-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you try from a browser? i can get to it just fine.
- -- dims
Sean Mullan wrote:
| Has anyone been able to access the svn repository in the last day or two?
|
| $ svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security/trunk
| xml-security
| s
w. I'm also on the W3C XML Security
> Specifications Maintenance working group that is hosting the workshop.
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
ll that really matters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speaking of which, I don't want to step on any toes at Apache. If
>>>>>> we do
>>>>>> succeed in securing financial support for JuiCE we would not want to
>>>>>> disturb the relationship with the Apache Incubator. Is there
>>>>>> anyone at
>>>>>> Apache I should sound out for permission/participation? OSSI has not
>>>>>> had the opportunity to work with the ASF yet, but we expect to in the
>>>>>> near future for other initiatives so I don't want to offend anyone
>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, I take it that http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/juice/
>>>>>> is the
>>>>>> latest and greatest source, and that there is no JuiCE project
>>>>>> page per se?
>>>>>>
>>>> Werner, all:
>>>>
>>>> We're being nagged again by the sponsor. They seem to be really
>>>> interested in reviving the JuiCE project. Any interest in working with
>>>> us to develop a proposal to secure the funding they have indicated
>>>> would
>>>> be forthcoming?
>>>>
>>>> If none of the original maintainers are able to participate we can
>>>> engage Java developers elsewhere, but we'd prefer to work with the
>>>> original team if at all possible.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Steve M.
>>
>>
>>
>> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>>> If we want to keep this going - we need to call it out now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Berin
>>>
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Put Apache Juice into dormant status
>>> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:12:13 -0400
>>> From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> Nothing appears to be happening, and there is no one around to provide
>>> status or anything else.
>>>
>>> --- Noel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
e at some
point
but it never went anywhere because people just stopped validating.
-- Scott
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Perhaps we should wait for more people say ok
[ ] -1
Regards,
Raul
--
http://r-bg.com
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
FYI, i published the 1.4.0 jars to the m2 repo
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/santuario/
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
a focus on the C++ code.
> Scott has been active on the mailing list for a number of years,
> providing advice and ideas as well as submitting bugs and feature
requests.
>
> Welcome aboard!
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
--
http://r-bg.com
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
Remember about new
filename of your .jar ) Thanks guys for your help! Matthew
View this message in context: Re: Apache XML Security Encoding problem in
encrypting/decrypting XML
Sent from the Apache XML - Security - Dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
t; Oh, and it *installs* clean on Solaris, finally (thank you!)
>
>
> . I'm glad - it was one of the main drivers for doing the
> conversion!
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
+1 from me.
On 11/13/06, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you think that the SVN head of java is in shape for doing the 1.4 release?
[ ] +1 , We have delayed it too much
[ ] 0 , We should do, but I'm not very confident.
[ ] -1, It fails (...)
--
http://r-bg.com
Done. Thank you sir!.
-- dims
On 11/6/06, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Raul, Sean,
>
> Looks like the prev patch from me for parseFragment does not really
> help much :( As XMLCipher has a private constructor and the
> parseFragment
own to the use of "keysVerify" thread local tracker
in
> > > > > > org.apache.xml.security.algorithms.SignatureAlgorithm to tack the
> > > > > > initialization of the java.security.Signature instance with
> > > > > > private/public keys.
> > > > >
showstopper.
Thanks,
Sean
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> We've tried unfortunately no other fix is possible as far as we can
> tell. we were setting the java wide system property for the DBF to
> pick our impl and unfortunately no one can use that in production as
> you well can tell
ngelog accordingly ?. So I can
label it, do a compilation, and upload the jar to people.apache.org
before going to bed (2 hours left).
Regards,
Raul
On 11/2/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've tried unfortunately no other fix is possible as far as we can
> tell. we wer
y other solution?
or perhaps we should quick vote the inclusion?
Regards,
On 11/2/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> We have a showstopper in Axis2/WSS4J land. This is the only way to fix
> the problem. I spent a lot of time into doing the least ch
> +DocumentBuilderFactory dbf =
> +DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
> +dbf.setNamespaceAware(true);
> +dbf.setAttribute("http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces";,
Boolean.TRUE);
> + DocumentBuilder db = dbf.new
o?
