Hi Sean,
Thank you for feedback. I've updated the bug report.
14.09.16 19:57, Sean Mullan wrote:
Thanks for the information. It would be very useful if you could add
that additional information as an example into the bug report for
future reference.
--Sean
On 09/14/2016 11:26 AM, Sergei
Thanks for the information. It would be very useful if you could add
that additional information as an example into the bug report for future
reference.
--Sean
On 09/14/2016 11:26 AM, Sergei Kovalev wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm working for testing minimal JRE image. If I create custom JRE with
Answered in other thread
14.09.16 18:54, Wang Weijun wrote:
Sorry I was thinking about another bug on TLS tests -- 8166032. What
exception is thrown there if the jgss module is missing?
Thanks
Max
在 2016年9月14日,23:44,Wang Weijun > 写道:
Sorry I was thinking about another bug on TLS tests -- 8166032. What exception
is thrown there if the jgss module is missing?
Thanks
Max
> 在 2016年9月14日,23:44,Wang Weijun 写道:
>
> The example shows jdk.crypto.pkcs11 is needed, but I still don't know why
>
The example shows jdk.crypto.pkcs11 is needed, but I still don't know why
java.security.jgss is. Can you give another example where jgss must be present?
Thanks
Max
> 在 2016年9月14日,23:26,Sergei Kovalev 写道:
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> I'm working for testing minimal JRE image.
Hi Sean,
I'm working for testing minimal JRE image. If I create custom JRE with
java.base only - the tests fail. To emulate such behavior we can use
"--limit-modules java.base" option. In case if we have no module
declaration in tests header the test fails with, e.g. ClassNotFound
exception
Looks fine to me, but can you explain in more detail why the extra
dependencies are needed, or an example using --limit-modules? These
tests are not failing regularly now, so when do the missing dependencies
cause failures?
Thanks,
Sean
On 09/13/2016 08:34 AM, Sergei Kovalev wrote:
Hello
Hello team,
This is re-request for review of very small changes. Could somebody take
a look?
08.09.16 17:03, Sergei Kovalev wrote:
Hello team,
Could you please review the fix for below CR:
Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165689
WebRev:
Hello team,
Could you please review the fix for below CR:
Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165689
WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8165689/webrev.00/
Goal: make test possible to run with "--limit-modules" flag.
Summary: added @modules tag into jtreg header if
Hello team,
Could you please review the fix for below CR:
Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165689
WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8165689/webrev.00/
Goal: make test possible to run with "--limit-modules" flag.
Summary: added @modules tag into jtreg header if
10 matches
Mail list logo