Re: [Scons-dev] sconsign database discussion

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 6:02 PM Mats Wichmann wrote: > > I did get a quick implementation going, and the informal timing I did on > that were somewhat disappointing. Disappointing for SQLite or for pickled dict? Is there still an easy way to do SCons benchmarks and share them? -- anatoly t.

Re: [Scons-dev] sconsign database discussion

> There's been some discussion of making sconsign be a "real" database, > not least because the "dump the entire dictionary (pickling as we go) to > database on exit" behavior is pretty irritating - quite a slow operation > if you didn't do any work. Can we start with some digits? Otherwise how

Re: [Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

/it, so maybe it can still be used? scons scons-local -- /path/to/where/I/want/it On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:54 PM Bill Deegan wrote: > > no more likely > scons SCONS_LOCAL_DIR=/path/to/where/I/want/it scons-local > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:50 AM anatoly techtonik wrote: &g

Re: [Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

location to build the scons-local and > not copy it after it's been constructed. > Seems a much simpler method. > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:03 PM anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:13 PM Bill Deegan wrote: >> > >> > yes. it be

Re: [Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

e asked to discuss it first. > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:01 AM anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 12:23 AM Bill Deegan >> wrote: >> > >> > probably should be on the users mailing list. >> >> Not really. I want to add a featur

Re: [Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

But it will be be a patch for https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/master/SConstruct On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:02 PM Bill Deegan wrote: > > THis belongs in scons-user mailing list. Moving it there. > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:33 AM anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> On Sun

Re: [Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

hat you want.. https://scons.org/doc/4.0.1/HTML/scons-user/ch11.html Looks like installation is just a copy. Or is there something I missed? > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:33 AM anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> Is it possible to create a build command that will copy

Re: [Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 7:12 PM Mats Wichmann wrote: > > > > Is it possible to create a build command that will copy > > SCons local to the target directory? > > > > SCons/ -> /path/to/project/SCons/ > > scripts/scons.py -> /path/to/project/scons > > > > I haven't used SCons for a while

[Scons-dev] scons copyto /path/to/project

Hi. Is it possible to create a build command that will copy SCons local to the target directory? SCons/ -> /path/to/project/SCons/ scripts/scons.py -> /path/to/project/scons I haven't used SCons for a while and I don't remember how to create phony target "copyto" and handle path

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:52 AM anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> Any voting options for non-Twitter people? >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:23 PM Bill Deegan >> wrote: >> > >> > https://twitter.com/SConsProject/status/1169688929903230976?s=

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Any voting options for non-Twitter people? On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:23 PM Bill Deegan wrote: > > https://twitter.com/SConsProject/status/1169688929903230976?s=20 > ___ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org >

Re: [Scons-dev] Fwd: SourceForge Project of the Week January 7th, 2019

Without absolute digits it is hard to tell if it is not the result of exodus of other projects to GitLab etc. =) On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:54 PM Mats Wichmann wrote: > > On 1/13/19 9:24 PM, William Deegan wrote: > > FYI! > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: Joan Uy Ang > >

Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 4:12 AM Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > I think SCons would be making a serious mistake if it dropped support > for Python 3.5. Just because the distro is using an older version of > SCons, doesn't mean that SCons shouldn't support the latest version of > Python available on

Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 7:39 PM Russel Winder wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 13:54 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > > […] > > > > Regardless I think we've covered the bases in this discussion and > > let's > > revisit Jan 2019 to see what makes sense. > > The thoughtful discussion is much

Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 7:18 PM Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > > Pretty certain Gary's with me in saying, > SCons will support Python 2.7 and 3.5+ in (at least) the 3.x releases. > Most likely through (at least) the end of 2018. > > > Yes, absolutely. SCons is used by lots of people on older legacy

Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub

; Or use something to render the wiki sources onto a "normal" website via > travis or buildbot or other? I use https://www.netlify.com/ for both building and hosting static content. Render wiki sources on the web site with added edit button, yes. > > -Bill > > On Fri,

Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:16 PM Mats Wichmann wrote: > > On 07/20/2018 05:57 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > And add https:// to URL at the top https://github.com/SCons/scons for > > the same reason. > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 5:31 PM anatoly techtonik > > wro

Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:14 PM Russel Winder wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 16:13 +0800, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:43 AM Jonathon Reinhart > > wrote: > > > > > > No way. Distros (e.g. Debian 9) package Python 3.5. > > >

Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub

And add https:// to URL at the top https://github.com/SCons/scons for the same reason. On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 5:31 PM anatoly techtonik wrote: > > Long time no see. =) > > Is there a plan to move website sources to https://github.com/SCons/web ? > > And setup redirect from htt

[Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub

Long time no see. =) Is there a plan to move website sources to https://github.com/SCons/web ? And setup redirect from https://www.scons.org/ to https://scons.org/ for consistency? -- anatoly t. ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org

Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:43 AM Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > No way. Distros (e.g. Debian 9) package Python 3.5. They are not going to upgrade to SCons 3.x, so it is safe. https://packages.debian.org/stretch/scons > >> Downside is longer ci iterations and using more resources from the > >>

Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Github Project renamed from SConsProject to SCons

Awesome. ) More proposals from my side. 1. SCons repos need `scons` label to compete in this list: https://github.com/topics/scons 2. SCons website need to be moved to GitHub as well: https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons-new-website https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons-website This should probably be

[Scons-dev] Site News Update

Hi, Nice to see things are moving. I wonder why site is not updated with new info? Is it hard or just not included in any release checklists? http://scons.org/tag/news.html -- anatoly t. ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

. > But removing docbook (which isn't easily possible anyway because our doc > toolchain relies on it currently) would save us only 2MB roughly. > > Regards, > > > Dirk > > > On 24.09.2017 10:50, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 bri

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

Just removing docbook-xsl-1.76.1 brings compressed repository size from 110.50 MiB down to 10.45 MiB https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9068127 On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote: > HI Bill. > > History is ok, but repository size

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

convert-git/commits/master/src/script/scons.py >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Must be the conversion from multiple heads to one, and the current one >>

[Scons-dev] SCons run phases

Hi, I've tried to explain how SCons run works. Please, tell me that I wrote everything correctly. https://stackoverflow.com/documentation/scons/10170/scons-run-phases -- anatoly t. ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org

Re: [Scons-dev] .scons/

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 15:18 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> I am thinking about introducing project level .scons/ >> directory located in the same directory as top level >> SConstruct. >

Re: [Scons-dev] Windows executables

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:22 AM, William Blevins wrote: > Team, > > I have a really dumb question (probably). Dumb questions are the most interesting. =) > Some of the SCons tests that execute binaries have code to check whether or > not the platform is win32. If win32,

Re: [Scons-dev] pip install scons

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Alexandre Feblot wrote: > Hi, > > Supporting multiple versions at the same time will be required as soon as a > SCons release breaks compatibility. If you want your older product sources > built with an old SCons to keep building, you need to

Re: [Scons-dev] Hg vs Git

To sum up my opinion - I am not against going to Git+GitHub, but only when current repository history is cleaned up of the garbage, such as DocBook templates and is kept small of that garbage and binary files. SCons repository size shows that it is untidy mess.

Re: [Scons-dev] Hg vs Git

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > All, > > So it sounds like (from limited consensus), that switching to Git now, would > remove a significant barrier to contributing code/fixes? No. Let's run a Git mirror and see how many fixes will end up there. HG

Re: [Scons-dev] Two questions…

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > 1. Is there a good reasons for having Perl code in our SCons > repository? Where? > 2. Is there a good reason why we have lots of Python code in XML files? > > Oh and… > > 3. Is there any reason why we should not

Re: [Scons-dev] pip install scons

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > One question for the user base would be if anyone uses this ability anymore? > If not, good let's drop it. > > I'm all for moving to a pip based install as the primary method, with > scons-local still supported. >

Re: [Scons-dev] Repository README file

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had a read over of the README.rst file recently to make sure > it is still up to date and correct? No, but if you're going to proofread this, making a small commit to README.rst with a note that it

Re: [Scons-dev] Release 2.5.0

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Anatoly, > > Why would they be rebuilding the cache? > The contents are the same, it's simply the directory structure which > changes. > > Most users use the cachedir because building the contents thereof is >

[Scons-dev] Missing site entry for 2.5.0

Hi, I can barely keep up with amount of incoming mail, so I can't reply timely to all threads. Sorry. Today I noticed that 2.5.0 available from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SCons is not announced on releases page http://scons.org/tag/releases.html -- anatoly t.

