Re: svn commit: r1135380 - /james/mailbox/trunk/maildir/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/maildir/MaildirFolder.java

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
works here... Are you sure you use jdk 1.6 ? bye norman Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 schrieb Eric Charles : > Btw, MaildirFolder gives compile errors: > > Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-160" java.lang.Error: Unresolved > compilation problem: >        The method execute(MailboxSession, Mailbo

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Robert, Glad we found a solution :) I've tested, and the wrapper is back again. Tks, - Eric On 13/06/11 21:44, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Eric Charles wrote: OK, got it :) The tar.gz mention is here tanukisoftwrapper-delta-pack3.2.3tar.gz in http://rep

svn commit: r1135381 - /james/mailbox/trunk/lucene/

2011-06-13 Thread eric
Author: eric Date: Tue Jun 14 04:55:15 2011 New Revision: 1135381 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135381&view=rev Log: Add .* to svn:ignore on mailbox-lucene module Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/lucene/ (props changed) Propchange: james/mailbox/trunk/lucene/

Re: svn commit: r1135380 - /james/mailbox/trunk/maildir/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/maildir/MaildirFolder.java

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
Btw, MaildirFolder gives compile errors: Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-160" java.lang.Error: Unresolved compilation problem: The method execute(MailboxSession, MailboxPath) of type new MailboxPathLocker.LockAwareExecution(){} must override a superclass method Tks, - Eric On 14/06/11

svn commit: r1135380 - /james/mailbox/trunk/maildir/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/maildir/MaildirFolder.java

2011-06-13 Thread eric
Author: eric Date: Tue Jun 14 04:42:40 2011 New Revision: 1135380 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135380&view=rev Log: Remove logging I committed by error some time ago. Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/maildir/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/maildir/MaildirFolder.java Modified:

[jira] [Updated] (JAMES-1270) Tutorial for building James from Netbeans

2011-06-13 Thread ioan eugen stan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ioan eugen stan updated JAMES-1270: --- Attachment: netbeans-svn-checkout-browse.png netbeans-svn-checkout2.png

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-1270) Tutorial for building James from Netbeans

2011-06-13 Thread ioan eugen stan (JIRA)
Tutorial for building James from Netbeans - Key: JAMES-1270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1270 Project: JAMES Server Issue Type: Wish Components: Documentation Env

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-1269) Create a correct NOTICE/LICENSE files for the spring binary artifact (currently having bad contents)

2011-06-13 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048745#comment-13048745 ] Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-1269: Not sure when I will have enough time for

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > OK, got it :) > > The tar.gz mention is here > tanukisoftwrapper-delta-pack3.2.3tar.gz > > in > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/appassembler-maven-plugin/1.1.1/appassembler-maven-plugin-1.1.1.pom > > So maven central shouts i

svn commit: r1135245 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Jun 13 19:40:49 2011 New Revision: 1135245 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135245&view=rev Log: JAMES-1263 Added a public license previously issued by 'Tanuki Software' (but no longer available directly from the 'Tanuki Software' or the central repository) to Ste

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-1266) Found an exception when sending a mail

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048732#comment-13048732 ] Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-1266: -- So whats the deal with it now @eric ? Do you

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-81) my blog aggregatet to the planet

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048724#comment-13048724 ] Norman Maurer commented on MAILBOX-81: -- I will get some clearification stay tune

svn commit: r1135230 - in /james/project/trunk/project/src/site: resources/css/site.css xdoc/download.xml

2011-06-13 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Jun 13 19:13:33 2011 New Revision: 1135230 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135230&view=rev Log: JAMES-1263 http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html asks that a notice about crypto is added to download pages. James distributes several products designed to work with t

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-1269) Create a correct NOTICE/LICENSE files for the spring binary artifact (currently having bad contents)

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048714#comment-13048714 ] Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-1269: -- you are right... Will you work on this, or sh

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-81) my blog aggregatet to the planet

2011-06-13 Thread ioan eugen stan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048675#comment-13048675 ] ioan eugen stan commented on MAILBOX-81: All the code I committed is under ASF and

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-1269) Create a correct NOTICE/LICENSE files for the spring binary artifact (currently having bad contents)

2011-06-13 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
Create a correct NOTICE/LICENSE files for the spring binary artifact (currently having bad contents) Key: JAMES-1269 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JA

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
Same here. Now that Stefano has republished to wrapper, I think we can add re-enable it for the beta1 release. Tks, - Eric On 13/06/11 18:15, Norman Maurer wrote: I agree with stefano. I really cant understand what all the trouble is about :( bye norman Am Montag, 13. Juni 2011 schrieb

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
OK, got it :) The tar.gz mention is here tanukisoftwrapper-delta-pack3.2.3tar.gz in http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/appassembler-maven-plugin/1.1.1/appassembler-maven-plugin-1.1.1.pom So maven central shouts it depends on wrapper-delta-pack 3.2.3 which has been republished by S

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
I agree with stefano. I really cant understand what all the trouble is about :( bye norman Am Montag, 13. Juni 2011 schrieb Stefano Bagnara : > 2011/6/13 Robert Burrell Donkin : >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >>> 2011/6/12 Robert Burrell Donkin : On Sun, Jun