Thanks,
Sean
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
11. septembre 2006 15:24
> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight?
>
> I think we have enough bug fixes to do a RC tonight, what do you think?
> [x] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
, so it's reasonably low impact on everyone in the first instance.
We *do* need to set up a PMC mailing list - I'll get that organised once
I have a feel for what people want to do about the name.
Cheers,
Berin
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
pe is limited to the xml-security
> piece, so not the broad security project.
>
> I'll put some thoughts together about where to from here over the next
> few days.
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
>
--
http://r-bg.com
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
t; I know we are trying not to create umbrella projects - I'm trying to
>> walk a middle ground to see if we can make something like this work with
>> a community that fosters this area. It's a bit of a community
>> experiment as well as a technical one.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Berin
>>
>>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
problems in multithread
> > environments.
> > I have done my tests but I don't want that bugs like
> > http://issues.apache.org/ bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38605
> > <
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38605>
happens again.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Raul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://r-bg.com
>
>
--
http://r-bg.com
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
primary
> responsibility for management of the projects within the
> scope of responsibility of the Apache PMC; and be it
> further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache PMC:
>
>
Oops!
+1 to Raksha.
+1 to Berin as PMC Chair.
-- dims
On 5/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
On 5/31/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
>
> I've
Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Milan Tomic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Karel Wouters <[EMAIL P
06 10:26 AM
>> >> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
>> >>
>> >> Sanctuary is a cool name. However there is a product named
>> Sanctuary by
>> >> SecureWave: http://www.securewave.com/endpoint_security_solutions.jsp
>> >>
>> >> --Sean
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://r-bg.com
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
oing a release, but it should probably be 1.4 since
JSR 105 has been integrated and this would be a major new feature.
I think I fixed a few other bugs but haven't updated the changelog, I'll
do so.
--Sean
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
also encourage anyone else who
is interested to put their names or the names of others forward!
Cheers,
Berin
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Here's one i was thinking about - Raksha (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raksha)
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 3/15/06, Jesse Pelton &
de/outside the ASF, then we want to think about what
> > kind of message we want to give people when the project goes to top
> level.
> >
> > I'd also like to use it as a central point people can go to in order
> > to see all security related software in the ASF. Not to ha
there are references to svn, which
> makes me think that the project has moved to svn but the page has not
> been updated.
> Could someone please let me know how to pull down the devel tree?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
n or trade-off between two
> approaches, please give me your opinion.
>
>
> Regards
> Il-Gon Kim
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
esident,
> >> Apache XML Security, to serve in accordance with and subject
> >> to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
> >> Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> >> disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
> >> further
> >>
> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache XML Security PMC be and hereby
> >> is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> >> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> >> Apache XML Security Project; and be it further
> >>
> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache XML Security PMC be and hereby
> >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> >> XML PMC XML Security subproject; and be it further
> >>
> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the XML XML
> >> Security sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache XML PMC are
> >> hereafter discharged.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
that the initial Apache XML Security PMC be and hereby
>is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>XML PMC XML Security subproject; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the XML XML
>Security sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache XML PMC are
>hereafter discharged.
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Done.
On 2/15/06, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to do this, who to contact?
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
As part of reviving juice, can we please VOTE werner as a committer to
enable him to continue his offline work? [1]
Here's my +1.
thanks,
dims
[1] : http://www.nabble.com/Status-of-my-upgrades-and-so-on-t945224.html
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
lly use directly.
>
> TLP project status might also help us in the profile stakes.
>
> Anyway, as always, open to thoughts and suggestions!
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
do u think? anyone want to drive that?
(please start another thread :)
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
ng
> > the certificate to sign the Juice jar. My wotk on Juice came
> > to s stillstand because of th missing certificate from Sun,
> >
> > Did you get any feedback from Sun?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Werner
> >
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
&
as a separate project.
thanks,
dims
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xml-juice-dev/200407.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/security-dev@xml.apache.org/msg02758.html
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
svn to pick up the latest changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > cvs should be read-only at this time :)
> >
> > On 12/12/05, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Are we supposed to off
ost. The xml-security cvs repository
> is still there. If we have officially switched to use svn should we shut
> down the cvs repository (or at least make it read-only)?
