Stephen Haberman wrote on 10/11/2005 08:51:57 PM:
>
> > I'm surprised to see
> > so much discussion about a name.
>
> http://www.bikeshed.com/
>
> I'm guilty too, of course, though I maintain my intentions were good.
Sir, I resemble that remark.
Perhaps, we should submit all these suggestion
I think "HTML Table mode" works, but is wordy.
When i want a short term, i call this Square Selenium. Square because
tables are square and square because it is boring compared to driven or
twisted.
Bret
_
Bret Pettichord
www.pettichord.com
> I'm surprised to see
> so much discussion about a name.
http://www.bikeshed.com/
I'm guilty too, of course, though I maintain my intentions were good.
- Stephen
___
Selenium-devel mailing list
Selenium-devel@lists.public.thoughtworks.org
http://li
As a newcomer to Selenuim, easing in slowly, I
subscribed to the user lists for a few months,
then recently joined selenium-devel. Assuming
that selenium-devel stood for selenium-development,
not selenium-devilment, I expected difficult
messages about heavy objects. I'm surprised
to see so
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Mon, October 10, 2005 23:51, Aahz said:
>
> > Another option might be "Server" mode. Regardless of who calls whom,
> > the browser is definitely acting as a server. Also, the driver
> > initiates the initial connection, right? So the browser is doi
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Jason R Huggins wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, I think we should use the same terms used by the SOAP and REST
> guys --- Document vs RPC.
[...]
> So we have:
> 1) Document Literal Selenium
> and
> 2) RPC Selenium
+0, iff buzzword compliance is in the requirements <0.5 wink>
> Docume
On Mon, October 10, 2005 23:51, Aahz said:
> Another option might be "Server" mode. Regardless of who calls whom,
> the browser is definitely acting as a server. Also, the driver
> initiates the initial connection, right? So the browser is doing a
> callback on the driver. We could call it "Ca
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005, Mike Williams wrote:
>
> I like it too. A lot. I think "Document" vs "RPC" is the best
> distinction I've heard so far.
>
> "RPC" communicates the concept that the "driving" script sends
> commands to the browser, and receives results. This bugs me slightly
> though, as it'
Stephen Haberman wrote:
So we have:
1) Document Literal Selenium
and
2) RPC Selenium
I like it.
[Not sure what happened to my previous reply].
I like it too. A lot. I think "Document" vs "RPC" is the best
distinction I've heard so far.
"RPC" communicates the concept that the "
> So we have:
> 1) Document Literal Selenium
> and
> 2) RPC Selenium
I don't think mapping the concepts to SOAP works very well (as SOAP is
always client/server regardless of the style you use).
But just on their own "document-based" and "RPC-based" make a lot of sense
as names for the html-
John Lee wrote on 10/08/2005 12:50:43 PM:
> Here are a few more ideas
>
> - Tables mode
...
> I think I'm +1 on "Tables mode" until persuaded otherwise.
Okay, I'll take a crack at it. :-)
I started a thread on this back in March... I don't
think we decided on anything... even though we all agre
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005, Mike Williams wrote:
>
> It would be nice if it were another adjective, for symmetry with "Driven".
>
> Do any of these stick?
> - Simple mode
> - Dumb mode
> - Autonomous mode
> - Served mode
HTML mode
Browser mode (technically incorrect, but gets the point across -- and
> > Or "interactive mode".
>
> -1 Absolutely no reason why HTML tables (TestRunner) mode
> can't be run non-interactively from e.g. a cron job --
> indeed, we intend to do just that where I work.
Ah, true--I misunderstood what we're naming. Hence the need for a good name.
:-)
Table mode soun
[Mike]
> Do any of these stick?
> - Simple mode
> - Dumb mode
> - Autonomous mode
> - Served mode
[John]
> Here are a few more ideas
>
> - Tables mode
> - HTML Tables mode
> - Internal mode
> - Pull mode
- FIT mode
John
___
Selenium-devel mailing lis
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Stephen Haberman wrote:
> I'd suggest "user mode".
-1 Not very informative
> Or "interactive mode".
-1 Absolutely no reason why HTML tables (TestRunner) mode can't be run
non-interactively from e.g. a cron job -- indeed, we intend to do just
that where I work.
> And perha
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Mike Williams wrote:
> We're yet to find a better term to describe the "TestRunner" mode of
> operation, ie. the one that's not "driven" by an external script.
> (Yeah, that old can of worms.)
>
> It would be nice if it were another adjective, for symmetry with "Driven".
>
I'm not a big fan of "autonomous" -- perhaps its because I don't use
"autonomous" on a everday basis, but I don't readily the connection between
that and the "TestRunner mode".
I can't spell "autonomous" right on the first try either. I'm copy/pasting
right now. :-)
I'd suggest "user mode".
Or
17 matches
Mail list logo
