David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of
the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have
now made this a relatively simple task: the
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start
of the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES
have now made this a relatively simple task: the maven build and
the s
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the spring
integration code.
- the maven build enables pai
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sometimes my JAMES deal with around a million email in a day and I had
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Sometimes my JAMES deal with around a million email in a day and I had to
>>> "hack" some JAMES co
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About my concern it still applies also to the scenario where only the
"Envelope" (to be defined) is written on every queue change, but this cannot
be avoided with the suggested approach
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EM
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
generally: we've talked before and the
>>> David Jencks ha scritto:
> >>> At the moment the geronimo-james integration is simply a single gbean for
> >>> the whole james application: do you think it would be hard to support 1
> >>> gbean per function? JAMES is composed by api modules, libra
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JAMES is too hard to understand and that's why i think we need to pull
> out the protocols (smtp, nntp, pop3, imap) into independent,
> embeddable libraries with no coupling to avalon (or to the JAMES
> socket han
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>
>>> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>> At the moment the geronimo-james integration
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:10 AM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
>> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
We also depend on com.sun.mail.util.CRLFOutputStream but we should
Trying again to pass the antispam filter.
I and Rick had some off-list conversation about failures in our
testsuite when using geronimo javamail.
He already fixed the first NPEs I found, now I opened a few more issue
on the basic use of MimeMessage and our MimeMessageWrapper object:
GERONIM
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
We also depend on com.sun.mail.util.CRLFOutputStream but we should
definitely replace this with some james class (maybe copied from geronimo?)
Not sure what this cl
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
The binary can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/javamail/
---
You don't have permission to access
/~rickmcguire/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
on this
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
The binary can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/javamail/
---
You don't have permission to access
/~rickmcguire/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar on
this server.
---
Ok, the per
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
The binary can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/javamail/
---
You don't have permission to access
/~rickmcguire/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar on
this server.
---
Ok, the permission problem should be
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
The binary can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/javamail/
---
You don't have permission to access
/~rickmcguire/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar on
this server.
---
The source is split into two pieces, a spec component (essen
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
IIRC few months ago: the issue was with the smtpclient (to deliver
mail) and the "hidden" features (e.g: 8BITMIME) and specific
exceptions (on delivery failure for partial deliveries). We make use
of many internal things a
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
IIRC few months ago: the issue was with the smtpclient (to deliver
mail) and the "hidden" features (e.g: 8BITMIME) and specific
exceptions (on delivery failure for partial deliveries). We make use
of many internal things and we check for sun spec
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I
started by trying to use the geronimo mail provider before I
understood why the stage repo wasn't working
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has
started to irritate
Do you think t
On Jun 16, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
At the moment the geronimo-james integration is simply a single
gbean for the whole james application: do you think it would be
hard
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>
>> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
>
> Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I s
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I
started by trying to use the geronimo mail provider before I
understood why the stage repo wasn't working
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
i'm pretty sure that it fetchmail is the direct cause
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
i'm pretty sure that it fetchmail is the direct cause but i believe
that it's indirectly related to the spool design. do you run
fetchmail?
I run fetc
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
generally: we've talked before and the whole design a
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I started
by trying to use the geronimo mail provider before I understood why
the stage repo wasn't working for me). Is this intent
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EM
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
specifically: res
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
generally: we've talked before and the whole design around that area
of the system could be so much better
technology: actually support for any distri
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
At the moment the geronimo-james integration is simply a single gbean
for the whole james application: do you think it would be hard to
support 1 gbean per function? JAMES is composed by api
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> specifically: restarting m
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start
of the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES
have now made this a relatively simple task: the maven build and
the s
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has
started to irritate
Do you think that the current spoolrep
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
>
> Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has
started to irritate
generally: we've talked before and the whole design around that area
of
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the spring
integration code.
[...]
Instructions:
1. Apply patche
> rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
You do realize that rewriting the spool for JMS actually means introducing a
spool broker service, right?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>> ---
>>
>> Future directions
>>
>> Currently there is minimal integration between geronimo and JAMES. One
>> really obvious integration point would be to use ger
David Jencks wrote:
I've put the james config files in a geronimo-standard location of
var/james/config. I changed the ports so the server would start without
superuser permissions. So far I just know the server starts without
errors: I haven't figure out how to test if it can actually do any
David Jencks wrote:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the spring
integration code.
Me too. :-)
It was one of the
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 7:31 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
> Geronimo project.
cool
i have as well but not quite that long ;-)
> Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of
the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have
now made this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the
spring integration code.
- the maven build enables painless connection between the
46 matches
Mail list logo
