Re: http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Hackathon_Clinics_SemanticContentHack
= REMINDER =
What: Hackathon Project (HC-04): OntologySummit2013 Content Hack:
leveraging semantics on OntologPSMW (Ontolog's purple semantic
mediawiki)
When: This Saturday 6-Apr-2013 - All Day (virtual) - starting with a
~1.
I've been following the discussion over there, though I haven't gotten
involved (though it seems to have died down by now). A lot of the
resistance to SMW is part of a longstanding dislike, or at least lack of
understanding, of SMW among core MediaWiki developers; though as Niklas
points out, it do
Our organization has been running a twiki (now foswiki) intranet for years,
and it's full of information that can't be found easily. That's not
completely the fault foswiki, it certainly includes mechanisms for
classifying things. But users don't use those mechanisms, and when they do,
it's not d
On 4 April 2013 16:12, James HK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most user on this list are probably not aware of the current
> discussion that takes place on Wikitech-l [1] about "How SMW might
> help mw.org/wikitech.org" but what caused a moment of silence was the
> following comment.
>
> "I don't support movin
Hi,
I partly agree what is discussed there.
Currently when adding properties to pages in order to include semantic
annotiations is really hard for normal users in general, SMW+ tried to
counterattack this, but really did not achieve it in normal user point of
view.
I have implemented several SMW:
On 4 April 2013 18:12, James HK wrote:
> "I don't support moving to Semantic MediaWiki, which to me as user
> seems like a somewhat arcane and bloated piece of software that will
> require me and lots of people to relearn how we write documentation
> and project tracking" [2]
>
> I'm interest to h
Hi,
I wouldn't say "bloated" but I'd definitely agree with the "re-learn how we
write", or at least I have had to.
>From what I've experienced SMW seems to be focused more around nouns and
>specific objects. I use SMW to help manage technical documentation that
>focuses mostly only actions and
Hi,
Most user on this list are probably not aware of the current
discussion that takes place on Wikitech-l [1] about "How SMW might
help mw.org/wikitech.org" but what caused a moment of silence was the
following comment.
"I don't support moving to Semantic MediaWiki, which to me as user
seems lik