HI Dirk!
So an update.
I had a little time yesterday to look at this. I am down to 11 failures. They
all seem to be the same issue.
Quick summary:
I seem to have three issues with the branch as it is.
1) the base node did not have __dict__ in the slots definition. This prevents
my monkey
Hi guys,
I been fixing up Parts packaging logic so it is pip and wheel friendly. I was
wonder what are the plans for SCons on this front? It seems to me that this
should not be that complex for us to do in SCons. I just noticed there is a lot
of work going on in the current scripts with
for extending Nodes there already exists a dict named attributes. It
would be cool if you could rework your patch to use it, instead of
reintroducing a dict to the Base class.
attributes was added for the original Tag() API to help with RPM builders. I
updated this with a MetaTag in Parts that
Jason,
On 31.03.2015 21:06, Kenny, Jason L wrote:
[...]
So let me think this out load here. The main issues is that I have properties
that I am adding to the node objects and this fails with __slots__ being
defined without a __dict__, because I was adding a cache value to the object,
vs
Hi Jason,
On 31.03.2015 16:35, Kenny, Jason L wrote:
HI Dirk!
So an update.
I had a little time yesterday to look at this. I am down to 11 failures. They
all seem to be the same issue.
Quick summary:
I seem to have three issues with the branch as it is.
1) the base node did not have
So adding a __dict__ to __slots__ will add a type 'dict' object. This only
get assign dynamic attributes. So there is probably some memory mapped to it
for the core dictionary. A test would have to be done to see how much worse it
would make it. Most of any memory waste comes from add stuff to
