Re: Register new scm provider

2009-10-26 Thread Brett Porter
It should not be in the lib directory. You should add it under the build extensions. - Brett On 24/10/2009, at 4:56 AM, Lee Freyberg wrote: Hi, How do you go about registering a new provider? I have created a stub impl following the instructions on the scm site, and placed the its jar i

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-31 Thread Brett Porter
r 2009 05:02:15 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: 1) Create a JIRA ticket under SCM 2) you might like to submit a CLA - you can do it regardless, and if the work is accepted such a large chunk would probably require it (see http://www.apache.org/licenses/ and specifically http://www.apache.org/li

Re: AW: NPE with maven-changelog-plugin and git

2009-03-30 Thread Brett Porter
What version of Maven? I think prior to Maven 2.0.7 it was hardcoded to p-u 1.1. - Brett On 30/03/2009, at 10:23 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi Imran! Having only looked over your log quickly, it seems to me that this is not a git-scm problem: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.codehaus.p

Re: svnjava provider and maven scm

2009-03-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/03/2009, at 9:05 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: So I have moved back the provider to sandbox and start a fork here [1] If someone want to have karma ping me. I suggest we just remove the provider from the sandbox then rather than have the ambiguity. - Brett -- Brett Porter br

Re: svnjava provider and maven scm

2009-03-20 Thread Brett Porter
without the library, and give suitable warning on the impact of turning it on as an optional bit of Maven SCM for those that can use the license. Regardless, I closed the issue since Olivier moved it out. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svnjava provider and maven scm

2009-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
profile and making sure it is not in the aggregating POM. It can always go to mojo, but I think it'd be a shame to have to separate it, so it's worth asking. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svnjava provider and maven scm

2009-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
es.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-08 Thread Brett Porter
/2009, at 12:50 PM, Grant Gardner wrote: Hi, I've got my AccuRev provider to a point where both the release plugin and Continuum are working (for me). Includes unit tests and tck tests for all the implemented commands. How do I go about contributing the code?. Grant. -- Brett Port

Re: create a branch from a tag

2008-10-14 Thread Brett Porter
reate a branch from a tag without checkout the tag. > Is it planned to add this feature (can't find a JIRA on it ?) > > Thanks, > Benoit > -- Brett Porter http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Extending maven-scm with remote commands

2008-08-27 Thread Brett Porter
>>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 >>> >>> Here my +1. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -- >>> Olivier >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > With best regards, > Alexey Kakunin > -- With best regards, Alexey Kakunin -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: convenience POM for "standard" providers?

2008-08-17 Thread Brett Porter
Done (SCM-400). I excluded the "local" provider. I also update the SCM plugin POM to use it. - Brett On 15/08/2008, at 9:04 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote: +1 Vincent 2008/8/14 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, Dan brought this up on #maven IRC - he was looking for

convenience POM for "standard" providers?

2008-08-14 Thread Brett Porter
into other builds conveniently? Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: SCM website

2008-08-13 Thread Brett Porter
/maven.apache.org/scm/ (some links could be broken) It used src/site in all projects and we need to remove the maven-scm-site project. WDYT? Cheers, Vincent -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svn commit: r685168 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-site/pom.xml

2008-08-12 Thread Brett Porter
maven-scm-site @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ apache.website - scpexe://people.apache.org/www/maven.apache.org/scm + scpexe://people.apache.org/www/maven.apache.org/scm-$ {pom.version} -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Remove some files

2008-08-12 Thread Brett Porter
ED]>: Hi, I noticed that the trunk has some files like: LICENSE.TXT NOTICE.TXT checkstyle-license.txt Are they useful? If not, WDYT to remove them? Cheers, Vincent -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: when will maven-scm-1.1 be released?

2008-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
and I will provide patches. LieGrü, strub __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail. Dem pfiffigeren Posteingang. http://de.overview.mail.yahoo.com -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Should remote or "local" command be used to List, Changelog and etc. commands?

