[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Alan Burlison
Stephen Hahn wrote: >> That's not exactly what I meant, what I was asking was if a person has >> commit rights on a project that delivers to ON, do they automatically >> get ON commit rights, or do they explicitly need to be granted ON commit >> rights in addition to their project-level rights?

[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Alan Burlison
Stephen Hahn wrote: >> We also have the issue of who actually grants commit rights - is this >> going to be by a central body, or are the GCs and projects that make up >> ON going to manage their own committers? > > Both. I've been warning projects that seek to integrate into a > consolid

[scm-migration-dev] 355 pbchk should warn presence of new tags (non-local) or branches.

2007-12-04 Thread vijay.balakris...@sun.com
Author: Vijay Balakrishna Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm Latest revision: 104924f4c0bf7960770f6f9d042244851cb9441e Total changesets: 1 Log message: 355 pbchk should warn presence of new tags (non-local) or branches. Files: update: usr/src/tools/onbld/hgext/cdm.py

[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Richard Lowe
Stephen Hahn writes: > * Alan Burlison [2007-12-04 19:09]: >> Stephen Hahn wrote: >> >> >>We also have the issue of who actually grants commit rights - is this >> >>going to be by a central body, or are the GCs and projects that make up >> >>ON going to manage their own committers? >> > >> >

[scm-migration-dev] [Bug 391] cdm should check for merge turds.

2007-12-04 Thread bugzilla-dae...@np.grommit.com
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391 richlowe at richlowe.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|scm-migration- |richlowe at richlowe.net

[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Alan Burlison [2007-12-04 19:09]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > >>We also have the issue of who actually grants commit rights - is this > >>going to be by a central body, or are the GCs and projects that make up > >>ON going to manage their own committers? > > > > Both. I've been warning proje

[scm-migration-dev] [Bug 393] webrev should show parent node, no matter what.

2007-12-04 Thread bugzilla-dae...@np.grommit.com
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393 --- Comment #2 from richlowe at richlowe.net 2007-12-04 10:46 PDT --- http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richlowe/scm_393/ Would demonstrate what I mean (with one comment fixup, and an attempt to get rid of the often incorrect "Comments from" noise

[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Alan Burlison [2007-12-03 22:19]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > >>The problem we have is that we have no reliable way of identifying Sun > >>employees in the current OSO database. There is a employee_id column, > >>but there's nothing to check it is filled in correctly, or even at all. > >>Emai

[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Alan Burlison
Richard Lowe wrote: >> And as for commit roles, it is still completely unclear how commit >> rights are going to be allocated - for example are these managed >> centrally for all ON committers, or does each project that contributes >> to ON manage its own pool of committers? In the absence of

[scm-migration-dev] Mercurial, Subversion and identity

2007-12-04 Thread Alan Burlison
Jim Walker wrote: >> That is why the new database schema distinguishes between different >> classes of SCA - if we know a particular person is covered by a Sun >> SCA, we also know that their 'reference' will be a Sun employee ID, >> and that could be checked against the corporate LDAP database