Re: [Scons-dev] pip install scons

Here is SO bug https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14296531/what-does-error-option-single-version-externally-managed-not-recognized-ind I think that the culprit is that SCons historically allowed to install multiple versions of itself side by side. Maybe that's not actual anymore? On Thu, Mar

Re: [Scons-dev] Release 2.5.0

Migration won't help old clients who will be rebuilding the cache. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:44 PM, William Blevins wrote: > Automatic migration sounds legit to me. I just didn't want a SCons option > for it or something like that :) > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM,

Re: [Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

d I don't remember having a backup for it. > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:26 PM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> If I remember correctly MoinMoin is file based, so every page is a >> separate file. No? >> __

Re: [Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

If I remember correctly MoinMoin is file based, so every page is a separate file. No? ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] Mercurial remote tracking

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 21:57 +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > […] >> Catching magical bugs from merges that join code that was too far >> away causes much more extra work than just rebasin

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:57 AM, William Blevins <wblevins...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> >>> Hi,

Re: [Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 31.01.2016 13:23, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/ParseConfig is missing, >> referenced from >> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/UsingP

Re: [Scons-dev] Mercurial remote tracking

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 13:12 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> […] >> >> Qt allows to build beautiful interfaces. Don't you agree with that? > > As does GTK+3, Cocoa, wxWidgets, et

Re: [Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 16:51 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > […] >> >> Was it a code? Or a documentation? > > Not sure, but I have always thought pkg-config support was missing from >

Re: [Scons-dev] On the state of CI

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 13:15 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> […] >> >> Drone looks dead for me. Not sure if dead drones want money much. >> Have >> you tried to offer it that mon

[Scons-dev] Formula for CacheDir MD5 calculation

Hi, In https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/302/change-the-cache-to-use-2-character/diff it looks like CacheDir() can grow endlessly and needs to be purged from time to time. The PR propose a migration script for build cache, but I think it is useless if the cache needs to be purged

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tests bottleneck (Re: CI, Semaphore, Shippable)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:03 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> >> wrote: >> > I have asked Drone for spec

Re: [Scons-dev] On the state of CI

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 11:57 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> > […] >> No surprises. Do you have a default branch for testing SCons on >> drone.io? >> Mine is here: >> >>

[Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

Hi, https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/ParseConfig is missing, referenced from https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/UsingPkgConfig By the way, is there a tool for SCons that can do the job of pkg-config? Looks like it is a simple parser, no? -- anatoly t.

Re: [Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 15:23 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/ParseConfig is missing, >> referenced from >> https://bitbucket.or

Re: [Scons-dev] On the state of CI

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > I have a Drone.io account and have set up a Python 2.7 test CI on it > for my SCons__Python3 repository and the python3-port branch. It's very > red. No surprises. Do you have a default branch for testing SCons on

Re: [Scons-dev] Mercurial remote tracking

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > HgView shows remote tracking branches. AFAIK mercurial doesn't have remote tracking branches. So what is the purpose of this letter? Inform about a bug in HgView or there is some deeper rationale behind that? > Pity

[Scons-dev] SCons tests bottleneck (Re: CI, Semaphore, Shippable)

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > I have asked Drone for special dispensation for long test times for > SCons repositories. Have you tried to measure what exactly takes so much time and if it is possible to do something about it? -- anatoly t.

Re: [Scons-dev] Longer term plans

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > Should we be looking to add type hinting to the SCons codebase. I > suggest the answer is yes, the only question is when. After we the mess with site and release announcements is cleaned up. For example, I can not find

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons.org website up

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Greetings, > > We've refreshed the website. > Please let me know if you find any issues/comments/suggestions for > improvement. News - http://scons.org/tag/news.html 1. don't have dates 2. not a front page anymore

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons developer DVCS survey

I am 1 of 2 people out of 11 who still prefer Mercurial. OMG. =) I wonder why Mercurial is considered bad. Is it just a poor user experience with BitBucket or there is something more in it? On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > All, > > Please take a

Re: [Scons-dev] A new architecture...

