SF) are set to be transferred to Git... anyway, I have a
>> bunch of code now that's waiting to be checked in, including this
>> patch - I hope to do that in the next few weeks, at the latest.
>>
>> -Yaron
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Vladimir Kostyu
Hi Yaron,
How its going with my patch?
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Vladimir Kostyukov <
vladimir.kostu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yaron,
>
> I've changed my patch according to your suggestions. You can find it
> attached.
>
> Actually, I added support of defa
:26 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>> I'm still not convinced - just because a page is important, doesn't mean
>>> that a person's *relationship* to it is important. For instance, the person
>>> could be editing the
rent opinion, and I'm open to counter-arguments, by you
> or others.
>
> -Yaron
>
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Vladimir Kostyukov <
> vladimir.kostu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yaron,
>>
>> Thanks for such a fast reply! Regarding pag
; worth something.
>
> Could you explain why you want that checkbox checked on some forms?
>
> -Yaron
>
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Vladimir Kostyukov <
> vladimir.kostu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yaron, Stephan and everyone!
>>
>> I'v
quot;default" tag is ignored. Than I've decided to implement this feature. I
think its very useful, to have a way set "watch" or "minor edit" default
value for *separated form*.
What do you thing about this feature?
--
Thanks,
understand what
> "one-to-many" validation means. What do you want to validate against
> what? What is the "one", what is the "many"? How would it be different
> from normal validation?
>
> On 30 May 2012 11:22, Vladimir Kostyukov
> wrote:
:04 PM, Stephan Gambke wrote:
> Hi Vladimir.
>
> On 30 May 2012 10:48, Vladimir Kostyukov
> wrote:
> > Are SFI stil has problem with "one-to-many" validation, that we discussed
> > before in this thread? I am planing to make same changes in my patch
> > (reg
eforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>
--
Thanks,
Vladimir Kostyukov
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
t
t; Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>
--
Thanks,
Vladimir Kostyukov
--
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packagi
it for textareas?
>
> - Will this work for inputs that allow multiple values? It seems like it
> won't.
>
> - It appears that this validation will only kick in if the field is
> declared as "mandatory". Is that true, and if so, is it on purpose?
>
> -Yaron
&
antly. This patch sounds very
> interesting, and I plan to look at it at some point soon, unless someone
> else does first.
>
> -Yaron
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Vladimir Kostyukov <
> vladimir.kostu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All! I've resent my
changing focus) (see
"change" event of jQuery).
In current patch version there is not special message for "non
existing value". I am using "blank field" message.
I use my patch in our corporate project and it works fine. Wha
s not special message for "non existing
value". I am using "blank field" message.
I use my patch in our corporate project and it works fine. What do think
about it?
--
Thanks,
Vladimir Kostyukov
validation.patch
Description: Binary data
14 matches
Mail list logo