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
> I'm also more eclipse. Patch for last section (Build James Source from other > IDEs) of http://james.apache.org/server/3/dev-build.html is welcome :) I got the hint ;). -- Ioan Eugen Stan http://ieugen.blogspot.com/ - To unsu

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
We don't reference the tar.gz in the container-spring pom. We simply ask appassembler-maven-plugin to generate daemons. Do you mean the appassembler-maven-plugin will fetch the tar.gz ? But I don't see mention of that in http://mojo.codehaus.org/appassembler/appassembler-maven-plugin/dependency-

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/6/13 Eric Charles : > On 13/06/11 15:49, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >>> >>> >  Anyone who has a public license could republish the artifact under >>> >  that public license. There would be no problems then using that >>> >  instance. >> >> So at least we have a way out as I can redistribute it, bu

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-81) my blog aggregatet to the planet

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048577#comment-13048577 ] Eric Charles commented on MAILBOX-81: - >From http://planet.apache.org/, it's not clear

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Ioan, I'm also more eclipse. Patch for last section (Build James Source from other IDEs) of http://james.apache.org/server/3/dev-build.html is welcome :) Tks, - Eric On 13/06/11 12:22, Norman Maurer wrote: ah ok. I never used netbeans, I'm more the eclipse user ;) Bye, Norman 2011/6/13

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
On 13/06/11 15:49, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Anyone who has a public license could republish the artifact under > that public license. There would be no problems then using that > instance. So at least we have a way out as I can redistribute it, but I hope we don't even need this (I don't want

Re: James support for MS Exchange

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Ioan, Linking to MS Exchange is an example area where James could have more traction that other classical servers. But for now, it is not supported. To have this, we would need: - Enhance our LDAP user repository (to use the MS Active Directory) - Implement a new Mailbox that links to the

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/6/13 Robert Burrell Donkin : > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> 2011/6/12 Robert Burrell Donkin : >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >>> wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > Hi Robert, >>> >>> Hi Norm

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-69) Correct organisation meta-data for JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048557#comment-13048557 ] Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MAILBOX-69: -- IMHO duplicating all this inf

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-69) Correct organisation meta-data for JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048556#comment-13048556 ] Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MAILBOX-69: -- eg http://svn.apache.org/rep

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > I obtained the package from them some year ago. > It was under the MIT license and I can now redistribute it under the > same licensing. If you did this then I think that there's an easy way to solve this problem. Since you have a publ

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-69) Correct organisation meta-data for JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048541#comment-13048541 ] Norman Maurer commented on MAILBOX-69: -- I still don't get what exactly needs to get d

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-69) Correct organisation meta-data for JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048538#comment-13048538 ] Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MAILBOX-69: -- Add a supplementary model wit

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > 2011/6/12 Robert Burrell Donkin : >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Norman Maurer >>> wrote: Hi Robert, >> >> Hi Norman >> I still don't get your point and

svn commit: r1135105 - in /james/mailbox/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/quota: OverQuotaException.java QuotaManager.java

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 11:58:50 2011 New Revision: 1135105 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135105&view=rev Log: Add special exception for over-quota. See MAILBOX-64 Added: james/mailbox/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/quota/OverQuotaException.java Modified:

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-69) Correct organisation meta-data for JavaBeans(TM) Activation Framework

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048527#comment-13048527 ] Norman Maurer commented on MAILBOX-69: -- @Robert: Can you explain what we need todo t

svn commit: r1135100 - /james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 11:47:16 2011 New Revision: 1135100 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135100&view=rev Log: Move to latest jackrabbit version for tests Modified: james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/pom.xml Modified: james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/pom.xml URL:

svn commit: r1135099 - /james/mailbox/trunk/store/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/store/StoreMailboxManager.java

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 11:45:47 2011 New Revision: 1135099 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135099&view=rev Log: Make sure we use a in memory copy of the mailbox entity when pass it to the events. Otherwise it may fail to access properties if they are lazy loaded from the store.

svn commit: r1135096 - /james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/src/main/resources/org/apache/james/imap/scripts/Authenticate.test

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 11:34:50 2011 New Revision: 1135096 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135096&view=rev Log: Adjust test data to match imap trunk Modified: james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/src/main/resources/org/apache/james/imap/scripts/Authenticate.test Modified:

svn commit: r1135094 - /james/mailbox/trunk/store/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/store/search/MessageSearches.java

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 11:26:37 2011 New Revision: 1135094 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135094&view=rev Log: Fix address searching. I introduced the bug a few days ago :( Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/store/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/store/search/MessageSearche

svn commit: r1135091 - /james/mailbox/trunk/store/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/store/search/MessageSearches.java

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 11:25:19 2011 New Revision: 1135091 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135091&view=rev Log: Fix address searching. I introduced the bug a few days ago :( Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/store/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/store/search/MessageSearche