2008-05-30 Thread Brett Porter
, Remeslennaya 17-415, 197110, Russia Phone: +7 (812) 498-72-21 Mobile: +7 (921) 301-77-13 -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: About info command

2008-05-25 Thread Brett Porter
ussia Phone: +7 (812) 498-72-21 Mobile: +7 (921) 301-77-13 -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Are you going to support get_file command in the future?

2008-05-19 Thread Brett Porter
regards, Sergey Zakusov -- Software Developer, EmDev, St.-Petersburg, Remeslennaya 17-415, 197110, Russia Phone: +7 (812) 498-72-21 Mobile: +7 (921) 301-77-13 -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Extending Maven SCM Interfaces

2008-05-19 Thread Brett Porter
provider may return, for example not basic ChangeSet - but extended ChangeSet, and programs, required it - will able to use them. So, is it possible somehow contribute our changes into maven core and that we should do from our side for it? -- With best regards, Alexey Kakunin --

Re: svn commit: r653572

2008-05-08 Thread Brett Porter
nce in an accompanying notice file. - I believe it is OK to set version to "1.1-SNAPSHOT" Generally we start out with 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Yep, but we can change it to 1.1-SNAPSHOT now since it's been included in the main distribution. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porte

making a 1.1 release

2008-05-07 Thread Brett Porter
nclude at this stage for a final release? Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svn commit: r645182

2008-05-06 Thread Brett Porter
eported by Matthew Bucket - currently work in progress), plus the patch in SCM-374 still needs to be applied to the apache SVN. Signed CLA is otw. LieGrü, strub --- Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: On 06/04/2008, at 7:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jvanzyl Date: Sat

Re: svn commit: r645182

2008-05-05 Thread Brett Porter
d me. Given the size of this contribution, I think it would be helpful for both these guys to submit CLAs - especially given Eugene contributes to the embedder too. Jason? Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: When will SCM bug 323 be released?

2008-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone think a 1.0.1 release with the current fixes might be in order? - Brett On 05/01/2008, at 4:42 AM, brewk9 wrote: I see this is fixed - just wondering how/when it would be available in a release? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-will-SCM-bug-323-be-relea

Re: build failures on JDK 1.4

2007-09-24 Thread Brett Porter
Never mind - you got it :) On 25/09/2007, at 7:51 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Thanks Dennis! SCM API is fine, there seem to be new problems in the providers though. I'll take a look. On 25/09/2007, at 6:42 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Should be fixed now. We'll need to check the

Re: build failures on JDK 1.4

2007-09-24 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks Dennis! SCM API is fine, there seem to be new problems in the providers though. I'll take a look. On 25/09/2007, at 6:42 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Should be fixed now. We'll need to check the results in Continuum later. Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Is SCM meant to support

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
On 28/03/2007, at 2:37 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I added two development guide in the site, it would be cool if you can look at it. The docs look good - thanks for that. I have some questions about the SCM manager part: it's unclear about how getScmManager is used. It looks like somethi

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
I think it's definitely time for another beta ASAP. For 1.0, I'd still like to review (if not include) the following JIRAs. High priority: - SCM-17: I think the test structure needs some review, and we need to ensure all unit tests run fast and without the software installed. The TCK should

Re: Post 1.0 release process

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
On 28/03/2007, at 7:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 27 Mar 07, at 12:30 PM 27 Mar 07, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I describe there (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SCM/Maven-SCM +Release+Process) the release process and scm structure I'd want to use after the release of 1.0. This is mi

Bazaar test failures

2007-01-14 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, There appears to be a test failure in Continuum for Bazaar now that I have the client installed again. This is bzr-0.13, Python-2.5, Solaris 10 x86. http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/surefireReport.action? buildId=2367&projectId=202&projectGroupId=16#org.apache.maven.scm.provid

Re: Synergy Provider

2006-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, This is great to hear. For code of this size, I think it is wise to have a software grant on file before we accept it. Please submit the following paperwork to the ASF secretary: http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt In addition to that, please attach the code to a JIRA ite

wiki

2006-09-04 Thread Brett Porter
FYI, I've removed anonymous commenting ability on the SCM wiki and removed all the comment SPAM on the SCM matrix. - Brett

