James C. McPherson wrote:
> Alan Perry wrote:
>> When I run hg pbchk, I get the error:
>>
>>> Comments check:
>>> These bugs/ARC cases were not found in the databases:
>>> PSARC 2008/317
>> The case is in the PSARC case directory
>> (/net/sac/export/sac/PSARC/2008/317). Can I safely ignore this
Alan> So I am good to go with just this pbchk issue?
Your issue should be resolved now. There were two problems:
1. The arc.py script that our tools use had a pointer to an old path
for the CSV file where the ARC data is kept. I corrected that
around 2 this afternoon.
2. A bug in a differ
So I am good to go with just this pbchk issue?
-original message-
Subject: Re: Comment check issue
From: Richard Lowe
Date: 09/08/2008 13:34
Alan Perry writes:
> James C. McPherson wrote:
>> Alan Perry wrote:
>>> When I run hg pbchk, I get the error:
>>>
Comments check:
These bugs/AR
Alan Perry wrote:
> When I run hg pbchk, I get the error:
>
>> Comments check:
>> These bugs/ARC cases were not found in the databases:
>> PSARC 2008/317
> The case is in the PSARC case directory
> (/net/sac/export/sac/PSARC/2008/317). Can I safely ignore this error or
> do I need to resolve
Alan Perry writes:
> James C. McPherson wrote:
>> Alan Perry wrote:
>>> When I run hg pbchk, I get the error:
>>>
Comments check:
These bugs/ARC cases were not found in the databases:
PSARC 2008/317
>>> The case is in the PSARC case directory
>>> (/net/sac/export/sac/PSARC/2008/
James C. McPherson wrote:
> Alan Perry wrote:
>> When I run hg pbchk, I get the error:
>>
>>> Comments check:
>>> These bugs/ARC cases were not found in the databases:
>>> PSARC 2008/317
>> The case is in the PSARC case directory
>> (/net/sac/export/sac/PSARC/2008/317). Can I safely ignore this
When I run hg pbchk, I get the error:
> Comments check:
> These bugs/ARC cases were not found in the databases:
> PSARC 2008/317
The case is in the PSARC case directory
(/net/sac/export/sac/PSARC/2008/317). Can I safely ignore this error or
do I need to resolve this first?
alan