James support for MS Exchange

2011-06-13 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
Hello, One of the question received during the presentation I held was if there are plans for James to support MS Exchange protocol. Regards, -- Ioan Eugen Stan http://ieugen.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-u

svn commit: r1135081 - /james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 10:46:08 2011 New Revision: 1135081 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135081&view=rev Log: Move to 0.3-SNAPSHOT version of imap Modified: james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/pom.xml Modified: james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/6/13 Stefano Bagnara : > I still think we should ship the beta with the JSW wrapper as it was 2 > days ago [...] Need to fix this statement: I think we should include JSW as it was 2 days ago, but we also have to make sure we add some text to our binary NOTICE and we add the "double MIT licen

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/6/12 Robert Burrell Donkin : > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Norman Maurer >> wrote: >>> Hi Robert, > > Hi Norman > >>> I still don't get your point and I really disagree about "commenting >>> out". >> >> I was worry that

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
ah ok. I never used netbeans, I'm more the eclipse user ;) Bye, Norman 2011/6/13 Ioan Eugen Stan : > 2011/6/13 Norman Maurer : >> Huh ? >> >> All the tests work for me. Are you sure you use jdk 1.6 ? >> > > It seems NetBeans is playing tricks with me. There where some missing > dependencies, reg

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
2011/6/13 Norman Maurer : > Huh ? > > All the tests work for me. Are you sure you use jdk 1.6 ? > It seems NetBeans is playing tricks with me. There where some missing dependencies, regarding the test packages, that it refused to see. I reopened the project and some files and it found them. I had

svn commit: r1135072 - /james/mailbox-integration-tester/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/maildir/host/MaildirHostSystem.java

2011-06-13 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Mon Jun 13 10:00:00 2011 New Revision: 1135072 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135072&view=rev Log: Make sure we use unique uids per message even on heavy load when using the maildir implementation. This is done by using a MailboxPathLocker. See MAILBOX-87 and MAILBOX

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
Huh ? All the tests work for me. Are you sure you use jdk 1.6 ? Bye, Norman 2011/6/13 Ioan Eugen Stan : > 2011/6/13 Norman Maurer : >> hi, >> >> best for now is to follow the 0.2 release of mailbox. i think we >> should be able to release 0.3 soon but till then you should not care >> to much ab

Re: Why does SMTP sending mail w/o authentication?

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi Barry, now is the perfect moment to give feedback on the api. Feel free to post your comments in the issue. Thanks, Norman 2011/6/13 Barry : > Hi Norman, I also need to be familiar with the related API, because my > requirement is a little complex. > If need help on the API, I will talk to y

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
2011/6/13 Norman Maurer : > hi, > > best for now is to follow the 0.2 release of mailbox. i think we > should be able to release 0.3 soon but till then you should not care > to much about it. We will help you to migrate your code once it is > out. I appreciate. I checked out 0.2 from svn and notic

Re: Why does SMTP sending mail w/o authentication?

2011-06-13 Thread Barry
Hi Norman, I also need to be familiar with the related API, because my requirement is a little complex. If need help on the API, I will talk to you later. Thanks for your response. Barry 2011/6/13 Norman Maurer > hi barry, > > so response for your questions: > > 1) it should e really fast after

Re: Why does SMTP sending mail w/o authentication?

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
hi barry, so response for your questions: 1) it should e really fast after it was calculated the first time. As the rest just use inmemory values. 2) that really depends on your need. We ship one version that just uße the same quota for all users. 3) It will be part of mailbox-0.3 which should ge

Re: what mailbox artifacts should I use

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
hi, best for now is to follow the 0.2 release of mailbox. i think we should be able to release 0.3 soon but till then you should not care to much about it. We will help you to migrate your code once it is out. You should not use the low-level mailbox-api if possible. just extend the mailbbox-stor

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Norman Maurer
I hope to finish my commons-daemon maven plugin soon. maybe agood replacement. bye norman Am Montag, 13. Juni 2011 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin : > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Eric Charles wrote: >> Sad :/ >> I was fan of the wrapper. >> I will document with something like "use 'nohup run

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Eric Charles wrote: > Sad :/ > I was fan of the wrapper. > I will document with something like "use 'nohup run.sh &'" to let know users > how to launch in the background. Given a little effort, I have hopes of a workaround but I'd like to focus on shipping the bet

Re: svn commit: r1134885 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/pom.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Charles
Sad :/ I was fan of the wrapper. I will document with something like "use 'nohup run.sh &'" to let know users how to launch in the background. Tks, - Eric On 12/06/11 21:28, Norman Maurer wrote: Hi there, the "normal" scripts work without a problem. And the wrapper is not included anymore:

svn commit: r1135038 - /james/server/trunk/README.crypto

2011-06-13 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Jun 13 07:21:41 2011 New Revision: 1135038 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135038&view=rev Log: JAMES-1263 Apache James is design to work with cryptography libraries. This README contains the text required by http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html. I elected to us

Re: svn commit: r1134971 - /james/server/trunk/container-spring/src/assemble/bin.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Eric Charles wrote: > Also builds for me, but produces beta2 (pom probably defined for next > iteration) Apologies - I should have given a fuller explanation The assembled binary we ship does not contain lots of stuff (for example, the source) required to build J