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > thanks hen.
> >
> > On 12/1/05, Hen
>> So take a look at the test repository above, and if it looks okay let me
> >> know and I can go ahead and do the real thing.
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> >>
> >>> +
t;
> I have put the JSR 105 code on a branch off of the main and would like
> to integrate this for the next release. In a prior thread, people seemed
> very interested in this as it would give them a standard Java API for
> generating and validating signatures. Of course, the old API would still
> be included so you could move to it at your own pace. Let me know if you
> have any comments on this plan.
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
zation.
> * Bug fixes.
> The detailed changelog can be found here:
> http://xml.apache.org/security/changes.html
>
> Thanks to everyone involved.
>
> The XML Security Team
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
=
> ResourceResolver.getInstance(URIAttr,this._baseURI,
> this._manifest._perManifestResolvers)
> is throwing an exception.
>
> Can anyone help?
> Regards,
> Anshuk
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
+1
On 11/10/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So good to go with the migration? :)
>
> Hen
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > On 10/13/05, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
oughts on the matter.
>
> Is a standard strategy okay:
>
> xml/
>security/
> trunk/
> tags/
> branches/
>
> ?
>
> Hen
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
release and going to worry about new
> > things?
> >
> > [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> > [ ] +0,
> > [ ] -1, I think that other RC3 is good.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Raul
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
2.02 is better?
>
> Regards,
>
> Raul
>
> On 9/14/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Folks,
> > With the latest CVS (updated libraries)
> >
> > JDK1.5 : "ant clean test" works out of the box.
> > JDK1.4 : "ant clean
aul,
Please use the lowest JDK (1.3.1_15) to build the release.
Thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
gt;>>
> > >>> Vishal
> > >>>
> > >>> Raul Benito wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
> > >>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
> > >>>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
> > >>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What do you thing?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> > >>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Raul
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
> >
> > What do you thing?
> >
> > [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> > [ ] +0,
> > [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Raul
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
Subject: SVN
> >
> > Not sure if everyone is aware, but the ASF is gradually
> > converting all
> > the CVS repos to SVN.
> >
> > What are peoples thoughts to moving xml-security to SVN?
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
+1 from me.
On 8/22/05, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure if everyone is aware, but the ASF is gradually converting all
> the CVS repos to SVN.
>
> What are peoples thoughts to moving xml-security to SVN?
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
&g
it seems more an error in the DOM tree that in the library as
> it hits a very common path, with a testcase that right now is passing)
> .
>
> So grab from the apache
> site(http://xml.apache.org/security/dist/java-library/xmlsec-1.2.96.jar)
> and have fun.
>
> Regards,
&
gt; Phase 2 would be a longer-term release and would consist of removing
> redundant code and APIs and generally making a cleaner fit beneath the
> JSR 105 APIs. This means that API compatibility would be broken so it
> would have to be a 2.0 release.
>
> What do people feel about thi
on is still
> accessible.
>
> I hope this helps.
> --
> -- Chad
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
.
The developer community mailing list is hosted by yahoo on
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tsik/
Initial committers
--
Hans Granqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mark Hayes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Apache sponsor/champion
-------
Davanum Srinivas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
to a tar), and I'd like to also do
> a beta of the XKMS message handling classes whilst I work on a client
> engine.
>
> We need to formalise - so +1 from me!
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
rently available at
> http://www.itu.dk/people/kaj/xkms_src.tgz or
> http://xml.linux.dk/xkms_src.tgz and there is a test instance of the
> service running at http://bea.itu.dk:8080/xkms.
>
> If the thesis gets accepted, I'd like to thank Berin for technical
> assistance and inspiration and Karel Wouters for the idea to the
> project. :-)
>
> ---
> Cheers,
> Kenneth
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
body, WSE fails to verify its own signed message!, so I don't
> expect Java library to verify it. But if you assign only an "Id"
> attribute, everything works fine.