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > > the discussions about new features in SCons during the last weeks, have led > me to start working on some architectural changes > for SCons. They aim at refactoring the module/package structure, such that > it's possible to

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:27 PM, William Blevins wrote: > I'm not opposed to a CoC; I'm just a skeptic neutral party. > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Tim Jenness wrote: >> >> >> > On Dec 10, 2015, at 09:59 , Gary Oberbrunner

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Tim Jenness wrote: > >> On Dec 10, 2015, at 09:59 , Gary Oberbrunner wrote: >> >> I don't see it that way. I see it as a proactive, positive step. >> > > +1 > >> Look, right now there's a lot of, well, not-so-nice people

Re: [Scons-dev] A new architecture...

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Anatoly, > > On 28.12.2015 15:24, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> [...] >>> >>> Right now it is: >>> >>> 1. problem: some not good enough support >>>

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Anatoly, > > In the entire history of SCons we've only had a small handful of instances > where any of the proposed CoC's might have been violated. > So infrequent I can't remember the last one. > > That said, if you

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > I don't see it that way. I see it as a proactive, positive step. > > Look, right now there's a lot of, well, not-so-nice people in the world. > Many of them hang out online. This isn't PC, it's a fact of modern

[Scons-dev] python-for-android

http://python-for-android.readthedocs.org/en/latest/quickstart/ I don't have any Android projects, but I thought that the builder by the link above is a pretty good fit for a SCons tool. In ideal world I would join a company who uses Python and Android to try and bring those two together (along

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Alexandre Feblot wrote: > Hi, > Call me the Grinch, but I have the feeling there are 2 kinds of people in > the world: > * those who behave naturally, who don't need such written CoC because it is > obvious for them, And they are also +1,

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > As Bill reported, people start to ask for a CoC when looking at a project. What are their motivations? 1. "I am acting according to rules. I want to know if your rules match those that I am acting." 2. "I am too vulnerable. I

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > All, > > Perhaps it's a good idea to add an official code of conduct for SCons. > http://blog.codinghorror.com/the-hugging-will-continue-until-morale-improves/ > > The following site seems to provide a reasonable

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons running on pypy?

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > There is an existing framework "timings" though right now the data reporting > is a bit broken. > http://buildbot.scons.org/timings > > The records have subversion versions and mercurial SHA's as the index and > are

Re: [Scons-dev] Multiple heads in repository

eleases changes in it but not > submitted. Then I submitted those. > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:22 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Seems ok now. What went wrong? >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsu

Re: [Scons-dev] Tests for SCons.Debug

simply answered the questions asked, you wouldn't have wasted > anyone's times including your own. > And if you'll simply answer the questions asked now, in the pull request, > I'm sure we can get it merged. > > But if you continue to be argumentative, I'm likely to spend my time on less

Re: [Scons-dev] Multiple heads in repository

I'll take a look. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:31 PM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Looks like something is wrong with release process. >>> Bitbucket reports multipl

[Scons-dev] Tests for SCons.Debug

Hi. We can't make this merged, and I am wasting my emotions on useless discussion instead of doing something useful for SCons. Please tell me if you find it useful to write the test for the following debug function, because I definitely don't see it as such:

Re: [Scons-dev] Would requiring Python 2.7.4 or above be a problem for future release?

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Greetings, > > To drop the requirement for pywin32, it may be necessary to require python > 2.7.4 or above. Where this conclusion comes from? -- anatoly t. ___

[Scons-dev] Argumentation for Python 2.6 support removal

Hi, Do we have any list specific incompatibilities with Python 2.6? What was the main reason for that sign. I am asking because it seems to me that consensus is being reached based on feelings instead of data, and that looks like a death spiral to me. -- SUPPORT FOR PYTHON VERSIONS BEFORE

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons running on pypy?

I guess the main question is how to run that performance comparison? On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Greetings, > > Is anyone running SCons on pypy? > Any anecdotal performance comparison data? > > Thanks, > Bill > >

Re: [Scons-dev] Would requiring Python 2.7.4 or above be a problem for future release?

