Re: Replace MINA by Netty

2010-04-21 Thread Norman Maurer
Ok I will take all needed steps to remove MINA then.. Bye, Norman 2010/4/19 Eric Charles eric.char...@u-mangate.com: I can confirm netty implementation is running fine after 1 week with real prod traffic and prod users. Tks, Eric On 04/19/2010 01:22 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: +1,

Re: Replace MINA by Netty

2010-04-19 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
+1, Netty being a popular OpenSource project, If it performs better, it is enough for me. -Manolo On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, due the last weeks we encountered some problems realted to memory usage etc. To see if the problem is within MINA

Re: Replace MINA by Netty

2010-04-19 Thread Eric Charles
I can confirm netty implementation is running fine after 1 week with real prod traffic and prod users. Tks, Eric On 04/19/2010 01:22 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: +1, Netty being a popular OpenSource project, If it performs better, it is enough for me. -Manolo On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at

Replace MINA by Netty

2010-04-18 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi all, due the last weeks we encountered some problems realted to memory usage etc. To see if the problem is within MINA (or our usage of MINA), I wrote a socket implementation using NETTY (http://www.jboss.org/netty). Since the release of NETTY 3.x its license under the ASL2. The Framework is