Re: Setting svn properties or how to avoid problems with line endings

2006-04-28 Thread Brett Porter
I disagree with having a general property set/get since that appears to be SVN specific at the moment. Regardless of setting NL's correctly, you still need to indicate whether a file is binary or not. SVN takes a good guess (but doesn't set the property), CVS doesn't even attempt to guess. W

Re: svn commit: r397253 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-api/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/scm/ScmFileSet.java

2006-04-26 Thread Brett Porter
Carlos Sanchez wrote: now the behaviour is consistent between empty lists and non empty if we want to make the list unmodifiable, both should but not just the empty one as before Yes, I agree both should be unmodifiable (I have intellij set up to complain at me now when I leak that though I do

Re: svn commit: r397253 - /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-api/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/scm/ScmFileSet.java

2006-04-26 Thread Brett Porter
Doesn't that seem a bit leaky to you? Why is an external entity modifying the files list directly? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: carlos Date: Wed Apr 26 10:48:41 2006 New Revision: 397253 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397253&view=rev Log: Prevent problems when returning an unmodif

Re: Adding a directory recursively

2006-04-26 Thread Brett Porter
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett Porter a écrit : Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I think it would be good to add this method and it's easy to do. For svn, we must check if : - .svn directory exist in directory for subversion - CVS directory exist in directory for CVS - .bzr directory exi

Re: Adding a directory recursively

2006-04-26 Thread Brett Porter
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I think it would be good to add this method and it's easy to do. For svn, we must check if : - .svn directory exist in directory for subversion - CVS directory exist in directory for CVS - .bzr directory exist in directory for bazaar - nothing to do for file provider - do

Re: Java version policy

2006-04-06 Thread Brett Porter
Torbjorn Smorgrav wrote: > Do we have a Java version policy? > I guess we are targeting 1.3? > > Cheers > Torbjørn > 1.4

Re: PVCS and Maven

2006-03-28 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks for contacting us. This is certainly welcome - nobody is better positioned to write this code than you are, and that is a good thing for users of PVCS that use Maven and/or Continuum. I'd just like to add that we can only accept code donations that are licensed under the Apache License 2.0

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Maven SCM Bazaar Provider

2006-03-24 Thread Brett Porter
on -c "import cElementTree" > > Torbjørn > > > > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24. mars 2006 08:03 > To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Maven SCM Bazaar Provider > &g

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Maven SCM Bazaar Provider

2006-03-23 Thread Brett Porter
Any ideas on this? bzr 0.7 seems to be properly installed now. Can the output of the tests be improved? - Brett Continuum Build Server wrote: > Online report : > http://ci.codehaus.org/continuum-maven/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/66/buildId/714 > Build statistics

Re: [vote] Add Torbjørn Smørgrav as Mav en-SCM committer

2006-03-08 Thread Brett Porter
Got 6 x +1's here. Time to move forward? Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Hi > > I'd want to add Torbjørn Smørgrav as Maven-SCM committer. > He's the maintainer of bazaar scm provider and have done a good work on > it and TCK. > He want to maintain it in next year (at least). > > Here my +1 > > Emmanu

Re: Tests of 1.0

2006-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
Some more feedback. Again, sorry I didn't get this to you earlier. - since Bazaar, VSS, etc are "partially implemented", according to the site, should they be omitted from this release? Or do they do enough to be useful? Can we list what is implemented and what is not? - why is the login package

Re: Tests of 1.0

2006-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
Other test failures: ClearCase checkout: junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...c...> but was:<...C...> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81) at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87) at org.apache.maven.scm.provider.clearcase.command.