>
> Vishal
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> >Vishal,
> >
> >what's the pr
gt; >>> would like to
> >>> know if someone has got Apache xml-security-J interoperating
> >>> with the
> >>> .NET (Microsoft WSE)? I've been trying to debug this for
> >>> quite some
> >>&g
ignature, and vice versa.
> >
> > Vishal
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";>
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#"; Id="arg1"
> Type="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Content";>
> Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#DESede"/>
>
> sJzgu8mTQpJ2Xu/ABKVfBQ==
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
s not the problem. With appropriate
> > >VM-params I'm able to parse a 100MB file into a DOM-document. The
> > >problems start while signing. The memory demand is much higher than
> > >during parsing and I'm able to sign "only" a 10MB SOAP request.
>
helping hands.
>
> So +1 for me.
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
ll be used).(RB)
> * fix Fix a bug when using base64transformation and external
> resources.(RB) Thanks to Sean Mullan. Fixes 33393.
> * fix Fix a bug when passing XMLsignatureInput(InputStream)
> streams that don't acknowledge reset() as expected. (RB)
>
get rid off of two of them (build-deprecated.xml
> and build-ant1.5.xml) and concentrate only in build.xml
> Any insight will be appreciate.
> Regards,
>
> Raul
> --
> http://r-bg.com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
on the list and involved in the various
> issues that the C++ library (and Java!) has thrown up.
>
> Really finally - I'd really like to have someone else actively involved
> in the C++ code!!
>
> So +1 from me!
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
gt; test.runTest();
> }
> }
>
> Just drop commons-lang-2.0.jar, commons-logging.jar, xercesImpl.jar,
> xml-apis.jar and xmlsec.jarto the
> classpath and run java Test File.xml.
>
> Version 1.1 output: time spent 952 ms
> Version 1.2 output: time spent 29172 ms
>
> Where is the catch?
>
> Regards,
> Egor Pervuninski
> egor {dot} pervuninski {at} gmail {dot} com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or person responsible
> for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and
> destroy or delete this communication immediately."
> ==
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
gt; Regards,
>
> Raul
> http://r-bg.com
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
ain, and thanks to everybody who has tested the previous
> release and expecially to the ones who has report problems.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Raul
>
> http://r-bg.com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
a problem with the HEAD(Perhaps nobody is testing it ;-) ).
> >Perhaps we can proceed first with xmlsec-1.2RC.jar so people that are not
> >CVS savy can test it.
> >
> +1.
>
> Vishal
>
>
>
> > What do you all think?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Raul
> >
> >http://r-bg.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
t; public, and why does the Reference need to be constructed with a Manifest
> instead of a more abstract object or interface?
>
> Maarten Gerbrands
> Communication Networks Branch,
> Communication and Information Systems Division
> NATO C3 Agency
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
blem is with Optimal
> > Asymmetric Encryption Padding, whose name should follow the format -
> > "OAEPWithAndPadding", but BC provider seems to uses
> > "OAEPPADDING" for this padding.
> >
> > Vishal
> >
> > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html#AppA
> >
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
orting jre 1.3
> please raise your hands/email so I can see if worth the effort of doing
> more or less hacky for xml-sec 1.2 or we do right but for latter
> version.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raul
> http://r-bg.com
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
e to do a release of the C library - I have a fairly
> functional message factory for XKISS messages, and there have been some
> fixes in the C library that it would be good to get out.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Should we aim for mid October?
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
onfig.wsdd.
>
> Do you think, this could be an useful extension of project xml-security?
> I am a little hesitant, because it hinges on two dependencies: axis and
> xml-security - do you think it would be better off below axis?
>
> Juergen Key
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
va.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/p11guide.html#DelayedSelect
> [4]:http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html#AppA
> [5]:http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppA
>
> --Sean
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
tNodeSet.isEmpty()) {
> !
> XMLUtils.circumventBug2650(XMLUtils.getOwnerDocument(this._inputNodeSet));
> !}
> return this._inputNodeSet;
> } else if (this.isOctetStream()) {
> DocumentBuilderFactory dfactory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
which is awkward.
