HI Sean,
I think the change looks reasonable and I would keep it focused on its current
intent for zip files given the problem you were addressing.
The test also looks reasonable. Did you give any consideration to throwing a
SkippedException if posixAttributes are not supported?
Also remember
Hi Sean,
Nice patch. I wonder why permissions should be preserved only in zip
files. Jar files also are zip files, according to the jar file specs,
and hence, shouldn't jar files benefit of preserving permissions, too?
The file name extension is most often zip for zip files and jar for jar
files
Hello, I wonder if you have some input regarding the following issue.
I noticed a couple of instabilities (in jdk13 and higher) in the test
security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java
.
The test sometimes fails when validating the "validity inte
Hi Philipp,
On 17/01/2020 12:40, Philipp Kunz wrote:
Hi Sean,
Nice patch. I wonder why permissions should be preserved only in zip
files. Jar files also are zip files, according to the jar file specs,
and hence, shouldn't jar files benefit of preserving permissions, too?
Thanks for your comment
Am 2020-01-17 um 11:59 schrieb Seán Coffey:
Hi,
Looking to introduce some JDK private functionality which will help
preserve internal zip file attribute permissions when jarsigner is run
on a zip file. Some of the logic is taken from the recent work carried
out in this area for zipfs API.
h
Hi,
Looking to introduce some JDK private functionality which will help
preserve internal zip file attribute permissions when jarsigner is run
on a zip file. Some of the logic is taken from the recent work carried
out in this area for zipfs API.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-82180