Re: [vote] Release Maven-SCM 1.0 final

2006-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
I think it's a good idea, or at least mark them deprecated. If this release goes out with them in, you have to keep them working forever :) - Brett Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > I'm not sure. I know all these methods are deprecated since a long time. > You can provide a patch but i don't know if i'll

Re: Tests of 1.0

2006-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
Currently, the Bazaar provider tests fail for me under Windows (I have Bazaar installed in Cygwin). IT is only the status command that fails. junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Check result was successful, output: at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) at junit.framewor

Re: [vote] Add Torbjørn Smørgrav as Mav en-SCM committer

2006-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
+1. That looks like some great work. - Brett Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Hi > > I'd want to add Torbjørn Smørgrav as Maven-SCM committer. > He's the maintainer of bazaar scm provider and have done a good work on > it and TCK. > He want to maintain it in next year (at least). > > Here my +1 > > E

Re: [vote] Release Maven-SCM 1.0 final

2006-02-27 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Emmanuel, It seems everyone is happy with this vote given the time and feedback so far. I'm going to review this tomorrow before adding a +1. I'm sorry I didn't dedicate time to it sooner. Is it possible that the code can be stabilised for 24 hours before actually cutting the release to give e

Re: Questions about adding a new SCM implementation

2006-01-29 Thread Brett Porter
You should have to do one of the following: - add the dependency on the new provider to the maven-scm-plugin pom.xml - in your pom, add it as part of the scm plugin declaration: maven-scm-plugin org.apache.maven.scm maven-new-scm-provider 1.0-SNAPSHOT We're

Re: Where are scm releases deployed?

2006-01-08 Thread Brett Porter
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > The Maven 1.x repository doesn't really exist any more. Everything is > supposed to be served via the Maven 2.x repository. I'm just fixing that > now. > > > When I noticed it, I think we had always two distinct repositories. > I forgot to verify it when y

Re: Where are scm releases deployed?

2006-01-08 Thread Brett Porter
il now nobody replied. > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSCM-68 > > cheers, > > Arnaud > > On 1/8/06, *Brett Porter* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote: > > I was going to say m1 == m2 repo, but it appears that'

Re: Where are scm releases deployed?

2006-01-08 Thread Brett Porter
I was going to say m1 == m2 repo, but it appears that's not the case here. I have to figure out what's going on. - Brett Mike Perham wrote: > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/scm/ > > I guess the beta releases have not been sync'd to m1. > > -Original Message- > From: Den

Re: [vote] Mike Perham as a committer to Maven SCM

2005-12-02 Thread Brett Porter
+1 Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Hi, > > Mike works on Perforce provider. > This is a vote to make him a committer. > > +1 from me. > > Emmanuel >

Re: Exercising more commands?

2005-11-30 Thread Brett Porter
Once the provider is ok, it can be dropped into a 1.0.2 install, though? Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > so, Perforce won't be support in continuum 1.0.2 > > Mike Perham a écrit : >> I don't have time to do this right now. It'll have to wait until we >> deploy continuum here internally. >> >> -Ori

Re: Exercising more commands?

2005-11-29 Thread Brett Porter
The best way is to implement the TCK methods (some of which may not exist yet). Mike Perham wrote: > How do I exercise the commands which are not used by the release plugin? > I'm thinking mostly of the diff and changelog commands - are there any > m2 plugins that use these commands? > > mike >

[jira] Created: (SCM-75) messages are logged twice

2005-11-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
messages are logged twice - Key: SCM-75 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-75 Project: Maven SCM Type: Bug Components: maven-scm-provider-cvs Reporter: Brett Porter running scm:update on the wadi project was logging everything

[jira] Created: (SCM-74) users for scm:update instead of the one in the checkout

2005-11-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
Reporter: Brett Porter this is problematic with a :ext:ssh: checkout, and a :pserver: connection, as it gives the cryptic error "password is required" (which should be explained more anyway about doing a cvs login, or even use plexus-interactivity to do the login step) -- This

Re: no such provider 'clearcase'

2005-11-17 Thread Brett Porter
You can also add it within the plugin tag in your pom Emmanuel Venisse wrote: you need to update the release plugin pom and rebuild it. you need for release plugin tag, checkin, checkout, update remove and status commands. Emmanuel

[jira] Closed: (SCM-59) the mojo should refers to pom to pickup connectionUrl

2005-10-07 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-59?page=all ] Brett Porter closed SCM-59: --- Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version: (was: 1.0-alpha-4) > the mojo should refers to pom to pickup connection