>
> Vishal Mahajan has a fix for this problem and will be putting it back soon.
>
> --Sean
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
ther one has to do with something that schema
> processing overrides.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
ound is
> > not to validate during parse.
>
> It is possible with Xerces, we do it in OpenSAML to enable signing a signed
> object, which of course includes base64 data. There's a parser "feature" or
> whatever they call it to disable schema normalization
APIs to the standard? I presume that will take
> place rather than just relying on Sun's version as it rolls out (ever so
> slowly!)... Has anybody determined how hard it is to migrate to the
> standard API?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
_ENTITY_URI;
> public static final int FUNC_DOCLOCATION;
> public static org.apache.xpath.compiler.FuncLoader[] m_functions;
> private static final int NUM_BUILT_IN_FUNCS;
> private static final int NUM_ALLOWABLE_ADDINS;
> static int m_funcNextFreeIndex;
> public org.apache.xpath.compiler.FunctionTable();
> public static org.apache.xpath.functions.Function getFunction(int);
>throws javax/xml/transform/TransformerException
> public static int
> installFunction(java.lang.String,org.apache.xpath.Expression);
> public static void installFunction(org.apache.xpath.Expression,int);
> static {};
> }
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
lse try testing with 1.4.2_05? Remember you must
> install the unlimited JCE strength policy files for all tests to pass.
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > C:\JDK14\jre\lib\security>jar tvf local_policy.jar
> >169 Mon Jun 16 15:36:32 E
E/jre/lib/security/local_policy.jar
> META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> META-INF/JCE_DSA.SF
> META-INF/JCE_DSA.DSA
> META-INF/JCE_RSA.SF
> META-INF/JCE_RSA.RSA
> META-INF/
> default_local.policy
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > yep. i did.
> >
> > -- dims
&
oll to bottom of page).
>
> --Sean
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > FYI, if i drop bc-jce-jdk13-124.jar into jre\lib\endorsed it works
> > fineSo it's probably a bug in the javax.crypto / local_policy.jar
> > / US_export_policy.jar
> >
>
back today after JavaOne and vacation but swamped in email, etc... I
> should be able to look at this later in the week.
>
> --Sean
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Sean,
> >
> > Are u guys back from vacation yet? :)
> >
> > -- dims
&
FYI, if i drop bc-jce-jdk13-124.jar into jre\lib\endorsed it works
fineSo it's probably a bug in the javax.crypto / local_policy.jar
/ US_export_policy.jar
-- dims
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:27:00 -0400, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, "JDK 1.3.1_11&quo
e0(Native Method) at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
-------
0700, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims,
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > Vishal,
> >
> > I was thinking about the xalan dependency and noticed that JDK15 has
> > xalan under com.sun.apache.*...Are u planning to take a stab at being
> &g
ctet
> String from the DER-encoded extension value and then strip off the octet tag.
>
> If I have some time later, I'll send a snippet of code.
>
> --Sean
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > would you be able to compile a fresh version of xml-securit
on of this message or any of its
attachments or the information contained in this e-mail, or the taking
of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail and delete this message.
--
Davanum Srini
alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++
> GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
with JDK 1.4.2?
>
> Thanks Dominik
>
> --
> +++ Jetzt WLAN-Router fïr alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++
> GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
xception e) {
> > throw new MyErrorException(e);
> > } catch (KeyResolverException e) {
> > throw new MyErrorException(e);
> > }
> > return cert;
> > } else {
> > throw new MyErrorException(
> > "Message contains no KeyInfo. " + "Cannot check dsig.");
> > }
> > } else {
> > throw new MyErrorException(
> > "Message contains no X509Data. " + "Cannot check dsig.");
> > }
> > }
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
s: 0, Errors: 5, Time elapsed: 0.801 sec
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:47:07 -0700, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dims,
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > Vishal,
> >
> > I was thinking about the xalan dependency and noticed that JDK15 has
>
iredKey="AES" />
> + + JCEName="AESWrap"
> + RequiredKey="AES" />
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#kw-aes256";
> ***
> *** 479,484
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
