2021/8/3 9:40:58 -0700, sean.mul...@oracle.com:
> On 8/2/21 8:28 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Having established that OpenJDK is not yet willing to compromise, I have
>> been attempting to create an authorization layer using Agents, so that I
>> can restore perimeter security following
2021/6/29 5:17:39 -0700, anika.westb...@raytion.com:
> Dear Developers,
>
> we have the problem with Kerberos and AdoptOpenJDK in a cross-realm
> setup that the first request succeeds, but subsequent requests
> fail. The reason is that the ticket from the referrals cache does not
> work for proxy
https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411
Summary: Deprecate the Security Manager for removal in a future
release. The Security Manager dates from Java 1.0. It has not been the
primary means of securing client-side Java code for many years, and it
has rarely been used to secure server-side code. T
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:45:00 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> This PR is to introduce a new random number API for the JDK. The primary API
>> is found in RandomGenerator and RandomGeneratorFactory. Further description
>> can be found in the JEP https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/356 .
>>
>> javadoc can be
2020/12/4 6:08:13 -0800, er...@openjdk.java.net:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:30:02 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. That's the
>>> reason I need input on this: All I know is that is definitely not
>>> the responsibility of the Build Group to maintai
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:16:23 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> The change is (just) to remove legacy usages of a JDK-private custom tag.
As the creator of these tags many moons ago, I approve this change.
-
Marked as reviewed by mr (Lead).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/81
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/339
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/332
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/329
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/324
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/319
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/288
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/287
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/273
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/249
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/246
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/232
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/229
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/219
- Mark
2014/8/13 7:20 -0700, alan.bate...@oracle.com:
> The usual thing is to just have a default implementation that is used
> when ServiceLoader doesn't locate a useful provider. You'll find many
> examples of this in the JDK. In those cases then the default is not
> listed in a services configuratio
This changeset was erroneously pushed to jdk8/tl/jdk:
Changeset: da4b0962ad11
Author:robm
Date: 2014-02-10 14:35 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/da4b0962ad11
7152892: some jtreg tests fail with permission denied
Reviewed-by: coffeys
! test/java/
2013/11/4 1:49 -0800, michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com:
> Changeset: 48449b5390fa
> Author:michaelm
> Date: 2013-11-04 17:47 +
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/48449b5390fa
>
> 8027687: The constructors of URLPermission class do not behave as described
> in javad
>
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/166
- Mark
2012/7/6 3:27 -0700, weijun.w...@oracle.com:
> I have these questions:
>
> ...
>
> Well, if you really think the current "Fri Jul" output is too English, instead
> of localizing the string, how about we de-localize it totally and choose a
> neutral format?
Excellent idea!
> There are several fl
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/152
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/140
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/131
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/130
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/129
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/124
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/123
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/121
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/116
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/115
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/114
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/113
- Mark
FYI I've rolled back these changesets, together with the merge changesets
that followed them, and I've added the first changeset in the sequence
(2ded3bb14529) to the jcheck blacklist.
The tip revision in jdk7/tl/corba is now:
changeset: 207:8260ec509a10
parent: 203:76aeef3afc04
pare
This change was integrated prematurely. I've rolled it back in the
jdk7/tl/jdk repository.
If you've already pulled it into a local repository then you can remove
it using the hg strip command, which is part of the mq extension.
Your tip changeset should be:
changeset: 1563:5cd12b68d09b
u
> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:08:38 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Last night there was a changeset introduced to the JSN gate that
> contained an incorrect changeset comment. Rather than pollute the
> changeset history for everyone, we're going to rollback this changeset,
> and have the author
39 matches
Mail list logo
