I have read some but probably not as strictly as a reviewer. Anyway, let's
start dealing with them one by one.
The following 2 lists should have the same orders.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=assignee%20%3D%20nwilliams%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/twos
Hi,
Could I get the following update reviewed?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8221253/webrev.00/
Because of the padding impact, the TLS 1.3 record in the JDK Reference
implementation could exceed the limit. It is not the expected behavior.
Thanks,
Xuelei
Looks good, but just a reminder to change system to security property in
the javadoc per Joe's comment in the CSR.
--Sean
On 5/7/19 11:31 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Updated webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8200400/webrev.02/
The CSR at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-821
Thanks. Looks good.
regards,
Sean.
On 09/05/2019 17:38, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 5/9/19 11:29 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Nice feature to have Sean. Thanks.
What do you think about adding a debug print if such a value is set ?
(perhaps in initializeTimeout method)
Good suggestion. I've added the f
On 5/9/19 11:29 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Nice feature to have Sean. Thanks.
What do you think about adding a debug print if such a value is set ?
(perhaps in initializeTimeout method)
Good suggestion. I've added the following to the intializeTimeout method:
+private static int initializeTi
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 12:43:04PM +0800, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Also, all your comments and responses posted in the previous mail are
> on files but not on a specific bug. Now that all bugs/RFEs are created
> [...]
When I'm done making the changes I agreed to make, I'll make sure to
have a "fixup"
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:40:49AM +0800, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Wow, this is overwhelming. Please post updated webrevs here and we will push
> the final agreed version, one by one.
I posted only the collated commentary from GitHub and my responses to
the comments. The "diffs" in the commentary are
Nice feature to have Sean. Thanks.
What do you think about adding a debug print if such a value is set ?
(perhaps in initializeTimeout method)
regards,
Sean.
On 07/05/2019 17:16, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 5/7/19 11:28 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
What do you think if com.sun.security.crl.readtimeout is
Updated webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8223063/webrev.01/
Mostly test change. One unused export removed.
Thanks,
Max
> On May 1, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
> Please take a look at
>
>https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8223063/webrev.00/
>
> Unfortunately, a
Hi Philipp,
I've posted your patch at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8221719/webrev.00/
Everyone please take a review.
I think it looks fine. Just one question: why do you need to create the
Manifest in the test. Can you just create a jar without MANIFEST.MF and let
jarsigner add it?
10 matches
Mail list logo