Jun 1, 2014, at
Hi,
Just to summarize the situation and to avoid confusion.
There are mainly two things where I was focusing my attention.
1 - Nipals PCA (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_component_analysis#The_NIPALS_method
)
This is a good alternative to SVD and it is much faster in situations where
Hi scikit-team
I am sorry that I was not aware that weekly posts were a requirement for
GSoc 2014. Fortunately I have been notified to start announcing my
weekly progress.
Although I am posting regular updates in this link:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/3204, I have also
I don't believe that weekly posts are a requirement of GSoC, but (Daniel
and I as his mentors) we have asked Maheshakya to do posts at least weekly.
So don't worry, but do keep posting regularly!
On 2 June 2014 09:28, Issam issamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi scikit-team
I am sorry that I was
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:43:38AM +1000, Robert Layton wrote:
I don't believe that weekly posts are a requirement of GSoC, but (Daniel and I
as his mentors) we have asked Maheshakya to do posts at least weekly.
They are a requirement of the PSF.
G
IIRC, weekly post are not a GSoC requirement but they are a _PSF_
requirement, and since scikit-learn is participating to GSoC under the
PSF umbrella, the requirement applies to us. I think it's great
incentive to think of your work in terms of what you could show to
others. No matter how
OK, thanks for the update -- they are a weekly requirement.
On 2 June 2014 09:48, Vlad Niculae zephy...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, weekly post are not a GSoC requirement but they are a _PSF_
requirement, and since scikit-learn is participating to GSoC under the PSF
umbrella, the requirement
Thank you for clearing this up!
On 6/2/2014 2:53 AM, Robert Layton wrote:
OK, thanks for the update -- they are a weekly requirement.
On 2 June 2014 09:48, Vlad Niculae zephy...@gmail.com
mailto:zephy...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, weekly post are not a GSoC requirement but they are a _PSF_
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:27:34AM +0100, Luca Puggini wrote:
This is a good alternative to SVD and it is much faster in situations where we
have a lot of variables and we are interested only in a small number of
components.
This is a well known and tested algorithm and I was actually
Hello,
In the past I've found it extremely useful to inspect internal (non-leaf)
nodes of sklearn DecisionTrees (especially the root nodes).
However, at some point a small code optimization was made and now values of
internal nodes are no longer stored:
you can see the code that avoids storing
14 matches
Mail list logo