2.4 On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:27 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> > wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> To drop the requirement for pywin32, it may be necessary to require

Re: [Scons-dev] Show source SConscript on error

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Jason Kenny wrote: > A node can be used in many different files. The creation of a node is more > like: > > > > Env.File() => env.fs.file() => look up file in fs tree, if not found > create a new one. > But who creates the actual node -

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.4.1 available via pypi

https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SCons/ And what about previous versions? I remember there ability to see this in PyPI. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > All, > > Now you can do : pip install scons and get the latest version. > Enjoy! > -Bill >

[Scons-dev] Multiple heads in repository

Hi, Looks like something is wrong with release process. Bitbucket reports multiple heads in default branch. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/src/tip/LICENSE?at=default=file-view-default -- anatoly t. ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org

Re: [Scons-dev] Show source SConscript on error

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Jason Kenny wrote: > The node for hello.c does not exist until the Program builder function is > called. Is calling Node subclass constructor is the only way nodes are created? I want to try keep track on them and make sure that every node is

Re: [Scons-dev] Show source SConscript on error

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Likely that means every Node would have to be annotated with the source > file and line it came from? > That could be quite memory intensive. > Make it optional? =) ___

Re: [Scons-dev] Show source SConscript on error

Try https://ci.appveyor.com/project/nlprocby/rhvoice/build/1.0.9 On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> wrote: > No permissions to view the log file.. > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:32 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> >

Re: [Scons-dev] Show source SConscript on error

age and a non-zero exit status. > > -Bill > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Try https://ci.appveyor.com/project/nlprocby/rhvoice/build/1.0.9 >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Bill Deegan <b..

[Scons-dev] Show source SConscript on error

Hi, I was looking at this build log (see also below) https://ci.appveyor.com/project/YauhenMinsk/rhvoice/build/1.0.8 and noticed that there is no way to tell whan SConsript complains about missing target. Do we have this info at all? If yes, why it is not shown by default? ...

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <ga...@oberbrunner.com> wrote: > Comments inline. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:52 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <ga...@oberbrunne

[Scons-dev] SystemPlatform (Was: SCons tools refactoring progress)

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jason Kenny wrote: > My point here is that I think Scons would be a more robost system if for > example we add some form of the Parts SystemPlatform object to Scons as > this become a common and standard way to express an important concept in

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Jason Kenny wrote: > > I would hope that the concepts I talked about here are something we can > find common ground on and talk about defining some common name for. I know > this is a large e-mail, However I like very much some thoughts about

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:57 PM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> > wrote: > >> I'm thinking that some combination of bugs in the bug tracking system + >> wiki to capture

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <ga...@oberbrunner.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> I see the implementation, but I don't see any use cases. I know it sounds

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons tools refactoring progress

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Vasily wrote: > so I wanted to see if there was something on the SCons side of things I > can look at for inspiration. Well, the current message about missing Visual Studio on Windows is a great source of inspiration to me. =) --

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Florian Miedniak < florian.miedn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thought about using JIRA? It's free for open source projects and very > intuitive to use IMO while being very flexible, if you need it. Nice > integration with bitbucket, confluence and version control system

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:17 PM, William Blevins wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > >> On 24.09.2015 20:01, William Blevins wrote: >> >>> I took a quick peek. Couldn't log in with demo/demo. I got an invalid >>> page address

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:03 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > > Maybe worth sticking in a scons bitbucket repo? > > > […] > > A DVCS repository is indeed where all code belongs :-) > Four years ago I''ve put those scripts

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > Hi all, > > On 28.09.2015 14:42, Russel Winder wrote: > >> On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:03 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: >> >>> Maybe worth sticking in a scons bitbucket repo? >>> >>> […] >> >> A DVCS repository is indeed where all

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > How does it compare to bugzilla? > Written in Python. Extensible with Python plugins. Shared codebase with bugs.python.org Has REST API in the process ___ Scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

It looks like I am biased. =) ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons Node ID

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 04.09.2015 06:16, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> I have another question about SCons. If I specify target explicitly, it >> ends up >> as str in BUILD_TARGETS and it is impossible to t

Re: [Scons-dev] 2.3.6 out. Next up merging slots branch to default for stabilization and then release

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tim Jenness tjenn...@lsst.org wrote: I would like to reiterate that I’m very interested in the port of scons to python3 and motivated to help. One of the ways to help is add buildbot slave for Python 3. http://buildbot.scons.org/buildslaves

Re: [Scons-dev] Updated work in progress SCons.org

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote: Anatoly, Thanks for your feedback. The RSS is an RSS

  1   2   3   4   >