Speaking of multiple signatures... How can I verify multiple
signatures in my document? Can I use findDSIGNode() to do the job? I
belive this function finds only first signature element and can't be
used for finding next one.
Best regards,
Milan
> -Original Message-
> From: Seungwoo
Title: [java] Large XML Files ( > 1 MB )
Signing large xml file (1,5 MB) took more than 300 MB RAM. Is there a way to make it consume less memory?
Thank you.
Signing large xml file (1,5 MB) took more than 300 MB RAM. Is
there a way to make it consume less memory?
Well.. there's a patch in CVS from a while back from Sean that improved
performance a little bit, but no, at this time there's little we can do to
make it consume less memory. The ent
Erwin,
We're testing it like mad. It seems good. It is my plan to check it in
today if all goes well.
Danke Herr Dittmann.
ax/
Erwin van der Koogh wrote:
Signing large xml file (1,5 MB) took more than 300 MB RAM. Is
there a way to make it consume less memory?
Well.. there's a patch
Axl, all,
would be nice if you can do so. Then I can get a fresh
version from CVS. Do you plan to update other parts
of the code? I saw some problems using the internal
serializer class (the patch addresses only the TEXT
node, not the others). If I can be of any help
Regards,
Werner
> -
[snip]..I saw some problems using the internal
serializer class (the patch addresses only the TEXT
node, not the others). If I can be of any help
It will be greatly appreciated ;-)
But I guess the most important thing I to log them in bugzilla.. that way
it 's not going to be forgotten.
I am
Werner,
Help would be nice. No, help would be much appreciated. I am currently
occupied elsewhere. The more you do, the more you are allowed to do! Go
for it.
Thanks
Ax/
Dittmann Werner wrote:
Axl, all,
would be nice if you can do so. Then I can get a fresh
version from CVS. Do you plan
Title: [java & c++] URI
Apache Java libraries allow URI "Id" attribute to be "Id" or "id". Apache C++ libraries allow only "Id". W3C recomends "Id". What is right?
XML Signature Example:
http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315">
http://
Apache Java libraries allow URI "Id" attribute to be "Id" or "id".
Apache C++ libraries allow only "Id". W3C recomends "Id". What is right?
[snip example..]
Was this bug fixed?
I am not entirely clear what you think is a bug?
If the W3C RECOMENDS "Id" (and I haven't read the spec lately, so I
Milan,
Anything can be an Id, but it needs to be defined as such within the
DTD/Schema (type=ID). In the XML DSIG spec, anything that has an
type="ID" attribute is called "Id", so references, objects, manifests
etc should all have attributes called Id.
But if the file is parsed in non-validat
Axl, Security committers,
Werner has pending patch
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1679).
Hint: grow the team :)
-- dims
--- Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
Werner,
Help would be nice. No, help would be much appreciated
Hi Dims,
Werner has pending patch
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
che.org&msgNo=1679).
We are well aware that there is a pending patch. Axl said he was working on
testing it and I am sure Berin will glance over it when he has time. I
don't have the encryption expertise and
Dims, all,
I tested the patch. It looks good. I am going to check it in now.
Erwin van der Koogh wrote:
Hi Dims,
Werner has pending patch
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
che.org&msgNo=1679).
We are well aware that there is a pending patch. Axl said he was
working on t
Dims,
thanks for the honour :-).
However, I spend most of my free cycles to WSS4J
and the associated Axis handler, documentation etc.
So I'm not quite sure if I can really contribute
regularly to XML Sec.
If I spot a problem in other software, e.g. XML Security,
I'll try to fix it and genera
Thanks Axl.
--- Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims, all,
>
> I tested the patch. It looks good. I am going to check it in now.
>
> Erwin van der Koogh wrote:
>
> > Hi Dims,
> >
> >> Werner has pending patch
> >> (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> che.or
Just trying to stir the pot. It was just a hint :) :) Also FYI, Werner and I
(primarily Werner)
are working on WSS4J (http://wss4j.sf.net). We'll soon move it to Apache Web Services
project.
thanks,
dims
--- Erwin van der Koogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dims,
>
> > Werner has pending pat
I have been looking at the memory consumption using some
profiling tools, to see if there are any obvious things
we can fix in the short-term. I don't have any patches
yet (other than the one I sent in a few weeks ago), but
I will keep you informed as I find stuff.
Thanks,
Sean
Dittmann Werner wrot
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Milan,
Anything can be an Id, but it needs to be defined as such within the
DTD/Schema (type=ID). In the XML DSIG spec, anything that has an
type="ID" attribute is called "Id", so references, objects, manifests
etc should all have attributes called Id.
But if the file
> I agree with that. I don't think the library should be guessing what an
> ID is in the signing case.
+1. With DOM3, the reasons for this hack are gone.
-- Scott
Dittmann Werner wrote:
However, I spend most of my free cycles to WSS4J
and the associated Axis handler, documentation etc.
So I'm not quite sure if I can really contribute
regularly to XML Sec.
Whatever contribution is made - it is always welcome!
(Thx for the patch :>. I was going to get on
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Just trying to stir the pot. It was just a hint :) :) Also FYI, Werner and I
(primarily Werner)
are working on WSS4J (http://wss4j.sf.net). We'll soon move it to Apache Web Services
project.
Must have a look-see!
Where did you end up with the licensing issue for this?
C
Milan Tomic wrote:
Speaking of multiple signatures... How can I verify multiple
signatures in my document? Can I use findDSIGNode() to do the job? I
belive this function finds only first signature element and can't be
used for finding next one.
You are correct. At the moment you have to manua
What about a middle ground for transition. An explicit call has to be
made into the library to enable the fudged Id in the signing case?
Cheers,
Berin
Scott Cantor wrote:
I agree with that. I don't think the library should be guessing what an
ID is in the signing case.
+1. With DOM3,
Can't you use XPath for that? An expression like "//*[local-name()='Signature'][n]"
gives you back the n-th signature element.
Marius
-Original Message-
From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [c++] RE: C
Marius,
Yup that would work.
Inside the library though I've tried to avoid using XPath wherever
possible, because I'm trying to ensure that users only need to link in
Xalan if they want XPath/XSLT support for transforms.
Cheers,
Berin
Marius Constantin wrote:
Can't you use XPath for t
25 matches
Mail list logo