[Fwd: commit messages]

2005-10-05 Thread Brett Porter
fyi --- Begin Message --- Subversion commit messages are sent to different lists according to the following mapping # Maven [/maven] for_paths = maven/ to_addr = commits at maven.apache.org suppress_if_match = yes [/maven/continuum] for_paths = maven/continuum/ to_addr = continuum-commits at mav

[jira] Created: (SCM-50) flesh out the SCM provider interface

2005-07-24 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
flesh out the SCM provider interface Key: SCM-50 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-50 Project: Maven SCM Type: Task Components: maven-scm-api Reporter: Brett Porter Fix For: 1.0-alpha-2 instead of having an

[jira] Created: (SCM-49) bring ScmManager back to maven-scm proper

2005-07-24 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
bring ScmManager back to maven-scm proper - Key: SCM-49 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-49 Project: Maven SCM Type: Task Reporter: Brett Porter Assigned to: Emmanuel Venisse Fix For: 1.0-alpha-2 we should

Re: scm plugin(build test failures with m2

2005-06-25 Thread Brett Porter
I've seen all these before, but I can't remember how I got them. For the number of files, I thought I fixed a bug - it was uncommitted. I'm putting it in now - svn updated your code. For the bytes difference - this was experienced by someone using CVSNT on windows (it works with Cygwin). We'd

Re: Adding a new provider

2005-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
Can you explain what you mean by "recognised"? Where are you using it? If you want it to be part of the build, include it in in maven-scm-providers/pom.xml. If you are talking about having it available at runtime - it will depend on what application you are using it with. It just needs to be

[jira] Created: (SCM-41) username configuration not used for svn+ssh

2005-06-02 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
username configuration not used for svn+ssh --- Key: SCM-41 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-41 Project: Maven SCM Type: Bug Components: maven-scm-provider-svn Reporter: Brett Porter Fix For: 1.0-alpha-2

[jira] Created: (SCM-40) username as part of svn+ssh url not accepted

2005-06-02 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
username as part of svn+ssh url not accepted Key: SCM-40 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-40 Project: Maven SCM Type: Bug Components: maven-scm-provider-svn Versions: 1.0-alpha-1 Reporter: Brett

Re: Flaw in maven-scm-api command line expansion

2005-05-26 Thread Brett Porter
We discussed this online already... it is very hard to do an "excludes" without this happening. The best way to handle it would be to: - just use the directory name when all children in the directory are included - for checkin, only pass files that are modified - not allow excludes on some opera

Re: PVCS and Maven

2005-05-26 Thread Brett Porter
Richardson, Simon (Treasury) wrote: Jason van Zyl replied to my post to maven users regarding PVCS support in Maven. I understand from this post that you're now focusing efforts on SCM support within Maven SCM. I assume this is in relation to M2? I'm working with Maven 1.0.2 and hope to retro

Re: starteam changelog's dateformat issue

2005-05-25 Thread Brett Porter
I think you may just have to hard code the format, but only if the locale is en_US. Can you test en_AU and see if it works? (We reverse the day and month in the date, would be interested to see whether that makes a difference here). - Brett dan tran wrote: Folks, starteam history command

[jira] Closed: (SCM-27) The SVN provider doesn't pass the tests

2005-05-04 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-27?page=all ] Brett Porter closed SCM-27: --- Resolution: Fixed > The SVN provider doesn't pass the tests > --- > > Key: SCM-27 > URL: http

[jira] Created: (SCM-30) clean up dependencies

2005-04-07 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
clean up dependencies - Key: SCM-30 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-30 Project: Maven SCM Type: Task Reporter: Brett Porter - move ScmTestCase out to provider-test instead of being in API - check over the dependencies (plexus

[jira] Closed: (SCM-27) The SVN provider doesn't pass the tests

2005-03-30 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-27?page=history ] Brett Porter closed SCM-27: --- Fix Version: (was: 1.0-alpha-1) Resolution: Fixed Assign To: Brett Porter fixed two problems: - bad svn add command line - bad checkout directory >